Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Your self employment if not earning very much (say less than £500 monthly) may mean that the Job Centre don't see it as being main employment as not paying enough to live on. Therefore they expect you to search for standard employed job of any type that you could do.   When you have to move from tax credits to Universal Credit, you will have to just follow the process and provide the information required. Once your claim is set up, the Job Centre will tell you what is required.        
    • Hi,   I'm currently engaged with a previous landlord as I applied for a RRO. I've already put my statement of case in, but when she responded to it with her "response" ad PDF bundle it literally:   1) Didnt address one issue in my statement of case. It literally moaned about all sorts of non related issues which were not listed in the statement of case I presented. 2) There's allegations in her response that i "made advances on her to make her my girlfriend", which quite frankly, there's more chance of elvis returning from the dead. Non of these so called advances have any evidence, there's no emails, texts, calls, voicemails... So I have no idea how to address this if at all. 3) There's allegations that my guarantor contacted her on a number of occasions, and I've confirmed that this isn't true. She literally mixed up me and my guarantor as well as the tenancy reference agency and blamed the guarantor. I have no idea how to address this.   Despite most of the above being outside of scope of what I listed in my Statement of Case, and all of her points in her "explanation" being moot as they also dont address any of the points in my Statement of Case, how do I respond to that?   Do I literaly list my statement of case items and so something like::     etc... Or do I activly need to respond to her points in her case? As much as I feel that would be the right thing to do, surely she needs to address my items listed in my statement of case. Otherwise we might as well pick and choose what we address lol   Anyway any help woul dbe really appreciated.   Cheers   Ade
    • Hi   This is there Terms & Condition: Terms & Conditions WWW.RADIOWORLD.CO.UK Shop and purchasing something from our ecommerce store, you agree to be bound by the terms and conditions contained in this document.   Now what I noticed with these is you need to go down the webpage to where is states 'Return and Refund Policy'   Now look directly above where it states 'Return and Refund Policy' you will notice it states: "International returns".   Look at 'Your Order Cancellation Rights' it states: You are entitled to cancel Your Order within 14 days without giving any reason for doing so.   Look at 'Conditions for Returns' it states: The Goods are in the original packaging and The Goods were not used or damaged. (so how are you meant to check the goods were fit for purpose)   Look at 'Returning Goods' You are responsible for the cost and risk of returning the Goods to Us.    
    • Hi   What the Landlord has done is the Right to Re-Entry/Forfeiture by changing the locks they have terminated your Lease Agreement as this is an easier route for the Landlord of a Commercial Property than going through the Court process.   Now the but for the above the Landlord must have something in your Lease Agreement for the Commercial Property that states this (so have a good read of your Lease Agreement about this).   How much are you in Arrears for the Commercial Property?   Was it actually the Landlord that changed the Locks or did the Landlord use a Bailiff?   Were you given any notice to have the Arrears paid by and any action the Landlord may take to recover?   Has the Landlord been in contact with you about the Arrears?   Some info for you:   From 25th March 2022 all previous restrictions due to COVID-19 were lifted but the Government introduced the Commercial Rent (Coronavirus) Act 2022.   This sets out new Rent Arbitration Procedure that is Compulsory for Rent Arrears known as 'Protected Rent Debt'. The Arbitration will protect Tenants in certain Sectors where they were forced to close by the Government between 21st March 2020 and 19th July 2021. An Arbitrator will then decide how much rent these Tenants will have to pay. (note: Forfeiture is then prohibited for this Debt)   The above does not apply to Commercial Rent Arrears which had been incurred before 21st March 2020 or any that incurred post 18th July 2021.   These Restrictions DO NOT apply to Commercial Businesses that were not required to close by the Government   Have a Good Read of the Below Link: (you will have to download both the Commercial Rents (Coronavirus) Bill & Commercial Rents Code of Practice)   New measures in Bill to assist commercial landlords and tenants in resolving rent debts resulting from the COVID-19 pandemic - GOV.UK WWW.GOV.UK Commercial tenants mandated to close to be further protected from enforcement action to pave the way for proportionate resolution of...      
    • Martin Guzmán's departure leaves a big question mark over Argentina's future economic policy.View the full article
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

can same car be repossessed twice?


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4538 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I found the car i wanted to buy 9/9/08.

Paid for hpi check 10/9/08.

collected and paid cash for the car (3k) 12/9/08.

 

Roll on june 2009. The car was taken from outside my house by repossession agents acting on behalf of 'logbook' loans. I try to dispute what they are saying. They show me a letter clearly stating that THEY ARE THE LEGAL OWNERS OF THE VEHICLE. I hpi check the car again. It clearly states outstanding finance;logbook loans.

 

The man who sold me the car had used the car as security for a 6k loan on 11/9/08- ie the day before i collected the car.

 

I came to an agreement with logbook loans to buy back the car from them for 1500. They give me a receipt to say they have no further interest in the vehicle.

 

Tonight I have had a phone call from 'welcome finance' saying that they have tracked me down as the current owner of the vehicle. There is outstanding finance on it from an agreement dated 24/9/08.

 

I cannot believe it, i will have to sleep in the car to make sure they dont take it again.

 

i am desperate for any legal knowledge if anyone could help

xx

Link to post
Share on other sites

I found the car i wanted to buy 9/9/08.

Paid for hpi check 10/9/08.

collected and paid cash for the car (3k) 12/9/08.

 

Roll on june 2009. The car was taken from outside my house by repossession agents acting on behalf of 'logbook' loans. I try to dispute what they are saying. They show me a letter clearly stating that THEY ARE THE LEGAL OWNERS OF THE VEHICLE. I hpi check the car again. It clearly states outstanding finance;logbook loans.

 

The man who sold me the car had used the car as security for a 6k loan on 11/9/08- ie the day before i collected the car.

 

I came to an agreement with logbook loans to buy back the car from them for 1500. They give me a receipt to say they have no further interest in the vehicle.

 

Tonight I have had a phone call from 'welcome finance' saying that they have tracked me down as the current owner of the vehicle. There is outstanding finance on it from an agreement dated 24/9/08.

 

I cannot believe it, i will have to sleep in the car to make sure they dont take it again.

 

i am desperate for any legal knowledge if anyone could help

xx

 

Hi Foxy welcome

 

You have been a victim of fraud, you will need to take this-along with your paperwork to the police get the ball rolling-keep a carefull notes on how much you are out of pocket..

 

 

You are the owner full stop, the letter you state you have says they have no intrest-buy LBL have sold the loan on to a DCA- You will need to get info from the DCA- I would recommend a SAR to them on the account. Send all letters by Regietered post, send them a copy of the letter that show they have no intreast and state quite clearly that you own the car. Let them do the hardwork.

 

Have a good read of the post and stickys. Oh DCA's cannot take the car.

Don't panic and don't worry. The guys that turn up are agents-**** suckers feeding on the bottom of the pond. They are NOT Baliffs-they will lie and cheat to get what they want. You are not dealing with LBL anymore.they have no intrest.

 

trooper68

Trooper68:)

Link to post
Share on other sites

thanks for your reply.

 

From what i understand Welcome finance are not a DCA. They lent money to the same person using the same car as security.

 

We found out that he (man who sold us the car) had a duplicate logbook. From reading other posts i see that LBL dont take the logbook from you when you have a loan through them.

The date of his agreement with LBL was 11/9/08.

 

Maybe he was surprised that LBL didnt keep the logbook so he then lent against it again on 24/9/08 with welcome finance.

 

Our logbook shows that i aquired the vehicle on 14/9/09, it wasn't printed until 25/9/09 though.

 

By this point the finance should have been showing from LBL though if Welcome did a finance check? Are LBL legally obliged to record their financial interest in the car, if so how soon?

 

There could be more companies out there looking for the car!!

 

The car is my only source of income. I have a personal loan of 6k although i only paid 3k for the car. I have since had it LPG converted, fitted a huge roofbox, paid for it to be badged as a taxi. It is a people carrier used for airport transfers only. I have a diary full of work:(

Link to post
Share on other sites

thanks for your reply.

 

From what i understand Welcome finance are not a DCA. They lent money to the same person using the same car as security.

 

We found out that he (man who sold us the car) had a duplicate logbook. From reading other posts i see that LBL dont take the logbook from you when you have a loan through them.

The date of his agreement with LBL was 11/9/08.

 

Maybe he was surprised that LBL didnt keep the logbook so he then lent against it again on 24/9/08 with welcome finance.

 

Our logbook shows that i aquired the vehicle on 14/9/09, it wasn't printed until 25/9/09 though.

 

By this point the finance should have been showing from LBL though if Welcome did a finance check? Are LBL legally obliged to record their financial interest in the car, if so how soon?

 

There could be more companies out there looking for the car!!

 

The car is my only source of income. I have a personal loan of 6k although i only paid 3k for the car. I have since had it LPG converted, fitted a huge roofbox, paid for it to be badged as a taxi. It is a people carrier used for airport transfers only. I have a diary full of work:(

 

did you send of the logbook straight away? if you did the envolope stamped would be proof. Besides you both have been a victim of a crime-so you should report it as such. As long as the Police are aware you are a victim so to speak. Besides still SAR them-you never know what it will turn up-plus they have to give you everthing to do with the account (of the car) you will get a clearer picture of what they have. Have you seen a copy of the BoS?

 

Ahh I think they cannot touch it as its a taxi-I think that there may be a really old law covering that also that the car has been modified if they do take it the have "unjust enrichedment", besides its your only sorce of income...My advice at this point would be to have a chat with a Sol, perhaps someone that knows consumer law.

 

trooper68

Trooper68:)

Link to post
Share on other sites

STOP!!!!!!!!!!

first off Welcome Finance do not do logbook loans meaning you have the protection of the hire purchase act.

If their finance wasnt showing and you have your hpi check still you are in the clear as you can claim good title as you brought the car in good faith.

1st check what agreement it is on with Welcome Finance with them.

2nd check your hpi and if your in the clear tell them so they should back off oh and if it is hp they cannot repo without a court order anyway

3rd finance companies are NOT legally obligated to record finance on hpi, however if it is HP (ie not a logbook loan) if they dont and you are a private purchaser and do a hpi before buying you can claim to have brought the car in good faith and they cant touch it.

Edited by Pacman2
Link to post
Share on other sites

thats a point you have there pacman..

 

Do you think its a case of LBL sold on or there was HP on it and that they have found it? She did say there was no intrest on the HPI check when she did one-something is not right here at all..

 

trooper68

Trooper68:)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Foxy-questions.

 

You said you came to an arrangement with LBL for £1500, did you get any work on the car before they turned up? Do you suspect that LBL have sold on the debt to welcome or did welcome just come out of the blue stating they own the car? Cos if welcome are the HPI owners-did not own the car-you paid LBL for nothing...see where i'm coming from.

 

Any work to fix or convert the car could be enrichment.

If welcome was the HPI owners LBL had no legal right to clain ownership-you paid £1500 for nothing....

 

trooper68

Trooper68:)

Link to post
Share on other sites

thank you for taking an interest in my situation.

 

The lpg conversion, roof box and taxi plating were all done within 2-3 weeks of buying the car in sept 08.

 

from the dates of the agreements i would think that LBL had more claim to the car than Welcome?

LBL 11/09/08

Welcome 24/09/08

 

If LBL took longer than the 7 days to do the register BOS with the court thing maybe LBL didn't show when Welcome did their HPI check on 24/09/08?

 

My HPI check was done on 10/09/08 - before either of these agreements were made.

Link to post
Share on other sites

thank you for taking an interest in my situation.

 

The lpg conversion, roof box and taxi plating were all done within 2-3 weeks of buying the car in sept 08.

 

from the dates of the agreements i would think that LBL had more claim to the car than Welcome?

LBL 11/09/08

Welcome 24/09/08

 

If LBL took longer than the 7 days to do the register BOS with the court thing maybe LBL didn't show when Welcome did their HPI check on 24/09/08?

 

My HPI check was done on 10/09/08 - before either of these agreements were made.

 

The point here foxy is one of law bills of sale mean that wether or not log book loans registered their interest on hpi they could repo the car (welcome could have argued the toss with them as LBL being a company is NOT protected by the HP act but this is a different matter)

Welcome however do HP agreements if they havent put it on hpi BEFORE you do a hpi check and buy the car regardless of who you buy it off (for instance LBL which is what you have effectively done) they cannot pursue the car any further once this is brought to their attention as you have brought the car in "good faith" which is protected under the hire purchase act 1964 C.53 please read Hire Purchase Act 1964 (c. 53)

in other words your car tell them so!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Foxy-questions.

 

You said you came to an arrangement with LBL for £1500, did you get any work on the car before they turned up? Do you suspect that LBL have sold on the debt to welcome or did welcome just come out of the blue stating they own the car? Cos if welcome are the HPI owners-did not own the car-you paid LBL for nothing...see where i'm coming from.

 

Any work to fix or convert the car could be enrichment.

If welcome was the HPI owners LBL had no legal right to clain ownership-you paid £1500 for nothing....

 

trooper68

 

Ignore LBL for now one thing at a time from my understanding Welcome have now approached saying you owe them money after paying off LBL (since youve paid LBL off they are no longer an issue so i wont bother going into this one but i think that yes they could have taken the car, certainly i think they would have).

Welcome would have taken a HP agreement out with a customer either for the car or on the car as a HP agreement you have rights and protections you dont have with a log book loan one of the is called having brought the car in "good faith" if you can show you did all reasonable checks as a private individual buying the car (ie you did a HPI check and it didnt show up, you got log book etc) then the Law ie Hire Purchase Act says that you brought the car in good faith and welcome cant touch it end of!

Welcome Finance do not buy debt they are a finance company it would be a debt colection company that would be interested in buying the debt not them

Edited by Pacman2
Link to post
Share on other sites

 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...