Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Well tbh that’s good news and something she can find out for herself.  She has no intention if peace.  I’m going to ask the thread stays open a little longer.   It seems she had not learned that I am just not the one!!!!  plus I have received new medical info from my vet today.   To remain within agreement, I need to generally ask for advice re:  If new medical information for the pup became apparent now- post agreement signing, that added proof a second genetic disease (tested for in those initial tests in the first case but relayed incorrectly to me then ), does it give me grounds for asking a court to unseal the deed so I can pursue this new info….. if she persists in being a pain ? If generally speaking, a first case was a cardiac issue that can be argued as both genetic and congenital until a genetic test is done and then a second absolute genetic only disease was then discovered, is that deemed a new case or grounds for unsealing? Make sense ?   This disease is only ever genetic!!!!  Rather more damning and indisputable proof of genetic disease breeding with no screening yk prevent.   The vet report showing this was uploaded in the original N1 pack.  Somehow rekeyed as normal when I was called with the results.  A vet visit today shows they were not normal and every symptom he has had reported in all reports uploaded from day one are related to the disease. 
    • Hi Roberto, Read some of the other threads here about S Sixes - they all follow the same routine of threats, threats, then nothing. When you do this, you'll see how many have been in exactly the same situation as you are. Keep us updated as necessary .............
    • Nationwide's takeover of Virgin Money is hitting the headlines as thousands of customers protest that they will not get a vote on whether it should happen.View the full article
    • unrelated to the agreement then, could have come from Lowells filing cabinet (who lowells - they dont do that - oh yes they do!! just look at a few lowell paypal EU court claim threads) no name and address for time of take out either which they MUST contain. just like the rest of the agreement then..utter bogroll that proves nothing toward you ... slippery lowells as usual it's only a case management discussion on 26 April 2024 at 10:00am by WebEx. thats good simply refer to the responses you made on your 4a form response only. pleanty of SPC thread here to read before the 26th i suggest you read at least one a day. dx  
    • I think you have the supremacy of contract as it allows you to park in designated areas. I would argue that there being parking enforcement there clearly means its to be used as parking and as such you can use it under your lease. Only need to worry if they ever follow through with a letter of claim and a claimform though
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
        • Like
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
        • Like
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Help needed with letter to Welcome Please!!


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5211 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hello all, please I'm begging for some assistance I've reached a standstill and I desperately need to get this sorted for the sake of my sanity!!

 

I want to get Welcome off my back once and for all, the thing is they have screwed up so many times I just don't know how to correctly word everything into a letter that will get some results.

 

I've had advice previously and reserached things substantially so I know what I want to say just can't seem to find the words!!

 

OK I'll just list all the issues and if anyone could articulate them for me I'd be extensively grateful!

 

 

  1. I took out first HP agreement for car finance in june 2006, this agreement was flawed and also involved mis selling of ppi
  2. financial hardship agreed in may 2007 to which their response was to put me further in debt by lending me more money! Irresponsible lending??
  3. Second agreement taken out in May 2007 as a modification to original, this agreement unenforceable also. PPI not included on this one but no rebate given
  4. Welcome refusing PPI refund as they state it was the broker who dealt with it so they are not responsible
  5. On receipt of SAR discovered evidence of secret comission paid regarding first agreement
  6. SAR found to be incomplete as no statement of any payments made from first taking out agreement until rewrite
  7. wrote to welcome asking for remainder of sar but they ignored me
  8. attempted reposession on several occasions
  9. NO Default issued
  10. NO termination notice issued
  11. credit file is still showing as x months in arrears, NO default registered, updated monthly by welcome
  12. 72 month agreement stated as 73 months on credit file
  13. balance due on statement different from balance due on credit file
  14. I have evidence from the recovery agent in the from of a letter stating that all statutory notices under sec 87 of cca had been served but they have not!
  15. Letter states that account has been terminated but credit file shows it as active and they are still processing my data

This has been going on for a year now and they never call or write, won't take court action but carry on trying to reposses my car.

 

I must have enough evidence to be able to get them off my back once and for all one way or another??

 

I would be extremely grateful for any help to get a letter drafted or anything else. I just can't cope any longer with the constant fear that one day my car might disappear. It is parked on my drive so I know they can't legally take it, but since when did the law apply to Welcome??

 

The last recovery agent said he would come and take the car off the drive with or without keys as he was a county court bailiff and trespass laws don't apply to him!! These are the kind of people Welcome employ to do their dirty work.

 

Please help.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 58
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

This company really is unbelievable.... I keep saying in my posts they should go to trial for crimes against humanity lol....

 

Have you paid more than a third off your loan and is it possible for you to post a copy of your agreement on this thread minus any personnel details using photo bucket etc . . .

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

well they certainly cant take it without the correct default notices and if you have paid over 1/3 of the agreed payments then they will also need a court order.

 

get your agreement on here and any correspondence from welcome (delete personal details, account numbers and vehicle details) but leave the figures in.

 

the more info the guys on here see, the easier it is to help you.

 

 

Have you reclaimed the PPI yet?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello and thank you for your replies!

I tried reclaiming the ppi but they just kept passing the buck and then stopped answering my letters. I was going to go through the fsa but I know it is a lengthy process and I haven't heard of anyone actually getting their money back even when the fsa do rule in their favour! I will take this as far as it needs go but if primarily I can achieve a situation where the balance is written off and my credit file amended I will be satisfied enough.

 

I have posted my agreements on here before in previous threads so I know they are nonsense, even more so now with the clarification that the acceptance fee as a charge for credit is a no no. This is the reason I was so keen to get my statements from the first agreement so I could see where they'd magicked the figures from for the 2nd agreement, needless to say they won't supply anything.

 

It is a difficult one about whether I've paid a third or not. According to Welcome I haven't paid a third, (that was their defense for attempting repossesion), but according to the outstanding balance on my credit file I have paid over a third. I'm not sure now though how relevant this is considering they have terminated the agreement.

 

I have looked into dodgy DNs and their implications and it seems that if a company terminate an agreement without a valid DN they are not entitled to collect any outstanding amount. Even if they try to re issue a valid DN they cannot issue notices on a terminated agreement without first reinstating the agreement, but they would need the customer to agree to that first which is seriously unlikely to happen!!!

I would hope that NO default would count equally as a dodgy default and the same rules would apply??

 

They are already in breach of section 87 of the Act by not serving the correct notices in the first place.

 

I have also read elsewhere on CAG that the account can be considered terminated if I have any correspondance from the company stating that the account has been terminated. I do have this! Even though it looks like the account is still active.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well the PPI issue if definitely worth chasing up even if it takes months.

 

Hopefully Post and a few others will pop by and give you some better advice and point you in the right direction to take.

 

you seem fairly clued up, but are you willing to fight it through?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well the PPI issue if definitely worth chasing up even if it takes months.

 

Hopefully Post and a few others will pop by and give you some better advice and point you in the right direction to take.

 

you seem fairly clued up, but are you willing to fight it through?

 

I have absolutely no qualm with fighting them lol! We all know what they can and can't do according to the law, the problem I have is how to stop them continuing to do the things they can't do!

 

I understand my rights and where I stand I just need some help to take it further, this is where I am stuck :(

Link to post
Share on other sites

You're a gem thanks! There is another letter but I can't get my scanner to work so I'll prob just write it out; it basically says they are introducing their agent who has been instructed to collect the vehicle and all statutory notices have been served.

 

I really need to know where to go with this from here, if anyone can help me construct a letter or something I'd be really grateful.

Link to post
Share on other sites

At the bottom of the letter it says 'We are the legal owners of the above vehicle and all statutory notices have been served under Section 87 (1) of the Consumer Credit Act 1974'

 

I have letters to prove they did not serve a default before they state they terminated the agreement. I know this means they can't collect any outstanding balance or repossess the car but how do I tell them that??!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Send the **** a copy of those letters with a big fat "losers" from all of us at cag stamped across the top.

 

they have ballsed up and they prob dont know it, so take great joy from pointing it out to them and then enjoy watching them try to squirm out of it.

 

but hold fire till Post or someone else catches on your thread. Unfortunately I know bugger all about the legal side, but I like to wind em up if I can.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Put this On The Legal Issues Forum!!!:cool:

 

The Police Are NOT there To Side With Them!!! They Have Acted IMHO Unlawfully Themselves.

 

They Obviously Didn`t Know What They Should Do in The Situation, And they Acted Incorrectly By Allowing Them to Take The Car Like That.

 

They Attended To Stop A Breach Of The Peace. They Should have Removed the Person Who Was Trespassing!!!

 

There Will Be Lot`s Of Help On The Legal Issues Area.:mad:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Mark, I was near exploding point myself!

I just couldn't believe they were letting this happen!

 

The officer was a total p***k! I am going to make a complaint about him personally anyway, his attitude was terrible; he began by arriving and immediately having a laugh and joke with the recovery driver then came to my door and asked me why I was causing so many problems!

 

I told him they had not followed the correct procedure as in issuing the correct notices and they were not legally allowed to remove the vehicle from my property without a court order and my permission, he just said "yes they can"!

 

He refused to listen to anything I had to say or look at any of my evidence and just kept saying "I don't care" and "I'm not interested"! I told him I knew my rights and I knew the laws and he said that he knew his job and it was legal!!

 

He even threatened to arrest me for theft because I wouldn't give the keys over!

 

Luckily my partner filmed the whole thing and got him on tape saying that he was happy to allow this to happen.

 

The driver said he'd spoken to welcome and if I paid my arrears I could keep the car! How exactly am I supposed to pay arrears on a terminated account??

 

I've made a complaint to the FOS and now I'm on the war path. There is no way I'm going to let them get away with this, I'm going after welcome, the police officer and the recovery agents. I'm not going to let them do this to anyone else! I want blood!!!

 

I got some paperwork off the driver, one is the usual crap letter about them being the legal owners and serving all the statutory notices, the other is more interesting it's got my details, the car details and a section about welcome's termination details i.e. date of NOD and date of termination which funnily enough are blank!

 

They left without the log book and keys, after I'd deadlocked it of course. As soon as he moved the car the alarm went off and so it continued all the way down the road!

 

If I don't succeed in getting my car returned I'm seriously considering attending the auction and buying it myself for a snip!

 

I'll post on the legal forum just now, thanks for your support I'll keep you posted!

Link to post
Share on other sites

What a Farce! LOL. Obviously the Officer (P***K) Doesn`t Know A Lot About His Job:rolleyes: He Needs The Error Of His Ways Pointing Out To Him, By The Cheif Constable After You Make your Complaint.

 

You Say This Was Filmed? That Is Brilliant!!! LOL. See If Your Local TV Is Interested In Showing It??? :lol:

 

What Chance Do People Have Of Standing Up For Their Rights When Even the Ones Who Should Know The Rules Don`t???:eek:

 

Have You Looked at the Legal Issues Site Yet? This Will Point You In The Direction of How To State Your Complaint About The Police And Their Actions In The Proper Way. Which is What Needs To Be Done!!!:mad:

 

I Will Do Some More Research My Self Into All Of This! Any Help I Can Give You Just Ask.

 

Winds Me UP!!!:mad:

 

Cheers, MARK

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Mark, Just for a laugh I decided to give them ring! The ill informed man on the phone informed me that even though my agreement is terminated it is still active! I gave him the chance to bring my car back but he made the wrong choice lol!

 

He said the car had gone to auction now but I could still have it back if I paid the outstanding balance! Apparently a DN had been sent on the 16th of July. I asked him for a copy of it and advised him that I had made a complaint to the FOS and would now be commencing legal action, he had no explanation as to why it hadn't been registered on my credit file.

 

He also said a termination notice was sent on the 4th of August, now I do have a letter dated 4th of August but it has Without Prejudice written at the top of it, surely that can't be it?? Without Prejudice??! Nonsense!

 

I have posted on the Legal Issues forum but as yet no replies:(

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...