Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hi and thanks It looks like they ticked all the boxes to me but I'll try and upload the notice. I was wondering if a witness to late delivery might be considered proof - I'm assuming they posted it as normal but Royal Mail stuffed up delivery. If not then they're really saying it just has to be posted within 12 days of the incident, regardless of when it is received. Annoying! edit ok thanks Honeybee here's my 2nd (actually 3rd) attempt at anonymising, copying and uploading the notice! Sorry about the state of it - I sat on it while distracted by my dog 🙃 pcn front.pdf pcn back page.pdf
    • ROFL - dont get upset just because someone (quite a lot of someones) dont want smart meters - well unless you get paid for it .. in which case ...   I assume you haven't been with Octopus long enough to be on one of the very long fixed price tariffs they offered before the prices went bonkers .. and that you dont use your electricity in the evening/lunch time if you think the 'agile type tariffs are good value .. let alone worth installing a smart meter for - high price a good disincentive for an evening cuppa eh? Let alone all your computer/tv etc time in the peak price evening or lunch time. - and boy do those peak prices instantly hammer your bill when those Russian and middle eastern issues kick off.   I would only have considered a smart meter if solar panels had been an option for me - but roof is oriented completely the wrong way. Oh - and My opinion hasn't changed since the smart meter trials 40 years ago, because neither have the issues (well not enough) but I'm happy for you. Be happy for me.
    • Hi. I'm afraid I've had to hide your post with the pdf files to keep this anonymous for you. You've left the PCN reference number and your car reg showing. Could you edit that and repost please? HB    
    • Well naturally if you want to maintain your outrage, and retain something to bitch about, then arguing about the level of your fixed monthly DD is the way to go. You are of course perfectly free to ignore the easy solution.
    • His financial situation isn’t great, and the landlord has made lots of things up. The things he’s put isn’t true at all. My friend did tell the full truth with incoming and outgoing, I helped him fill in his form and he checked bills etc. to make sure it was right. His wage is ok, but not as good as the landlord thinks it is,  and he doesn’t have anything spare. How much are they likely to take from him? Should he send any reply?  the letter just says to take the court letter with him. 
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

please can someone help me figure out if welcomes figures are correct?


donkey123
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5132 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 95
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

putting in APR higher than actual is not an offence (the opposite is ) and this would appear to be a variable rate agreement bit like a credit card

I have a programme called discounted cash flow and can get up true apr etc in seconds Mark would u like a copy it will e mail

in this case APR 30.5 true rate 26.95 flat rate 15.63

Bet this Agreement says estimated interest on it

You could try mis selling of add ons ppi refusal is not a valid /legal reason to refuse you a loan Welcome are notorious for mis selling or as you may prefer lying !

Link to post
Share on other sites

putting in APR higher than actual is not an offence (the opposite is ) and this would appear to be a variable rate agreement bit like a credit card

I have a programme called discounted cash flow and can get up true apr etc in seconds Mark would u like a copy it will e mail

in this case APR 30.5 true rate 26.95 flat rate 15.63

Bet this Agreement says estimated interest on it

You could try mis selling of add ons ppi refusal is not a valid /legal reason to refuse you a loan Welcome are notorious for mis selling or as you may prefer lying !

 

beg to differ

 

the varience on interest rate is 0.5 and 1 %

estimated does not cut the mustard

its a legal document

 

can you email this apr calculator please

Link to post
Share on other sites

putting in APR higher than actual is not an offence (the opposite is ) and this would appear to be a variable rate agreement bit like a credit card

I have a programme called discounted cash flow and can get up true apr etc in seconds Mark would u like a copy it will e mail

in this case APR 30.5 true rate 26.95 flat rate 15.63

Bet this Agreement says estimated interest on it

You could try mis selling of add ons ppi refusal is not a valid /legal reason to refuse you a loan Welcome are notorious for mis selling or as you may prefer lying !

 

Yekrats. Great stuff, thank you. Your input is already paying dividends. You will see that there are people here who DO Know their Stuff.

 

If you could please e mail that to emanevs or post. PM them and they will I presume gratefully accept.

 

Cheers, MARK

Link to post
Share on other sites

yes its still on my loan, I was told I had to take this out otherwise I would not be given a loan. Being desperate for the money I agreed to it. Also I was told I needed to get medicare to get the loan, I wasn’t asked any medical questions by the staff

Link to post
Share on other sites

1) Why do you now believe PPI policy is now not suitable for your needs.

 

Please refer to page one question one as not enough space to write here.

2) at the time you bought the ppi were you in paid employment.

 

Please refer to question one page one as not relevent to my complaint.

 

3) has the nature of your employment changed since you bought the ppi.

 

Please refer to question one page one as not relevent to my complaint.

 

4) was your job secure, was their risk of losing your job.

 

Please refer to question one page one as not relevent to my complaint.

 

5) when you bought the policy were you in good health.

 

Please refer to question one page one as not relevent to my complaint.

 

6) how long would your income of lasted if you had lost your job.

 

Please refer to question one page one as not relevent to my complaint.

 

7) how long would your income of have continued if you had been unable to work due to accident or sickness.

 

Please refer to question one page one as not relevent to my complaint.

 

8 ) at the time you bought the police did you have anyone who was financially dependant on you.

 

Please refer to question one page one as not relevent to my complaint.

 

9) at the time you bought the policy did you have any other policy that protected your income in event of sickness or accident.

 

Please refer to question one page one as not relevent to my complaint.

 

10) any other comments to support your claim.

 

Please see page one question ten as not enough space to write here.

 

......................... ......................... ......................... .....

 

seperate letter.

 

 

Response to question one.

I was informed by your agent that my loan would not be accepted unless I took out the payment protection insurances. I have subsequently discovered that all insurances should be optional; I was NEVER given any option to take the loan without the insurances and was never provided with a comparative quote for the loans without the insurance premiums attached.

 

 

Response to question ten.

I was explicitly informed by your sales agent that we would not in any circumstances qualify for the loan without insurances attached as I was a “bad creditor”.

This I now know to be incorrect and feel you have created an unfair relationship due to the fact that the attached insurances are supposed to be optional.

Quite simply we were never given the option of taking out the loan with no insurances attached, the insurances themselves were not fully explained (Other than they were a necessity) and therefore were not sold following an accurate analysis of whether or not we required said cover and therefore were missold.

Therefore questions 2-9 on your questionnaire are not applicable to be answered, there was no investigation at the time of the loans as to these circumstances and the suitability of the cover and looking back in hindsight on these would only cloud current matters.

Put simply it is irrelevant as to whether or not policies may have benefited me as the option to take these out was never presented and I was misinformed that they were in fact compulsory after later discovering that they were optional. My circumstances were not considered at the time of applying these policies to my loans; therefore play no part in assessing mis-selling after the event. I was told that I had to take out the insurance to get the loan and so was misinformed and would like this resolving immediately.

  • Haha 1

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks, its the only response as questions 2-9 are there to catch you out and if you do not complete form you are not assisting welcome with your claim so the quickest route is to answer but give nothing away. MajorPlayer has posted a lot on this and helped loads on this process.

Also the above procedure with welcome is proven to work for a fast paying result. You want the premiums back plus interest plus the 8% stat interest.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

good stuff ozzy :D

I am a consumer just like you, please get a second opinion or investigate yourself on anything I advise as I am in no way legally trained. Everything I know has come from the Mighty CAG and fellow CAGGERS. :cool:

 

If I have helped in any way please click my reputation star and make a donation to CAG to enable us all to continue to help each other :cool:

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...