Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I'm not sure we were on standard tariffs - I've uploaded as many proofs as I can for the ombudsman - ovo called last night uping the compensation to 100 from 50 pounds for the slip in customer service however they won't acknowledge the the problem them not acknowledging a fault has caused nor are they willing to remedy anything as they won't accept the meter or formula was wrong.   I'd appreciate more details on the economy 7 approach and I'll update the ombudsman with any information you can share. 
    • To re-iterate and highlight my urgent question on this one: The N24 from the court did not include any instructions to submit paperwork 28 days before the date, unlike the N157 received for other smaller claims. Do I have to submit a WS for this court date? Link has!...
    • No, reading the guidance online it says to wait for a letter from the court. Should I wait or submit the directions? BTW, I assume that the directions are a longer version of the particular of claim accompanied by evidence, correct?
    • Thanks for opening, it's been another rough year for my family and I've procastinated a little.. Due to the age of my defaults on this and other accounts (circa 2021), I really need to avoid a CCJ as that will be another 6 years of credit issues. Mediation failed as I played the 'not enough info to make a decision' however during the call for some reason they did offer settlement at 80%, I refused. this has been allocated to small claims track, court date is June 3 and I've received their WS. I'm starting on my WS. They do appear to have provided everything required of them (even if docs could be reconstructions). Not really sure what my argument is anymore but I do want to attend court and see this through. Should a judgement be made against me then I will clear the balance within 30 days and have the CCJ removed - this is still possible isn't it? I'm going to be reading up today and tomorrow and hope you can provide me some guidance in the meantime. Wonder what your advice would be given the documents they have provided? I am now in a position to clear the debt either by lump sum or a few large installments - Is this something i should look into at this late stage? Thanks as always in advance
    • I have now received my SAR. It includes a great deal of information! Is there a time limit on how long account information is kept and/or can be provided to debtors? I have received many account statements which were not previously sent to me. I remember that the creditor should provide explanations of any acronyms and abbreviations that maybe used in the documents. Is this still the case? Also what, if any, are the regulations in regard to adding fees to a debt? Can fees be added to a debt after the court has approved a charge on a property. Perhaps due to the numerous owners of the debt, many payments I made were not properly recorded on the account, some were entered over a year after the payment was made! Following the Legal Charge, I paid every month until my payments were refused. I am trying to compute the over payments, but the addition of fees etc. is confusing me. Any comments and/or help would be appreciated.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

ATOS thread


F_DCAs
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3988 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 97
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

i was looking for the link, but allready looked at too much about this now and lost it!and the link!

i start to wonder now? if someone could take a family member in who was a policeman or a judge? ATOS would probably question their evidence? and favour some half cooked, half wit? that put giggleing as one of my side effects!

in my tribunal, i had to keep a straight face as i asked their doctor if he had ever written anything the like in somebodies notes before?

the only thing i find funny? is this whole procedure! so funny in fact i wet my pants with laughter? maybe thats their next excuse?

Link to post
Share on other sites

oo, i despise getting rarred about things, but heres an online petition about it, is for them to record the interviews and let us sign what they saying about us?

Petition to: Have esa medicals to be voice recorded, and to have the same rights as accused criminals. | Number10.gov.uk

if enough people sign it, maybe they look into it?

i read so much now, theres got to ba a lot of people willing to sign?

lets see?

ad

Link to post
Share on other sites

If nothing else, an accurate transcript can be generated from the recording for use at a tribunal hearing, assuming that use of a recording is disallowed.

 

If pushed, then I'd be more than willing to submit my own story to the press, citing that ATOS' dishonesty - not just in my case - is widespread and deserves to go public.

 

After all, ATOS are acting on orders from a government that not very long back (before it got to power, naturally!), stated it was against private firms getting involved in health matters.

 

ATOS' rules are not my rules, and I'm not obliged to jump to their tune.

Link to post
Share on other sites

we got more folks! forget recording your interview, i just got the official document from atos here it is:-

Audio or video recording.

 

Atos Healthcare has clear guidance agreed with the Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) on audiotaping and video taping a medical examination. This is designed to ensure that a consistent approach is taken to all such requests and is designed to safeguard the interests of both the customer and the HCP.

The DWP never requires that a medical assessment for the purpose of advising on entitlement to state sickness or disability benefits be recorded on audio or videotape.

Any request can only be agreed with the prior consent of the HCP, and then only if stringent safeguards are in place to ensure that the recording is complete, accurate, and that the facility is available for simultaneous copies to be made available to all parties present. The recording must be made by a professional operator, on equipment of a high standard, properly calibrated by a qualified engineer immediately prior to the recording being made. The equipment must have facility for reproduction so that a copy of the tape can be retained by all parties.

The cost of the making the arrangements rests with the customer, as recording is not a requirement of the DWP.

If Atos Healthcare is unable to grant a request for recording we will offer you an opportunity to rearrange your appointment so you can arrange for the examination to take place with a chaperone or other witness.

 

have just been on the phone for 1/2 an hour to leeds to get this!

apparently if i took my brother with me, who is a warranted police officer, even his statement would not be accepted by the DWP ATOS or the tribunal.

 

so not only do they not believe your GP consultant or YOURSELF they do not believe a police statement either!

 

as they do not/are not able to contact your GP i think the best is to tell them "my probation officer thinks it's best i'm not around pens as it took a long time to remove the last from the doctor i stuck it in"

or do a Frank Gallagher with a gallon of four star?

 

and i just been on the phone to my local welfare rights officer who said there is no point in applying to the upper tribunal unless i'm willing to pay a barrister to review the whole case and present any points of law that have been broken!

 

think you know what to do folks? sign the pettition above, remember when you're voting next it was LABOUR who signed us up for all this, and the CONSERVATIVE PARTY was going to do the same anyway! so theres only a few parties left!

and if you live in a conservative or labour constituency don't bother talking to your local MP as they just look at you as some kind of scrounger!

Link to post
Share on other sites

we should see if panorama or somebody would be interested? i'd be happy to wear covert recording equipment! i read a story last night where one guy lost both his hands in an industrial accident, and was told that he could pick a pound coin up off the floor? after speaking to my welfare rights officer, he gives the impression that it's not if you can do your old job? is if you can do any job! maybe the government need some doorstops? i'm getting so angry and frustrated by all this now i feel like their might be more than one disabled guy in the room after i finished my medical!

have also read today that ATOS have no duty of care, so today have sent them a mail requesting a copy of their health and safety policy, and tomorrow i'm asking for a copy of their public liability insurance? and maybe monday i find something else to annoy them with!

oh, i posted some phjone numbers the other day on here that was removed, DO NOT call them as they get really really annoyed when you do! and if you don't want them? don't do a google search for "atos clinicians numbers" and you wont find them!

 

and don't be so sarcastic like me!

Link to post
Share on other sites

So, to paraphrase recording your ATOS medical, the answer is 'yes, of course you can'. followed by 'but we'll make it so expensive no person can afford to do it'.

Sounds about right...

Rae.

Link to post
Share on other sites

shame they got to do so much work to earn their money? they seem to do so little for it at the moment?

the lady on the phone today wouldn't give me her name when she refered to me as a "customer" today "allegedly their not to give their names out" so now i'm going to have to write an email raising an official complaint that they have broken their contract with the DWP as in their contract the "customer" is a legal term for the DWP, and apparently i'm a claimant/patient/client, by the time they get to the medical they're going to want to take a recording! and maybe open us lot up a complaint department, that doesn't take a few weeks to reply, once again breaking their contract!

 

KNOWLEDGE IS SOMETHING YOU GET, JUST AFTER THAT POINT WHERE YOU REALLY REALLY NEEDED IT!

maybe tomorrow i get something done with their rules and regulations regarding recording phone conversations with them?

next thing will be when they ask to see the Portable Apliance Testing certificate for the equipment? will the equipment be so sensitive that i require a certicate of electrical installation for the recording company?

this is getting silly, they are silly, and i just cant decide whether to wear the clown suit to the medical?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just an update.

My wife got a letter today saying she has passed the medical and wont need another untill july 2011.

I dont know if its because of what i told the nurse at the begining of the medical . I told her i had an outstanding complaint against an atos hcp and i believe for whatever reason atos hcps are taking no notice of what claimants are saying to them and putting down the exact opposite of what they are being told.

I then went on to tell her i would be taking notes on what she asked my wife and what my wifes replys where i also told her that if there was any mistakes or un-truths i would also be complaining about her.

I know people have said record the assement, but if you cant afford the equipment take a note pad put it on the desk in plain site of them and as soon as the start talking you start writing , if at anytime you havnt managed to write down what was said interupt the hcp and ask for the question to be repeated.

It seemed to have the desired affect on the hcp that done my wifes medical.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just an update.

My wife got a letter today saying she has passed the medical and wont need another untill july 2011.

 

george1961 i had a medical back in 2006 and my review is in 2011, that will be 5 years apart, my right leg and back are in agony and i cant walk tor far either. HOW LONG APART WAS YOUR WIFES MEDICAL, i dont know how long apart these medicals sould be.

do you know how long Atos have done these medicals for.

just a thought if they say you fit for work and you lost appeal say i would get a job and if you had an accident while doing that job i would sue the DWP for forceing me back to work, i would say if your disabled and have an accident why your in no fit state to work thats a human rights issue methinks.:evil:

 

anyone shed some light on this!

My advice is based on my opinion and my experience. It is not to be taken as legal advice as I am not legally qualified

If my advice has been helpful, please take a moment to click on the scales

on the bottom left hand side of my profile :p

Link to post
Share on other sites

Its been at least 4 years since her last medical.In that period she has had to fill out 2 medical questioneres which she passed (that was the old points system)

I am not a 100% sure but i think they can call you for a medical anytime.They say they will look and revue peoples cases from time to time.

If you have a letter stating you dont need another medical for 5 years then i dont think they will bother you.If they do write to them and give them a copy of your letter, i would also advise you if they do try and give you a medical before the 5 years go to an advice centre they will be able to fight you case for you.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think atos took over in 2005 (someone on this site will confirm it)

Make sure if and when you go you take someone with you (it will go against you if you dont) and remember they are employed by atos, they are neither impartial or objective.

Link to post
Share on other sites

get the name of the person doing the medical and check online if they are registered with the general medical council

they have to by law

 

send atos a letter as well

 

ask if your condition was diagnosed by a computer program called

 

L.I.M.A.

 

SORRY ATOS, OUT THE BAG NOW

 

IT STANDS FOR

 

LOGIC, INVESTIGATION, MEDICAL, ASSESMANT

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think recording the medical exam would help but i think a major problem with the hcps employed by atos is in their written reports.Most people seem to think their medicals have went ok and they have answered all the relevent questions but when they are informed that they no longer qualify for benefits its only then that people ask for a copy of the hcps report and realise that the hcp has put down the exact opposite of what you told them.

I would like to see that after the medical you have access to a translated copy of the medical report before it is sent back to the dwp.

Then and only then will it be deemed fair to everybody it will also make sure that these people who are employed by atos will have to do their job the way they are ment to .

Prior to 2007 (according to atos) people were entitled to a copy of the report but for some reason they dont need to now ( i have asked atos to show me the official document that proves this but yet they havnt)

As far as i am concerened atos are in it for the money only and it wont matter a jot to them what your cindition is and how it affects you and the dwp and the government are happy to let them carry on as long as it gets people off the sick.

In one of the earlier posts on this site someone is asking for people to sign a petition to 10 downing st and i would ask as many people as they can to click on the link and sign it.

Maybe we should petition 10 downing st to go back to allowing people to see their medical report before it is sent back to the dwp.

I am sorry if it seems i am ranting but everytime i read posts on this site i get so angry by the way the government, the dwp and atos are treating people with genuine illnesess and disabilities

Link to post
Share on other sites

Demand A Copy Of The Referal Document And Report

 

Send Atos An Sar

 

I Did Even Though My Case Is Occupational Health Through Work

 

I Have Atos In Court At This Moment

 

They Are Putting Peoples Health At Risk And A Lot Are Not Qualified To Give Reports

 

Cagboot If You Wish

 

I Have All The Evidence Presented To The Court

 

Gmc Report

Hpc Report

 

A Lot Of States In America Have Banned Atos, Putting The Company Before Patients, They Are Owned By An American Insurance Company

Link to post
Share on other sites

You can only contact the gmc if it is a registered doctor atos call their people health care profesionals and this allows them to employ doctors , nurses, physios and any other person with a medical background as long as they go through and pass atos,s training.

Their training consists of 6 stages and it includes reading, class days, more reading, multiple choice questions (which you have to pass) another in-house class day and then you have to do 5 medical exams which are with someone from atos and if you pass them you are then a qualified hcp and can go and do the medicals on your own

Link to post
Share on other sites

Beg To Differ

 

Ime Talking Not On Occupational Health But Medicals For The Dwp

 

Part Of The Contract The Goverment Has With Atos Is All Its Advisors Ref Esa. Well Benefits Payments Have To Be Registered With The Gmc Or Midwifrey Council

Link to post
Share on other sites

The Ocupational Health Side Is That All The Atos Staff Have To Be Registered With The Health ProFessions Council

 

But They Dont Tell You What The Staff Are Qualified In, Be It

 

Orthaopaedics

Virology

Brain Surgeon

 

Get The Idea

 

And They Will Not Tell You

 

Thats Why I Used Cpr 31.16

Link to post
Share on other sites

You could be correct but i have seen posts from people who have complained to the gmc about how their medicals were done and the gmc have said they cannot get involved because the hcp was a nurse and not a doctor.My wifes medical last week was done by a nurse and i asked her for her gmc registration number and she told me she wasnt registerd with the gmc but was passed to perform these medicals by the secretary of state

Link to post
Share on other sites

thats crap

 

they have to be registered

 

ive had the same reply from the gmc ref registration numbers etc

 

you need to send atos a letter

 

ask for the registration number of the person doing the medical with the gmc or midwifrey council

 

tell them you do not require info on the health professions council, only midwifrey council and gmc

 

ask them why a person not registered with the midwifrey council and/or gmc is doing dwp medicals

 

do you need the address for complaints

 

send recorded

 

ive had acess to the contract between atos and the dwp

 

cant say much more for obviouse reasons

Link to post
Share on other sites

get the name of the person doing the medical and check online if they are registered with the general medical council

they have to by law

 

send atos a letter as well

 

ask if your condition was diagnosed by a computer program called

 

L.I.M.A.

 

SORRY ATOS, OUT THE BAG NOW

 

IT STANDS FOR

 

LOGIC, INVESTIGATION, MEDICAL, ASSESMANT

 

A condition is not diagnosed by LiMA. (Logic Integrated Medical Assessment). The purpose of an ATOS assessment for ESA/IB is not of diagnostics, as dignosis bears no relevance to the benefit system, and in most cases, the claimant has already been diagnosed with a condition. The DWP's position is to have it established how the condition affects the capability of a person to perform in a work related environment, to decide if the effects of the condition would place someone in the category of completely incapable of work, or capable of some type of work in accordance with the descriptors. The ESA system is set up to concentrate on what a claimant can do rather than what the cannot do.

 

The LiMA programme is simply a tool for data entry for the purposes of a DWP medical report, it provides medical assessors with a framework based on best medical practice to record their clinical findings. The medical assessor is still in control of making any judgements in relation to the condition; it is not for a computer programme to diagnose. It contains the same questions and multiple choice answers that the paper IB85 does. The use of free text is also available, if the assessor doesn't feel the optional choices allow for an accurate answer.

 

There is more about LiMA here for anyone who would like to read about it.

My advice is based on my opinion, my experience and my education. I do not profess to be an expert in any given field. If requested, I will provide a link where possible to relevant legislation or guidance, so that advice provided can be confirmed and I do encourage others to follow those links for their own peace of mind. Sometimes my advice is not what people necesserily want to hear, but I will advise on facts as I know them - although it may not be what a person wants to hear it helps to know where you stand. Advice on the internet should never be a substitute for advice from your own legal professional with full knowledge of your individual case.

 

 

Please do not seek, offer or produce advice on a consumer issue via private message; it is against

forum rules to advise via private message, therefore pm's requesting private advice will not receive a response.

(exceptions for prior authorisation)

 

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...