Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Good Evening, I've got a fairly simple question but I'll provide some context incase needed. I've pursued a company that has operations in england despite them having no official office anywhere. I've managed to find a site they operate from and the papers there have been defended so I know they operate there. They've filed a defence which is honestly the worst defence ever, and despite being required to provide their witness evidence, they have not and have completely ignored the courts and my request for copies of it. I'm therefore considering applying to strike out their defence on the grounds the defence was rubbish and that they haven't provided any evidence for the trial. However, it has a trial date set for end of june, and a civil application wouldn't get heard until a week before then, so hardly worth it. However, my local court is very good at dealing with paper applications (i.e ones that don't need hearings, and frankly I think they are literally like 1-2 days from when you submit it to when a Judge sees it. I'm wondering if I can apply to strikeout a defence without a hearing OR whether a hearing is required for a strikeout application.   Thanks
    • I have just opened another bank acc with lloyds (i have a few already) After doing some research they may have some relation to tsb or be apart of the same group will this cause me issue if my salary is paid into my lloyds account? Also, if the debts do go into default and nothing is paid then after 6 years it all goes away? As the DCAs cannot do anything? I do want to start paying in like 3/4 months or do you advise I leave it if it goes into default? again sorry for all the questions, i am just processing everything
    • one reply only  follow post 2 of letter of claim <<clickme link. dx
    • Sorry, I got confused  Yes, it states all three   Thanks, 
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Advantis Credit - Advice needed Please?


Billy_Beaumont
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5203 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hello,

 

I have recently received a demand from Advantis Credit acting for United Utilities for the sum of £928.55

I did not reply and now they have sent a second letter.

 

They say it is for an unpaid amount relating to Water service charges at my previous address for the period ending 24.11.07

 

I left that address in December 2002 and am not sure what this refers to.

Can someone advise me how to proceed?

 

 

Should I contact Advantis or should I contact United Utilities?

 

Any advice gratefully received.

 

Transcript of letters below.

 

Letter 1 received 26.11.09

Letter 2 received 11.12.09

 

Thank you.

 

Letter 1:

We have been instructed by our client, United Utilities Group Plc, to make arrangements to collect a debt which their records show as being outstanding. This debt is for an unpaid amount relating to Water service charges supplied to (Address I vacated in 2002) for the period ending 24/11/07.

Please contact us immediately on 0845 402 2430 to arrange repayment of this debt.

Alternatively you can pay via one of the methods overleaf which includes details of how you can pay online.

If you believe that you may not be liable for this outstanding amount it is important that you contact us immediately. Failure to contact us within 10 days of the date of this letter will result in further action being taken to recover this debt.

 

Letter 2:

Advantis provide professional services to a number of large organisations within the UK. We have been instructed by our client, United Utilities Group Plc, to verify the current whereabouts of (My Name), formally resident at (Address I vacated in 2002), in relation to an outstanding business matter.

We are writing to verify that we have your correct contact address. If you are the person named above please contact us on 0845 402 2688 to discuss the business matter that requires your urgent attention.

Please accept our apologies if you are not the person named above. We would appreciate it if you would please call us on 0845 402 2688 to confirm this so that we may update our records.

If you do not contact us we will assume that you are the correct person and we will contact you again in order that we can get the matter resolved.

Edited by Billy_Beaumont
Link to post
Share on other sites

Send them something similar to this:

 

 

To whom it may concern, Ref: Insert Reference Here

 

 

 

You have contacted me regarding the account with the above reference number, which you claim is owed by myself. I would point out that I have no knowledge of any such debt being owed to (Insert Name here). I am familiar with the Office of Fair Trading Debt Collection Guidance which states that it is unfair to send demands for payment to an individual when it is uncertain that they are the debtor in question. I would also point out that the OFT say under the Guidance that it is unfair to pursue third parties for payment when they are not liable. In not ceasing collection activity whilst investigating a reasonably queried or disputed debt you are using deceptive/and or unfair methods. Furthermore ignoring and/or disregarding claims that debts have been settled or are disputed and continuing to make unjustified demands for payment amounts to physical/psychological harassment. I would ask that no further contact be made concerning the above account unless you can provide evidence as to my liability for the debt in question. I now request a copy of your complaints procedures within 14 days, if you fail to provide me with these or I do not receive confirmation that you will no longer be pursuing this matter, I will have no choice but to make complaints to the Office of Fair Trading, my local MP, Trading Standards and the Financial Ombudsman. Yours,

 

Dont sign, print your name.

 

It is up to them to prove that you owe the money.If they cannot prove the debt is yours,dont worry. Send the letter registered,keep a copy,and be prepared for them to send another letter to you.They did this to my G\F several times before I sent them this letter, an then they stopped. DO NOT PHONE THEM EVER.WRITING ONLY AND SEND REGISTERED. Advantis are well known for this. hope this has helped

Advantis Blank.doc

Edited by diaz101
added letter
Link to post
Share on other sites

This is purely I suspect a fishing exercise from them, IF they phone, where will they get your number from? politely explain that you only deal in writing and that if they continue to call, on what is after all, your private telephone number, that you consider it harassment. QUOTE the following "I am of the view that your continued harassment of me by telephone puts you in breach of Section 40 of the Administration of Justice Act 1970, and the Protection from Harassment Act 1997. If you continue to harass me by telephone, you will also be in breach of the Communications Act (2003) s.127 and I will report you to OFCOM, Trading Standards and The Office of Fair Trading, meaning that you will be liable to a substantial fine." You can also add this to the letter i previously gave if they continue to call you. You dont have to give them ANY information on where you live or for how long,they can get this themselves, however, if your happy to give them this information and you are definately not liable for this utilities debt, then that decision is up to you, I however would not give them anything other than the standard "prove i owe it letter" Companies like this make money by scaring people into paying for things they do not owe. Until they can prove you owe the debt, just keep sending them the letters,likek I previously said, they will probably send a few more as happened to my GF, but if you genuinely do not owe the money,then they will get the message and leave you alone. regards

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi,

Diaz has given you some good advice. To help out, here is the link to the letters Diaz has recommended:

 

Harassment by telephone - Consumer Wiki

 

http://www.consumerforums.com/resources/templates-library/86-debt-collectors/573-general-debt-letter-if-you-know-nothing-of-the-debt

 

Highlight,copy and paste them to your word processing program then edit as nescessary.

 

I would point out to them that you left the property in 2002. I'm sure you are on the electoral register.

 

Insist on no futher communications as you are not the debtor.

If you are asked to deal with any matter via private message, PLEASE report it.

Everything I say is opinion only. If you are unsure on any comment made, you should see a qualified solicitor

Please help CAG. Order this ebook. Now available on Amazon. Please click HERE

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Hello again.

 

I sent them the letter suggested by Diaz by 1st class recorded on the 15.12.09.

 

On the 19.12.09 I received another letter from them dated the 14.12.09 (the day before I wrote to them) giving me ten days to pay up.

 

Do you think I should reply to this?

 

Many thanks

 

BB

 

14.12.09 Letter:

 

 

LETTER BEFORE ACTION

This debt is for an unpaid amount relating to Water service charges supplied to (Address I vacated in 2002) for the period ending 24/11/07.

 

Unless payment is made within ten days of the date of this letter an agent may be instructed to visit your premises to collect the debt personally or legal proceedings for the recovery thereof may be commenced without further notice or warning.

 

This may result in the issue of a County Court Claim or if resident in Scotland a Sheriff’s Court Writ against you. Should this prove necessary we will seek all fixed costs and fees together with statutory interest on the outstanding balances.

 

In the event that a County Court Judgment (CCJ) is obtained it will be recorded on the Register of Judgments, Orders and Fines, or if a Sheriff’s Decree is obtained details of the decree will be passed by the Court to The Registry Trust. The obtaining of a CCJ or a Decree may seriously affect your ability to secure credit in the future.

If a Judgment or Decree remains unsatisfied a Bailiff or Sheriff Officer may be instructed to recover assets from you to discharge the “New Balance” of your debt or we may apply to your employer for an Attachment of Earnings or we may apply for a Charging Order against your property, if owned by you.

If you dispute liability for this debt please state your reasons in writing and supply documents in support of your defence to any claim. If you fail to notify us of any potential dispute prior to the issue of proceedings and you subsequently file a defence we reserve the right to show this letter to the Court.

 

To prevent further action being taken call Advantis Credit now on 0845 402 2430.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Billy, dont worry, this seems to have been an issue of crossed post, I would follow silverfox's advice and write the prove it letter,again pointing out you have were not there at that time,after all this is a letter before action, which means bugger all. I can write you a letter before action and say all the things they have.Does that mean you will pay me the money instead???? relax,enjoy christmas regards ps there is also a letter that you can send to stop doorstep visits without your express premission, its in the templates of the silverfox post.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Hello all,

 

I just recieved the above letter from Advantis Credit saying they were going to send someone unless payment is made in 10 days cc claim and CCJ etc

 

It was on behalf of Ikano for £133.96 I made the mistake of phoning and asking them

1 Who the company was.

2 What the money was for.

3 The dates of when I owed this money.

4 I am not in the habbit of owing money and have no Idea what this is for

 

The rather rude operator told me he could not provide those details and if I paid then I could dispute it.

I then told him I was not born yesterday and would not send money to just anyone who sent a threatning letter and would be sending a letter of complaint.

I just sent all the above letter and Ill let you know what they say.

 

Thanks all

 

TL

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...