Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
        • Like
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
        • Like
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Bank paid a standing order and charged me....


amartin1908
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5169 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I had forgotten about a standing order that was due. The bank paid it, despite the fact that I did not have enough in my account to cover it, and IMMEDIATELY debited my account with a £25 charge for going overdrawn! They are now charging me £5 a day while I am overdrawn.

 

Firstly I thought they had to give you so many days notice of charges due to be applied.......in this case they havent. Secondly I offered to clear the charge with my credit card. They apparently do not take payments over the phone and advised me to go into my branch to clear it. I advised that there is not a branch close enough to my work for me to go in at lunchtime, and its closed by the time I finish work. I was advised to do a transfer from credit card to bank account which would take a minimum of three days and they will continue to charge me £5 per day!

 

I think by refusing to accept telephone payments to clear charges, is their way of earning more money out of us. They know most people cannot get to a bank in their lunch hour and have to rely on transfers....so they continue making money!

 

Any advice would be greatly appreciated

Hearing date 04/12/06 - Halifax £399.62

Hearing date 04/12/06 - Cap One £167.21

Link to post
Share on other sites

Are you sure that the charge was not levied in relation to some earlier "transgression".

Check your last monthly statement to see if they advised you of a forthcoming charge.

 

If there is nothing there then come back here.

 

I agree about not accepting a payment on the phone.

I think that you should ask where does it say that payments by phone are not accepted. I expect that they will not be able to identify the actual term in theri contract.

If they refer to the T&Cs then press the point and say that you want to kow which term.

If they say that it is policy then ask them for a copy of the policy document.

If they way that it is confidential then aslk for the date and reference number of the policy document.

 

If you can, record the call. If you can't record it then get the name of the person you are speaking to and then log the call and note dow everything which was ssaid in great detail and also note down the date and time and then come back here.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi bankfodder

 

There was no earlier transgression. They told me directly today that they had paid the standing order and the rest of the money I was over my overdraft was due to the £25 charge they had levied due to having to pay the standing order when there was insufficient funds.

 

I have since taken your advice and spoken to them about telephone payments, and they said as a bank they do not and have never had that facility. She referred me to the terms and conditions relevant section detailing ways to pay money into my account and it does not include making payments over the phone.

 

There was a section stating that on a payment review they will debit the fee immediately - however, if I lived in northern Ireland, I would have been given 14 days notice. I feel like I am being discriminated against for being english. Its the same bank and it should have the same policies regardless of where you live!

Edited by amartin1908

Hearing date 04/12/06 - Halifax £399.62

Hearing date 04/12/06 - Cap One £167.21

Link to post
Share on other sites

Have you seen the relevant T&Cs yourself? or are you just taking their word for it? I have found that bank staff will often refer to T&Cs just to get people off the phone but that they are often wrong. Have you actually checked them?

 

Get all of the blurb about your account - T&Cs, also the banking code. The banking ode at least says that they will give you notice of charges. Get the code and find the para which deals with this. Check your T&Cs and also their website. They are not allowed to have T&Cs which conflict with the code.

 

Get this info and we will understand where to go next.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have seen their T&C's as they are accessible on the website.

 

However I have trawled through the banking code and I cannot really find much apart from it states they have to let you know about charges.

 

My banks attitude is that they made me aware of charges at the outset, and in this instance they have notified me of this charge as they have written to me. The letter went out at the same time they debited my account and I still have not received it yet

Hearing date 04/12/06 - Halifax £399.62

Hearing date 04/12/06 - Cap One £167.21

Link to post
Share on other sites

Download a copy of their T&Cs. Make sure that there is no reference to phone payments in them. If there is no reference then it seems to be unreasonable and unfair for a banking organisation to block them.

Do they list other methods of payment - or do they not mention it at all?

It also is unfair for them to tell you that it is policy. It must be in the T&Cs.

 

What do the T&Cs say about warning you that charges will be levied?

 

Exactly what words are used in the code in respect of giving advance notice of charges?

 

The code says that they must give you warning so the bank is in breach of the code there.

 

If payments are not listed at all then there is a good case for alleging unfairness there.

 

 

If all of the info stack up, how do you want to deal with this? - the slow way or the quick way?

Link to post
Share on other sites

i have also been charged £25 on numerous occasions for the pleasure of them allowing a d/d out of my account when there wasnt enough funds to pay for it. And subsequently charged £5 per day. The charge of £25 is a fee they charge to honour the payment. i have rang them to question why they allow a payment out if there is not enough funds in the account and then have the cheek to charge £5 per day for allowing this payment.

 

I only have a basic bank account and no overdraft facility. They did eventually refund all charges and leived them for the next 3 months for me, thanks to a very helpful advisior who amazingly understood my situation.

 

hope it all works out for you

Link to post
Share on other sites

i have also been charged £25 on numerous occasions for the pleasure of them allowing a d/d out of my account when there wasnt enough funds to pay for it. And subsequently charged £5 per day. The charge of £25 is a fee they charge to honour the payment. i have rang them to question why they allow a payment out if there is not enough funds in the account and then have the cheek to charge £5 per day for allowing this payment.

 

I only have a basic bank account and no overdraft facility. They did eventually refund all charges and leived them for the next 3 months for me, thanks to a very helpful advisior who amazingly understood my situation.

 

hope it all works out for you

 

I too have been shafted many times. the latest when they instantly charged me £25 for a £2 standing order.

 

They give no notice.

 

They order the charges to generate more charges, for example, 2 DD's going out, enough money to pay both minus £2 something. DD 1 goes out, charge applied prior to this on the statement, DD2 goes out, further £25 charge. £50 for £2.x is standard. Then the next day they will charge again.

 

However, on many occations, each time you look at your account, bearing in mind it is online only, the amounts are reordered.

 

I have been gathering evidence for over a year now. I have printed off as pdf's statements twice a day and taken an ATM print out and they all have different running totals on them.

 

One day they actually showed a payment of over £400 going in first thing, from the previous days banking but delayed for no reason. Later that day all the payments due to go out were listed BEFORE the £400 with a list of over £75 in charges....

 

I have gathered my data, evidence and statement very carefully, issued a complaint, followed by an LBA based on the Govern Law Centre documents in December. I am about to take the plunge now and file in court, I have a thread for this action I need to update.

 

I do not see how I or anyone else can operate the account when you can never be sure of the amount of cleared funds available. They are utterly dishonest but I will extract my revenge and over £700 in charges and interest in the end. Never give up!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...