Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • FINAL UPDATE.  I have not posted as the defence were reading the thread.  An agreement was reached on the day of the hearing.   I am unable to go into detail but for those in this position the forum has been priceless support and advice so thank you all in the site team.   for those going through this, follow the process, ignore intimidating tactics and threats and get to the Judge.  They are very supporting of those self representing.   I note her name has gone from the heading of the thread.  Was this them ?  Thanks again.  
    • I'm not sure what the "appeal" system asked but he said he definitely didn't indicate he was the driver so I'm just going to have to take his word for it. Honestly, I don't think the hirer will contact them. I think my brother will tolerate it. I did have a similar experience with another company 6-7 years ago and sought advice on here then to which you guys told me to ignore, I got the exact same DRP letters and then a "Gladstones Solicitor" letter.  After that nothing happened and it died away. Based on my experience with that I assumed the same would happen here but only asked to see if perhaps anything had changed since then.    Hopefully it doesn't get to court but if it did, I feel like we have enough evidence to sway a judge who probably hates dealing with this type of nonsense anyway. Or maybe I'm too optimistic. 
    • Your attachment showing the cinema parking restrictions seems crystal clear. Let's see what the photos turn up.
    • Meter certification periods re given in The Meters (Certification) Regulations 1998, Schedule 4. From there you can check if they are correct about your specific meter .. https://www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/1998/1566/schedule/4 If they're telling porkies then you have e clear grounds to tell them to take  hike. If they're correct or if you haven't been able to confirm then you have  few options. You could just keep fobbing them off. In general Octopus can't keep up with demand for smart meters. It took 9 months to get our. So they may not push too hard. Or ask if you can install your own choice of meter. The Electricity Act 1989 cover this in Schedule 7 (2) and (2A) https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1989/29/schedule/7 Or fight the them and their enforcement. Or go off supply.
    • We received a copy of the completed Directions Questionnaire (N181) from the solicitors along with a draft copy of their directions. I am on a course today so can upload over the weekend if needed. By 4pm on 16th May both parties must each give standard disclosure of documents by way of list by category. By 4pm on 30th May any request for inspection or copies of docs must be made and compiled 14 days thereafter. I will provide more over the weekend.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Fraud with Orange


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5203 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I'm in a dispute with Orange at the moment, which has been going on for 10 months. I've sent three letters and got no reply at all!

 

Basically my 'friend' ran up a bill in my name and changed my home address to her house, telephone number, password and security questions. She then added a second handset when they blocked the first one for her not paying the bills and continued running up a bill on the new one. Orange didn't contact me for permission (even though they're claiming I'm still the account holder and am liable). Because my home address has been changed if they had sent me letters I wasn't getting them.

 

Since then it has been referred to a debt collection agency and the total now stands at £1470, from the original £450. This girl used to work at Orange so knows the system inside out. I don't know what to do about this, I've requested a System Access Request so hopefully the recorded phone calls to them will prove it wasn't me adding that handset and changing the address.

 

Is there anything else I can do, anything I'm missing? If anyone has been in this situation please let me know how it was resolved, I really don't think it's fair I have to pay this.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Regarding the first handset. How did your friend change the account address? Had she been granted third party access by you with her own password or did she call customer services posing as you? If the latter did she know your password?

 

If she didn't have her own third party access and didn't know your password then a verbal security check would have been completed. If the questions (such as date of birth etc) had been answered correctly and the agent was satisfied he/she was speaking to you then the caller would be granted access and asked to set up a new password.

 

If you have compromised your account's security by divulging your password then you're unlikely to have the funds written off unless they take pity on you. If, however, it can be established that your friend posed as you then it should be refunded as this is essentially a failure of Orange's security procedures and a breach of the Data Protection Act. This is the best line to follow.

 

Regarding the second handset. Was this bought directly from Orange via their website or by phone, or through a third party dealer? If a third party dealer was it at a store or over the phone? If bought in a store rather than by phone/mail order then the buyer must provide proofs of identity at point of sale. Did your friend have these (such as a utility bill, driving licence etc)?

 

If this issue is already under investigation then it should not have been referred to an external debt collection agency. It sounds like the complaint isn't being taken too seriously.

 

Please answer the above questions and I may be able to assist further.

 

Once you're armed with all relevant information I would suggest the following steps:

 

1. Escalate the issue as high as you can go to the Executive Office. The Orange escalation procedure works as follows - CSR > Team Leader/CSM > Ops Manager > Executive Office. You have to be escalated to one level of seniority at a time. If you're not satisfied with the response from one level ask to escalate again until you get to the Exec Office. I would expect the issue to be resolved before it is necessary to escalate to Exec Office. Another route to the Executive Office which avoids the escalation procedure is to lodge the complaint with Ofcom. They in turn will provide you with a reference number and forward it to Orange's Exec Office for resolution. Mobile providers are targeted under Ofcom rules and this will ensure your complaint is taken seriously.

 

2. Insist they immediately call off the external debt collection agency.

 

3. At some point it may be suggested they "meet you halfway" and offer to refund half of the charges. If this is purely a failure of Orange's security procedures, or out and out fraud, then it should all be refunded. You are not at fault and are not liable. If, however, you have compromised your account's security (see above) then this would be a fair outcome as Orange are under no obligation to refund any of it.

 

4. Once resolved you need the debt history removed from your credit file. This must be done by submitting a written request to Orange's Credit Referrals department. They will provide you with the address. Ensure they notepad your account confirming your are not liable for the charges.

 

Hope this helps.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Wow, that's a great reply thank you. They're definitely not taking it seriously, they're taking their time getting anything resolved so more charges get added on. I'll make sure to involve Ofcom, is there anything specific I can say to Orange about Ofcom? I was going to go to Watchdog too, because no company likes bad publicity.

 

In answer to your questions - I transferred the account into her name, or so I was told by the Orange operator, and she was paying the bills. I was told the second handset was apparently added by 'credit referral'? I'm not sure what this means; I don't understand how she could've possibly used my credit with Orange as a backing to add another handset if she wasn't pretending to be me - which is surely fraudulent activity?

 

They say I confirmed the addition of a second handset using credit referral too, but I definitely did not allow it. I had no idea it had happened until they rang telling me the amount she had got the bill to. If this was the case then she must've pretended to be me when she called to add the handset - I never gave her my password, but she used to work for Orange so is it possible she knew the system and knew how to get round 'forgetting' a password and the questions? The only other option is that she knew the person on the other end of the phone from being a colleague and they just did it for her...

 

I have the e-mail address of the executive office for Orange and have requested a System Access Request to get all information and notes on my account, so I can take this to a solicitor and hopefully get somewhere.

 

The account's security was definitely compromised and it's Orange's fault for allowing a third party (as they're claiming she was) to add a handset without the account holder's permission. If they somehow do have evidence that I gave permission it certainly didn't come from me, which is fraud. I don't see how they can still be claiming I'm liable! I think they just want anyone to pay it, however they get the money.

Link to post
Share on other sites

It sounds like the account is still in your name as you're being held liable for the charges for both handsets, but it's possible it was eventually transferred to her name and you're being held personally liable for charges prior to the transfer. Or she may have been paying the bills but the account remained in your name.

 

Regarding Credit Referrals - when an application is made for a new or additional handset it is sometimes referred to this department for review. They will conduct a more indepth credit check and sometimes call the account holder on a verified number (usually the existing mobile or a 118-verified landline number) to check the application is genuine. If the account was still in your name, and they called the first mobile number, then they would have assumed they were speaking to you, so this was probably how she got away with it. Again, a failure of Orange procedure.

 

You're wasting your time contacting Watchdog or even threatening to do so. It won't have any effect. They've heard it all before.

 

You really need a more detailed breakdown of what's happened. If it was transferred to her name find out when. I know how the system works but it's difficult to piece this one together without all the relevant information.

 

The upshot is:

 

- If she accessed your account posing as you it is fraud and you shouldn't be liable for the second handset.

- If the costs were incurred while the handsets were in her name you are not liable.

- If she had access to your account to change the address she can also pose as you when applying for a second handset and when she spoke to Credit Referrals.

 

Orange may have the opinion that, regardless of your friend unlawfully accessing your account, you still allowed the use of the first handset when the account was in your name, therefore you should be liable. Please update when you have more information. Good luck.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...