Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I have received a PCN from Euro Car Parks for MFG - Esso Cobham - Gravesend. I was completely unaware that there was any such limit for parking and always considered this to be a service station. I stopped there to use the toilet, have a coffee and made a couple of work calls. I have read the previous topics on this location which suggest I can ignore this and ECP will not take legal action. The one possible complication is that the vehicle is leased by my employer so I do not want to involve them with the associated reminders and threatening letters. The PCN was first issued to the leasing company Arval who have notified ECP of the hiring company. I have attached a copy of the PCN Notice to Hirer with details removed as per instructions. What options do I have or should I just pay the PCN promptly at the reduced rate of £60? img20240424_23142631.pdf
    • What you have uploaded is a letter with daft empty threats from third-party paper tigers.  Just ignore it. What we need to see is the original invoice you received last October or November.
    • Thanks for posting the CPR contents. i do wish you hadn't blanked out the dates and times since at times they can be relevant . Can you please repost including times and dates. They say that they sent a copy of  the original  PCN that they sent to the Hirer  along with your hire agreement documents. Did you receive them and if so can you please upload the original PCN without erasing dates and times. If they did include  all the paperwork they said, then that PCN is pretty near compliant except for their error with the discount time. In the Act it isn't actually specified but to offer a discount for 14 days from the OFFENCE is a joke. the offence occurred probably a couple of months prior to you receiving your Notice to Hirer.  Also the words in parentheses n the Act have been missed off. Section 14 [5][c] (c)warn the hirer that if, after the period of 21 days beginning with the day after that on which the notice to hirer is given, the amount of unpaid parking charges referred to in the notice to keeper under paragraph 8(2)(f) or 9(2)(f) (as the case may be) has not been paid in full, the creditor will (if any applicable requirements are met) have the right to recover from the hirer so much of that amount as remains unpaid; Though it states "if any applicable ...." as opposed to "if all applicable......" in Section 8 or 9. Maybe the Site could explain what the difference between the two terms mean if there is a difference. Also on your claim form they keeper referring to you as the driver or the keeper.  You are the Hirer and only the Hirer is responsible for the charge EVEN IF THEY WEREN'T THE DRIVER. So they cannot pursue the driver and nowhere in the Hirer section of the Act is the hirer ever named as the keeper so NPC are pursuing the wrong person.  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

HM Revenue and Customs debt collectors


red.ninja13
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5243 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi I need help!

 

My boyfriend has been getting letters from HM Revenue and Customs for the last few months claiming he owes £7k, something he has never heard of before, saying its something to do with a 2001 self assessment form he sent in.

 

He has never sent any self assessment forms in.

 

He ignored them for a while, then one day wrote to them to say he doesnt know what the debt is for, and asked them for evidence of what the debt is from.

 

He recieved a statement saying:

31 JAN 2001 - BALANCE PAYMENT DUE 99/00 £2000.00

 

and then it has loads of late payment and interest charges and two more £1000 charges with 1st and 2nd payment on account due for year 00/01

 

then more late charges and interest in the year 2002 then nothing and another two charges for 2009.

 

Obviously this doesnt explain to us why this money is owed, and we have no idea, as he has never submitted a self assesment claim, and wouldnt have a clue how to do it.

 

He chose to ignore it, and now today there is a letter from HM Revenue and Customs debt collectors saying:

 

I called today to collect the above debt or levy Distraint on your goods and assets but was unable to make contact with you.

 

You Must Pay the Debt in Full Now.

 

If you don't I will make a further call and if you are not available i may levy distraint in your absence.....blah blah blah......

 

There is no way he will pay for something he has no idea about, and doesnt think he owes, and there is no way in hell he will ever be able to pay £7k! We can barely afford to eat. He is currently signed off work sick due to complications from an illness he has, so he doesn't even get a proper wage, and i am definately not paying it!!

 

AND they defo aint getting anything from my house, i'll beat them!

 

Obviously i know i can say everything in the house is mine, and provide receipts and dodgy receipts etc to try and prove its all mine, and i won't let the vampires in, but they're not bailiffs, do the same rules apply?

 

How should we approach this, obviously its a government debt, so it isn't statute barred is it?

 

Can someone advise, before i get arressted for assulting Lynne the debt collector.:sad:

 

Thanks :)

Me Vs ICS = 1-0

Me Vs BT = 1-0

Me Vs UKPC = 1-0

Me Vs 3 = 0-1 :-(

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry to hear about your predicament red ninja.

 

Can I ask you a couple of questions? Did your boyfriend have a second job at the time HMRC are stating? If so, did it pay cash in hand?

 

If no to those questions then it might be to do with a shortfall of PAYE, wrong tax code etc. But that doesn't explain the self-assessment forms. Sorry, I can't think of anymore reasons why HMRC would do this.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think he needs to get sorted out how this tax demand occurred and there is a Recoverables Department in every regional tax office. I would make an appointment to see them and get to the bottom of it, then at least he knows where he stands and will have the correct information to dispute it.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hmm only thread I can find at present is this one:-

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/debt-collection-industry/154287-15k-ccj-hmrc-long.html

 

ok, found it... on this one he explains about the stat barred for tax debts..

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/debt-collection-industry/194212-tax-debt.html

 

Pinky's advice is sound, get an appointment made asap.

 

S.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for your replies guys.

 

I am going to be on his case to get to the bottom of it, but what about Lynn the debt collector, can she let herself into our house? Can she take our stuff?

 

If HM Revenue take him to court i dont care (to some extent) because its him not me, but I will go beserk if someone trys to take my stuff!

Me Vs ICS = 1-0

Me Vs BT = 1-0

Me Vs UKPC = 1-0

Me Vs 3 = 0-1 :-(

Link to post
Share on other sites

Perhaps she's talking about a walking possession order where you agree for them to come in and tag everything... if the debt doesnt get paid they can come back and take everything. Also I'm not sure if to get a warrant to force entry they have to tell you they are applying?

 

You HAVE rights, but they obviously arent going to tell you them. If she doesnt have a warrant then I would not let her in and I'd ensure all windows/backdoors are locked shut.

 

Contact the tax office and see what they state.

 

S.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks, I have already told him not to leave any windows open, unfortunately we have had previous experience with bailiffs levying our goods for a previous tenants debt!?! So we know all about them.

 

I just dont see how she thinks she can levy our goods.

 

I am going to get him to call her and the office tomorrow morning, and if he doesnt get anywhere i think i will SAR their butts,

 

hopefully then i will get to the bottom of this, just dont want to spend the £10, what with a £150 gas bill on the way :-(

Me Vs ICS = 1-0

Me Vs BT = 1-0

Me Vs UKPC = 1-0

Me Vs 3 = 0-1 :-(

Link to post
Share on other sites

Unfortunately SAR's take up to 40 days and I'm not sure what kind of response you'd get back from the inland revenue? I think the need is more urgent.

 

A call to the insolvencyhelpline might help find out if this "person" could have obtained a warrant without your know how... at least then you'll know where you stand when it returns.

 

Unless someone on here can answer

 

S.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Arghhhh what a pile of poo!

Its annoying that he is going to speak to them and i cant intervene.

I guess i will have to wait and see what happens tomorrow

. Thanks for your help :-) x

Me Vs ICS = 1-0

Me Vs BT = 1-0

Me Vs UKPC = 1-0

Me Vs 3 = 0-1 :-(

Link to post
Share on other sites

The best advice is to talk to them. Avoid doing it by phone if at all possible, face to face is preferable so that you can have paperwork available for both parties to see and discuss. Make sure you have relevant numbers to hand, such as NI and any reference numbers for child benefit/CTC/WFTC etc that may be applicable. If your OH has wage slips for the relevant period that will also help.

 

HMRC are not garden variety DCAs, they do have powers to distrain on your goods (they will attend with a bailiff). They also have powers of entry that, in some circumstances, are more than that of the police.

Don't forget that bailiffs can distrain on anything they can see, so keep the curtains closed as well as keeping the windows shut.

 

Whatever you do, don't ignore them.

  • Haha 1

It's a steep learning curve....

 

Wendella 1 : RBS 0

Link to post
Share on other sites

Please follow the advice above from Wendella. HMRC have some very considerable powers at their disposal and if ignored WILL use them. For example... HMRC given powers to raid home businesses - Times Online

 

You partner must contact them and endeavor to resolve this. Establish the facts, be honest with them and if neccesary he will need to make suitable arrangements to repay what he owes, if indeed he does. The normal rules of engagement do not apply regarding HMRC (and if Lynn is from HMRC that applies to her too!).

 

Best of luck. FF

Link to post
Share on other sites

Completely agree with the other posters on here. Don't ignore HMRC- they will continue to pursue this matter until it is resolved.

 

Having said that, HMRC should be fair in its dealings with you and they will respond to letters etc.

 

This sort of distraint letter may have real intent behind it but it is also used to spur people into making contact with them.

 

As others have said this alleged debt may have arisen from self employment or PAYE issues. The comment about the self assessment form is curious if your b/f has never submitted a return. However, always bear in mind that HMRC make mistakes (too many in my opinion) and it's quite possible that they have made on here. However you will need to engage with them to sort it out.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just to add to comments above : the HMRC have a set of well-defined procedures and rules they must follow. You might not like those rules but HMRC do stick to them.

 

You must always play straight, honest and up-front with HMRC. Not doing this will bring heaps of real, serious trouble.

 

 

However, in saying that, they threatened several times to make me bankrupt. I couldn't afford to do this myself, and no-one else would do it, so I went back to HMRC and asked them to do it. They refused. I asked again, then I begged and entreated them. Still they said no.

It turns out they knew more about my finances than I did, and knew that making me bankrupt was pointless.

I really do appreciate all those 'thank you' emails - I'm glad I've been able to help. Apologies if I haven't acknowledged all of them.

You can also ding my gong if you prefer. :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • dx100uk changed the title to HM Revenue and Customs debt collectors
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...