Jump to content


!!!!!!big News Alert!!!!!!!!!!!


master99
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5191 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Press releases 2010

 

 

OFT consults on unenforceable credit agreements guidance

 

05/10 27 January 2010

The OFT has today published draft guidance for consumers and industry on the application of sections of the Consumer Credit Act 1974 (the CCA) that allow consumers to request information about their credit agreements.

The OFT is consulting on guidance because of concerns that some debtors are being misled into thinking that these sections can be used to get their debts written off and that some creditors are not following legal obligations to provide information to customers.

The draft guidance consists of a document setting out the technical legal issues for businesses and consumer advisers, and a simpler version for consumers.

It incorporates the findings of recent High Court cases that have clarified a number of technical issues. For example, sections 77-79 of the CCA allow a consumer to request a 'true copy' of their agreement. The High Court ruled that a true copy does not have to be a photocopy or an exact copy of the original. The lender is allowed to provide a reconstituted agreement, as long as that version is accurate and contains all the original information apart from the few exceptions that the law allows (which include the signature, signature box and date of signature).

The guidance also makes it clear that if a lender cannot comply with the sections - making an agreement unenforceable - then it is restricted in the debt collection activities it can undertake. Whilst lenders are able to request repayment and to record any arrears or default with a credit reference agency, the OFT considers it would be wrong to threaten court action if the lender knows that it is not possible.

Ray Watson, OFT director of consumer credit, said:

'There has been a great deal of confusion over the meaning of these sections with many borrowers being misled into thinking that they can get their debt written off.

'This guidance is to clarify the legal position and the OFT view on standards expected of the industry, and to make consumers aware that they may be at risk if they seek to use these sections to avoid paying legitimately owed debts.'

The deadline for responses to the consultation is 21 April 2010.

NOTES

1. The consultation document is available on the OFT website.

2. The recent judgment in Carey v HSBC Bank Plc [2009] EWHC 3417 can be found on the Judiciary of England and Wales website.

 

 

 

 

:-x:-xDoes this mean the debt collecters can make up all kinds of rubbish with there own agrreement? all they have to do is have your name and where you live???

:D I WON. HALIFAX PAID IN FULL DONT GIVE UP THE FIGHT IT WILL BE ALRIGHT:)
Link to post
Share on other sites

Not exactly news-we reported on this before Chriustmas.:)

Have a happy and prosperous 2013 by avoiiding Payday loans. If you are sent a private message directing you for advice or support with your issues to another website,this is your choice.Before you decide,consider the users here who have already offered help and support.

Advice offered by Martin3030 is not supported by any legal training or qualification.Members are advised to use the services of fully insured legal professionals when needed.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

No worries.

Have a happy and prosperous 2013 by avoiiding Payday loans. If you are sent a private message directing you for advice or support with your issues to another website,this is your choice.Before you decide,consider the users here who have already offered help and support.

Advice offered by Martin3030 is not supported by any legal training or qualification.Members are advised to use the services of fully insured legal professionals when needed.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Whilst the OFT are trying to give the impression that they are legally qualified to give legal opinions they are NOT & never have been. The OFT are supposed to police the CCA UCCR & licensing on behalf of consumers & they are overstepping their brief by even suggesting that their advice is law.

Contrary to their role they gave 'advice' to the Manchester Court which had the effect that the court ruled in favour of the creditor advice I may add that was contrary to advice they had given earlier & which I suspect will be produced if any of the Manchester Judgments are appealed

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...