Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Barclay's default marked on our credit record


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5237 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hello,

 

A number of years ago we had a business. In 2004 we found a buyer for the business and informed our bank (Barclays) to this effect. We were then informed that our overdraft facility of £10000 was to be removed. Our business manager said we would have to take out a loan to cover the outstanding o/d. We did this but then when the business was sold 3 months later we found we were liable for additional charges for paying off the loan early. This would not have applied had we been able to continue our o/d to the sale of the business.

 

After selling the business we started to examine the charges we had been paying over the previous 7 years. We asked for copies of all bank charges for the period but were stalled at each attempt. We issued a letter of intent that we would be challenging the account charges, the over-priced critical illness cover we had been forced into taking out, and we stated that the loan to cover the overdraft was now in dispute and that repayments would be suspended.

 

There followed a period of letters and phonecalls from ourselves and denials by Barclays that any of this had ever been received. In the meantime we were harrassed from other departments for repayment of the (o/d) loan. Eventually Barclays sent a letter saying that they now considered the loan in default and that unless we repaid the full amount immediately it would be put into the hands of a debt collection agency. We were so fed-up with the whole thing we sent a cheque for the full amount and just wanted nothing to do with Barclays ever again. Now we find there is a default notice on our credit record in relation to the loan. It states that the loan is ''satisfied'' but it blights our chances of ever obtaining credit.

 

I intend writing to Barclays as I feel this is beyond unfair. Any comments or help would be much appreciated.

Edited by royalflush
Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello,

 

A number of years ago we had a business. In 2004 we found a buyer for the business and informed our bank (Barclays) to this effect. We were then informed that our overdraft facility of £10000 was to be removed. Our business manager said we would have to take out a loan to cover the outstanding o/d. We did this but then when the business was sold 3 months later we found we were liable for additional charges for paying off the loan early. This would not have applied had we been able to continue our o/d to the sale of the business.

 

After selling the business we started to examine the charges we had been paying over the previous 7 years. We asked for copies of all bank charges for the period but were stalled at each attempt. We issued a letter of intent that we would be challenging the account charges, the over-priced critical illness cover we had been forced into taking out, and we stated that the loan to cover the overdraft was now in dispute and that repayments would be suspended.

 

There followed a period of letters and phonecalls from ourselves and denials by Barclays that any of this had ever been received. In the meantime we were harrassed from other departments for repayment of the (o/d) loan. Eventually Barclays sent a letter saying that they now considered the loan in default and that unless we repaid the full amount immediately it would be put into the hands of a debt collection agency. We were so fed-up with the whole thing we sent a cheque for the full amount and just wanted nothing to do with Barclays ever again. Now we find there is a default notice on our credit record in relation to the loan. It states that the loan is ''satisfied'' but it blights our chances of ever obtaining credit.

 

I intend writing to Barclays as I feel this is beyond unfair. Any comments or help would be much appreciated.

It certainly does seem unfair, but is just another axample of how these institutions now behave.

 

It is probably worth writing to Barclays in the first instance, laying out the situation and telling them that you think you have been treated unfairly and that their manager was irresponsible, mis-selling you a long term loan, when clearly what you needed was a short term solution. Ask them to remove the default.

 

If they have registered a default, then they need to issue you with a Default Notice. This is an important document and hopefully you still have this. If you do, can you post the date of the notice and the date when the default has to be rectified. You may be able to refer to this in your letter.

 

Copy this letter in to the CEO of Barclays.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...