Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Thats because this claim has not been allocated as yet hence the above hearing *Case Management " to determine the directions (N157 Notice of allocation) which will follow after this hearing. You are not requested to submit a statement but have all the details with you (claim form defence CPR CCA etc etc)   Andy
    • Our price is the same all day, but varies day to day. Yes there's a risk of high prices but it has never gone above SVR any time since I signed up. Last 30 days average 17.67p/kWh, max 20.67 and lowest was 11.83.  It saved just under £300 during 2023.  
    • It you had E7 in the past but have converted to single rate then the meter will still hold the last recorded Night readings. This introduces scope for error when manually reading. If the meter has only ever been used on single rate then there's only one figure that can be taken. For example ours shows "Rate 1" reading and a "Total import" reading, but they both give the sme figure. If it has ever been on E7 the total will be higher, including the retained night reading.
    • okay, perfect and thank you so much for the help once again. so firstly i am going to initiate the breathing space, during this time it's likely ill receive a default. when i receive the default are you aware of how long it will take for me to know whether the OC have sold it off to DCAs? Once it's with the DCAs i do not need to worry as they cannot issue a CCJ only the OCs can Even if i decide to come an arrangement with the DCAs no point as the default will remain for 6 years paid or not paid I should only consider repayment if the OC still won the debt and then issue a CCJ? Just to confirm the default will not be seen after 6 years? No one can tell I had one then after 6 years ill be all good?
    • I'm not sure we were on standard tariffs - I've uploaded as many proofs as I can for the ombudsman - ovo called last night uping the compensation to 100 from 50 pounds for the slip in customer service however they won't acknowledge the the problem them not acknowledging a fault has caused nor are they willing to remedy anything as they won't accept the meter or formula was wrong.   I'd appreciate more details on the economy 7 approach and I'll update the ombudsman with any information you can share. 
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Cap One 2005 28 Days Default Notice Or 7???


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5227 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi,

 

Back in 2005 The consumer credit act stated that a minimum 7 days notice had to be given for a default - I'm aware that this has now changed to 14 days. However the Banking Code section 13.7, Lending code section 7.5 and the ICO guidelines 33-34 all state that lenders are to give 28 days notice of the intention to file a default.

 

Capital One's terms and conditions state that "Subject to sending to a default notice , we may close your account and demand immediate payment of the outstanding balance. We will give you one months notice to put right any remediable breach"

 

Capital One is a member of the Banking Code and their default notice back in 2005 only gave 20 days before they actually filed a default with the Credit Reference agencies. So have they broken contract?

 

Or does this 28days just apply to a letter they can send and not actually the formal default notice?

 

I have asked for a copy of the default notice but they have been unable to supply that to me and instead sent a print out of a computer screen showing what date this default notice was sent?

 

Any advice?

 

Thanks :|

Link to post
Share on other sites

Rollocks

 

They Have To Have A Copy On File To Enforce

 

Computer Screen Shots Mean Nothing

 

Money Laundering Regs

 

Six Years From The Account Is Terminated Data Is To Be Held

 

Capone Fracked Up Again

 

O Dear

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for the reply....I have already complained to Crap One but the are not budging. After many letters I am now thinking of taking them to court - Im just worried that the 28 days means any type of notice and not the formal default notice? Also another bonus is the first few letters from CRap One gave conflicting dates regarding the default notice - so I can inc that they did not store my personal data correctly?

 

thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

They Were Brought In Two Years Ago I Believe

 

All Financial Tranactions Have To Be Kept On File For A Period Of Six Years. If An Account Is Active, It Goes Six Years From When The Account Is Closed, Not Its Conception.

 

Variouse Creditors Tried This Under The Stat Of Limitations But As Its Financial, Not A Chance

 

All Info Ref A Credit Account Comes Under This Legislation

 

If They Have Confirmed No Default Notice Then they Cant Enforce The Agreement:D:D

 

IVE HAS TWO ACCOUNTS WRITTEN OFF ON THAT SCORE

Link to post
Share on other sites

thanks postggj,

 

The other thing is that as no money is owed on the account ~(account satisfied ) then apparently they do no need to send a copy of the default notice - which i think is correct. :sad:They have sent copies of all the transactions. I am trying to clear the default to get a better mortgage deal.

 

As the money laudering regs were bought in 2 years ago they wont apply back to 2005?:sad:

 

Help?

 

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...