Jump to content

 

BankFodder BankFodder


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • the property is not yours you are not on the deeds you are/were not ever on the mortgage..   stop trying to do their job in scamming you.        
    • Capital assessments are based on the:   amount or value of the asset at the time of the application outcome of checks carried out to protect against fraud As with income assessments the partner's share of the equity is included in these calculations - unless there is contrary interest. Just found the above in the law society website.  So am I screwed.  So confused.   
    • I am bound to say that their alleged contract is probably the weirdest I have seen. Considering it is supposed to be a serious legal contract to set out the conditions under which CEL manage the parking on land that does not belong to them it leaves a lot to be desired.   For a start it does not comply with the BPA Code of Practice which is   7.3 a the definition of the land on which you may operate, so that the boundaries of the land can be clearly defined b any conditions or restrictions on parking control and enforcement operations, including any restrictions on hours of operation c any conditions or restrictions on the types of vehicles that may, or may not, be subject to parking control and enforcement d who has the responsibility for putting up and maintaining signs e the definition of the services provided by each party to the agreement.   So no mention of hours: no mention of types of vehicle restrictions: no mention of who is responsible for the erection and maintenance of signage   and much more serious -no mention that CEL have to comply with the BPA Code of conduct-that one is listed on 7.1.    All it states is that the operator can pursue outstanding PCNs in accordance with the COP but that is not the same as saying that CEL will abide by the CoP which it must say.   Also AFAIK the only entity that can pursue for trespass is the land owner regardless of what this quasi agreement says. There is also no mention of the financial aspect of the arrangement nor how the long it lasts and what notice is required for either side to terminate.     It might be worth writing [not emailing ] to Medburn Estates asking them to confirm if this is the only agreement with CEL and whether they think it right that CEL have not received planning permission for their signs from the Council rendering their signs illegal which is more serious than unlawful and therefore all PCNs issued are worthless and should not have been issued as it is impossible to form a contract with motorists when the signs are illegal.   Also that as CEL are their agents Medburn Estates LTD are responsible for the actions of their agents. You could also ask them to cofirm that the signature on the paper is that of their Director, Anthony Brown and whether their copy has a counter signature of a CEL representative.   Carry on that CEL are taking you to Court and as another Judge has asked a Landowner to appear in front of him to explain their contract, whether it might be in the best interest of Medway to have a serious conversation with CEL to avoid any possible  embarrassments in your  [ie Laluna] Court appearance.   I have not looked much at your WS though it is looking good.   I would have mentioned that as they failed to comply with  Town and Country Planning (Control of Advertisements) (England) Regulations 2007.   that they are in breach of their agreement CoP with BPA to keep to all the legal requirements in running their parking  operations.   It calls into question their right to apply for motorists data from the DVLA.   I would wait for their WS to arrive so that you can pick holes in that too. however watch that if they are late that you send yours off just within the Court guidelines.   What you are tying to do with your WS is to put your side of the case plus put CEL in as bad a light as possible for them to  decide that they don't really want to go to Court after all.
    • UncleB - where you write "This could lead you to facing the Bank in Court..."   1stly -  would that mean now?  by remote hearing?  Or when the courts open after the summer?   2ndly - Does the application for set aside automatically prevent the B hearing going ahead?   3rdly - Will sending in an application to have the B petition set aside mean that I have to disclose an address for service?   I can only give a mailing address   4thly - Could having an early (remote) set aside hearing potentially quicken up the process for the bank if I am obliged to give them a suitable place for service?  At the moment I assume the hearing was adjourned for lack of physical service.   I want/ need to get a set aside.  But don't want to shoot myself in the foot.  
    • Where I have sight of a letter which states the following: "a) the case is removed from scheduled date and time on the court list forthwith    b) the case will be re-listed on the 1st open date after x few months, a date to be advised" Is there any way a hearing would be any earlier than suggested?  Lockdown closed courts but may they open early?    Could the bank ask it to be brought forward even with lockdown still in place officially til end July?    Would that depend on them physically serving a b petition?   Could the 1st open date be any time up to Christmas with such a potential back log of cases?  
  • Our picks

    • View this quiz Employment status during COVID-19
      What do you do if you’ve been told not to come to work due to the current crisis.  Watch the video here or on the Youth Consumer Service Instagram page.

      Did you learn anything? Do the quiz
       
       
      Submitter BankFodder Type One Right Answer Time 5 minutes Total Questions 8 Category The Youth Consumer Service Submitted 15/05/20  
      • 0 replies
    • One Parking Solutions - Damning judgement. Read more at https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/421148-one-parking-solutions-damning-judgement/
        • Thanks
        • Like
      • 63 replies
    • View this quiz Coping with extreme hardship
      Life can be tough when you're entering the world of work and in the present virus crisis, things are even more difficult.

      Watch the video below or go to the Youth Consumer Service Instagram page . Afterwards, you can see if you've understood the points which are being made by taking the quiz.
       
       
      Submitter BankFodder Type One Right Answer Time 5 minutes Total Questions 8 Category The Youth Consumer Service Submitted 15/05/20  
      • 1 reply
    • View this quiz: Pre-pay meters
      An explanation of how some gas and electric companies offer emergency quarantine support.

       
      Watch the video here – or go to the Youth Consumer Service Instagram page and watch it there. Then come back here and do the quiz
       
       
      Submitter BankFodder Type One Right Answer Time 5 minutes Total Questions 6 Category The Youth Consumer Service Submitted 15/05/20  
      • 1 reply
wannabedebtfreesoon

elcome for illegal repo in contravention of section 92 and unfair relationship ** WON **

style="text-align:center;"> Please note that this topic has not had any new posts for the last 2856 days.

If you are trying to post a different story then you should start your own new thread. Posting on this thread is likely to mean that you won't get the help and advice that you need.

If you are trying to post information which is relevant to the story in this thread then please flag it up to the site team and they will allow you to post.

Thank you

Recommended Posts

A whole host of different rules apply when making consumer credit act claims. Obtaining judgement by default is not possible. I do find this a bit odd though as I have seen others win by default when using this procedure. Oh well, so far it seems good to me ;)

They have 14 days to either pay the amount claimed, make an offer or dispute the claim. If they ignore judgement can be entered against them, although it will still be down to the judge I think.


“First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win.” - Ghandi

"You must have the resources to deal with the judicial intervention - the confidence not to be overawed, the resilience to respond, the tenacity to challenge, the tact to mollify, the authority to inform and persuade."

 

Strength does not come from winning. Your struggles develop your strengths. When you go through hardships and decide not to surrender, that is strength.

 

<-- If I have helped in any way please click my star!! ;)

Oh and I am a lady!! :)

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It does sound pretty reliant on the judge but that can only be a good thing with all the info you have submitted :)

So I guess if they ignore its still sort of winning by default just for the judge to decide what they are liable for


I am a consumer just like you, please get a second opinion or investigate yourself on anything I advise as I am in no way legally trained. Everything I know has come from the Mighty CAG and fellow CAGGERS. :cool:

 

If I have helped in any way please click my reputation star and make a donation to CAG to enable us all to continue to help each other :cool:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The bonus here is that they won't be able to get away with it!! The judgement by default means there is never any blame and they don't have to accept any liability. This way, however, a judge will decide and they will have to accept liability if the judgement goes against them ;)

If they ignore they will be liable for further costs on top of the amount I claimed :)

They can still dispute but it'll be up to the judge on the day to decide if they have a valid defence or not.

The fact is that this is an Originating Application that is brought under the authority of a specific Act, so what is there for a judge to decide?? It either breaks the law or it doesn't.


“First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win.” - Ghandi

"You must have the resources to deal with the judicial intervention - the confidence not to be overawed, the resilience to respond, the tenacity to challenge, the tact to mollify, the authority to inform and persuade."

 

Strength does not come from winning. Your struggles develop your strengths. When you go through hardships and decide not to surrender, that is strength.

 

<-- If I have helped in any way please click my star!! ;)

Oh and I am a lady!! :)

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Makes perfect sense to me :)


I am a consumer just like you, please get a second opinion or investigate yourself on anything I advise as I am in no way legally trained. Everything I know has come from the Mighty CAG and fellow CAGGERS. :cool:

 

If I have helped in any way please click my reputation star and make a donation to CAG to enable us all to continue to help each other :cool:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

and they have to have their defence filed within 14 days, even though the hearing isn't for 28 days! It doesn't look good if they file late and expect to rely on it at the hearing.


“First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win.” - Ghandi

"You must have the resources to deal with the judicial intervention - the confidence not to be overawed, the resilience to respond, the tenacity to challenge, the tact to mollify, the authority to inform and persuade."

 

Strength does not come from winning. Your struggles develop your strengths. When you go through hardships and decide not to surrender, that is strength.

 

<-- If I have helped in any way please click my star!! ;)

Oh and I am a lady!! :)

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I hadnt heard of it being done this way (not that that means anything lol) do you think it may be down to the value of the claim its been sent this way?


I am a consumer just like you, please get a second opinion or investigate yourself on anything I advise as I am in no way legally trained. Everything I know has come from the Mighty CAG and fellow CAGGERS. :cool:

 

If I have helped in any way please click my reputation star and make a donation to CAG to enable us all to continue to help each other :cool:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I suppose I'll wait the 14 days then contact the court to see if they've responded. I have no problem going to court, I know my poc inside out and back to front and I relish the opportunity to show and tell my masterpiece :D

 

P.s. Hello Guest ;)


“First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win.” - Ghandi

"You must have the resources to deal with the judicial intervention - the confidence not to be overawed, the resilience to respond, the tenacity to challenge, the tact to mollify, the authority to inform and persuade."

 

Strength does not come from winning. Your struggles develop your strengths. When you go through hardships and decide not to surrender, that is strength.

 

<-- If I have helped in any way please click my star!! ;)

Oh and I am a lady!! :)

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Is this a case they can defend without attending? I know some routes you have to attend and some you dont.

 

So within 28days this could all be sorted for you (best case scenerio)

Edited by beyondhope
typo

I am a consumer just like you, please get a second opinion or investigate yourself on anything I advise as I am in no way legally trained. Everything I know has come from the Mighty CAG and fellow CAGGERS. :cool:

 

If I have helped in any way please click my reputation star and make a donation to CAG to enable us all to continue to help each other :cool:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

PRACTICE DIRECTION 7B – CONSUMER CREDIT ACT 2006 – UNFAIR RELATIONSHIPS - Ministry of Justice

 

I quoted from this in my poc, it's by the ministry of justice so there's no doubt about what's right and what's not!

It tells all about the civil procedure rules for unfair relationships and what sections of the act are covered by it.

 

I'm sure they do have to attend the hearing, it would look very bad if they didn't, in fact I think it counts as admission but don't quote me on that!!

They have a form to fill in and send back within 14 days if they want to dispute the claim but it has to include their defence. The judge can still decide their defence is not valid on the day tho.

 

They have to respond to the claim within 14 days, they can do this by either paying me the amount I've claimed, making an offer or disputing the claim. So best case scenario, I get a cheque for the full amount within 14 days :) Forgive me for not holding my breath tho!!!

 

If they try to dispute and the judge rules against them, well that leaves them open to all sorts of things. I'm sure the press will have a field day with this one!!


“First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win.” - Ghandi

"You must have the resources to deal with the judicial intervention - the confidence not to be overawed, the resilience to respond, the tenacity to challenge, the tact to mollify, the authority to inform and persuade."

 

Strength does not come from winning. Your struggles develop your strengths. When you go through hardships and decide not to surrender, that is strength.

 

<-- If I have helped in any way please click my star!! ;)

Oh and I am a lady!! :)

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

oooo interesting reading thanks for sharing ;)

 

I see it stays where the 'debtor' resides so unlikely t be transferred to notts anyway then :)

 

I would hold ya breath blue is not this season colour :lol:


I am a consumer just like you, please get a second opinion or investigate yourself on anything I advise as I am in no way legally trained. Everything I know has come from the Mighty CAG and fellow CAGGERS. :cool:

 

If I have helped in any way please click my reputation star and make a donation to CAG to enable us all to continue to help each other :cool:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It wouldn't be transferred to Notts anyway. It only gets transferred to the defendant's home court if they are an individual, because they are a company it will stay in your home court :)


“First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win.” - Ghandi

"You must have the resources to deal with the judicial intervention - the confidence not to be overawed, the resilience to respond, the tenacity to challenge, the tact to mollify, the authority to inform and persuade."

 

Strength does not come from winning. Your struggles develop your strengths. When you go through hardships and decide not to surrender, that is strength.

 

<-- If I have helped in any way please click my star!! ;)

Oh and I am a lady!! :)

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

20th is submission day for me unless someone gets an attack of sense and makes me an offer before then :lol: again no holding of breaths please :lol:


I am a consumer just like you, please get a second opinion or investigate yourself on anything I advise as I am in no way legally trained. Everything I know has come from the Mighty CAG and fellow CAGGERS. :cool:

 

If I have helped in any way please click my reputation star and make a donation to CAG to enable us all to continue to help each other :cool:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Good for you! At least you know kind of what you can expect now. I'll keep you informed as I go along :)


“First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win.” - Ghandi

"You must have the resources to deal with the judicial intervention - the confidence not to be overawed, the resilience to respond, the tenacity to challenge, the tact to mollify, the authority to inform and persuade."

 

Strength does not come from winning. Your struggles develop your strengths. When you go through hardships and decide not to surrender, that is strength.

 

<-- If I have helped in any way please click my star!! ;)

Oh and I am a lady!! :)

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello Cab, it's all good thanks. N1 filed on 1st April, (no joke!), I received the notice of issue on 8th April, it'd been served on the 6th and we have a hearing on the 6th May :)

 

They've got until the 22nd I believe to either pay up, make an offer or dispute. I can't win by default, it has to go before a judge, but if they ignore or dispute later than the 14days and then rely on that defence at the hearing it really, really won't look good!

Apparently they don't have to submit a defence but if they do it has to be filed within the 14 days.

 

Personally, I'd love to hear their defence! So far it seems to consist of "we served all the right notices" and "well the police didn't say we couldn't come on to your premises and take it". They'd have to have some significant balls to put that in front of a judge and expect to come away unscathed!!

 

So it's just the waiting game at the minute :)

I don't mind tho, at least the hardest part is over and I've got plenty to keep me busy in the meantime. I'm up with my dog at this ungodly hour, she's been having puppies since 3am! 5 so far :D

 

I'll keep posting as soon as I hear anything from them, (if I hear anything!).


“First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win.” - Ghandi

"You must have the resources to deal with the judicial intervention - the confidence not to be overawed, the resilience to respond, the tenacity to challenge, the tact to mollify, the authority to inform and persuade."

 

Strength does not come from winning. Your struggles develop your strengths. When you go through hardships and decide not to surrender, that is strength.

 

<-- If I have helped in any way please click my star!! ;)

Oh and I am a lady!! :)

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

So im assuming should a defence not appear by next week then they arent defending and its down to the judge whats awarded and why? Id love them to take those reasonings in front of a judge - should they dare please please record the judges reaction :lol:

 

Awwww puppies congrats :lol: xxx


I am a consumer just like you, please get a second opinion or investigate yourself on anything I advise as I am in no way legally trained. Everything I know has come from the Mighty CAG and fellow CAGGERS. :cool:

 

If I have helped in any way please click my reputation star and make a donation to CAG to enable us all to continue to help each other :cool:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I can't win by default because I am using the Consumer Credit Act Procedure and there are set rules that apply-

 

 

"The Consumer Credit Act procedure

 

5.1

 

In the types of claim to which paragraph 3 applies the court will fix a hearing date on the issue of the claim form.

 

5.2

 

The particulars of claim must be served with the claim form.

 

5.3

 

Where a claimant is using the Consumer Credit Act procedure, the defendant to the claim is not required to:

(1) serve an acknowledgement of service, or

 

(2) file a defence, although he may choose to do so.

 

 

5.4

 

Where a defendant intends to defend a claim, his defence should be filed within 14 days of service of the particulars of claim. If the defendant fails to file a defence within this period, but later relies on it, the court may take such a failure into account as a factor when deciding what order to make about costs.

 

5.5

 

Part 12 (default judgement) does not apply where the claimant is using the Consumer Credit Act procedure.

 

5.6

 

Each party must be given at least 28 days’ notice of the hearing date.

 

5.7

 

Where the claimant serves the claim form, he must serve notice of the hearing date at the same time, unless the hearing date is specified in the claim form."


“First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win.” - Ghandi

"You must have the resources to deal with the judicial intervention - the confidence not to be overawed, the resilience to respond, the tenacity to challenge, the tact to mollify, the authority to inform and persuade."

 

Strength does not come from winning. Your struggles develop your strengths. When you go through hardships and decide not to surrender, that is strength.

 

<-- If I have helped in any way please click my star!! ;)

Oh and I am a lady!! :)

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Having looked in to it further, it seems slightly more straightforward than that I think.

Unless I'm mistaken, the judge only needs to make a decision if they dispute the claim and then it'll be a decision based on whether their defence is valid or not.

 

Ultimately, on the day the prominent decision made by the judge will be about what costs to award.

 

But this is only my interpretation of it from the ministry of justice and hm courts websites :-)

 

http://www.hmcourts-service.gov.uk/courtfinder/forms/n1fd_0406.pdf

 

Maybe somebody could offer their opinion please???


“First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win.” - Ghandi

"You must have the resources to deal with the judicial intervention - the confidence not to be overawed, the resilience to respond, the tenacity to challenge, the tact to mollify, the authority to inform and persuade."

 

Strength does not come from winning. Your struggles develop your strengths. When you go through hardships and decide not to surrender, that is strength.

 

<-- If I have helped in any way please click my star!! ;)

Oh and I am a lady!! :)

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

i find this angle very interesting (as i know totally zilch about it).

so if they just totally ignore it, what costs would you achieve out of it.

 

cab


Cab1ne-Lombard-Shoosmiths **Claim Recieved**

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?181761-Cab1ne-Lombard-Shoosmiths-**Claim-Recieved**/page25

Summary Judgement 01/02/2011 **REFUSED** set for trial "May 23rd To June 30th 2011"

DISCONTINUED 3rd MAY 2011 **WON**

 

santander" Responsible Lending!!!!!!!

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?219431-quot-santander-quot-Responsible-Lending!!!!!!!

 

Capquest "V" Cab1ne

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?262962-Capquest-quot-V-quot-Cab1ne

 

"STAYED"

 

CAB "Sittin Tight"

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes I know, I'm still learning every day! I'm still not quite sure why it's happened like this with my case but I've seen it be different with other people's cases. Maybe that they didn't outline their cases as being CCA cases or go for the unfair relationship part of it?? Who knows :confused:

 

This is where I did most of my reading-

PRACTICE DIRECTION 7B – CONSUMER CREDIT ACT 2006 – UNFAIR RELATIONSHIPS - Ministry of Justice


“First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win.” - Ghandi

"You must have the resources to deal with the judicial intervention - the confidence not to be overawed, the resilience to respond, the tenacity to challenge, the tact to mollify, the authority to inform and persuade."

 

Strength does not come from winning. Your struggles develop your strengths. When you go through hardships and decide not to surrender, that is strength.

 

<-- If I have helped in any way please click my star!! ;)

Oh and I am a lady!! :)

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

To be honest I haven't got the foggiest!! I would expect it would be down to the judge to decide and if it gets that far I was sort of planning to go with the flow, not very scientific I know! :)

 

It was this part of the form that made me think it would be the decision of the court-

 

"If you send your defence to the court after the 14 days has

expired, and you want to rely on it at the hearing, the

court may take your failure to file it on time into account

when deciding what order to make in respect of costs."


“First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win.” - Ghandi

"You must have the resources to deal with the judicial intervention - the confidence not to be overawed, the resilience to respond, the tenacity to challenge, the tact to mollify, the authority to inform and persuade."

 

Strength does not come from winning. Your struggles develop your strengths. When you go through hardships and decide not to surrender, that is strength.

 

<-- If I have helped in any way please click my star!! ;)

Oh and I am a lady!! :)

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Also, I really don't think they can afford to totally ignore this. It's not the same as losing by default where there is never any admission of liability. It will go before a judge and there will be a decision made on liability. If the courts decide they were wrong to do what they did, floodgates will open!


“First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win.” - Ghandi

"You must have the resources to deal with the judicial intervention - the confidence not to be overawed, the resilience to respond, the tenacity to challenge, the tact to mollify, the authority to inform and persuade."

 

Strength does not come from winning. Your struggles develop your strengths. When you go through hardships and decide not to surrender, that is strength.

 

<-- If I have helped in any way please click my star!! ;)

Oh and I am a lady!! :)

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

i'll have to do some serious reading on that one, it seems pretty straight forward on the face of it, but when you get down to it, it kind of goes "blah blah blah". maybe a legal bod could put some clarity on it for us (regarding the cost levels).

 

cab


Cab1ne-Lombard-Shoosmiths **Claim Recieved**

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?181761-Cab1ne-Lombard-Shoosmiths-**Claim-Recieved**/page25

Summary Judgement 01/02/2011 **REFUSED** set for trial "May 23rd To June 30th 2011"

DISCONTINUED 3rd MAY 2011 **WON**

 

santander" Responsible Lending!!!!!!!

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?219431-quot-santander-quot-Responsible-Lending!!!!!!!

 

Capquest "V" Cab1ne

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?262962-Capquest-quot-V-quot-Cab1ne

 

"STAYED"

 

CAB "Sittin Tight"

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm not 100% sure I follow!

We all know the law and what they can and can't do but what we can't seem to find is what happens in consequence when they break the law like this. It's not like section 90 where the consequences of breach are stated in the Act itself.

 

This is why I'm going down the unfair relationship route because at least there are set "powers of the court" stated in the 2006 Act.


“First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win.” - Ghandi

"You must have the resources to deal with the judicial intervention - the confidence not to be overawed, the resilience to respond, the tenacity to challenge, the tact to mollify, the authority to inform and persuade."

 

Strength does not come from winning. Your struggles develop your strengths. When you go through hardships and decide not to surrender, that is strength.

 

<-- If I have helped in any way please click my star!! ;)

Oh and I am a lady!! :)

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

"BINGO" now i am getting the jist of things now (my apologies). the 2006 act and unfair relation ships. i am confusing myself with the 1974 act pre april 2007, (reality check). now your planting the seeds of knowledge (much appreciated) "NICE":D

 

cab


Cab1ne-Lombard-Shoosmiths **Claim Recieved**

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?181761-Cab1ne-Lombard-Shoosmiths-**Claim-Recieved**/page25

Summary Judgement 01/02/2011 **REFUSED** set for trial "May 23rd To June 30th 2011"

DISCONTINUED 3rd MAY 2011 **WON**

 

santander" Responsible Lending!!!!!!!

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?219431-quot-santander-quot-Responsible-Lending!!!!!!!

 

Capquest "V" Cab1ne

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?262962-Capquest-quot-V-quot-Cab1ne

 

"STAYED"

 

CAB "Sittin Tight"

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yay! I'm glad it's not me making stuff up! ;) Cos the link I put in post 162 that outlines the CCA procedure is all about unfair relationships and the 2006 Act :)


“First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win.” - Ghandi

"You must have the resources to deal with the judicial intervention - the confidence not to be overawed, the resilience to respond, the tenacity to challenge, the tact to mollify, the authority to inform and persuade."

 

Strength does not come from winning. Your struggles develop your strengths. When you go through hardships and decide not to surrender, that is strength.

 

<-- If I have helped in any way please click my star!! ;)

Oh and I am a lady!! :)

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    No registered users viewing this page.


  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...