Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Good Evening, I've got a fairly simple question but I'll provide some context incase needed. I've pursued a company that has operations in england despite them having no official office anywhere. I've managed to find a site they operate from and the papers there have been defended so I know they operate there. They've filed a defence which is honestly the worst defence ever, and despite being required to provide their witness evidence, they have not and have completely ignored the courts and my request for copies of it. I'm therefore considering applying to strike out their defence on the grounds the defence was rubbish and that they haven't provided any evidence for the trial. However, it has a trial date set for end of june, and a civil application wouldn't get heard until a week before then, so hardly worth it. However, my local court is very good at dealing with paper applications (i.e ones that don't need hearings, and frankly I think they are literally like 1-2 days from when you submit it to when a Judge sees it. I'm wondering if I can apply to strikeout a defence without a hearing OR whether a hearing is required for a strikeout application.   Thanks
    • I have just opened another bank acc with lloyds (i have a few already) After doing some research they may have some relation to tsb or be apart of the same group will this cause me issue if my salary is paid into my lloyds account? Also, if the debts do go into default and nothing is paid then after 6 years it all goes away? As the DCAs cannot do anything? I do want to start paying in like 3/4 months or do you advise I leave it if it goes into default? again sorry for all the questions, i am just processing everything
    • one reply only  follow post 2 of letter of claim <<clickme link. dx
    • Sorry, I got confused  Yes, it states all three   Thanks, 
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
        • Like
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
        • Like
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

TV LICENSING left me flabbergasted :(


loopinlouie
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4989 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

No I am not imagining it IQOR are contracted by the bbc to administor payment plans for licenses. Doesnt that mean the debt industry considering the pressure put on people getting license to give phone number under conflict of interest.

 

So a dca has the chance of the phone number to every address in uk, lovely, wonder if they pass the information around?:eek:

 

Lets see how long till calls start, Ive just been persuaded before realised to give number for call back as they admit origianal information was wrong and put me under unecessary pressure, what do they expect with a dca taking the call.

 

Explains hash of information told by them, they are foremost a dca not the bbc.:wink:

 

Goodness these people get our bank and card details day in day out.

Edited by loopinlouie
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 62
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

tv license and IQOR - The Consumer Forums

 

20 posts - 6 authors - Last post: 12 May

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/.../255525-tv-license-iqor.html - CachediQor Recovery Services Ltd - Please can you HELP!!!‎ - 20 posts - 9 Mar 2010

Ebay and IQOR advice required!!‎ - 4 posts - 9 Oct 2009

Iqor Recovery Services‎ - 17 posts - 19 Aug

Have a happy and prosperous 2013 by avoiiding Payday loans. If you are sent a private message directing you for advice or support with your issues to another website,this is your choice.Before you decide,consider the users here who have already offered help and support.

Advice offered by Martin3030 is not supported by any legal training or qualification.Members are advised to use the services of fully insured legal professionals when needed.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Application / Licence Details

 

 

 

Licence Number:0124079

Licence Status:Current

 

Current Applicant / Licensee:

 

Business NameCompany Registration Number IQOR Limited1613010

 

Categories:

 

Consumer credit Consumer hire Credit brokerage Credit reference agency Debt adjusting/counselling Debt collecting

 

Right To Canvass Off Trade Premises:Yes

 

 

Trading Name(s) (Current):

 

IQOR Iqor Ltd Legal & Trade Financial Services

 

Issued Date: 28-May-1982

Expiry Date: 13-Oct-2012

 

 

Legal Formation:

 

Body Corporate (incorporated inside UK)

 

Current Individuals that run the organisation:

 

NamePosition Gregory Edwards Harmer John Norman Ricketts Mark Jules Levy William James Wilson

 

Historic Individuals that run the organisation:

 

NamePosition Anselm Gaetano BassanoOFFICER Geoffrey Philip OgnallOFFICER Mr Aron GoldbergOFFICER Mr David JeremyOFFICER Mr Ikene Malkah CohneOFFICER Mr John Paul MackinOFFICER Mr Kenneth Lewis WatersOFFICER Mr Mark Monash GoldbergOFFICER Mr Raymond PageOFFICER Mr Robert Mossman ScottOFFICER Mr William BellOFFICER Ms Catherine Stevens GibsonOFFICER Ms Judith BergerOFFICER Ms Linda Beatrice SteenOFFICER Ms Sharon Esta OgnallOFFICER Nicholas PetriniOFFICER Norman Brian EnglenderOFFICER Norman Le Jean Merritt JrOFFICER Paul Anslow Paul AnslowOFFICER Paul Michael NugentOFFICER Richard Guy Thomas StenhouseOFFICER Richard SchultzOFFICER Stephen EisensteinOFFICER Stephen John TudgeOFFICER William James WilsonOFFICER William KaneOFFICER

 

Nature of Business:

 

Other

 

Current Address(es):

 

Address TypeAddress Correspondencec/o WJ Wilson, 33/34, Winckley Square, PRESTON, Lancashire, PR1 3EL, United Kingdom Principal Place Of Businessc/o WJ Wilson, 33/34, Winckley Square, PRESTON, Lancashire, PR1 3EL, United Kingdom Registered Officec/o WJ WIlson, 33-34, Winckley Road, PRESTON, PR1 8EL, United Kingdom

Have a happy and prosperous 2013 by avoiiding Payday loans. If you are sent a private message directing you for advice or support with your issues to another website,this is your choice.Before you decide,consider the users here who have already offered help and support.

Advice offered by Martin3030 is not supported by any legal training or qualification.Members are advised to use the services of fully insured legal professionals when needed.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

TV licences cover from whatever date you purchase until the end of the 11th month - pretty much like Vehicle Excise Discs. It often takes them around 3-6 months to arrange a home enquiry visit, unless they happen to be doing your area at the time. You are buying your licence from and being services by Capita, a well-known outsourcing supplier, so staff turnover is quite high, and you can be told porkies simply because the person you are speaking to hasn;t a clue and is making it up as they go along.

 

If you have no equipment able to view/recieve live broadcasts, then there is little point renwing your licence. Let it lapse. If you need to purchase a replacement later, take out a FRESH one, and to stop it being backdated (or being accused of same) slightly modify your name, to that of the missus, your partner or your pet. My dog has been named on my licence for the last 8 years.

 

Since it is the ADDRESS that is reghistered for viewing purposes, the person named on the licence has no requirement to be the main viewer, or indeed wiew any of the content, it just gives them someone to threaten should the need arise.

 

My dog isn't easily intimidated. :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks buzby I will use my dog to reknew when/if get the tv. They said they would ring back tonight, no call.

 

My main concern is the behaviour of dcas well we dont need to say is questionable to get their cut, it explains why they have told so much bull **** to me, they cant be trusted.

 

I dont think the bbc should use a dca to collect monies, I serioulsy think that behind close doors they have put each household at risk of calls etc and information being passed on, I have no proof of course, but what would you guess.

 

Even as a less side line it would help them decide what debts they would buy as apposed to ignore, by having the phone number on their systems.

 

I think for peace of mind it reknewing will buy full license at post office, untill then nor buy tv, son glued to xbox enough as it is and well dvds can be bought cheap enough 3-4 quid now. Kids have old analogue portables with no analogue link or cable so they should be okay as they play dvds.

 

Imagine how I shreaked when he said IQOR:D YIKES

Edited by loopinlouie
Link to post
Share on other sites

Wonder how the post office will react if tell them my name is mrs anita goforadump and straight faced have that on my licence, cant wait for any poss calls for me cos can then let them know my new assumed name xxxxxxxxx:D

 

On my license if buyone so gotta be true xx

 

If any sales calls come for said person I know who sold the number he he he

Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't think the Post Office handle licences any more. You can certainly hand over cash to a Paypoiint, give your Address and Postcode, and when they ask for a name say the licence holder is Sparkles McGoo (or whatever). It really doesn't matter, ONLY the address for the licence mist be where youu view.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Told today tvlicensing deals with the payments not IQOR even though they are in the same building. Was told the phone system must be in error transfering callers to wrong dept. Apparantly IQOR do chase the accounts in arrears for tvlicensing and in diff dept.

 

Right then who is telco.

 

Sorry if suspicious but I imagine a large office with different corners with people just wearing diferent hats. Say one corner is short of staff another pitches in and thats how I think they cant answer the phone with the right company name:lol:

 

Reminds me of dca and solicitors sat at the same desk with different addresses:lol::lol::lol::lol::lol:

 

Told they removed my number from system, told them I had concerns that a dca had the possibiity of phoing every household in the uk with a license that is and he just said uuuhhmmm.

 

Well now going to go six months without replacing tv and see how we do, if the kids are frothing at the mouth by xmas I will buy a tv then and licence when need it.

 

Did hear something odd in background of my call today, a woman talking to customer and talking about a white van with yellow markings could be seen outside her house soon. Wondered what this could mean and wondered wether they were infering a magical tv van was going to appear if she didnt pay hers, dont know of course, but why would a member of this company tell a caller to then look for a white van with yellow markings appearing outside her house soon in put down speak, makes you think. Maybe the debt collectors are threatening a call for her belongings, wouldnt put it past a dca.

 

The man accidently told me he was IQOR, and telco, dont think he was supposed to do that:lol::lol::lol::lol::lol:

 

 

If anyone knows are the tvl supposed vans white and yellow, not that bothers me but interesting to know if people are getting intimidated by tvlicensing.xx

Link to post
Share on other sites

It is a CALL centre - visit one sometime! The operator only has a PC monitor and a headset, they can canswer calls for ANY of the clients the CS deal with, the monitor witching to the correct enquiry database based on the inbound calling number. The call you overheard could easily have been overspill from AA Breakdown. TVL no longer use detector vans, they are now in museums or scrapped.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks buzby, yep I realise that. Thing is he was the one keen to stick to the idea of different companies in different parts of building. I realised they are all plumped into one:D

 

Probably the next assistant is trying to squeeze a bill payment out of an old woman or threaten to stamp on her cat. Anotherwords its took a longtime to for me miss stupid to realise it, but I have been gullible for a long time.

 

Thing is the tvlicensing get so much money I think it should only be run by the bbc, no external agencies, then proper information rather than pay us or youll die young, will likely appear.

 

But hey know I am in la la land now and going on so off I go, hey cant watch the telly tubbies now, cry xxxxx :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks buszy, yep I realise that. Thing is he was the one keen to stick to the idea of different companies in different parts of building. I realised they are all plumped into one:D

 

Probably the next assistant is trying to squeeze a bill payment out of an old woman or threaten to stamp on her cat. Anotherwords its took a longtime to for me miss stupid to realise it, but I have been gullible for a long time.

 

Thing is the tvlicensing get so much money I think it should only be run by the bbc, no external agencies, then proper information rather than pay us or youll die young, will likely appear.

 

But hey know I am in la la land now and going on so off I go, hey cant watch the telly tubbies now, cry xxxxx :)

 

 

 

 

 

 

Could get a black and white telly, if they still sell em that is..

Link to post
Share on other sites

Rang them to make payment and they went through security, fair enough. Untill:shock:

 

Asked me for my mobile phone number, fair enough you think, I just need to remind them they dont have my mobile number and I dont give it out.

 

To get told but they need it. What for I reply, you may need it, but I wont give it. To which he gets hoyty toyty and goes into, well are you making a payment then, duh duh I think, isnt that why I rang and decide to put the phone down.

 

Rang back to ask why when a customer does say no I dont want to give my number,it is my right to say no, are we treat as an awkward pain in the bott, to be told, we have to ask it, they want us to get as many numbers as possible.

 

So I said please put a note on my file not to harass me for my mobile number when I ring, cant do that I am told. So told them to cancel payment card and that I will reknew license in full end of may.:-x

 

Then I get thinking, do I really need a tv license, can I manage without it and I talk to my kids and we decided yes we are happier with radio, games console etc iplayer.....

 

I would much prefer putting the money away for the license and saving it maybe.:D

 

 

So I remind myself of previous statement, we have to get as many numbers as possible, yep because the are DEBT COLLECTORS. I succered into finally giving it never got the calls back, so they just wanted my number, havnt proved me otherwise, they probably sell them on to other dca's.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The aim of CS staff (ANY CS staff) is to populate empty fields, DoB, Mobile Phone, Mothers maiden name, etc on the pretext that they have more than enough identifiers should they wish to make you leap through 'security' at some later stage. A great tip is to find a range of numbers that is now no longer allocated (defunct VOIP geographic landline, old Cellnet/Vodafone codes and numbers 07860 and 07860 and check that they don't work. Jot these down and use these if required to provide info - it keeps the call short, and actually provides no additional contact routes, yet does provide useful secutiy, especially if you noted the number and can reprovide it if asked. I do the same with a DoB too....

  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

The aim of CS staff (ANY CS staff) is to populate empty fields, DoB, Mobile Phone, Mothers maiden name, etc on the pretext that they have more than enough identifiers should they wish to make you leap through 'security' at some later stage. A great tip is to find a range of numbers that is now no longer allocated (defunct VOIP geographic landline, old Cellnet/Vodafone codes and numbers 07860 and 07860 and check that they don't work. Jot these down and use these if required to provide info - it keeps the call short, and actually provides no additional contact routes, yet does provide useful secutiy, especially if you noted the number and can reprovide it if asked. I do the same with a DoB too....

 

Your a clever one buzby, I never thought of that:D Good idea:)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Already covered. The licence is to have 'installed' equipment capable of recieving these broadcasts. It is evidence that the 'crime' can be committed - the viewer then has to explain to the judge that they don;t. If they are believed, then there's no problem. However, nobody needs to be 'watching' for a successful prosecution. By removing or not having a viable tuner/reciever, there is no issue and any chance of a successful prosecution can be avoided.

Link to post
Share on other sites

people get prosecuted through their own naievity surrounding the myth of the powers of TVL. You DON'T have to give them your name, you DON'T have to answer the door to them, you DON'T have to tell them whether or not you have a tv, you DON'T have to sign ANYTHING and you certainly DON'T have to let them in your property. FOI to follow

Link to post
Share on other sites

Isn't everyone prosecuted through their own naivety? The easiest way in not to have have any equipment capable of recieving, and this stops them dead, whether they (a) have your name (b) answer the door © see you have a TV or (d) sign anything.

 

Please don't post the complete Freedom of Information Act. It isn't relevant or appropriate, the Communications Act 2000 is the source of law.

Link to post
Share on other sites

why don't you want to me to post the FOI, scared people will recieve the correct info in black and white from the holier-than-thou BBC themselves?

anyone wanting any FOI stuff PM me, theres literally hundreds available.....if you know where to look!

Link to post
Share on other sites

The FOI, as you well know is the publics way to find out information that is not generally made public, especially by the BBC. I have the full visiting procedures document that the TVL goons have to adhere to and it clearly states that if they are told to leave the property they have to. i suspect you know all about this dont you, as you seem to know so much

Link to post
Share on other sites

If you are referring to TVL's 'Operating Proceedures' then whilst they may have been disclosed to an enquirer under the FoI, it has nothing else to do with it. Most of the requests to TVL under the FoI can be viewed online, go to WhatDoTheyKnow.com and do a search.

 

I think that's pretty public, wouldn't you agree?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Know what I really think, the tvlicense are worried about how many people dont want to watch them anymore.

 

How can they keep wasting millions on party and dos and art if we arnt paying:)

 

You are now thinking along the right path.

Keep it up.:D:D:D:D:D:D:D:D:D:D:D:D:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

If you are referring to TVL's 'Operating Proceedures' then whilst they may have been disclosed to an enquirer under the FoI, it has nothing else to do with it. Most of the requests to TVL under the FoI can be viewed online, go to WhatDoTheyKnow.com and do a search.

 

I think that's pretty public, wouldn't you agree?

 

It has everything to do with it. It tells the TVL staff that if they are requested to leave a property they must do so.

Is that why the BBC removed most of them? Fortunately there are savvy folks out there on the web who downloaded them before they were removed.

And folks, check out You-Tube, there are some real funnies on there of TVL staff getting what they deserve.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...