Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Should this to be take into court with him or should he send something in earlier?
    • This is the other sign  parking sign 1a.pdf
    • 4 means that they need to name and then tell the people who will be affected that there has been an application made, what the application relates to (specificially "whether it relates to the exercise of the court’s jurisdiction in relation to P’s property and affairs, or P’s personal welfare, or to both) and what this application contains (i.e what order they want made as a result of it) 5 just means that teh court think it is important that the relevant people are notified 7 means that the court need more information to make the application, hence they have then made the order of paragraph 1 which requires the applicant to do more - this means the court can't make a decision with the current information, and need more, hence paragraph one of the order is for the applicant to do more. paragraph 3 of the order gives you the ability to have it set aside, although if it was made in january you are very late. Were you notiifed of the application or not?    
    • These are the photos of the signs. At the entrance there is a 7h free sign. On some bays there is a permit sign.  Also their official website is misleading as it implies all parking is free.  I can't be certain of the exact parking bay I was in that day, and there was no PCN ticket on my car and no other evidence was provided.  parking sign 2.pdf
    • Hi, In my last post I mentioned I had received an email from SS who were asking me to hand over the keys to my mother’s flat so they could pass them to the Law firm who have been appointed court of protection to access, secure and insure my mother’s property.  Feeling this, all quickly getting out of my hands I emailed ss requesting proof of this. I HAVEN’T HEARD BACK FROM SS.  Yesterday, I received an email (with attached court of protection order) from the Law Firm confirming this was correct (please see below a copy of this).  After reading the court of protection order I do have some concerns about it:   (a)   I only found out yesterday, the Law firm had been appointed by the court back in January.  Up until now, I have not received any notification regarding this.  (b)   Section 2   - States I am estranged from my mother.  This is NOT CORRECT    The only reason I stepped back from my mother was to protect myself from the guy (groomer) who had befriended her & was very aggressive towards me & because of my mother’s dementia she had become aggressive also.  I constantly tried to warned SS about this guy's manipulative behaviour towards my mother and his increasing aggressiveness towards me (as mentioned in previous posts).  Each time I was ignored.  Instead, SS encouraged his involvement with my mother – including him in her care plans and mental health assessments.   I was literally pushed out because I feared him and my mother’s increasing aggression towards me. Up until I stepped back, I had always looked after my mother and since her admission to the care home, I visit regularly.   .(c)    Sections -  4, 5 and 7  I am struggling to understand these as I don’t have a legal background.  I was wondering if there is anyone who might be able to explain what they mean.  It’s been a horrendous situation where I had to walk away from my mother at her most vulnerable because of; ss (not helping), scammer and groomer. I have no legal background, nor experience in highly manipulative people or an understanding of how the SS system operates, finding myself isolated, scared and powerless to the point I haven’t collected my personal belongings and items for my mother’s room in the care home.  Sadly, the court has only had heard one version of this story SS’s, and based their decision on that. My mother’s situation and the experience I have gone through could happen to anyone who has a vulnerable parent.    If anyone any thoughts on this much appreciated.  Thank you. ______________________________________________________  (Below is the Court of Protection Order)  COURT OF PROTECTION                                                                                                                                                                                   No xxx  MENTAL CAPACITY ACT 2005 In the matter of Name xxx ORDER Made by  Depty District Judge At xxx Made on xxx Issued on 18 January 2024  WHEREAS  1.     xxx Solicitors, Address xxx  ("Applicant”) has applied for an order under the Mental Capacity Act 2005.  2.     The Court notes (my mother) is said to be estranged from all her three children and only one, (me) has been notified.  3.     (Me) was previously appointed as Atorney for Property and Affairs for (my mother).  The Exhibity NAJ at (date) refers to (me) and all replacement Attorneys are now officially standing down.  4.     Pursuant to Rule 9.10 of the Court of Protection Rules 2017 and Practice Direction 9B the Applicant 2must seek to identify at least three persons who are likely to have an interest in being notified that an application has been issues.”  The children of (my mother), and any other appointed attorneys are likely to have an interest in the application, because of the nature of relationship to (my mother).  5.     The Court considers that the notification requirements are an important safeguard for the person in respect of whom an order is sought.  6.     The Court notes that it is said that the local authority no longer has access to (my mother’s) Property.  7.     Further information is required for the Court to determine the application.  IT IS ORDERED THAT  Within 28 days of the issue date this order, the Applicant shall file a form COP24 witness statement confirming that the other children of (my mother) and any replacement attorneys have been notified of the application and shall confirm their name, address, and date upon which those persons were notified.  If the Applicant wishes the Court to dispense with any further notification, they should file a COP9 and COP24 explaining, what steps (if any) have been taken to attempt notification and why notification should be dispensed with.   Pending the determination of the application to appoint a deputy for (my mother), the Applicant is authorised to take such steps as are proportionate and necessary to access, secure and insure the house and property of (my mother).   This order was made without a hearing and without notice.  Any person affected by this order may apply within 21 days of the date on which the order was served to have the order set aside or varied pursuant to Rule 13.4 of the Court of Protection Rules 2017 (“the Rules”).  Such application must be made on Form COP9 and in accordance with Part 10 Rules.              
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
        • Thanks
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Cunningham Lindsay & Lloyds TSB


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5155 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hello

 

First time to one of these forums

 

Cunningham Lindsey are in my opinion a bunch of cowboys.

 

We were unfortunate to have a flood in May 2009, they did their usual using Rainbow to dry the property out, their own builders Rok to bodge the work, we were unhappy with the work, the laminate which had only been down for two months was only partly lifted leaving the rest down on water, a new flooring company were instructed and it was them who noticed the wet floor Rainbow were called back to dry our property properly 9 months later 2 inch file of correspondence having to constantly chase Cunningham Lindsey we hopefully will soon have our floor back, I would like to sue them for negligence but do not know how to quantify damages, both my husband and I over this time have been to the Doctors due to stress caused by this carry on, my children have been walking on freezing concrete it ruined our Christmas, Cunningham Lindsey have lied about contacting people when they have done nothing. Can someone tell me where I should start. I am in the fortunate position of having some knowledge of suing people in the small claims of the county court is this where I should start?

Link to post
Share on other sites

There are 2 ways of dealing with this. Firstly is through the FSA and the ombudsman. Secondly is through the court. However, as you are claiming stress - i.e. an injury (presuming you live in Eng / Wales) you would expect your claim to be over £1000. This means you have to issue through the fast / multi track, then you would preferrably need solicitors.

 

however, I would initially, under the DPA, ask for the file Cunningham Lindsay have on you.

Abbey - owed £3260 - Paid up.

 

Barclays owed £2500 - Paid up.

 

Halifax, Mint & Egg - next on the hit list

 

Dont click on the scales - I'm quite proud of my little red dot! - As the little red dot has gone - click away!!!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for that, didnt think about the data protection act, we've been trying to get stuff off them but are getting nowhere :mad:

 

Also, we didn't think of stress being an injury either. If this is the case, does this come under personal injury, in which case, we may be able to get a no win no fee PI solicitor.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for that, didnt think about the data protection act, we've been trying to get stuff off them but are getting nowhere :mad:

 

Also, we didn't think of stress being an injury either. If this is the case, does this come under personal injury, in which case, we may be able to get a no win no fee PI solicitor.

 

I am sorry to hear that the handling of your claim has been such a headache to you. The one thing I can say is that do not mistake incompetence with malice. There could be a number of reasons why your claim has not proceeded with due speed. Telephone tomorrow and ask for the procedure to make a formal complaint from the first person who answers the telephone. Follow the procedure and make a request for compensation (due to the stress and inconvenience you have suffered) in your letter.

 

Forgive me for asking but why have you given CL so long to handle this? Have you tried complaining to your insurer about lack of service?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks very much for taking the time to respond. I don't believe C&L are being malicious but do believe they are incompetent. Unfortunately the case has not settled, but we are now dealing solely with our Insurers as we have lost all confidence in C&L, can I still deal with their complaints procedure even though the file is not complete? I have difficulty in measuring a quantum of damages, any law I can find would be helpful.

 

There is no problem in asking why we have given CL so long, and to be honest it is a very good question, why did we give them so long, we have no idea, we just kept plugging away in the hope of having it resolved, only recently the stress has become so much that we couldn't deal with it and Lloyds are now dealing with it on our behalf. We also have never in the 20 plus years had to claim and were unaware that we could go back to Lloyds. Only in the last 2-3 weeks we have involved Lloyds, wish we had done it sooner. It was only due to the fact that CL's builders had done a poor job on patching the floor that we found out how badly the whole claim had been managed. We also have our own business to run which is open 7 days a week for some 12 to 14 hour days from April to October (we are still open through the winter on shorter days) bearing in mind the initial flood was in May, we also have two small children to look after.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks very much for taking the time to respond. I don't believe C&L are being malicious but do believe they are incompetent. Unfortunately the case has not settled, but we are now dealing solely with our Insurers as we have lost all confidence in C&L, can I still deal with their complaints procedure even though the file is not complete? I have difficulty in measuring a quantum of damages, any law I can find would be helpful.

 

There is no problem in asking why we have given CL so long, and to be honest it is a very good question, why did we give them so long, we have no idea, we just kept plugging away in the hope of having it resolved, only recently the stress has become so much that we couldn't deal with it and Lloyds are now dealing with it on our behalf. We also have never in the 20 plus years had to claim and were unaware that we could go back to Lloyds. Only in the last 2-3 weeks we have involved Lloyds, wish we had done it sooner. It was only due to the fact that CL's builders had done a poor job on patching the floor that we found out how badly the whole claim had been managed. We also have our own business to run which is open 7 days a week for some 12 to 14 hour days from April to October (we are still open through the winter on shorter days) bearing in mind the initial flood was in May, we also have two small children to look after.

 

As I understand it, you never had to vacate your property so do not expect too much in the way of compensation. If I were handling your claim I would offer no more than £50 initially and set my maximum at £75 for stress, but I throw that figure out there without knowing ANY real details of your claim. Secondly, I am not a solicitor by any means, but I would not bother with taking your case to small claims court, unless the insurer rejected your claim or you incurred uncompensated, significant financial loss.

 

Do you have a designated contact person for your claim? Are they responsive to your plight?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Hi, yes i do belive you do have a case, before you think about a pi claim i would first complain to the ombudsman. I would be happy to provide further details of the working ethics of cunningham lindsey as an ex employee, but not on a public forum...

 

please issue me a contact email address where we can talk further.

 

8)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...