Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Ok this is weird. I have had an email from icl to make a claim on any loans that I have taken out due to irresponsible lending and yet the7 have sold it on. What should I do?
    • Thanks for the welcome Andyorch   dx100uk - I have had 2 previous addresses since coming back to the UK.   Does this mean I should not ignore?   
    • I would be inclined to rip their WS apart. That way, I doubt that VCS would wish to proceed to Court.  In paragraph 5 VCS claim they have full compliance with their Code of Practice for Private Enforcement and Private Land. Really? Can this be the same VCS that was issuing PCNs between 2013 and 2017 knowing that the signage there had not been agreed by Liverpool council and therefore the signage was illegal. Here is an open letter from the Parking Prank   Tuesday, 19 November 2013 An open letter to Simon Renshaw Smith of VCS parking regarding Liverpool John Lennon Airport   19/11/2013 Dear Mr Renshaw Smith,   I wish to draw your attention to the procedural impropriety in your operational activities on the approach roads within Liverpool John Lennon Airport.   You are actively operating under contract to issue civil penalty tickets (PCN’s) for traffic offences on the roads such as stopping at the roadside, whether for seconds, minutes or even longer, or for parking on the roadside verges.   You are doing so based on an allegation of contractual agreement for a breach of parking conditions and are actively sending out a notice to keeper in each case where you ask for the name and address of the driver. You are doing this under the provisions of the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012.   As you are no doubt aware, due to your many years of experience in emptying people’s wallets, where land is governed by byelaws the remedy for any breach of conditions of those byelaws is through the criminal courts, such as a magistrates.   Not only that, since the byelaws set an amount of penalty for failure to comply with them; a further amount based on your own assessment is unlawful at best and perhaps even fraudulent.   A set of the byelaws for the Liverpool Airport have now been obtained from a reliable source, Liverpool City Council,  which sets out the airport’s stance on roadway use, or misuse. It also lays down a penalty upon summary conviction for a breach of the byelaws of £5 for the 1st offence and a further amount of 40 shillings for a continued daily breach.   I put it to you that these byelaws govern the airport’s penalty regime for the alleged contraventions you are enforcing. In fact there is no penalty for stopping at the roadside. There is no offence committed so there can be no penalty unless it can be proven in a magistrate’s court that this action amounted to a failure under para 14: “Driving or placing a vehicle carelessly or dangerously or without due consideration for persons using the airport”   Para 18 gives notice that a “failure by the driver of a vehicle to comply with any direction for the regulation of traffic given by a constable or any person acting on behalf of the council or a traffic sign” will be subject to the penalty regime of the aforementioned £5 plus 40 shillings per day afterwards.   The mention of the traffic signs and the council's part in the overall monitoring means that the signs must be compliant to the TSRGD which are those shown for the public highways; not the ones arbitrarily stuck at the roadside by yourself which are meaningless in the context of the legal status of the byelaws.   Furthermore, POFA 2012 3(1)(c) states that Schedule 4 only applies on land on which the parking of a vehicle is not subject to a statutory control. It further states (3)For the purposes of sub-paragraph (1)(c) the parking of a vehicle on land is “subject to statutory control” if any statutory provision imposes a liability (whether criminal or civil, and whether in the form of a fee or charge or a penalty of any kind) in respect of the parking on that land of vehicles generally or of vehicles of a description that includes the vehicle in question.   The byelaws state at para 2.19 that the following act is prohibited. The penalty for this is a fine not exceeding five pounds.   POFA 2012 therefore does not apply, and you may therefore only pursue the driver and not the registered keeper. Moreover, you may only pursue them for the sum of five pounds.   Knowingly pursuing the registered keeper when POFA 2012 is an offence which the DVLA take extremely seriously and may ban you from access. The BPA wrote to you in their electronic newsletter this month reiterating this.   I put it to you, Mr Renshaw Smith, that your company is operating unlawfully at the Liverpool Airport site and ask what you intend to do since this has now been brought to your notice.   May I remind you that since this is an unlawful operation, you may well be required at some later time to recompense the amounts of the PCN’s already paid by drivers, and perhaps face tough questions in a court of law, not just a civil court.           Happy Stopping Briefly At the Roadside   The Parking Prankster   The Prankster would like to thank his source for the above   I am sure that you will find other examples of VCS not complying with Code of Conduct or the Law.   And of course VCS do not have the ability to take you to Court because you were a trespasser and only the land owner can take a trespasser to Court.          
    • Yes ...you have it confirmed by the court above that they requested a copy of the Order/Consent on the 2/08/2019....and then requested judgment on 21/08/2019 .
    • blimey J&P   I wonder how many more solicitor firms UAE creditors will try and use as a cheaper alternative to IRDWW and their cohorts that appear to have cost them £1000's in fees for nothing in return.   if this is not a letter of claim  pers i'd ignore them unless you have previous UK addresses since coming to the UK?
  • Our picks

teaboy2

Its Not The End Of The Road For Reclaiming Bank Charges Just Yet

style="text-align:center;"> Please note that this topic has not had any new posts for the last 3590 days.

If you are trying to post a different story then you should start your own new thread. Posting on this thread is likely to mean that you won't get the help and advice that you need.

If you are trying to post information which is relevant to the story in this thread then please flag it up to the site team and they will allow you to post.

Thank you

Recommended Posts

Having read the post by Bankfodder regarding the Oft decision to dicontinue with legal proceedings in regards to Bank Charges. I feel its only right to let you all know that its is not quite the end just yet, infact its still possible for you to make a new reclaim based on a new legal argument that has been put forward, which the OFT feel is more beneficial for us to take the bank on individually. Read the article in the link provided below.

 

Bank charges: they think it's all over, it's not quite - MoneySavingExpert News

 

Although alot of you may already be aware of this i am sure their is just as many that are not yet aware of this, and since i have not found any mention to this yet i felt it was only right to make a post about it.

 

Bankfodder i did try to send you a private message but your inbox was full.


Please note that this advice is given informally, without liability and without prejudice. Always seek the advice of an insured qualified professional. All my legal and nonlegal knowledge comes from either here (CAG),my own personal research and experience and/or as the result of necessity as an Employer and Businessman.

 

By using my advice in any form, you agreed to waive all rights to hold myself or any persons representing myself of any liability.

 

If you PM me, make sure to include a link to your thread as I don't give out advice in private. All PMs that are sent in missuse (including but not limited to phinishing, spam) of the PM application and/or PMs that are threatening or abusive will be reported to the Site Team and if necessary to the police and/or relevant Authority.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Having read the post by Bankfodder regarding the Oft decision to dicontinue with legal proceedings in regards to Bank Charges. I feel its only right to let you all know that its is not quite the end just yet, infact its still possible for you to make a new reclaim based on a new legal argument that has been put forward, which the OFT feel is more beneficial for us to take the bank on individually. Read the article in the link provided below.

 

Bank charges: they think it's all over, it's not quite - MoneySavingExpert News

 

Although alot of you may already be aware of this i am sure their is just as many that are not yet aware of this, and since i have not found any mention to this yet i felt it was only right to make a post about it.

 

Bankfodder i did try to send you a private message but your inbox was full.

 

I think its time to realise that its the money men who rule this country and the banking system is just their 'tool' - They (the financial system) can cripple country's and then get bailed out by the £billions while every other industry suffers, remember the majority of the influencial MP's are part of the financial system (or gain from it) and now the 'consumers champion' has left the consumers high and dry because it would cost too much - funny because i thought the OFT was government funded, but, as previously said government are the MP's and its run by the money men.

 

This situations just game to them - Yes they paid out millions in the begining to tempt us, but with all the interest on the fee's they now have from those who waited must be 100 times what they paid out, Martin Lewis and the other campainers have just been pawns in that game with the (unknown) objective of rallying the cannon fodder/troops.

 

What ever 'legal' arguments there are supposed to be, 'they' will win because 'they' set the rules - Face up to it, we've all been played for mugs by the financial institutions, the money men and the corrupt government (no particular party - but all in general), unfortunately no-one will want to admit to that though.

Edited by jingles2020

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    No registered users viewing this page.


  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...