Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Frpm David Frost and Robert Jenrick: 'Conservatives must show we respect the votes in 2016 and 2019 and not give the Opposition the chance to undo the benefits of leaving the EU'   Sweep away the Brexit gloom – or Labour will unravel a huge gain ARCHIVE.PH archived 22 Apr 2024 05:47:50 UTC  
    • Please please help we were miss sold full fibre by EE July 22  Install couldn’t go ahead no equipment sent and no. Survey it was hell  foind out no full fibre in road so we had to go back to cooper no choice we involved. Ceo and they put in a man from customer resolution s  he was vile he told me I had to go to engineers  something very odd about the ex resolution s in bt basically they took my drive up said they Would put ducting in ready for full fibre we have got £ 40 for a hours upon hours phones stress and more told to go to ombudsman  then bill was £35 we called twice told it was that price as they had treated us appalling two weeks later all sky package gets pulled we call again our bill goes to 165 the next two weeks was hell trying to get yo bottom why it’s off our package it was all on in the end I spent a day on the phone  341 mins was the call anyway I got to the bottom it was this resolution man coveting up the other issue another deadlock  to cover it all up  they hide data  ee did so couldn’t get the miss sell in writing I have now only from sept  Basically now we tried getting full fibre and they have found my drive had to be taken up again which has sunk .  The engineer has placed the wrong ducting again under my drive and need s to be taken to again apparently and the pipe sticks up middle of the drive near gate not behind look so odd it’s a big as a drain pipe open to water and it’s below touching the electrical cables to hot tub . I was sent a letter from the ex resolution to say I had stopped the work  I haven’t  it’s so sadistic she covering up for her mate in that team as the orginal install he didn’t check it had been done correctly  I took to Twitter and posted on open reach they ignored me then after 3 calls of two weeks they sent a engineer bt ignored me ceo emails blocked tag on Twitter unanswered then we get someone from twitter send a engineer he written report to say it’s dangerous since we have  had a  letter to say our problem can not be resolved  then a email to say sorry we are leaving and we can’t get into our account Bt will not talk to us ofcom tells us nothing they can do Citzens advice said go to the police  we can’t go back to virgin due so mass issue with them only option is sky  but point is they make out we have canceled we haven’t we have this mess on our drive dangeous work we are in hell  it’s like she covering up for this collegue it’s all very odd I am disabled and they like played mentaly with me open reach say bt resolved the issue no they have not  I recon they have terminated us making our we have  to hide it from mgt  Help it’s hell I don’t sleep we have 29 may we have tried  calling they just ignore me  at first they are so lovely as they say I am then they go to nnamager and say we can’t say anything to you end call  Scared police are rubbish I need help even typing is so painfull  Thankyou  anyone hello be so grateful     
    • There's a thread somewhere about someone sending the baillifs against Wizzair that is quite hilarious. I would love to see someone do the same to Ryanair. Question is, should you be the one to take that role. You are entitled to the £220, if your flight was from the UK. If it was TO the UK I suppose it is more of a grey area... though the airlines I know have been using £220 as standard. Not that surprising for Ryanair, the worst cheapskates in the universe, to go for the lower amount, and if you forward this to the CEO he will probably have a jolly good laugh and give his accountants a verbal bonus. After all he's the one who said and I paraphrase "F*** our customers, they'll fly with us again anyway". While we would all love to see Ryanair get wooped in court again, I have to join my fellow posters in thinking it's not worth the hassle for (hypothetically) £7 and not sure it will expedite the payment either. It's already an achievement that you got them to accept to pay.
    • The US competition watchdog has taken legal action to stop Tapestry's $8.5bn takeover of rival Capri.View the full article
    • thank you you mean you got a notice of discontinuance? dx  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Excel Windscreen PCN - parked in disabled bay - westgate wakefield


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4648 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I am in despair,

I received a parking charge for parking outside mothercare,

 

having a twin pushchair and two small babies and visiting mothercare I drove into what I thought was a mother and baby as the signs were iced over I thought it was a mother and baby with it being directly outside the shop, makes sense.

 

When I came back to the car the sun had melted the ice and the sign was visible and it was a wheelchair sign,

I put the babies back in the seats and the pushchair back in the car,

upon going to my door I found the parking ticket,

I approached the attendant who told me it was my own tough luck.

 

I paid the ticket for £60, and then appealed against the charge.

I received a letter today from excel parking, saying the appeal is declined and the charge now reverts to £100 and if I don`t pay this they will take me to court.

I do not have this money to pay any more, and I am very worried what the outcome will be.

Can anyone help me with this matter, I am truly desperate.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I approached the attendant who told me it was my own tough luck. I paid the ticket for £60,

!!!!! you paid it :eek:!!!!!

and then appealed against the charge. I received a letter today from excel parking, saying the appeal is declined

wow, I thought they would have accepted your claim and sent you your money back with an extra tenner for your trouble.... not. Appeals don't work when you haen't paid them, so no chance when they already have your money is there.

 

and the charge now reverts to £100 and if I don`t pay this they will take me to court.

haha. Yeah, like you owe them any more money. If they do try court (which they won't) that would be a good time to counter-cliam for your 60 quid back.

 

I do not have this money to pay any more, and I am very worried what the outcome will be. Can anyone help me with this matter, I am truly desperate.

 

The outcome will be, you can now ignore everything they send you and console yourself that you have at least saved yourself 40 quid by coming to CAG

Link to post
Share on other sites

In future do not park in any of the Excel Parks, they are there only to take your brass, and the fillings out of your teeth while you talk to them.

This company have no legal powers to fine you, what you have got is a worthless piece of paper, which pretends to be legal.

Here is the good news, you owe them Zero, nowt, not a sausage.

Do not contact them again, and ignore the letters that come from them.

In future park in the Ridings Centre where it is hassle free from the Excel's of this world.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Can you explain why - if you PAID the ticket, why are they pursuing you? As you've paid the money you will have been deemed to have agreed to their terms and settled your contractual liability. So it cannot increase to £100.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ignore any future letters. Its taken a year for them to stop sending letters to me. Search for my thread.

 

I had many a letter in different colours, and ones from a debt collection agency and a fake court document.

 

If they want to take you to court let them try, they will not win if they do.... so they won't.

 

They have to prove who the driver was, and that a contact existed between you two that has been broken. Even then they can only claim for the losses they have suffered.... for an hours parking its about 50p?

 

Do you read the Wakefield Express? They are in there every other week at the moment with a lot of negative publicity. They are hopefully having the contract terminated soon. The local MP is also on the case. :D

 

The many victims of the threat o grams will get the last laugh.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I paid the fine because I was frightened by the response I got when I rang to complain and the fear of them taking me to court, they have reverted to the £100 because they say I didn`t pay up within the 7days, I got the fine on the 4th February, and paid on the 12th, 1 day over if you count Sunday as a working day, which I thought office workers only did Mon-Fri, how wrong I was. Reading this forum I realize now I am not by myself on this matter, but I do not have the funds to pay the rest of the fine, I couldn`t afford to pay the amount that I did pay, it was pure fear on my part that made me pay the fine, oh how I wish I had found this site first. I am still frightened that they will pursue me for the remainder of the money, I don`t know if I can face having the letters coming through my letter box. HELP !

Link to post
Share on other sites

You can tell its election time when an MP gets involved.

They know a good [problem] when they see it.

 

The problem is that Mary Creagh the MP involved is useless, she advises people to appeal against the fines.

 

When wil she get her facts straight

 

There is no appeals process

 

They are not fines

 

But heyho don't let the facts stop you from jumping on any chance of publicity before an election

 

Mossy

Link to post
Share on other sites

If it is making you ill - pay it.

 

You've been bullied, and you can console yourself you're not the first and most certainly won;t be the last, but spare a thought for the rest of us - who refuse to go through life being a 'victim' because someone has discovered a business opportunity and doesn't care about extracting money with menaces.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

I will never shop in Wakefield again, they want local and surrounding areas habitants to use Wakefield as a prospering shopping centre, if people stay away how can it? To be penalized by hideous companies like Excel parking, and as in my case be foolish enough to pay the so called fine, the town does not deserve to prosper, it is just unfortunate for the genuine people who work in Wakefield, that they have a council who let these stupid companies operate there, especially in the hard recession that is going on, you would think the so called goverment officials would do all they could to encourage shoppers, and get innocent peoples money back for them and revoke any authorization that these horrid companies have and get rid of them, come on local goverment officials do what you should be doing and help local people stay local, otherwise more will do as I intend to do, "Shop in another district". Go to york where you can park for free, all day long, and either walk into the town, or ride on the LOW COST buses, which run every 5-10 mins at the free park and rides. Come on people pay a visit to york, the Mothercare there is huge, it is at Clifton Moore. FREE PARKING!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

If you parked in the Ridings or any council run car park, you would not have the problem. As far as trying to remove Excel? We residents are all working on that. Its all in the local paper.

 

The reality is that you cannot remove Excel, a better reality would be if the local paper didn't mislead their readers by suggesting that Excel have the power to issue fines and actually gave proper guidance to what people should do if they receive anything from Companies like Excel etc.

 

At least if you overstay in a carpark owned by Excel you do not have to pay a ridculous amount, unlike a Council ticket!!!!!!!!

 

If nobody paid the likes of Excel then maybe things would change

 

Mossy

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have received another letter this morning demanding I pay a further £40, I have tried in vain to e-mail my MP, you cannot send an e-mail and it get through, what should I do next, the letter has threatened bayliffs and court, this is truly frightening me.

Link to post
Share on other sites

If you're being scared - pay up. There's little point worrying if you cannot stand up to bullies. Your MP is easily contactable by email, HERE: Are your MPs and Peers working for you in the UK's Parliament? (TheyWorkForYou.com)

 

Alternatively, they have no right to your money, so if you can - ignore it. They'll look for other mugs to intimidate.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have received another letter this morning demanding I pay a further £40, I have tried in vain to e-mail my MP, you cannot send an e-mail and it get through, what should I do next, the letter has threatened bayliffs and court, this is truly frightening me.

The whole point of their letters is to try to scare people into paying money that they don't have to pay. Bailiffs can only become involved if Excel take you to court, and win, and you don't pay the judgement - all about as likely as the Canadian ice hockey team losing an Olympic final to Nigeria.

 

The only people who should be scared are Excel, given how badly they were spanked on the couple of occasions they tried going to court.

 

Ignore this rubbish and get on with your life.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Why do you want to speak to an MP?

Thats worse than talking to yourself.

 

Just ignore the letters that Excel send to you they are just silly unenforceable words which have no basis in law.

Just ignore these people as they are an inch short of crimminal conduct.

Link to post
Share on other sites

If you're being scared - pay up. There's little point worrying if you cannot stand up to bullies.

 

Dont pay up! You are only inviting to demand more money from you, as they already are and also by encourgaing them they will stay aorund and demand money off future unfortunate motorists.

 

Ignore the letter and dont give in to their idle threats. If you need encourgament then read the numerous threads on here where people like yourself have ignored and no action has been taken by Excel or other **** like them.

Link to post
Share on other sites

You are only inviting to demand more money from you,
?

 

Some people do not have an ability to treat these demands with the contempt they deserve, preferring to see the matter end (and the tension they cause). Once paid, there is no requirement to pay 'more' money for the same demand.

 

Only the OP can decide.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Once paid, there is no requirement to pay 'more' money for the same demand.

 

Indeed but as above they are already demanding more money! the OP will have to be acreful they dont get themselves in a vicious circle hence why I would say dont pay as many others have not.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 months later...
I paid the fine because I was frightened by the response I got when I rang to complain and the fear of them taking me to court, they have reverted to the £100 because they say I didn`t pay up within the 7days, I got the fine on the 4th February, and paid on the 12th, 1 day over if you count Sunday as a working day, which I thought office workers only did Mon-Fri, how wrong I was. Reading this forum I realize now I am not by myself on this matter, but I do not have the funds to pay the rest of the fine, I couldn`t afford to pay the amount that I did pay, it was pure fear on my part that made me pay the fine, oh how I wish I had found this site first. I am still frightened that they will pursue me for the remainder of the money, I don`t know if I can face having the letters coming through my letter box. HELP !

 

After ignoring the demands from Excel Parking, I have now received a letter from Roxburghe Debt Collectors, and the extra amount they now require is £81-12, I am so desperate, I have contacted the council, who say the cannot do anything, I have tried to get through to Yvette Cooper about the matter, and have also contacted the Wakefield Express, what else can I do ????

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...