Jump to content

 

BankFodder BankFodder


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Why don't a few of you join a relevant Trade Union and ask them for help about present/future conduct of this employer ?  It has to be more than one person that joins a Union, before the employers have to recognise the Unions role in representing workers at your place of work.   Normally if you join a Union, they won't offer legal help in regard to issues before you joined them or for a short after you joined them, but they might be able to offer some assistance.   Given what you say about their conduct, I would strongly recommend contacting a Union for details of how to organise for yourself and colleagues to become members.    
    • Hi,   it’s entirely up to the boss if they use furlough or not; but there’s no harm volunteering, and if you are ok with 80% and no top up, that’s good to say also. They can choose who stays and who is furloughed, yes.   Anonymous phone call to HSE is usually how I’d handle a safety risk where the employer is a bit tricky; risk assessment if they’re decent. But I imagine HSE are a bit busy right now.
    • Hello and welcome to CAG.   Here's a link to ACAS that should answer your contract questions. If you look around their site, you should find information about some of your other questions.   https://www.acas.org.uk/employment-contracts   I expect people will be along later with more answers.   Best, HB
    • I have added their poc in your above post for clarity.   you need to address para 3.    bump point 3 forward down 1 number and add in:   3. Paragraph 3 is denied as I am unaware of any legal assignment or Notice of Assignment allegedly served in yyyy by either the claimant or the original creditor .    if mcol is still flaky ….   MCOL is only one way of responding to a claim.  . If you are having problems logging in, or would prefer not to use MCOL,  you can fax, email or post your response to the Court instead.  If you send your response by e mail  please send it to ccbcaq@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk and ensure you quote “Claim defence response” and quote the claim number in the subject field.  . neither by email nor MCOL do you need to inc I confirm that the above facts and statements are true to the best of my knowledge and recollection.
    • you should have done the pictures weeks ago not leave it till 1 min before you need to file a defence. you've been here +6yrs and have numerous court threads and numerous private parking ticket threads  but somehow always seem to screw up one way or anther..   if you look on google earth street view you can see the cameras and the entrance/exit layout which matches the photos from that link I gave you and your upload which I've now redacted properly now .   POC   1.Claim for monies outstanding from the Defendant in relation to a parking charge (reference 00000000) issued on 10/10/2019.   2.The signage clearly displayed throughout KFC (Walkden Manchester) states that this is private land, managed by ParkingEye Ltd, and that it is subject to terms and conditions, including a max stay period, by which those who park agree to be bound (the contract).    3.ParkingEye’s ANPR system captured vehicle 000000 entering and leaving the site on 07/10/2019, and overstaying the max stay period.   4.Pursuant to Sch 4 of the Protection of Freedom Act 2012, notice has been given to the Parking Charge payable upon breach.   5.As no response was received, an alternative service address was obtained and further correspondence issued (CPR 6.9(3)).   defence:   1. i am the registered keeper of the car Reg No. xxxxxx mentioned in the claimants claim.   2. the defendant denies that any monies are due to the claimant because there was no breach of contract to create a cause for action.   3. The claimants Accredited Trade Association, the BPA has a MINIMUM grace period of 10 minutes to allow the necessary consideration of the offer of conditions to park and other actions before any contractual condition can be applied.   4.The defendant denies exceeding any free parking time in addition to said grace period as neither the land owner who may have employed the claimant to manage parking with a current paid for contract covering the date of the overstay nor the claimant have any legal authority to vary any free parking period granted by the relevant council upon issuing the original planning consent for the entire walkden retail park.    needs firming up people...   you can file by email if MCOL is playing up still though from research today 99'9% of all PPC claimforms are being postponed for many months by all courts now,      
  • Our picks

F_DCAs

ATOS thread

style="text-align:center;"> Please note that this topic has not had any new posts for the last 2499 days.

If you are trying to post a different story then you should start your own new thread. Posting on this thread is likely to mean that you won't get the help and advice that you need.

If you are trying to post information which is relevant to the story in this thread then please flag it up to the site team and they will allow you to post.

Thank you

Recommended Posts

I had an assessment through ATOS (for ESA) a few weeks ago.

 

Expecting the worst, having already had a first assessment a couple of years before, and being rejected due to a pack of lies, I audio-recorded the whole thing this time around.

 

Now, I have evidence (the device I recorded it on also saves the time and date the recording was taken) that their report is inaccurate and misrepresentational.

 

I'd encourage anyone attending an ATOS assessment to do this (same way that collection agency/bailiff calls should always be recorded). ATOS simply cannot be trusted, and seem to lie incessantly on an even grander scale than bailiffs or debt collectors.

 

I also believe that the government is entirely aware of what ATOS is doing, and is letting it continue. Still, they did lie us into a war, so I'm not surprised they'd persecute the sick and then lie about that as well.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hear hear, I agree. As soon to be transfered from single parent status to incapacity benefit I expect to have one of these interviews in new year and will also record it.

 

Just one plus I have been anxious about travelling to it as the atos offices were over 30 miles away and cant go out on own, so taxi was going to have to be yes, but found out they have opened up base in my town, thank god.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Recording the assessment sounds a great idea. Did you tell them you were recording it?

 

Having had an ATOS assessment myself, I would also recommend not to go alone, if someone you trust will come with you.


Illegitimi non carborundum

 

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

No, I didn't tell them. I don't have to. ATOS will give you some lying, fob-off excuse if you told them what you were doing.

 

ATOS now has a reputation for lying, and I think if everyone called in for an assessment did record them, they'd have no credibility to do what they're doing.

 

I record any and every dealing I have with banks, DCAs, companies or otherwise. Being lied to becomes tiring after a while.

Edited by F_DCAs

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'd very highly recommend that the assessment is audio-recorded also (dictaphone or mobile in the shirt pocket). I went for an ATOS test a few months ago, and wasn't surprised to find out that they lied completely in their report back to the DWP.

 

5 or 6 NHS professionals - all of whom I have seen more than six times over a piece - were of the opinion that I should not be working.

 

ATOS had other ideas - their doctor (I wasn't even sure he WAS a doctor), who I never saw before, and spent no more than 20 minutes with, seems to be of the contrary opinion.

 

Strange that the DWP would take his less-than-credible word over 5 or 6 doctors, including two specialists - what are the chances of that?

 

(edit)

Edited by ErikaPNP
please refer to section 3.12 of the forum rules

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I audio-recorded my ATOS interview, and strongly recommend anyone else does the same.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

Strange that the DWP would take his less-than-credible word over 5 or 6 doctors, including two specialists - what are the chances of that?

 

 

 

True, especially when you look at the qualifications and experience of the doctors who typically work there. Put it this way, and with total sympathy for your situation Natalie, just be glad they aren't actually treating anyone.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I know this might not help short term but i would advise as many people as possible to write and complain to atos about their hcps.Try and get your mp involved because the only way atos will be stopped is if enough people complain and take their complaints as far as possible then the government will eventually sit up and take notice.Mp,s wont like having to work for their money so make sure they are involved.

This is happening all over the uk and i dont believe for a minute that its by chance that so many people are getting declined for benefits after visiting an hcp employed by atos.

I think it is time for people to start to fight back , contact everybody you think might help your case ,automaticaly complain against the dr that done your medical get your mp involved.

I get so angry when i read sites like this , that atos seems to have the governments blessing to do this and get away with it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

So, we are to assume that the government doesn't trust NHS professionals. Not if it takes the word of one guy with questionable qualifications over the word of 5 NHS staff, including two specialists.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Agree with that. It's happening on a wider scale than the public are generally aware of.

 

TBH - I hate this government with a passion, and one of the main reasons why is for the sanctimonious, patronising 'It's for the common good' manner it always displays whenever it puts the boot into a group of people - usually those who find it diificult to fight back.

 

They don't play fair, so why should we? Hence the idea of audio-recording to catch them out.

 

I also read that ATOS were prosecuted in America for the same thing. Nice that the government has chosen such a fine, upstanding company to do its dirty work.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Further to what was said before, I believe the government are practicing human rights violation and victimisation by the backdoor on a grand scale in using ATOS.

 

Though we've had a few local newspaper articles regarding ATOS, nothing's been said nationally and the government have not been called out on it to explain this. The issue certainly deserves wider attention than it currently has.

 

As has been said before, I'd be very worried if the shady ATOS doctors were looking after my health - especially when no-one has any clue of what medical credibility they have. Moreso when the DWP and ATOS are less than willing to explain themselves, or what kind of contract they have in place.

 

When you have terminal cancer cases being kicked off the sick, purely for political expediency or profits in the coffers of an evasive private conglomerate, it's not just unfeeling cost-cutting - it's pure evil.

 

And it's worse still in that the people who this system was supposed to root out, are left alone.

Edited by F_DCAs

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Iam fighting my own case against atos just now.

My case against their hcp is rock solid so it will be interesting to see what their reply is.

In-between my fight against them i have found information that might force them to change the way they do the medicals but i dont want to say too much too soon (its possibly a legal issue).

When i get the reply from them i will let you know how i got on. I am actually interested to see if they will still back their doctor so as soon as i find out i will let you all know.The one good thing to come out of this is that i am actually training to become a volunteer in an advice centre.If i can help one other person to fight atos/dwp then it will be worth it

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Ideally, I'd prefer it if it went back to the old DWP appraisal system, whereby the word of one doctor was enough. Now, I've found that it's completely irrelevant no matter how many doctors or specialists are involved, and that's an absolutely scandalous state of affairs.

 

By using ATOS to do what the DWP should be doing, the government is also acknowledging that it has mismanaged the DWP (as well as the NHS) to the point where it doesn't trust the DWP either.

 

And if the government trusts both the NHS or DWP so little, then why have the NHS or DWP around at all - if the word of a shady (and at best elusive and secretive!) private conglomerate triumphs over all?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

There are far too many member's threads being hijacked in regard to ATOS. Whilst the benefit of others' experiences/opinions can be beneficial, it can also be detrimental, particularly where people are already worried about their upcoming assessments. For this reason, this new thread has been created from some merging other posts to discuss ATOS, as an issue seperately.

 

Please bear in mind that we all have our own experiences and opinions, and although this can be a highly charged issue, we have to be mindful of what we post in an open forum. Please ensure the site rules are read before posting.

 

There is also a petition which some of you may be interested in.


My advice is based on my opinion, my experience and my education. I do not profess to be an expert in any given field. If requested, I will provide a link where possible to relevant legislation or guidance, so that advice provided can be confirmed and I do encourage others to follow those links for their own peace of mind. Sometimes my advice is not what people necesserily want to hear, but I will advise on facts as I know them - although it may not be what a person wants to hear it helps to know where you stand. Advice on the internet should never be a substitute for advice from your own legal professional with full knowledge of your individual case.

 

 

Please do not seek, offer or produce advice on a consumer issue via private message; it is against

forum rules to advise via private message, therefore pm's requesting private advice will not receive a response.

(exceptions for prior authorisation)

 

 

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Agreed. Sorry about that - just I had an ATOS assessment (as previously stated), which I'm very sore about, and think that the matter does deserve attention. No harm meant to anyone on these boards, and I apologise if any has been caused by this.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It's no problem. Easy to get carried away when you have a bad experience with a company - and you naturally want to warn people. Whilst it is absolutely fine to discuss our own experiences, it's not fair to other posters when their threads are taken over by this. This always happens with ATOS threads, which makes one thing clear:

 

ATOS needs it's own thread, where the issues which go along with it can be discussed and experiences shared, without detracting from the OP in other threads.


My advice is based on my opinion, my experience and my education. I do not profess to be an expert in any given field. If requested, I will provide a link where possible to relevant legislation or guidance, so that advice provided can be confirmed and I do encourage others to follow those links for their own peace of mind. Sometimes my advice is not what people necesserily want to hear, but I will advise on facts as I know them - although it may not be what a person wants to hear it helps to know where you stand. Advice on the internet should never be a substitute for advice from your own legal professional with full knowledge of your individual case.

 

 

Please do not seek, offer or produce advice on a consumer issue via private message; it is against

forum rules to advise via private message, therefore pm's requesting private advice will not receive a response.

(exceptions for prior authorisation)

 

 

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I know of a chap who told them beforehand he had 28" biceps yet when he attended their blood pressure cuff thing would not go around his arm. They are no more than quacks. He has been awaiting an MRI scan for 9 months as they dont have machine his shoulders will fit in now this ultimate humiliation. He remains haviong fits/blackouts and the 'medical assessment' was nothing of the sort and served no helpful purpose beyond no doubt the DWP hoping to starve him out. He cannot drive HGV's as he is having the fits....

Edited by ErikaPNP
please refer to section 3.12 of the forum rules

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Is this the atos thread ?

If it is could anybody show me how i can find the information about atos being fined in America.

Thanks

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

ATOS just part of problem. Update from 21st December - ATOS info had apparently not been received so DWP mandatory interview lot placed him in work focused interview group. They arranged a taxi which arrived 30 minutes early today. Chap could not get in as he was too big taxi firm left him at roadside in cold. Over 45 minutes later mandatory interview lot on partners phone quizing her as to him whereabouts. On going outside she found him collapsed on the grass. He had been lying there all that time. No further taxi had called. A strong complaint to mandatory interview lot revealed he should have been placed in support group as unfit to work yet 27 days later the info had seemingly not been passed on. Article 3 of human rights act clearly states "No one shall be subjected to torture or degrading treatment or punishment". It is hard to see what more he could have done to assist matters and this has hardly helped him get better.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

hello all,

have just been through the mill with this atos medical and then tribunal rubbish, as my condition has worsened since the last medical which i failed? passed? i dunno? i'm in a position where i have to make another claim for exactly the same benefit (ESA) which i was claiming a year ago before some doctor claimed (amongst other things) that i suffered from giggleing as a side effect of the medication? i know! strange! without explaining my personal problems too much you can guess what other rubbish they put!

i went to a tribunal, i was tough, and when i got there they claimed the doctor didn't say half the things he wrote down on the report, and didn't believe that what i told the doctor was definately not what he put in his report!

SO WHAT I'M PLANNING THIS TIME IS TAKING MY MP3 PLAYER IN AND MAKING A RECORDING OF THE MEDICAL

as i understand it is illegal to record someone without their knowledge? i am planning on making this fact very clear to them, i put it on the form, and i'm going to make them sign a written statement that they have no problems with me using the recording as further later evidence.

ANYBODY TRIED ANYTHING LIKE THIS BEFORE?

and anybody got any idea of what kind of reaction i should get off them!

 

i remember clearly the doctor pointing out that it wasn't upto them the outcome of the medical, it was the computer system, when you been to a tribunal it makes you think about a law degree and why you was honest?

never give up!

ad

Edited by ErikaPNP
please adhere to the forum rules

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Pesonally, I would just go ahead and record without telling them.

 

What are they going to do?

 

Fine you? Because of ATOS, your income's just been seriously impeded.

 

Or jail you? The prisons are full up already.

 

ATOS don't play fair - as you've found out - so why should anyone who has to deal with them?

Edited by F_DCAs

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

From threads on the employment forum, I don't think recording the meeting is a problem. Employment tribunals have accepted transcripts of meetings, when they were made by the appellant.


Illegitimi non carborundum

 

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

My wife had to go for a medical the other day.

When we arrived we were told that there was a 40 min delay,i told the receptionist that i dad parked the car in a parking bay for two hours and going by the delay i would end up getting a ticket, she told me i could go out and put extra money in the meter but i told her no and if she wanted us to stay then she could give me the money , she then said she could re-arrange the medical but i told her we wouldnt be comeing back,she went and spoke to her supervisor who then said we would get the medical on time (and we did)

When we went into the medical i asked the hcp if she was a qualified dr and she said no she was a nurse, i then asked her what her qualifications were and she explained she was trained by atos.

I then told her i would be taking notes and querying any of the questions she asked my wife.

She let for about 15 mins and came back with a note,she went on to tell me about the data protection act but i told her i knew about it.

I also informed her that i had an outstanding complaint against an atos hcp and i would be obtaining a copy of her report to make sure she put down what my wife told her as this was one of the problems people have with atos.

I have to admit that she was very plesant and it seemed if she understood my wifes condition.

It will be interesting to see what she has put down in the report as i warned her if her report in anyway is false i would be taking it further.

She knows i took notes on my wifes responses to her questions so there cant be any mistakes.I will wait and see how it goes and i will keep you all informed.

Cheers George

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

yep, i got a bit into this last night, apparently ATOS have some rules, that with agreement with the courts, the only way you can record the evidence and use it as evidence is to use a dual tape recorder of their specification (and a better spec than the police use", that has been aproved by a sound engineer, no more than 30 minutes before the interview? well if your interview is delayed 45 mins, this is not possible! so have found this link DWP ESA Medical Examinations where some guy has been documenting all his experiences over the last year, he even by the looks of things got offered £100 by ATOS to keep his mouth shut! but like myself, it's obvious he's got nothing to loose, so is now pushing to take this to the high court in london!

what he's done is real clever, but to be honest, theres a few golden nuggets in there, that if everyone was to put on their medical assesment forms would cause them so much work!

sending a cover letter stating "please provide the name of the qualified health proffesional who will review the imformation i have provided to decide on a face to face meeting" "and that i may wish to independantly check with the GMC that the individual is qualified"

"i must stress the the importance that in order for a valid assesment to be made the qualified healthcare proffesional must contact my gp and consultant" the crux of this is they have a contract with the DWP to reply within 2 days, and answer in 20 days, which they never do! and hence breaking the contract before they started!

the other point to make, is that if at any point an ATOS employee terms you as a "customer" ask them their name and write a letter of complaint as they have a legal and contractual obligation to refer to you as "claimant" or "patient" even more proof that they have no clue what they are doing!

be warned too! if you don't play their game, they can mark you down just for being uncooperative!

am just about to start the letter to the upper tribunal now, but they seem to be in the same boat as atos when it comes to being economical with the truth!

all of this makes me feel quite sick, but best advice seems to be take someone with you, and make them feel as intimidated as you do! i can imagine they hate nothing more than someones mom peering over their shoulder checking all the answers they put?

good luck all!

ad

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I read this here: BBC - Ouch! (disability) - Messageboard Ouch! Talk - Failed ESA medical!

"ATOS's official criteria is that you may not record anything unless you have professional equipment, using dual decks, calibrated by a professional sound engineer directly before the exam (as said, this is more exacting than the police use) and if they notice you using any other form of recording device, they will stop the interview (and, unofficially, mark you down as refusing to cooperate)." Apparently someone did just that and you can read what happened on the Benefits and Work site. I haven't read it myself as I'm no longer a paid up subscriber to that site. I'd still record it secretly, if only for my own satisfaction.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    No registered users viewing this page.


  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...