Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • we dont get N157 because its new OCMC but no court dont have evidence either.   Just seems a bit of a pointless wait but oh well
    • Post #9 suggested some options to avoid or put off having a smart meter. Post #12 a simple solution to your complaint about the ay they handle fixed monthly DD. It's not really clear why you posted if you're going get irate when members "jump in" with suggestions. You can see what I'm referring to on "gasracker.uk" to allay your suspicion that I was lying in Post #16 which was made to correct ther misinformation shown in your Post #15
    • Back to octopus from the smart meter/tariff salesperson. Octopus have now said just ignore the letter - I dont have to have one despite there letter implying (at least) it was required, but that i will HAVE to have a smart meter if current meters stop working as 'their suppliers dont supply non smart meters any more'. They also say they do not/will not disable any smart functionality when they fit a smart meter I am of course going to challenge that. Thats their choice of meter fitter/supplier problem not mine
    • Point taken that we should inform new Caggers that the £20 option is there in wrong registration cases.  Well, supposedly there, who knows what the PPCs would do in practice.  Anyway, the option is allegedly there with both the BPA as you say, but also the IPC (I've just checked). However, there's a danger here of baby, bathwater. The two easiest types of cases to win are (a) residential - due to Supremacy of Contract and (b) wrong registration - due to "de minimis".  Indeed until recently we has been boasting that no Caggers, over two years, who had sent a PPC the wrong registration snotty letter, had even been taken to court, let alone lost a court hearing. We simply can do nothing about a terrible judge.  The judge seems - I say seems because we haven't had all the details - to have ignored "de minimis",. got fixated on a sign and awarded unreasonable behaviour costs.  A totally bizarre judgement.
    • You mean your witness statement 
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

HELP - in a DMP but got Court papers today


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5202 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi,

 

After months of trying to communicate with creditors but they were ignoring my letters and offers to pay, I entered a DMP with Payplan. the plan is operational and making payments to all creditors, but only one has "accepted" the arrangements, the others are not, one has today issued a Court claim form.

 

Payplan seem very blase about this - unlike me - I entered this plan to prevent this sort of hassle.

 

I've CCA's the ones I think were incorrect, and in fact have heard nothing from one creditor for months now, but the others won't accept I'm doing my best to pay them

 

I've no idea how best to proceed, and the thought of going to Court terrifies me.

 

What can I do next?? thanks.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Howard Cohen issued papers on behalf of CL finance who have been assigned the credit card debt from G E Money.

 

The particulars are basically that we owe the money, we haven't paid, so they are claiming via the court.

 

Yes, I am paying them via payplan, on a pro rata basis with the other creditors, after having gone through an extremely comprehensive income/expenditure statment with payplan.

 

Payplan have given be a breakdown of what might happen, which seems to involve lots of Court attendances complete with fees and paperwork, following which they might send bailiffs or ask for charging orders or attachment of earnings.

 

And there was I thinking I'd been handling the debts responsibly by attempting to pay them off as best as I can afford.

 

By the way, over the past couple of years they have racked up the interest to where my monthly payments were barely covering the interest, and one creditor who has accepted my offer, the interest and charges are three times the amount I'm paying, so I can't see this ever ending.

 

Payplan mentioned an IVA, but I have equity in the house (which I obviously don't want to sell), so I thought I couldn't do that??

 

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

well if the creditor are still adding interest your payment are doing nothing to reduce the debt, so there is no paoint making payment through Payplan, so personally I would cancel the arrangement.

 

I would send CCA request to each creditor and see if their paperwork is sufficiently in order to even have the right to enforce the debt.

 

as for them saying

'they might send bailiffs or ask for charging orders or attachment of earnings'

 

this is not on. They are there supposedly to help debtors, not intimidate them, that is the job of the DCA.

 

There will be no bailiffs, charging orders or anything else into they have took the case to court and WON, even them you would have to default on the payment schedule ordered by the court.

 

how old are these debts?

what kind of debts are they?

 

As for the court claim, you have to acknowledge the claim.

Once you have done that we can go about requesting under Cival procedure the copies of the documents they intend to reply on in court.

 

Don't worry about the court thing it is no big deal, you are in good hands on here

Edited by alfwithhair
Link to post
Share on other sites

Howard Cohen issued papers on behalf of CL finance who have been assigned the credit card debt from G E Money.

 

The particulars are basically that we owe the money, we haven't paid, so they are claiming via the court.

 

Yes, I am paying them via payplan, on a pro rata basis with the other creditors, after having gone through an extremely comprehensive income/expenditure statment with payplan.

 

Payplan have given be a breakdown of what might happen, which seems to involve lots of Court attendances complete with fees and paperwork, following which they might send bailiffs or ask for charging orders or attachment of earnings.

 

And there was I thinking I'd been handling the debts responsibly by attempting to pay them off as best as I can afford.

 

By the way, over the past couple of years they have racked up the interest to where my monthly payments were barely covering the interest, and one creditor who has accepted my offer, the interest and charges are three times the amount I'm paying, so I can't see this ever ending.

 

Payplan mentioned an IVA, but I have equity in the house (which I obviously don't want to sell), so I thought I couldn't do that??

 

Thanks

 

Have you read this thread ? -

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/legal-issues/241827-legal-action-how-start.html

 

Have you completed the Acknowledgment of service ?

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

 

I am too with Payplan, and they usually complete the claim form for you on your behalf.This will involve completing an income and expenditure, offering a payment, and calling the creditor to suspend this action. If you are having problems, ask if anyone could guide you through it or complete it on your behalf.

 

Yes Payplan have an IVA company too. IVA, all of your assets will be protected, including your house. The creditors would just require you to remortgage in the 4th year of the IVA, and pay in your share of 85% loan to value of any equity you have. The IVA is a 5 year, legally binding agreement between you and your creditors, if you have enough surplus, it may be worth looking into, as I know Payplan are free of charge.

Link to post
Share on other sites

DONT SEND COURT PAPERS TO PAYPLAN THEY ADMITT THE DEBT AND YOU THEN HAVE TO PAY THE WHOLE DEBT AND FEES THEY REFUSE TO ACT IN ANYOTHER WAY ON YOUR BEHALF.

 

This is well documented on the forums.

OFT debt collection guidance

 

Please remember the only stupid question is the one you dont ask so dont worry about asking the stupid questions.

 

Essex girl in pc world looking 4 curtains 4 her pc,the assistant says u dont need curtains 4 a computer!!Essex girl says,''HELLOOO!! i,ve got WINDOWS!!'.

Link to post
Share on other sites

deal with it urself thats what every other CAGger does.

OFT debt collection guidance

 

Please remember the only stupid question is the one you dont ask so dont worry about asking the stupid questions.

 

Essex girl in pc world looking 4 curtains 4 her pc,the assistant says u dont need curtains 4 a computer!!Essex girl says,''HELLOOO!! i,ve got WINDOWS!!'.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

I am a newbie on here I am on a DMP with Payplan since August 09 I have 2 debts with MBNA they accepted the payment plan and have been paid regularly since Aug 09 yet today I received 2 court claim forms (Northampton) the solicitors acting for MBNA are Restons. I received a letter from Restons 5th Jan 2010 requesting payment and financial statement I contacted Payplan who told me to send copy of the letter to them which I did the same day and they would deal with it. The date on the court forms is 22nd Jan and Payplan did not contact them until 25th Jan ? dont know if the delay has resulted in this legal action ?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Helpfull...

 

Not being funny but there has been advise offered and links to threads that need to be read.

 

Questions have been asked which have not been answered so before commenting maybe reading first.

OFT debt collection guidance

 

Please remember the only stupid question is the one you dont ask so dont worry about asking the stupid questions.

 

Essex girl in pc world looking 4 curtains 4 her pc,the assistant says u dont need curtains 4 a computer!!Essex girl says,''HELLOOO!! i,ve got WINDOWS!!'.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

I am a newbie on here I am on a DMP with Payplan since August 09 I have 2 debts with MBNA they accepted the payment plan and have been paid regularly since Aug 09 yet today I received 2 court claim forms (Northampton) the solicitors acting for MBNA are Restons. I received a letter from Restons 5th Jan 2010 requesting payment and financial statement I contacted Payplan who told me to send copy of the letter to them which I did the same day and they would deal with it. The date on the court forms is 22nd Jan and Payplan did not contact them until 25th Jan ? dont know if the delay has resulted in this legal action ?

 

 

I would advise you create your own thread and link it in to here.

 

I would also advise the court your defending the claim and CPR MBNA/Restons.

 

They are playing silly buggers and they know it.

OFT debt collection guidance

 

Please remember the only stupid question is the one you dont ask so dont worry about asking the stupid questions.

 

Essex girl in pc world looking 4 curtains 4 her pc,the assistant says u dont need curtains 4 a computer!!Essex girl says,''HELLOOO!! i,ve got WINDOWS!!'.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...