Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Thank you for that i thought id just ask as i was unsure.  Just hope its returned to me and doesnt spend the rest of its life going back and forth to Singapore  
    • Thanks @lolerz. I've attached it to the post. What do you think? What's the organ grinder? NTK.pdf
    • I'm afraid that if the value of the item was under declared then that is probably the best that you can hope for. Also, because the item was incorrectly addressed – even by a single letter, if that because the issue relating to the delivery then that has probably compounded the problem. There is probably very little that can be done. If you are lucky you will get the item back and then you can start again and declare it properly. Undervaluing parcels which are sent by any means is always going to cause a problem if the item is lost or damaged. It may mean that the cost of delivery is slightly less – but at the end of the day the risk becomes yours. When you enter into any kind of contract, effectively you declare it a level of risk to your contracting partner – and they decide to enter into the contract with you based on that level of risk. You have declared a level of risk and £50 – and that's the deal.   Additionally, undervaluing an item which is an internationally has the effect also of evading customs and any VAT system which is in force in that country – and that makes the whole thing a little bit more serious
    • Perfect. Nice and brief and to the point. You don't bother to start telling your life story. Just the way it should be. Send it off. You have probably done enough reading to understand that it won't make any difference don't start drafting your particulars of claim. Open an account with the MoneyClaim County Court system and start preparing. Post your particulars of claim here before you click it off. You may have noticed that at some point you will be asked if you want to go to mediation on this. We used to advise it but now we recommend that you decline mediation and go to trial. Your chances of success are much better than 95%. Going to trial will incur an additional hearing fee but of course you will get that back. However if you go to mediation, they will simply try to penny pinch and to get you to compromise and also they will sign you up to a confidentiality agreement and probably threaten you if you breach it. Not only that, if the mediation fails because you stand your ground, it will add additional delay while they then give you a date to go to trial. The best thing to do is to decline mediation – prepare for court hearing. Pay the extra fee. The chances are that rather than get a judgement against them they will then offer you a full settlement rather than go to court. If they do offer you full settlement then you will be obliged to accept it – but that's what you want. If they don't offer you full settlement then you will go to trial and there will be a judgement against them. Just so that you understand, our first interest is that you get your money back – but a close second is that it does go to trial and there is a judgement which we will then be able to use to help other people. Anyway as you should realise, we will help you all the way.
    • I sent a parcel to Singapore but i spelt the address incorrecltly by 1 letter so the parcel couldnt be delivered and was returned back to the Uk but checking the tracking today the parcel had returned to the UK but is somehow on its way back to Singapore as the tracking says "Item leaving the UK"    Ive spoken ( tweeted) Royal Mail help who confirm that the parcel seems to be going back to Singapore and that if its not " Delivered" by the 29th of April theyll deem it as lost and will accept a claim but i cant remeber when booking what the compensation amount was but i dont think it covers the amount of the item.  As it was my fault that it wasnt delivered in the first place can i trey and claim the full amount back ? i think if i remember correctly it was £50 compensation but the item was £170 So the timeline is thus ...   22nd Of March .    Booked via P2G & dropped off a Post Office.  25th March arrives in Singapore and goes through customs ect ect 26th   Incorrect address and item is flagged as "return to sender" 28th Item leaves Overseas intenational processing centre 15th of April , Item is leaving the Uk (Again)   ?    
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Advent Computer Training (Barclays Partner Finance)Info and discussion thread


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3878 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

hi guys just spoke to computeach the msca and mcse costs £1679 for a year contrcta. Thats way less than advent.... surely thats not right ??how can they put us on a course thats cheaper and expect us to pay more

 

This is for a year though - my MCSE route was for 3 years so 3 x 1679 = 5037 which is more like the advent figure

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 5.3k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

Some post back someone wrote they had a start and end date on their enrolment form.. I posted mine it was different to his.. bigger.. with more sections on it.. but I had no start or end date on it.

 

But the guy at advent did mention that what we were paying for was 2 years worth of training and support from them.. but I have not seen this in writing unlike the other poster

 

I unfortunately do have a time scale on my enrolment form and I was told support would end once this date is reached.

 

"Luckily" I was on track at the time of them collapsing. Now well, I dont think I will go back into home studying untill I get a job - practical experience rules all.

Link to post
Share on other sites

yes but now you end up paying anything over £1679 so your argument is null.

 

I paid the full amount up within a year though - and I wasn't trying to argue, just raise a speculative point that Advent and Computeach are offering different timescales for the courses and as such the prices are scaled to them.

 

If Advent offered MSCE for one year at £5950 I would understand the point raised.

 

I just want to add as well that we shouldn't even consider venting energy at each other we need to save the anger and passion for fighting BPF for our money back.

Edited by Savarok
Link to post
Share on other sites

Bluedo did you say that you were from Scotland? I remember someone saying that anyway! If that's the case we surely have an excellent get-out clause for the not being like-for-like. I was told by my salesman that the exams were all local and the workshops, although very beneficial, were entirely optional. If this had not been the case there is just no way that I could have contemplated travelling the 730 mile round trip more than once or twice a year. How many trips of this length would CT be expecting me to do in year??? Impossible when I work full-time! :eek:

 

Incidentally Thanks to everyone on this site for help and advise - especially site team (percentage of my refund will definately be coming your way!) I have just sent my first letter of complaint to BPF (thanks to all whose suggested content made it so much easier) and made an enquiry via Consumer Direct. Do I need to do anything else other than wait patiently for Martin's expert advise?

 

 

Hi GillyBee,

Aye I'm from Bonnie Scotland :D You're quite right about the distance. I could sit exams in Glasgow and the workshops were ok too cos my friends live in Kidderminster and I could have stayed there. Sorted!!

If I think about it everyone has been" Sorted" by the salesyappers, whatever their circumstances were.

So that should cut it clear for us and any one who will now have a distance to travel to Dudley. cos Trading Standards have already told me to wait see who the new provider is and if they're not same or too much distance then contest it on grounds of not like for like but also there's quite a few points they're not the same.

Think Martin's been snowed under maybe hear something soon :-D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi GillyBee,

Aye I'm from Bonnie Scotland :D You're quite right about the distance. I could sit exams in Glasgow and the workshops were ok too cos my friends live in Kidderminster and I could have stayed there. Sorted!!

If I think about it everyone has been" Sorted" by the salesyappers, whatever their circumstances were.

So that should cut it clear for us and any one who will now have a distance to travel to Dudley. cos Trading Standards have already told me to wait see who the new provider is and if they're not same or too much distance then contest it on grounds of not like for like but also there's quite a few points they're not the same.

Think Martin's been snowed under maybe hear something soon :-D

Thats great news - I'm from Northern Ireland so that'd be a fair few miles i'd have to travel too!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Long time reader first time poster, firstly a big thanks to all of you for the correspondence on this forum it has been a massive help. I will not go over old ground as it has been well documented in here over the past couple of months, but for the record I 'purchased' the database administrator course and paid the course off (£4950) within the 12 months through the government approved 'career development loan' and received all the correspondence and other appalling customer care from all those organisations involved in this debarkle.

Can the CAG team include myself in the course of action

Link to post
Share on other sites

What address have people been using for BPF please that has actually prompted a response, however dismissive? Gotta send my letter asap as they wanna reactivate my account next week and just wanna be sure Im sending it to the right place so they cant dispute whether they've received it or not. I'll be sending it recorded delivery.

 

Sorry, I know it was posted sometime back im just not sure where!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Savarok:Sorry if i came across as aggressive i didn't mean to be like that.

 

This whole thing has got me real down in the dumps i not going to pay them that is for sure. What really gets me is how they are allowed to levy distress on people who were only trying to better themselves. I imagine that they only read the contracts after they terminated advent's finance and they subsequently collapsed. So that must have been a real Doh! moment for them i don't understand why these people do not listen to us. I know they are all foot soldiers etc. but i just cannot imagine how they can sit on the phone and lie to people knowing it will cause them emotional and sometimes physical distress.

 

How can these people sleep at night?

Link to post
Share on other sites

hi all, just to say i finally posted my BPF complaint letter on tues morning (i'd spent hours on it - so it's very lenghty and thorough - i'd post it on here but it's ground basically been covered by lots of you now) to the customer relations manager: REFUSING to accept CT as alternative provider and REFUSING to re-commence monthly DD, and reasons why ie - poor reputation; current students taking legal action; not the agreement with advent; restricted time to complete course; exams can't be taken locally; investigated by FO and trading standards; no student support for 8 weeks after advent collapse then further 2 weeks for CT (i just dispose of and ignore CT email/letter) re-sits not paid for; finance company on verge of collapse; course and structure delivery different, far inferior company/ facebook student complaints gallore; no careers service/ local job recruitment; CCA sect 75/ enterprise act etc etc, just to say a HUGE THANKS to all that continue to post and offer sound advice, any further action i can take or support CAG team and members i will, fight on people!! get them complaint letters to BPF in their thousands demaning no further payments and refusing to accept thier pathetic attempts to fob us all off on CT!! good luck to us all;-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

My second letter was delivered to BPF, got the electronic proof of delivery. Lets see if they ignore this letter. Nothing special in it, just refusing Computeach and complaining about getting the contract cancelled and interest free period extended as I'm not receiving any service that I should be getting. Also complaining that they did not respond or even acknowledge my first letter to them. That also had electronic proof of delivery!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Savarok:Sorry if i came across as aggressive i didn't mean to be like that.

 

Dont worry about it - I was gambling on the MCSE to help my family emigrate to New Zealand. The sales rep told me that Advent would help me find a job over there and now I have £6000 worth of debt instead so trust me I completley understand the frustrations you and the other posters on here are feeling.

Edited by Savarok
Link to post
Share on other sites

Just thought i'd share this.

 

just spoke to Barclays about which correspondence address to use for my complaint and enquired about the hold on my account and they said that it should remain on hold for this month as they're planning on sending letters to everyone to advise them when the hold will be lifted (most likely in may). She did say however that once the hold was lifted then even if there was an ongoing dispute that payments would still need to be be made but that if the account was cancelled then obviously all payments will need be returned (whether she was referring to ALL payments or just those since the hold was lifted i'm not sure).

I appreciate it was a phone conversation and that everyone seems to be getting different answers on the phones but thought it was quite interesting.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yeah it is.....didn't they say a while back if no alternative had been found by the next payment date they would refund everyone as well?

 

Thats not something I've heard but it'd be sweet if it was the case. Maybe they're hoping that the majority of people will accept computeach, get themselves registered there and bound to them and that there wont be many people like us left that they'll have to deal with!!

 

Here's hoping.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi GillyBee,

Aye I'm from Bonnie Scotland :D You're quite right about the distance. I could sit exams in Glasgow and the workshops were ok too cos my friends live in Kidderminster and I could have stayed there. Sorted!!

If I think about it everyone has been" Sorted" by the salesyappers, whatever their circumstances were.

So that should cut it clear for us and any one who will now have a distance to travel to Dudley. cos Trading Standards have already told me to wait see who the new provider is and if they're not same or too much distance then contest it on grounds of not like for like but also there's quite a few points they're not the same.

Think Martin's been snowed under maybe hear something soon :-D

Rang up computeach pretending to be an interested customer... they said you can do the exams locally!!

 

does that mean we cant use this reason to get out of this?!?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi,

 

Just joined this forum to fight and hopefully get some help.

 

I signed a contract for a 1 year differed loan with Advent/BPF and begin making payments on the 16th April.

 

I have sent a letter to BPF requesting for my contracted to be cancled which was actaully given to me by a member of this forum, written by a solicitor.

 

I have received a reply to this letter from BPF today stating they have not breached the contract!

 

This whole mess has put me under a massive amount of stress, I had made specific arrangments with advent who adpated my training becuase of personal circimstances and was also in the process of changing course.

 

I will not be moved to anouther provider becuase a bank are trying to make money and will choose my own training provider which will probably be a college or university after this experiance!

 

I have the money saved to pay for the course which i would have paid happily if Advent where still my provider but now, I'm willing to go bankrupt just to ensure that barclays receive £0!

 

I have read that CAG are helping with this situation which i think is outstanding, so any advice from you guys will be much apprecaited.

 

 

Thank you!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Rang up computeach pretending to be an interested customer... they said you can do the exams locally!!

 

does that mean we cant use this reason to get out of this?!?

 

 

That was one of my main arguments......so thats annoying that they're saying that.

 

Im sure I read in some of the literature, either the email or on their site, that exams would be 'carried out at their dedicated testing centre' or something. I cant find it now though.

Link to post
Share on other sites

hi all,

 

just spoke to bpf...didnt give me any useful information, just that i would have to pay the money back as soon as the interest free year is up, which for me is may 1st :( i really dont want to have to pay this back as i hadnt used advent since december 2009. i was considering ringing computeach, but didnt in case they take this as me accepting them as a provider. WHAT DO I DO NEXT ? :confused:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Rang up computeach pretending to be an interested customer... they said you can do the exams locally!!

 

does that mean we cant use this reason to get out of this?!?

 

i rang them to, i was told if you did the exams locally then you miss out on the workshops... as they do the workshops and then the exams straight after

Link to post
Share on other sites

style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3878 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...