Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Charges refunded. But they now want them back.


LordLee
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 1873 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

LordLee

 

This seems to be taking a rather extende amount of time to sort out.

We may be bale to give you some serious assistance here - plus there are important issues but I think that you will need to get a move on and be a bit more proactive please

 

i have the letter scanned and will be posting this afternoon

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 280
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

did you incur more charges after they paid out on your first claim?

 

i don't know. this is why i need to submit an SAR. all i know is when the account was closed i was £180 overdrawn.

 

one complication is that whilst the account was closed my place of work accidently paid my salary into the wrong account (as in the A&L suspended account). I had to fight to get it withdrawn. I had to pay a token £35 to do so.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Estoppel applies when, for instance, a bank tells the customer that his debt has been cleared- they are estopped from being able to re-instate the debt and request payment at a later date. Or for another example, when a garage tells the customer that the repairs carried out were free of charge, they cannot later raise an invoice for these works.

 

You get the idea :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

the original poster was overdrawn by £359 and the bank ceased collection, for whatever reason.

 

he reclaimed charges and was sent a cheque for the amount under hardship rules. This means the overdraft of £359 stayed as it was.

 

now the bank has resumed collection and wants the overdraft paid. Had they refunded under a normal complaint then this would have gone towards the overdraft and the remaining amount sent to the claimant.

 

so the bank is still owed £359 because they have refunded charges to the claimant, which he should have used to pay off the overdraft, which would put him in the same position as if the charges hadn't been applied.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Estoppel applies when, for instance, a bank tells the customer that his debt has been cleared- they are estopped from being able to re-instate the debt and request payment at a later date. Or for another example, when a garage tells the customer that the repairs carried out were free of charge, they cannot later raise an invoice for these works.

 

You get the idea :)

 

i've tried estoppel but it doesn't seem to work, either with the bank or at the FOS. The bank seems to be able to change its mind whenever it wants.

 

at court it may be a different thing and i'll find out soon.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I used it with my insurance company with much success over a claim costing them well over £3500, maybe just got lucky- who knows... But considering the debt isn't too impressive it might be worth seeing what their reaction would be.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...