Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Thank-you dx for your feedback. That is the reason I posted my opinion, because I am trying to learn more and this is one of the ways to learn, by posting my opinions and if I am incorrect then being advised of the reasons I am incorrect. I am not sure if you have educated me on the points in my post that would be incorrect. However, you are correct on one point, I shall refrain from posting on any other thread other than my own going forward and if you think my post here is unhelpful, misleading or in any other way inappropriate, then please do feel obliged to delete it but educate me on the reason why. To help my learning process, it would be helpful to know what I got wrong other than it goes against established advice considering the outcome of a recent court case on this topic that seemed to suggest it was dismissed due to an appeal not being made at the first stage. Thank-you.   EDIT:  Just to be clear, I am not intending to go against established advice by suggesting that appeals should ALWAYS be made, just my thoughts on the particular case of paying for parking and entering an incorrect VRN. Should this ever happen to me, I will make an appeal at the first stage to avoid any problems that may occur at a later stage. Although, any individual in a similar position should decide for themselves what they think is an appropriate course of action. Also, I continue to be grateful for any advice you give on my own particular case.  
    • you can have your humble opinion.... You are very new to all this private parking speculative invoice game you have very quickly taken it upon yourself to be all over this forum, now to the extent of moving away from your initial thread with your own issue that you knew little about handling to littering the forum and posting on numerous established and existing threads, where advice has already been given or a conclusion has already resulted, with your theories conclusions and observations which of course are very welcomed. BUT... in some instances, like this one...you dont quite match the advice that the forum and it's members have gathered over a very long consensual period given in a tried and trusted consistent mannered thoughtful approach. one could even call it forum hi-jacking and that is becoming somewhat worrying . dx
    • Yeah, sorry, that's what I meant .... I said DCBL because I was reading a few threads about them discontinuing claims and getting spanked in court! Meant  YOU  Highview !!!  🖕 The more I read this forum and the more I engage with it's incredible users, the more I learn and the more my knowledge expands. If my case gets to court, the Judge will dismiss it after I utter my first sentence, and you DCBL and Highview don't even know why .... OMG! .... So excited to get to court!
    • Yep, I read that and thought about trying to find out what the consideration and grace period is at Riverside but not sure I can. I know they say "You must tell us the specific consideration/grace period at a site if our compliance team or our agents ask what it is"  but I doubt they would disclose it to the public, maybe I should have asked in my CPR 31.14 letter? Yes, I think I can get rid of 5 minutes. I am also going to include a point about BPA CoP: 13.2 The reference to a consideration period in 13.1 shall not apply where a parking event takes place. I think that is Deception .... They giveth with one hand and taketh away with the other! One other point to note, the more I read, the more I study, the more proficient I feel I am becoming in this area. Make no mistake DBCL if you are reading this, when I win in court, if I have the grounds to make any claims against you, such as breach of GDPR, I shall be doing so.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Cancelled GAP Insurance


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5213 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi

 

I'm hoping this will be a simple query.

 

Five weeks ago I purchased a new Fiat Bravo for £12,000. At the dealership I signed up for GAP insurance. The GAP insurance cot £499.

 

The car and GAP insurance was financed by HP agreement with FIAT Finance.

 

Car Cost £12,000 + £4000 interest over the term of five years

GAP Cost £499 + £279 interest over the term of five years.

 

The GAP insurance policy was with a company seperate to FIAT finance; it was just paid for with the HP agreement.

 

Now, the GAP policy contained a 14 day cooling off period in which I could cancel. Looking on the Internet I sound discovered I had been ripped off for GAP insurance. I can get the same level cover and a more comprehensive policy for £114.

 

So, I wrote recorded delivery to the GAP insurance and cancelled the policy (within the 14 days). I clearly stated I wanted them to advise the HP company that paid them. The GAP insurance company wrote back stating they had cancelled the policy and I was due a refund.

 

I have just received a cheque for £499 from my local Fiat dealer as way of refund for the GAP insurance. This is not good. The HP finance agreement will still charge me £279 interest for the GAP insurance I have just been refunded on.

 

Can they get away with this? Effectively, I'm being charged credit on a GAP policy I don't have. I don't understand why the dealer sent me just £499. My contract was not with them surely. They just acted as agents for the finance company and the GAP insurance policy.

 

Cheers Al

Edited by upnorthal
Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes, they can get away with it if you let them.

 

They have taken the easy way out, what you should do is go back to the garage and arrange a new finance agreement WITHOUT the GAP.

 

It's more hassle for them, new docs required so they will tell you otherwise, and may suggest that you bank the £499 and let the interest you arn on it offset the interest you get charged (yes I know it won't but they will hope you don't spot that).

 

You will need to be firm and tell them that you are demanding a new agreement because the insurance is now declined, and you wil need to send that cheque (or the money) back to whoever sent you it.

 

Mossy

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks.

 

I bet the garage get apaid a decent chunk of that interest up front from the finance company, hence their cheque for the net value , excluding interest.

 

I'm going to write to the finance company and put them on notice that the insurance is cancelled and that I want confirmation they are ammending the agreement.

 

I don't see what the garage has to do with the finance company. The contract names me and FIAT Fianance, not the dealership.

 

I thought the spirit of Section 75 protection was that you don't end up paying for something on credit that you don't have / or goods that are faulty etc.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't see what the garage has to do with the finance company. The contract names me and FIAT Fianance, not the dealership.

 

 

The garage is the agent for the finance company. You didn't deal direct with them, and also a new proposal now needs to be submitted because the amount has been changed, this also needs doing via the garage.

 

And finally, the credit agreement must be signed on trade premises.

 

Mossy

Link to post
Share on other sites

The garage is the agent for the finance company. You didn't deal direct with them, and also a new proposal now needs to be submitted because the amount has been changed, this also needs doing via the garage.

 

And finally, the credit agreement must be signed on trade premises.

 

Mossy

 

The garage is not named in the HPA contract. Agent they may be, but not according to the agreement - therefore I don't recognise them as party to the contract.

 

I've written to the HPA company advising them they are joinly liable as per s75 Consumer Credit Act. I've enclosed a copy of the confirmation of cancellation for GAP insurance (for which they are joinly liable as the HPA finances this).

 

If they want me to deal with the garage as their authorised agents, then they can put it in writing to me.

 

As it stands, I'm paying interest on a service I don't have. It is my understanding that a basic, fundamental tenant of s75 Consumer Credit Act is that no consumer should be in the position of paying for goods or services they have not received / or are not of satisfactory quality.

 

I will see what they come back with.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello Upnorthal.

 

I can see what Mossycat means about the garage being an agent. This isn't quite my field, although insurance and assurance were. If I sold you a policy with Aviva, say, I don't think I would appear on the policy, but I would have been the agent and claimed the commission on the sale.

Illegitimi non carborundum

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Surely the agreement comes under the debtor/creditor/supplier agreement part of the CCA. The motor trader/broker being the supplier of the goods. In this case the goods supplied are now different to those stated in the agreement so the agreement should be null and void and a new agreement made.

PUTTING IT IN WRITING & KEEPING COPIES IS A MUST FOR SUCCESS

Link to post
Share on other sites

Surely the agreement comes under the debtor/creditor/supplier agreement part of the CCA. The motor trader/broker being the supplier of the goods. In this case the goods supplied are now different to those stated in the agreement so the agreement should be null and void and a new agreement made.

 

Exactly!

 

And the place to do that is the garage

 

Mossy

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

thanks guys. Lets see what they come back with.

 

I can't believe I was so stupid to agree to a £400 Gap policy at the showroom. I've found one online with higher cover levels for £140.

 

 

Cheers

 

Al

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi upnorthal. I really wouldn't beat yourself up too much over this. I suspect you might have been swept along by the euphoria of buying a new car [hope I got that right] and the salesperson made the most of it to persuade you their GAP insurance would be a good idea. I guess they weren't obliged to tell you if the policy was competitive or not.

 

I've done it myself in the past over extended guarantees, for instance and now leave them alone. I don't mean to hijack your thread here.

 

You might have been able to cancel the GAP insurance within the 'cooling off' period, but I'm out of touch with all this, so don't take my word for it.

 

You have learned a valuable lesson though, and hopefully next time you will be a bit more wary.

Illegitimi non carborundum

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

You might have been able to cancel the GAP insurance within the 'cooling off' period, but I'm out of touch with all this, so don't take my word for it.

 

You have learned a valuable lesson though, and hopefully next time you will be a bit more wary.

 

No problem. :) I was kind of 'sucked in' when I was in the showroom getting my new car. I managed to cancel the policy in time and I have a written letter saying it is cancelled. The issue is the Policy was £499 (I don't have the letter in front of me) and interest another near £200.

 

They have sent me a cheque for £499, but the full amount including £200 interest is still on my finance policy.

 

I guess they thought I would just forget about the interest!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...