Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Tangliss, if you can't upload the letter, could you tell us what the heading is please? My understanding is it should say 'Letter before claim' or similar. HB
    • Do you think I should send the CCA request now then instead of waiting? I really can do without the stress. Any advice would be appreciated. Thank you for responding.
    • How was the "receiver" appointed and what is their role? Appointed by the lender under the terms of their security on the loan (sometimes referred to as "LPA Receiver")? Or are they acting for you in insolveny? What's the current role of the agent?
    • Wait for more replies, but that letter to me can be interpreted as a letter before action. Ignoring it can have consequences. The court to impose sanctions for failure in responding to a letter of claim.
    • I'm still pondering/ trying to find docs re the above issue. Moving on - same saga; different issue I'm trying to understand what I can do: The lender/ mortgagee-in-possession has a claim v me for alleged debt. But the debt has only been incurred due to them failing to sell property in >5y. I'm fighting them on this.   I've been trying to get an order for sale for 2y.  I got it legally added into my counterclaim - but that will only be dealt with at trial.  This is really frustrating. The otherside's lawyers made an application to adjourn trial for a few more months - allegedly wanting to try sort some kind of settlement with me and to use the stay to sell.  At the hearing I asked Judge to expedite the order for sale. I pointed out they need a court-imposed deadline or this adjournment is just another time wasting tactic (with interest still accruing) as they have no buyer.  But the judge said he could legally only deal with the order at trial. The otherside don't want to be forced to sell the property.. Disclosure has presented so many emails which prove they want to keep it. I raised some points with the judge including misconduct of the receiver. The judge suggested I may have a separate claim against the receiver?   On this point - earlier paid-for lawyers said my counterclaim should be directed at the lender for interference with the receiver and the lender should be held responsible for the receiver's actions/ inactions.   I don't clearly understand that, but their legal advice was something to do with the role a receiver has acting as an agent for a borrower which makes it hard for a borrower to make a claim against a receiver ???.  However the judge's comment has got me thinking.  He made it clear the current claim is lender v me - it's not receiver v me.  Yet it is the receiver who is appointed to sell the property. (The receiver is mentioned/ involved in my counterclaim only from the lender collusion/ interference perspective).  So would I be able to make a separate application for an order for sale against the receiver?  Disclosure shows receiver has constantly rejected offers. He gave a contract to one buyer 4y ago. But colluded with the lender's lawyer to withdraw the contract after 2w to instead give it to the ceo of the lender (his own ltd co) (using same lawyer).  Emails show it was their joint strategy for lender/ ceo to keep the property.  The receiver didn't put the ceo under any pressure to exchange quickly.  After 1 month they all colluded again to follow a very destructive path - to gut the property.  My account was apparently switched into a "different fund" to "enable them to do works" (probably something to do with the ceo as he switched his ltd co accountant to in-house).   Interestingly the receiver told lender not to incur significant works costs and to hold interest.  The costs were huge (added to my account) and interest was not held.   The receiver rejected a good offer put forward by me 1.5y ago.  And he rejected a high offer 1y ago - to the dismay of the agent.  Would reasons like this be good enough to make a separate application to the court against the receiver for an order for sale ??  Or due to the main proceedings and/or the weird relationship a borrower has with a receiver I cannot ?
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5234 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Firstly, I hope that this isn't covered elsewhere and that I'm not just being annoying by posting, but my head is spinning so badly that I'm finding it hard to read too much.

 

I've run up a council-tax bill and want to pay it off, but the council's proposal for payment went into my spam folder and didn't get noticed before being passed to Bristow and Sutor for collection. Not all of the council tax owed has actually been accrued yet - some of it is for next year, but they want the lot and have a liability order.

 

The council wanted £180 a month from me, which is more money than I have. I emailed them back and told them that I would pay, even though it might mean that I have to eat packet noodles for two weeks a month (which would play havok with my disability, which leaves me emaciated and weak.)

 

I was told that they couldn't do anything and I should talk to the bailiffs. I called Bristow and Sutor and was told that they absolutely will not negotiate unless I allow them into my home to seize goods. Over my dead body.

 

I immediately made a payment of £150 to the council, which they accepted, and asked that they withdraw the account from the bailiffs - to which I was told: "I told you how much we wanted from you, now the account has been passed to the bailiffs and I am unable to withdraw it."

 

What do I do? I don't want to go to prison, I just want to pay off my debt at a rate that I can afford.

 

If you can offer any advice, I'd really appreciate it.

 

Thanks.

Link to post
Share on other sites

i think you will be classed as vunerable,

as you have discovered there is nothing to stop you paying the council direct via internet banking.

 

oh and stay off the phone to te bailiff do it in writing if you must converse with them.

 

more later

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

NATIONAL STANDARDS FOR ENFORCEMENT AGENTS may 2002

 

Those who might be potentially vulnerable include:

  • the elderly;
  • people with a disability;
  • the seriously ill;
  • the recently bereaved;
  • single parent families;
  • pregnant women;
  • unemployed people; and,
  • those who have obvious difficulty in understanding, speaking or reading English

Link to post
Share on other sites

I posted what just happened elsewhere, but I thought I'd post it on my thread too, as I can't quite believe it.

 

The bailiff just put a 'notification of bailiff visit' through my door, quietly, without knocking, it was signed with an 'x' and the 'full name' field was 'Jim'.

 

Also, he got my name wrong on the form.

 

I am being charged an extra £16 for 'Jim's' visit.

 

Is this something that's common for them to do?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes, that kind of thing is common, they'll do all sorts of things. just stick to the good advice above and on the stickys on the top of this section of the forum too. sounds like you may have grounds to complain, but wait till one of the forum resident experts posts. take care!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks, i've been reading, but i'm still worried that it'll turn out badly. I'm tired of begging the council to take the matter back into their own hands, and all I'm doing now is making whatever payments I can, and hoping that I'll not end up in prison - or with a criminal record.

 

Can they actually do that? The whole situation is horrible, and my nerves are shot. I'm jumping at shadows and dread returning home if I go out as I don't know what I'll find.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks, i've been reading, but i'm still worried that it'll turn out badly. I'm tired of begging the council to take the matter back into their own hands, and all I'm doing now is making whatever payments I can, and hoping that I'll not end up in prison - or with a criminal record.

 

Can they actually do that? The whole situation is horrible, and my nerves are shot. I'm jumping at shadows and dread returning home if I go out as I don't know what I'll find.

 

Prison is for those that refuse to pay not those who are paying and attempting to pay the debt, so I am sorry to tell you you will have to cook your own Xmas Lunch this year.

 

Follow PT...Don't forget to treat your bailiff....stuff him ...cook him, slice and serve him on a plate to the person you hate most.;)

wd

Link to post
Share on other sites

Pink_eeyore, no - I'm not even sure how to do that: I don't claim benefits, and I work as much as I can, though fatigue is a huge issue for many neuropathies.

 

Thank you to dx100uk, hallowitch and layercake for your advice, and wonkeydonkey: your words have made my christmastime a little better, cheers! I wouldn't eat a bailiff though, they're either too tough or full of **** :D

 

Any advice on where it's likely to go from here - I'm paying close to what the council insisted on, so I'm hoping, perhaps in vain, that this will all just go away.

 

Cheers all.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Plan of Action:

 

1. Before Monday contact your local Councillor - doesn't matter it's the weekend, they asked for public office so are used to being contacted at odd times.

2. Monday - contact Council - you need to know amount on Liability Order, amount still outstanding and when passed to Bailiff. Info can be requested by phone but back up by email and if necessary by hard copy.

3. Monday - contact Bailiff company - ask for statement of your account including screenshot - they are obliged to give you this. They may state they need £10 as it is for a Subject Access Request, your request falls outside of the Data Protection Act. Send info by email backed up by hard copy in post.

4. Formally request to Council asking they take your account back from Bailiff - usually again fails as Council staff can only read from script. Ask to speak to someone more Senior - you can go as far as Head of Revenues or Chief Executive. Always get name of who you are speaking to and their job title.

5. As you have said pay Council at a level you can afford - do this Online or by automated phone line.

6. When Bailiff calls totally ignore him - despite any threats he may make he can not have you arrested, break into your property (unless entry previously gained), attend with a locksmith, remove property in your absence. He is all bluff and bluster and as much use as a wet f*rt. You should also ask him for his ID and at what Court he is certificated - check this - he also has to carry a copy of the Liability Order.

 

It may be that the Bailiff is overcharging you and once that can be established you will hold all the aces. make sure you don't let him in and hide anything outside - particularly vehicles. There may be a couple of fees you may have to pay (£42-50 in total) but eventually he will go away to pester someone less fortunate.

 

PT

  • Haha 1

Please consider making a small donation to help keep this site running

 

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm not "vulnerable", but did succeed in an old CT debt being sent back to the Council.

 

My advice is:

 

  • Don't let them in
  • Don't call them - one had me in tears saying he was in my house
  • Don't let them in
  • Do fill in an income & expenditure from the Council - it does help
  • Don't let them in
  • If you have a car, don't park it in front of or near your house. A bailiff listed my neighbour's car, and when I questioned this I was told the bailiff would run a vehicle check before impounding the vehicle
  • Do write to the council stating how much you can pay per month (make it as low as possible so you can easily manage it, but don't take the proverbial), pay it direct to the Council and STICK TO IT
  • Did I say don't let them in?

Basically, bailiffs are there to collect the debt and enforce as much of their "fees" as they can.

 

Good luck!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...