Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Breaking News Biden wins Kennedy family endorsement Fifteen members of the storied Kennedy political family endorsed U.S. President Joe Biden at a Philadelphia campaign event on Thursday, with some joining him onstage, in a rebuke of Robert F. Kennedy Jr's independent bid for the White House. and 30 members in the extended Kennedy family   nytimes.com WWW.NYTIMES.COM Kennedys endorse Biden over their relative RFK Jr WWW.BBC.CO.UK Robert F Kennedy Jr is running for president as an independent - but many family members oppose him. More than a dozen Kennedy family members endorse Biden, snub RFK Jr. | CBC News WWW.CBC.CA President Joe Biden accepted endorsements from at least 15 members of the Kennedy political family during a campaign stop...  
    • Speaking of Frost and Johnson the corrupt liars' grate deal they forced through   Shortages of life saving medicines has become ‘new normal’ for UK after Brexit WWW.INDEPENDENT.CO.UK ‘The medicines supply chain is broken at every level,’ warns Dr Leyla Hannbeck   "Professor Tamara Hervey, of the City Law School, said: “There is nothing inevitable about this ‘new normal’ where Great Britain is isolated in efforts to manage fragilities in global supply of the products and people we need to run the NHS. It is the consequence of policy choices and those could be different.”     Mind you, the private sector is making hays while the NHS is burned. Private health insurance market grows by £385m in a year amid NHS crisis | Private healthcare | The Guardian WWW.THEGUARDIAN.COM Demand for private treatment booms as NHS waiting lists remain long, while more people also sign up for dental cover  
    • That's an idea on Maquarie. On being accountable, you also have to blame Ofwat and possibly the Environment Agency although they've been badly defunded. I put the Frost article up for balance.  
    • I agree HB, but there were no laws broken - its perfectly legal to fleece the UK and its infrastructure - and labour were little better than the Tories Perhaps an option would be to ban the aussie investment fund from the UKs markets
    • surprised you gave that frost article the light of day HB Long been the case that no further evidence of his wing-nutishness needed. Heck he even railed against the rubbish grate deal he largely created
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

(Alleged) fraud


leanne82duke
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5198 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

ok long winded sorry!

the loan i took out was in july 2003, i paid for a few months moved house and did not pay them again until appx 06/04, i then started to pay them again £40 per month until appx arch 2007 at which point they stopped taking the direct debits from my bank account.

i presumed i had paid it off.

appx a month or two later i started getting letters from lewis debt recovery stating that i still owed a large sum of money appx £1600, being naieve and knowing that the loan had a huge apr on it i set up another direct debit and continued to pay them.

 

roll on nov 2009 after looking at various forums and learning about enenforcibility i sent a letter to lewis debt recovery requesting the cca etc

 

what i recieved was a personal loan agreement but....

 

personal details of the customer stated my maiden name. i married in april 2004 three months before this so called loan agreement was written up?

 

it was dated 10/07/2004 a whole year after i took the loan out.

 

it had a signature on it that was not mine.

the amount on the loan was for £2000,

 

the loan i took out in 2003 was for appx £900.

 

looking on my credit report there are 2 entrys for welcome finance first one ended and second one started on the same day.

 

so looking into it i have no knowledge of this loan only the one i applied for in 2003.

had i not been so stupid i would have realised this earlier.

 

to date i have paid £2936 to welcome finance and lewis debt recovery.

 

so how do i get my own back on them? [EDIT]

Edited by Rooster-UK
Language.
Link to post
Share on other sites

Welcome to the forum Leanne, your first move has to be a SAR so you have all the information available (put both account numbers). Also can you post for us the copies of your agreements, you need to remove your personnel info.

 

WELCOME FINANCIAL SERVICE

COMPLIANCE

RUDDINGTON FIELD BUSINESS PARK

RUDDINGTON

NOTTINGHAM

NG11 6NZ

 

REMEMBER THE £10 POSTAL ORDER AND SEND RECORDED DELIEVERY

 

Never sign but print signature.

 

 

[your address]

 

 

 

[their address]

 

 

[DATE]

 

 

 

 

 

Data Protection Act 1998

 

 

 

 

 

 

Dear Sir/Madam

 

 

 

ACCOUNT NUMBER: xxxxxxxxx (or multiple numbers if more than one account)

 

 

 

Please supply me with copies of all the data which you hold on me in relation to any matter and in any form and for any period of time.

Please note that I require disclosure of any personal data which you hold on me for the entire period of my dealings with you.

The Subject Access is not limited to my transaction history and it is not linited merely to 6 years of historical information.

Additionally, where there has been any event in my account history over this period which has required manual intervention by any member of your staff, or any other person, I require disclosure of any indication or notes which have either caused or resulted in that manual intervention, or other evidence of that manual intervention in relation to my financial business with you.

I require all information on details of all insurance products supplied by welcome financial services. This is to include the statement of means, statement of price, details of all insurance premium tax paid, and underwriting sheets.

If mortage indemnity insurance has been added to the agreement, i require all details on who this premium was paid to, and who underwrites this insurance.

 

If you are unable to supply this data because there has been no such manual intervention, then please be so kind as to confirm this in your response.

 

I enclose the statutory maximum fee of £10. You have 40 days in which to comply. Furthermore, if I discover that you have levied disproportionate penalties or charges which are invalid under the Unfair Terms in Consumer Contracts Regulations against me, then I shall be reclaiming them together with any interest charges which you have levied on them.

As it is your wrongdoing and mishandling of my account which has created the necessity for this Subject Access Request, I shall also be reclaiming the enclosed £10 Data Protection Act subject access request fee.

 

If there is specific information which you require in order to satisfy yourself as to my identity, please let me know by return. However, please note that the above address is the one which you normally use to communicate my private business to me and which you have hitherto found to be acceptable.

I would be happy to collect the Data from my local branch.

 

 

Yours faithfully,

 

 

[signature]

 

 

[name]

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

This agreement is a wrewrite from previous loan, you need the other agreement also frrom orriginal loan. As this is a rewrite the accceptance fee is wrong but I would like somone else to double check this first. You should get other agreement when SAR is received.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

you need to get hold of the original 1973 loan document as you say the one shown is not yours. I guess the layout will be similar as all those at that time did not conform to the regs of CC1974 i.e no total cost of credit, no total payable, total number of payments estimated, all prescribed terms of CCA1974 are missing making the agreement unenforcible. See what the subject access request gives you and let us know. Something very fishy going on, but of course its Welcome so no surprise there. Sounds like you've paid enough for a 900 quid loan!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well as ozzywizard says, it would appear that someone within the local branch at Welcome has been creative and constructed a re-write in your name in 07/2004.

 

I leave you to conjecture as to why they would do this...

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yeah as it is not yet proven fraud you are leaving the forum open to possible legal implications by posting that welcome have "frauded you" so to protect the forum and its owners and even yourself this thread has been edited. Fraud is a very strong allegation, to ask if a company is at fault is one thing but to post a company has "frauded" without just cause or exact proof in a court of law is another.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

This agreement is a wrewrite from previous loan, you need the other agreement also frrom orriginal loan. As this is a rewrite the accceptance fee is wrong but I would like somone else to double check this first. You should get other agreement when SAR is received.

 

 

Does this suggest then that if you re-write a loan you should NOT have another acceptance fee applied? Could someone clarify please

 

thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

you need to get hold of the original 1973 loan document as you say the one shown is not yours. I guess the layout will be similar as all those at that time did not conform to the regs of CC1974 i.e no total cost of credit, no total payable, total number of payments estimated, all prescribed terms of CCA1974 are missing making the agreement unenforcible. See what the subject access request gives you and let us know. Something very fishy going on, but of course its Welcome so no surprise there. Sounds like you've paid enough for a 900 quid loan!

 

Sorry To Butt In Leanne! I Have Question To Ask Jamesf104 That May Be Relevant To All Of Us!!!8)

 

James, This Is The Second Time I Have Seen You Mention In Threads "Estimated Number Of Payments "!

 

Welscum Seem To Add An Extra Month To A Hell Of A Lot Of Contracts!!!

 

Information Kept By Credit Reference Agencies IE: 48 Months On Contract, But 49 Months With Credit Reference Agencies!!!:-?

 

Is This Allowed ? Is This What You Mean By Estimated Total Number Of Payments???:?

 

Cheers, MARK

Link to post
Share on other sites

ime very woried over this agreement

a £2000 LOAN OVER 60 MONTHS, THATS FIVE YEARS

 

THEY HAVE TO HAVE THE AMOUNT OF REPAYMENTS

ITS A PERSCRIBED TERM

SAYING ESTIMATED IS NOT GOOD ENOUGH

 

1 % PER MONTH RATE OF INTEREST DOES NOT EQUATE TO AN APR OF 14.6 %

 

DID YOU MAKE PAYMENTS BY DD PRIOR 10/07/2004

Link to post
Share on other sites

ime very woried over this agreement

a £2000 LOAN OVER 60 MONTHS, THATS FIVE YEARS

 

THEY HAVE TO HAVE THE AMOUNT OF REPAYMENTS

ITS A PERSCRIBED TERM

SAYING ESTIMATED IS NOT GOOD ENOUGH

 

1 % PER MONTH RATE OF INTEREST DOES NOT EQUATE TO AN APR OF 14.6 %

 

DID YOU MAKE PAYMENTS BY DD PRIOR 10/07/2004

 

AHH!!! Just Read Leannes Credit Agreement!!! The Question Of What Is Meant By " Estimated Number Of Payments " Is Answered!!!

 

Is It Only Personal Loans Where The Length Of The Contract Is " Estimated "???

 

Why Do They Add This Extra Month On When Recording Agreements With CRA`s???

 

 

Cheers, MARK

Link to post
Share on other sites

under the cca, you cant have estimated, agreement is crap, prescribed term

 

the reason welcome add the extra month is it makes the books look healthy to share holders and investors

 

this was one of the things that finished welcome

 

creative acounting

 

thats all

Link to post
Share on other sites

ime very woried over this agreement

a £2000 LOAN OVER 60 MONTHS, THATS FIVE YEARS

 

THEY HAVE TO HAVE THE AMOUNT OF REPAYMENTS

ITS A PERSCRIBED TERM

SAYING ESTIMATED IS NOT GOOD ENOUGH

 

1 % PER MONTH RATE OF INTEREST DOES NOT EQUATE TO AN APR OF 14.6 %

 

DID YOU MAKE PAYMENTS BY DD PRIOR 10/07/2004

 

yep have paid every thing by direct debit.

 

will post the sar request on monday now i have some ink for my printer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...