Jump to content

 

BankFodder BankFodder


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • the property is not yours you are not on the deeds you are/were not ever on the mortgage..   stop trying to do their job in scamming you.        
    • Capital assessments are based on the:   amount or value of the asset at the time of the application outcome of checks carried out to protect against fraud As with income assessments the partner's share of the equity is included in these calculations - unless there is contrary interest. Just found the above in the law society website.  So am I screwed.  So confused.   
    • I am bound to say that their alleged contract is probably the weirdest I have seen. Considering it is supposed to be a serious legal contract to set out the conditions under which CEL manage the parking on land that does not belong to them it leaves a lot to be desired.   For a start it does not comply with the BPA Code of Practice which is   7.3 a the definition of the land on which you may operate, so that the boundaries of the land can be clearly defined b any conditions or restrictions on parking control and enforcement operations, including any restrictions on hours of operation c any conditions or restrictions on the types of vehicles that may, or may not, be subject to parking control and enforcement d who has the responsibility for putting up and maintaining signs e the definition of the services provided by each party to the agreement.   So no mention of hours: no mention of types of vehicle restrictions: no mention of who is responsible for the erection and maintenance of signage   and much more serious -no mention that CEL have to comply with the BPA Code of conduct-that one is listed on 7.1.    All it states is that the operator can pursue outstanding PCNs in accordance with the COP but that is not the same as saying that CEL will abide by the CoP which it must say.   Also AFAIK the only entity that can pursue for trespass is the land owner regardless of what this quasi agreement says. There is also no mention of the financial aspect of the arrangement nor how the long it lasts and what notice is required for either side to terminate.     It might be worth writing [not emailing ] to Medburn Estates asking them to confirm if this is the only agreement with CEL and whether they think it right that CEL have not received planning permission for their signs from the Council rendering their signs illegal which is more serious than unlawful and therefore all PCNs issued are worthless and should not have been issued as it is impossible to form a contract with motorists when the signs are illegal.   Also that as CEL are their agents Medburn Estates LTD are responsible for the actions of their agents. You could also ask them to cofirm that the signature on the paper is that of their Director, Anthony Brown and whether their copy has a counter signature of a CEL representative.   Carry on that CEL are taking you to Court and as another Judge has asked a Landowner to appear in front of him to explain their contract, whether it might be in the best interest of Medway to have a serious conversation with CEL to avoid any possible  embarrassments in your  [ie Laluna] Court appearance.   I have not looked much at your WS though it is looking good.   I would have mentioned that as they failed to comply with  Town and Country Planning (Control of Advertisements) (England) Regulations 2007.   that they are in breach of their agreement CoP with BPA to keep to all the legal requirements in running their parking  operations.   It calls into question their right to apply for motorists data from the DVLA.   I would wait for their WS to arrive so that you can pick holes in that too. however watch that if they are late that you send yours off just within the Court guidelines.   What you are tying to do with your WS is to put your side of the case plus put CEL in as bad a light as possible for them to  decide that they don't really want to go to Court after all.
    • UncleB - where you write "This could lead you to facing the Bank in Court..."   1stly -  would that mean now?  by remote hearing?  Or when the courts open after the summer?   2ndly - Does the application for set aside automatically prevent the B hearing going ahead?   3rdly - Will sending in an application to have the B petition set aside mean that I have to disclose an address for service?   I can only give a mailing address   4thly - Could having an early (remote) set aside hearing potentially quicken up the process for the bank if I am obliged to give them a suitable place for service?  At the moment I assume the hearing was adjourned for lack of physical service.   I want/ need to get a set aside.  But don't want to shoot myself in the foot.  
    • Where I have sight of a letter which states the following: "a) the case is removed from scheduled date and time on the court list forthwith    b) the case will be re-listed on the 1st open date after x few months, a date to be advised" Is there any way a hearing would be any earlier than suggested?  Lockdown closed courts but may they open early?    Could the bank ask it to be brought forward even with lockdown still in place officially til end July?    Would that depend on them physically serving a b petition?   Could the 1st open date be any time up to Christmas with such a potential back log of cases?  
  • Our picks

    • View this quiz Employment status during COVID-19
      What do you do if you’ve been told not to come to work due to the current crisis.  Watch the video here or on the Youth Consumer Service Instagram page.

      Did you learn anything? Do the quiz
       
       
      Submitter BankFodder Type One Right Answer Time 5 minutes Total Questions 8 Category The Youth Consumer Service Submitted 15/05/20  
      • 0 replies
    • One Parking Solutions - Damning judgement. Read more at https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/421148-one-parking-solutions-damning-judgement/
      • 63 replies
    • View this quiz Coping with extreme hardship
      Life can be tough when you're entering the world of work and in the present virus crisis, things are even more difficult.

      Watch the video below or go to the Youth Consumer Service Instagram page . Afterwards, you can see if you've understood the points which are being made by taking the quiz.
       
       
      Submitter BankFodder Type One Right Answer Time 5 minutes Total Questions 8 Category The Youth Consumer Service Submitted 15/05/20  
      • 1 reply
    • View this quiz: Pre-pay meters
      An explanation of how some gas and electric companies offer emergency quarantine support.

       
      Watch the video here – or go to the Youth Consumer Service Instagram page and watch it there. Then come back here and do the quiz
       
       
      Submitter BankFodder Type One Right Answer Time 5 minutes Total Questions 6 Category The Youth Consumer Service Submitted 15/05/20  
      • 1 reply
wannabedebtfreesoon

elcome for illegal repo in contravention of section 92 and unfair relationship ** WON **

style="text-align:center;"> Please note that this topic has not had any new posts for the last 2856 days.

If you are trying to post a different story then you should start your own new thread. Posting on this thread is likely to mean that you won't get the help and advice that you need.

If you are trying to post information which is relevant to the story in this thread then please flag it up to the site team and they will allow you to post.

Thank you

Recommended Posts

As far as I'm concerned they broke the law and you don't get a much more clear cut case for unfairness than that!!

They think they can do whatever they please and nobody's gonna say anything :mad:

 

Cab did you get my poc? I pm'd them to you :)


“First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win.” - Ghandi

"You must have the resources to deal with the judicial intervention - the confidence not to be overawed, the resilience to respond, the tenacity to challenge, the tact to mollify, the authority to inform and persuade."

 

Strength does not come from winning. Your struggles develop your strengths. When you go through hardships and decide not to surrender, that is strength.

 

<-- If I have helped in any way please click my star!! ;)

Oh and I am a lady!! :)

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

wannabee,

 

I'm impressed! you are a goddess.

 

good luck next month and I am keeping everything crossed for you - not that you need it!

 

Bel

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

OK, their 14 days is up tomorrow. The claim form was served on 6th April and deemed received on 8th April.

I still haven't heard anything from the court so I will be ringing them in the morning to find out where we stand.

Basically they need to have done something within the 14 days or it won't look good for them.

 

Notes for defendant on replying to the claim form (Consumer Credit Act claim)

• You must reply to the claim form within 14 days of the date it was served on you. If the claim form was

• sent by post, the date of service is taken as the second day after posting (see post mark)

• delivered or left at your address, the date of service will be the day after it was delivered

• handed to you personally, the date of service will be the day it was given to you

• You may either

• pay the amount claimed

• admit liability for the claim and offer to make payments to keep the goods

• dispute the claim

• If you do not reply or attend the hearing, judgement may be entered against you.

 

Your response and what happens next

 

Disputing the claim

If you dispute the claim or wish to claim against the

claimant (counterclaim), complete Form N9D and send

it to the court within 14 days. Remember to keep a copy

for yourself and to bring it with you to the hearing. The

court will send a copy of your defence to the claimant.

At the hearing the court may make a final order or

judgement in the claim. If the court agrees that you have

a valid defence (or counterclaim), it will tell you and the

claimant what to do to prepare for a future hearing. If

you send your defence to the court after the 14 days has

expired, and you want to rely on it at the hearing, the

court may take your failure to file it on time into account

when deciding what order to make in respect of costs.

 

So tomorrow I will have a much better idea of what their intentions are!

They will either;-

 

  1. Have filed a defence
  2. Not file a defence but will file one late
  3. Not file a defence and won't bother filing one
  4. Make an offer
  5. Pay up in full to avoid going to court

If they haven't filed a defence by tomorrow this would seriously strengthen my case ;)

 

If you send your defence to the court after the 14 days has

expired, and you want to rely on it at the hearing, the

court may take your failure to file it on time into account

when deciding what order to make in respect of costs.

 

So fingers crossed for tomorrow everyone! Will keep on posting :D


“First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win.” - Ghandi

"You must have the resources to deal with the judicial intervention - the confidence not to be overawed, the resilience to respond, the tenacity to challenge, the tact to mollify, the authority to inform and persuade."

 

Strength does not come from winning. Your struggles develop your strengths. When you go through hardships and decide not to surrender, that is strength.

 

<-- If I have helped in any way please click my star!! ;)

Oh and I am a lady!! :)

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Oh and one other option is a counterclaim, but they'll have a hard job of that considering it was them who broke the law!!


“First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win.” - Ghandi

"You must have the resources to deal with the judicial intervention - the confidence not to be overawed, the resilience to respond, the tenacity to challenge, the tact to mollify, the authority to inform and persuade."

 

Strength does not come from winning. Your struggles develop your strengths. When you go through hardships and decide not to surrender, that is strength.

 

<-- If I have helped in any way please click my star!! ;)

Oh and I am a lady!! :)

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

so altho u cant win by default as such you can coz the judgement can be passed without them?


I am a consumer just like you, please get a second opinion or investigate yourself on anything I advise as I am in no way legally trained. Everything I know has come from the Mighty CAG and fellow CAGGERS. :cool:

 

If I have helped in any way please click my reputation star and make a donation to CAG to enable us all to continue to help each other :cool:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yep!

Oh and I just looked up counterclaim and they have to submit it within the 14 days too, so roll on tomorrow!!


“First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win.” - Ghandi

"You must have the resources to deal with the judicial intervention - the confidence not to be overawed, the resilience to respond, the tenacity to challenge, the tact to mollify, the authority to inform and persuade."

 

Strength does not come from winning. Your struggles develop your strengths. When you go through hardships and decide not to surrender, that is strength.

 

<-- If I have helped in any way please click my star!! ;)

Oh and I am a lady!! :)

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Outrageous!!!

I have received a copy of Welcome's defence!!

They have admitted not having a court order but say there should be no consequences for this!!!!

Any advice gratefully received :)

Although I think I have a fair idea of what I'm going to do next ;)


“First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win.” - Ghandi

"You must have the resources to deal with the judicial intervention - the confidence not to be overawed, the resilience to respond, the tenacity to challenge, the tact to mollify, the authority to inform and persuade."

 

Strength does not come from winning. Your struggles develop your strengths. When you go through hardships and decide not to surrender, that is strength.

 

<-- If I have helped in any way please click my star!! ;)

Oh and I am a lady!! :)

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

steer them into the direction of the s90's, consequences my a$$. then again word tactics come to mind,

 

there should be no consequences for this!!!!

 

definition of should:

common word used by creditors to bullsh*t the average consumer

 

cab

 


Cab1ne-Lombard-Shoosmiths **Claim Recieved**

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?181761-Cab1ne-Lombard-Shoosmiths-**Claim-Recieved**/page25

Summary Judgement 01/02/2011 **REFUSED** set for trial "May 23rd To June 30th 2011"

DISCONTINUED 3rd MAY 2011 **WON**

 

santander" Responsible Lending!!!!!!!

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?219431-quot-santander-quot-Responsible-Lending!!!!!!!

 

Capquest "V" Cab1ne

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?262962-Capquest-quot-V-quot-Cab1ne

 

"STAYED"

 

CAB "Sittin Tight"

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Therein lies the problem!! They are defending on section 90 but my claim is for breach of section 92!! :confused:


“First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win.” - Ghandi

"You must have the resources to deal with the judicial intervention - the confidence not to be overawed, the resilience to respond, the tenacity to challenge, the tact to mollify, the authority to inform and persuade."

 

Strength does not come from winning. Your struggles develop your strengths. When you go through hardships and decide not to surrender, that is strength.

 

<-- If I have helped in any way please click my star!! ;)

Oh and I am a lady!! :)

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Nowhere in their defence have they even referred to section 92! They admit not having a court order but deny this constitutes an unfair relationship or breach of duty. They do not give any reasons for why they think this :confused:

I find it very difficult to understand how they can just deny that their actions are not a breach of duty when it clearly states in the Act that it is!!!

92 Recovery of possession of goods or land

 

(1) Except under an order of the court, the creditor or owner shall not be entitled to enter any premises to take possession of goods subject to a regulated hire-purchase agreement, regulated conditional sale agreement or regulated consumer hire agreement.

 

(2) At any time when the debtor is in breach of a regulated conditional sale agreement relating to land, the creditor is entitled to recover possession of the land from the debtor, or any person claiming under him, on an order of the court only.

(3) An entry in contravention of subsection (1) or (2) is actionable as a breach of statutory duty.

 

But they admit the contravention!!! Madness!!


“First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win.” - Ghandi

"You must have the resources to deal with the judicial intervention - the confidence not to be overawed, the resilience to respond, the tenacity to challenge, the tact to mollify, the authority to inform and persuade."

 

Strength does not come from winning. Your struggles develop your strengths. When you go through hardships and decide not to surrender, that is strength.

 

<-- If I have helped in any way please click my star!! ;)

Oh and I am a lady!! :)

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It's such a load of contradictory cr*p! Cos later on they say it does not constitute unfair relationship because they have acted in accordance with their statutory duty!!!


“First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win.” - Ghandi

"You must have the resources to deal with the judicial intervention - the confidence not to be overawed, the resilience to respond, the tenacity to challenge, the tact to mollify, the authority to inform and persuade."

 

Strength does not come from winning. Your struggles develop your strengths. When you go through hardships and decide not to surrender, that is strength.

 

<-- If I have helped in any way please click my star!! ;)

Oh and I am a lady!! :)

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

think of it this way,

 

a judge in my opinion will have to find in your favour,

his very own county court ballifs can't even come on to your property to take goods without his "order". so for a judge to say "my very own ballifs have to stick to the statute of law but welscum can do what they like without any consequences for this!!!! just ain't gonna happen.

 

s90's (ninetees) are perfectly clear, should and maybe don't come into it.

 

90.—(1) At any time when—

(a) the debtor is in breach of a regulated hire-purchase or a regulated conditional sale agreement relating to goods, and

 

(b) the debtor has paid to the creditor one-third or more of the total price of the goods, and

 

© the property in the goods remains in the creditor, the creditor is not entitled to recover possession of the goods from the debtor except

on an order of the court.

 

if you have'nt paid a 3rd then yes they can use it. however they have to do it right, (and they have'nt)

 

91. If goods are recovered by the creditor in contravention of section 90

 

(a) the regulated agreement, if not previous terminated, shall terminate, and

 

(b) the debtor shall be released from all liability under the agreement, and shall be entitled to recover from the creditor all sums paid by the debtor under the agreement.

 

so at this point they still have an argument, you ain't paid a third, lets take it anyway, a judge "might" be persuaded in some strange way (judge lottery)

 

92.—(1) Except under an order of the court, the creditor or owner shall not be entitled to enter any premises to take possession of goods subject to a regulated hire-purchase agreement, regulated conditional sale agreement or regulated consumer hire agreement.

 

this is your "BABY" don't forget at s90 it clearly states 90.—(1) At any time when—

 

pure, plain, and simple,

 

it has nothing to do with what is and what is'nt paid or maybe this and should that.

 

Except under an order of the court,

 

the creditor or owner shall not be entitled to enter any premises to take possession of goods subject to a regulated hire-purchase agreement, regulated conditional sale agreement or regulated consumer hire agreement.

 

they are stuffed and trying it on,

 

cab


Cab1ne-Lombard-Shoosmiths **Claim Recieved**

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?181761-Cab1ne-Lombard-Shoosmiths-**Claim-Recieved**/page25

Summary Judgement 01/02/2011 **REFUSED** set for trial "May 23rd To June 30th 2011"

DISCONTINUED 3rd MAY 2011 **WON**

 

santander" Responsible Lending!!!!!!!

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?219431-quot-santander-quot-Responsible-Lending!!!!!!!

 

Capquest "V" Cab1ne

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?262962-Capquest-quot-V-quot-Cab1ne

 

"STAYED"

 

CAB "Sittin Tight"

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

thanks Cab, my point is tho section 90 has nothing to do with it. I didn't make any allegations with regard section 90, only section 92.

 

I can't decide whether to apply for summary judgement or just wait the 2 weeks until the hearing.


“First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win.” - Ghandi

"You must have the resources to deal with the judicial intervention - the confidence not to be overawed, the resilience to respond, the tenacity to challenge, the tact to mollify, the authority to inform and persuade."

 

Strength does not come from winning. Your struggles develop your strengths. When you go through hardships and decide not to surrender, that is strength.

 

<-- If I have helped in any way please click my star!! ;)

Oh and I am a lady!! :)

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Although I'm hopping mad at the nonsense they've come up with, it does actually all work in my favour ;)

 

1.) They admit not having a court order to take the car off my driveway

2.) They admit taking the car off my driveway

3.) They deny it is a breach of duty, (How can they deny the written law?? :D)

4.) They say it's not unfair relationship because it's not breach of duty, (The Consumer Credit Act 1974 says it IS breach of duty, therefore their argument is easily disproved)


“First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win.” - Ghandi

"You must have the resources to deal with the judicial intervention - the confidence not to be overawed, the resilience to respond, the tenacity to challenge, the tact to mollify, the authority to inform and persuade."

 

Strength does not come from winning. Your struggles develop your strengths. When you go through hardships and decide not to surrender, that is strength.

 

<-- If I have helped in any way please click my star!! ;)

Oh and I am a lady!! :)

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Also, in conclusion, they state they want the case dismissed on the basis that it was issued as a "return of goods claim" and they are confused by this.

 

It wasn't even me that issued a "return of goods claim"! I submitted my application as a Consumer Credit Act claim under unfair relationships, it was THE COURT that made the decision to forward it as a "return of goods claim", so go tell THE COURT they have confused you and ask them to dismiss the case on what they decided!!! :D


“First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win.” - Ghandi

"You must have the resources to deal with the judicial intervention - the confidence not to be overawed, the resilience to respond, the tenacity to challenge, the tact to mollify, the authority to inform and persuade."

 

Strength does not come from winning. Your struggles develop your strengths. When you go through hardships and decide not to surrender, that is strength.

 

<-- If I have helped in any way please click my star!! ;)

Oh and I am a lady!! :)

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Thanks Cab, my point is tho section 90 has nothing to do with it. I didn't make any allegations with regard section 90, (but they can use it to defend them selfs, they can use s333 of the peace treaty if they wanted to it's irrelivent.) only section 92. (crem de'la crem)

I can't decide whether to apply for summary judgement or just wait the 2 weeks until the hearing.

 

me personally, i would wait for the hearing. they probably won't even show up. dont forget, they will try any desperate measure they can think of to make you "scared":eek:

 

its "GAME OVER" for them:p

 

cab


Cab1ne-Lombard-Shoosmiths **Claim Recieved**

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?181761-Cab1ne-Lombard-Shoosmiths-**Claim-Recieved**/page25

Summary Judgement 01/02/2011 **REFUSED** set for trial "May 23rd To June 30th 2011"

DISCONTINUED 3rd MAY 2011 **WON**

 

santander" Responsible Lending!!!!!!!

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?219431-quot-santander-quot-Responsible-Lending!!!!!!!

 

Capquest "V" Cab1ne

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?262962-Capquest-quot-V-quot-Cab1ne

 

"STAYED"

 

CAB "Sittin Tight"

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Except under an order of the court, the creditor or owner shall not be entitled.....

 

"but your honour we didn't have a court order and did it anyway and we don't see what's wrong with that"

 

I think I'm going to explode!!!!!!!!


“First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win.” - Ghandi

"You must have the resources to deal with the judicial intervention - the confidence not to be overawed, the resilience to respond, the tenacity to challenge, the tact to mollify, the authority to inform and persuade."

 

Strength does not come from winning. Your struggles develop your strengths. When you go through hardships and decide not to surrender, that is strength.

 

<-- If I have helped in any way please click my star!! ;)

Oh and I am a lady!! :)

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It is totally beyond me how they can say they admit to not having a court order and deny that this constitutes an unfair relationship and further deny it constitutes a breach of duty!

 

I clearly stated in my particulars the quote from the Act that says they need a court order and if they do it without one it's a breach of duty, they just bloody ignore all the bits they don't like!!

 

The hearing is 2 weeks today and not a minute too soon I tell you!! :mad:


“First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win.” - Ghandi

"You must have the resources to deal with the judicial intervention - the confidence not to be overawed, the resilience to respond, the tenacity to challenge, the tact to mollify, the authority to inform and persuade."

 

Strength does not come from winning. Your struggles develop your strengths. When you go through hardships and decide not to surrender, that is strength.

 

<-- If I have helped in any way please click my star!! ;)

Oh and I am a lady!! :)

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I think I have a clearer idea now of what I've got to do. I have calmed down slightly ;)

 

On the hearing date the judge may make a final order or judgment in the claim. If the court agrees that they have a valid defence he will tell us what to do to prepare for a future hearing.

 

I feel it my duty to make the biggest fuss ever recorded about how they DO NOT have a valid defence. In a polite and respectful way of course ;)


“First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win.” - Ghandi

"You must have the resources to deal with the judicial intervention - the confidence not to be overawed, the resilience to respond, the tenacity to challenge, the tact to mollify, the authority to inform and persuade."

 

Strength does not come from winning. Your struggles develop your strengths. When you go through hardships and decide not to surrender, that is strength.

 

<-- If I have helped in any way please click my star!! ;)

Oh and I am a lady!! :)

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Don't forget to add

 

I am very saddened that they bypassed your authority and took the law into their own hands

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you :)

 

I need plenty of those little gems for the day :)


“First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win.” - Ghandi

"You must have the resources to deal with the judicial intervention - the confidence not to be overawed, the resilience to respond, the tenacity to challenge, the tact to mollify, the authority to inform and persuade."

 

Strength does not come from winning. Your struggles develop your strengths. When you go through hardships and decide not to surrender, that is strength.

 

<-- If I have helped in any way please click my star!! ;)

Oh and I am a lady!! :)

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

In their defence it states "It is admitted that the defendant did not possess a court order to retake the vehicle from the claimant's driveway. However it is denied that this constitutes an unfair relationship, and further denied that this constitutes a breach of duty on the part of the defendant."

 

Can anyone shed any light on this for me???

 

Do you think they are trying to say they didn't need one or they did need one but didn't get one????

 

Am I just reading too much into this??? :confused:


“First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win.” - Ghandi

"You must have the resources to deal with the judicial intervention - the confidence not to be overawed, the resilience to respond, the tenacity to challenge, the tact to mollify, the authority to inform and persuade."

 

Strength does not come from winning. Your struggles develop your strengths. When you go through hardships and decide not to surrender, that is strength.

 

<-- If I have helped in any way please click my star!! ;)

Oh and I am a lady!! :)

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

They also have not referred to section 92 at any point!


“First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win.” - Ghandi

"You must have the resources to deal with the judicial intervention - the confidence not to be overawed, the resilience to respond, the tenacity to challenge, the tact to mollify, the authority to inform and persuade."

 

Strength does not come from winning. Your struggles develop your strengths. When you go through hardships and decide not to surrender, that is strength.

 

<-- If I have helped in any way please click my star!! ;)

Oh and I am a lady!! :)

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
They also have not referred to section 92 at any point! (if you were them "would you". not in a million years, they are really trying to brush that under the carpet, "but they have'nt met LiP WANNABE;)

 

i think they have defo taken the pi$$ out of "LiP"

 

wannabe "is coming to get ya"

 

cab


Cab1ne-Lombard-Shoosmiths **Claim Recieved**

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?181761-Cab1ne-Lombard-Shoosmiths-**Claim-Recieved**/page25

Summary Judgement 01/02/2011 **REFUSED** set for trial "May 23rd To June 30th 2011"

DISCONTINUED 3rd MAY 2011 **WON**

 

santander" Responsible Lending!!!!!!!

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?219431-quot-santander-quot-Responsible-Lending!!!!!!!

 

Capquest "V" Cab1ne

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?262962-Capquest-quot-V-quot-Cab1ne

 

"STAYED"

 

CAB "Sittin Tight"

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks cab :)

I need to stop looking at it now, it's all so ridiculous. I just can't imagine that legally trained professionals wouldn't have better arguments than this. I keep thinking I must've missed something or there's some sort of catch somewhere :confused:


“First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win.” - Ghandi

"You must have the resources to deal with the judicial intervention - the confidence not to be overawed, the resilience to respond, the tenacity to challenge, the tact to mollify, the authority to inform and persuade."

 

Strength does not come from winning. Your struggles develop your strengths. When you go through hardships and decide not to surrender, that is strength.

 

<-- If I have helped in any way please click my star!! ;)

Oh and I am a lady!! :)

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    No registered users viewing this page.


  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...