Jump to content


sully123

CPS. Combined Parking Solutions

style="text-align:center;"> Please note that this topic has not had any new posts for the last 3625 days.

If you are trying to post a different story then you should start your own new thread. Posting on this thread is likely to mean that you won't get the help and advice that you need.

If you are trying to post information which is relevant to the story in this thread then please flag it up to the site team and they will allow you to post.

Thank you

Recommended Posts

Where Does It State Against Ignoring The Charge

 

Sorry wrong page from their site :oops:

 

 

Combined Parking Solutions - Legal Issues surrounding private land parking and tickets issued by Parking Management companies private land parking car park management David Keates

 

Many forums/sites advise people to ignore tickets, some advise them to send standard letters to deny liability for the ticket and other outrageous defences to avoid paying a charge

 

 

That is under>>

Refusing To Pay/Assist

 

 

 

Towards end of page

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

This Is All Corporate Bs

They Are Not Parking Tickets But An Invoice

 

They Never Seem To Get The SiGnage Right

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Also the court cases in their favour.

 

I just read the Blackburn V CPS in Birmingham county court.

 

It clearly said their CAR PARK. Did they own it or does it belong to someone else?

 

Would that be wrong in itself ?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

First of all you should not take anything that a PPC boss might say as gospel, or indeed as containing even a shred of truth. Especially one as notorious (laughable) as "Perky", the chief of the bunch of no-mark losers titled "Combined Parking Solutions" (when he is not doling out bacon butties, a job much more suited to his "talents"). Practically everything on that site exists in the realm of fantasy only - indeed there is a specific term for this kind of madness: "Perky Planet". Many of the cases are set ups extracted from the thousands of hours that Perky spends online trying to plot against his enemies (and failing miserably). A little birdie tells me that certain authorities may be getting in touch with the Deluded Ego sometime soon (perhaps to ask if he ate all the pies).

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

You know all those claims are Perky's stooges?

 

That's why he refuses to take one of us to court...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If you wish to believe them, when you finish paying them I can do you a great deal on a 5 year lease for the Golden Gate bridge

 

;)


omnia praesumuntur legitime facta donec probetur in contrarium

 

 

Please note: I am not a member of the legal profession, all advice given is purely my opinion, if in doubt consult a professional

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
If you wish to believe them, when you finish paying them I can do you a great deal on a 5 year lease for the Golden Gate bridge

 

;)

Wait a minute! You promised that to me! :lol:


If this has been useful to you, please click on the scales at bottom left of post. Thanks.

 

Advice & opinions of Rooster-UK are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Please use your own judgment.

-------------------------------------------------------

LOOK! Free CAG Toolbar.

Follow link for more information.

 

------------------------------------------------------

Please donate,

Help us to help others.

 

 

LINKS....

 

Forum Rules.

FAQs....

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Good grief

 

The bit where they name the guy who posted on forums and give his aliases just ends any pretence towards a professional image

 

Is all this lawful?

 

Especially showing his image?

 

 

They also mention the Road Traffic Act - can someone look at the wording to see if thats kosher? (as in the context they are using it in?)


omnia praesumuntur legitime facta donec probetur in contrarium

 

 

Please note: I am not a member of the legal profession, all advice given is purely my opinion, if in doubt consult a professional

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

CPS's boss used to be a regular poster on these forums until he was banned. (username: Perky88 amongst others).

 

His website makes all sorts of claims which have no basis in court. His quote of the road traffic act is valid, what he fails to point out that as private individual he has no rights to that information. A PPC cannot demand that someone tell him who was driving. They can ask but following the advice on here an ignore will usually do the trick or a sod off will work just as well.

 

Fof the record The owner may or may not know who was driving on the day in question but has no obligation to tell anyone other than an authorised and legal person (e.g. a policeman).

 

I think it is fair to say and others on this forum will agree that the CPS website makes some claims that are downright misleading and in some cases plain wrong or to quote GamingComissionRule "Practically everything on that site exists in the realm of fantasy only - indeed there is a specific term for this kind of madness: "Perky Planet".

 

PS

 

Wait a minute! You promised that to me! :lol:

Rooster I can get a really good deal on the Brooklyn Bridge if you're in the market. :-D


-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

This does not constitute legal advice and is not represented as a substitute for legal advice from an appropriately qualified person or firm.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Great information given back by you guys,

 

My reason for posting as I said was that when I was looking for the court cases mentioned in my thread, I came across this CPS site, and had a read, And for some not in the KNOW about this site might actually believe it.

 

You have now shown all the cracks in the wording and other sections, so well done all.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The Road Traffic Act stuff is clearly just rubbish on their part, so it fits in with the rest of it !

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Good grief

 

The bit where they name the guy who posted on forums and give his aliases just ends any pretence towards a professional image

 

Is all this lawful?

 

Especially showing his image?

 

This is the nature of these toerags. In fact Perky thinks he is clever with nasty stuff like this. All it makes him look is sad and twisted (which of course he is).

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    No registered users viewing this page.


  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...