Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Welcome are now officially dead and buried


RALALU
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4740 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi All,

 

Just a little xmas cheer for all you welcome sufferers, as of today Welcome are now officially being run down to close, debts will remain as they continue to collect over the next 2 to 3 years but there should now be some serious room for negotation and offers, see below announcement:

 

Cattles plc

16 December 2009

 

 

 

 

Cattles plc

 

 

 

 

General Meeting Update

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

At the General Meeting of Cattles plc (the "Company"), called today to consider the Company's serious loss of capital and the actions taken by the Board, the Executive Chairman of Cattles plc, Margaret Young, will make the following statement:

 

 

 

 

"The Board of Cattles plc announced on 25 November 2009 that it had agreed a Standstill and Equalisation Agreement (SEA) with its key financial creditors, and that this should improve the likelihood of Cattles achieving its restructuring objectives.

 

 

 

 

Since the SEA announcement, we have met with representatives of our financial creditors to update them on our recent financial performance and to review with them a range of strategic options. These meetings followed extensive strategic, operational and financial analysis of our Group's businesses.

 

 

 

 

Based on this analysis and against the background of the significant losses incurred to date by Welcome Finance ("Welcome"), the Group's principal business, we were unable to recommend a business plan to our financial creditors which would allow Welcome to lend to existing or new customers.

 

 

 

 

The Board has therefore recommended a plan which will focus on collecting out Welcome's customer loans. It is envisaged that the collection of the Welcome loan book could take two to three years and, during this period, the Group's cost base will contract to reflect the reducing size of the book.

 

 

 

 

The Group's smaller businesses, Shopacheck and The Lewis Group, will continue to trade as normal. The Board is still exploring the scope to develop these businesses further.

 

 

 

 

The shares in Cattles plc were suspended on 23 April. The Board requested a suspension when it became clear that we would not be in a position to fulfil our reporting obligations as a quoted company. At the time of the share suspension, the revelation of the Group's serious problems had already reduced the share price to a nominal level.

 

 

 

 

The shares will remain suspended until further notice while the Board continues to work towards agreeing a restructuring with the Group's financial creditors.

 

 

 

 

The Board indicated to shareholders at the AGM on 29 July 2009 that the size of the under-impairment in 2008 and earlier years was such that it would be very difficult to recover value for shareholders. The prospects for any such recovery have further diminished in the absence of a viable plan to rebuild the Welcome business.

 

 

 

 

Shareholders should therefore be aware that, in view of this and of the now substantial negative value of shareholders funds, the shares are likely to have little or no value."

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

For further information:

 

Margaret Young, Executive Chairman, Cattles plc 020 7269 7252

 

Geoffrey Pelham-Lane / Paul Marriott, Financial Dynamics

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 556
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

News  /  Breaking News: Cattles unable to recommend plan for Welcome Finance THEBUSINESSDESK.COM

 

CATTLES said today that it is unable to recommend a business plan to its financial creditors that would allow Welcome Finance to lend to existing or new customers.

Margaret Young, chairman of the Batley-based sub-prime lender, said that the decision was made on analysis of the group's businesses and against the background of significant losses incurred to date by Welcome.

She said the board was therefore recommending a plan, which will focus on collecting out Welcome's customer loans.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The shares are now worthless.

 

All collections will be moved to head office and all other offices closed, as the book is run down redundancies will be made month on month. Not a happy thought for the staff still employed there and who, if sensible, will now be looking for further employment asap.

Link to post
Share on other sites

serves them right for trying to rip people off, obviously i'm sorry for the well meaning employees who are now going to lose their jobs.

 

Looks like I shall be making them an offer to settle my HP early heh heh. about 10p in the pound sounds about right!! ;)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thats harsh Dibbo.......... i mean, i was thinking more in the line of 25p in the pound ;).

 

Seriously though, last week prior to the announcement i got them to agree to a 1/3rd reduction of my oustanding balance if I paid a lump sum as full and final payment. (luckily never agreed to this in writing)

 

I can't see the staff fighting too hard now against my new proposal, seeing as any extra money they can bring in, in the short term, will enable them to grab a few more bonuses between now and their impending redundancy.

Link to post
Share on other sites

just a thought, seeing as now the company are no longer able to honour their obligations under which our agreements were taken out under and offer a good service...are they in breach? (cant remember the exact wording on the paperwork I have, but will check it out later)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Dibbo - no i wouldn't have thought that they were, the only difference really is the closure of your local branch ( if it is indeed still open!)

 

Mrjoolz - i wouldnt be making any offers yet until the new year as todays news would have been taken hard by the staff and your unlikely to get a sympathetic ear. Personally I'll be waiting till mid jan and then will make the offer that I have stated previously - 25% of my outstanding balance. Its important that if you do make them an offer that you state its full and final and that you stipulate that your credit file will be marked as paid in full, also ensure that any agreement is confirmed via letter.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Mrjoolz - you can offer whatever you like but they do not need to accept it. Obviously if you feel that you have issues with your CCA request then this may give you more bargaining power. As i said i'd wait a month yet, lets see if there's any further announcements and if they actually propose any settelements first as the onus is now on them to get as much back in as short a timescale as possible.

Link to post
Share on other sites

was worth a shot.

 

so really all they will be doing is collecting repayments and paying out over reclaimed PPI and other issues heh heh. Makes you wonder if they will actually have any cash to repay their creditors!

 

I wonder why they decided to continue to collect, but not sell the loans on? I bet they know something that we all know and are gambling that some people don't find out heh heh

Link to post
Share on other sites

at present they are still losing over a million pounds a day (scary figures eh), in closing all the branches and making several hundred redundancies they will obviously reduce costs significantly but only enough to pay back SOME of them money that they borrowed - the latest figures being banding about is that they owe over 2billion!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi,

 

What would be an acceptable offer. What should I offer on 4K.

 

Is 10p to the pound a bit of a joke, or will they consider it ?

 

any advice appreciated

 

Me

 

I'd go even lower, 5p in the £. They might say no, but it leaves more room for negotiation.

 

They are the ones going bust not you. I daresay you are more than happy to continue paying them £1 a week. They need your money, no tht eother way round!

 

Dont you just love it when the shoe is on the other foot :D

If you find my post helpful please click on the scales at the top. Thank you

FAQ SECTION HERE

 

Halifax Bank Claim filed and settled

Halifax Credit Card settled

Argos Store Card settled

 

CCA requests sent to

Halifax Credit Card

LLoyds TSB Credit Card

Capital One

Moorcroft (Argos)

NDR

18/06/09

Link to post
Share on other sites

Im sat here somewhat resembling :D

I am a consumer just like you, please get a second opinion or investigate yourself on anything I advise as I am in no way legally trained. Everything I know has come from the Mighty CAG and fellow CAGGERS. :cool:

 

If I have helped in any way please click my reputation star and make a donation to CAG to enable us all to continue to help each other :cool:

Link to post
Share on other sites

I am thinking more like 0pennies per £1. I have paid more than the money they loaned me plus a good interest rate to them already :rolleyes:

 

Am i the only letter who have received the letter already for a discount (not that I intent paying it)

 

I love the part that say "our dedicated staff will be able to take payment as quickly and easily as possible" I bet they do and are real experts at this esp now with this news

 

 

scan0003.jpg

Edited by sherry_d

DPA request 08/02/2006

Ist money back request letter send 03/04/2006

2nd letter send 20/04/2006 - no reply

Filed claim @court for £1952.00 on 17/05/2006

Halifax paid up £1952.00 26/05/2006

Link to post
Share on other sites

style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4740 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...