Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • ps i doubt the PCN says macdonalds?? MET dont operate a reverse trespass car park for mc'd's parkers going to starbucks...(occupants left vehicle claim) they only do that for the starbucks part  i bet you parked in the starbuck side and walked to MCd's? dx    
    • it is NOT A FINE.....this is an extremely important point to understand no-one bar a magistrate in a magistrates criminal court can ever fine anyone for anything. Private Parking Tickets (speculative invoices) are NOT a criminal matter, merely a speculative contractual Civil matter hence they can only try a speculative monetary claim via the civil county court system (which is no more a legal powers matter than what any member of Joe Public can do). Until/unless they do raise a county court claim a CCJ and win, there are not ANY enforcement powers they can undertake other than using a DCA, whom are legally powerless and are not BAILIFFS. Penalty Charge Notices issued by local authorities etc were decriminalised years ago - meaning they no longer can progress a claim to the magistrates court to enforce, but go directly to legal enforcement via a real BAILIFF themselves. 10'000 of people waste £m's paying private parking companies because they think they are FINES...and the media do not help either. the more people read the above the less income this shark industry get. where your post said fine it now says charge .............. please fill out the Q&A ASAP. dx  
    • Well done on reading the other threads. If ECP haven't got the guts to do court then there is no reason to pay them. From other threads there is a 35-minute free stay after which you need to pay, with the signs hidden where no-one will read them.  Which probably explains why ECP threaten this & threaten that, but in the end daren't do court. As for your employer - well you can out yourself as the driver to ECP so the hamster bedding will arrive at yours.  Get your employer to do that using the e-mail address under Appeals and Transfer Of Liability.  
    • good you are getting there. Lloyds/TSb...i certainly would not be risking possible off-setting going on if a choice were there, but in all honestly thats obv too late now..., however..you might not never be in that situation so dont worry too much. regardless to being defaulted or not, if any debt that is not paid/used in 6yrs it becomes statute barred. you need to understand a couple of things like 'default' and 'default notice' a default is simply a recorded D in the calendar section/history of a debt, it does not really mean anything. might slightly hit your rating. the important thing here is a default notice , these are issued by the original creditor (OC) under the consumer credit act, it gives you 14 days to settle whatever they are asking, if you don't then they have the option to register a defaulted date on your credit file. that can make getting other credit more difficult. and hits your rating. once that happens, not matter what you do after that, paying it or not or not paid off or not, the whole account vanishes from your credit file on the DN's 6th b'day. though that might not necessarily mean the debt is not still owed - thats down to the SB date above. an OC very rarely does court and only the OWNER of a debt can instigate any court action (Attempted a CCJ) DCA's debt collection agencies - DCA's are NOT BAILIFFS they have ZERO legal powers on ANY debt - no matter what it's TYPE. an OC make pass a debt to a dca as their client to try and spoof people into paying through legal ignorance of the above statement. an OC may SELL on an old debt to a DCA/debt buyer (approx 10p=£1) and then claim their losses through tax write off and their business insurance, wiping their hands of the debt. the DCA then becomes the debt OWNER. since the late 70's dca's pull all kinds of 'stunts' through threat-o-grams to spoof a debtor into paying them the full value of the debt, when they bought if for a discounted sum (typically 10p=£1). you never pay a dca a penny! if read carefully, NONE of their letters nor those of any other 'trading names' they spoof themselves under making it seem it's going up some kind of legitimate legal 'chain' say WILL anything....just carefully worded letters with all kinds of threats of what could/might/poss happen with other such words as instruct forward pass... well my dog does not sit when instructed too...so... DCA's SOMETIMES will issue a court claim, but in all honesty its simply a speculative claim hoping mugs wet themselves and cough up...oh im going to court... BIG DEAL DCA - show me the enforceable paperwork signed by me...9/10 they dont have it and if your defence is conducted properly, most run away from you . however before they do all that they now have to send a letter of claim, cause the courts got fed up with them issuing +750'000PA speculative claims and jamming up the legal system. so bottom line is two conclusions.... if you cant pay a debt, get a DN issued ASAP (stop paying it!) make sure it gets registered on your file then it stops hurting your file/future credit in 6yrs regardless to what happens (bar of course a later DCA CCJ - fat chance mind!)  once you've a registered DN , then look into restarting payments if the debt is still owed by the OC, if SOLD to a DCA, don't pay - see if they issue a letter of claim (then comeback here!).        
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

sexual harrassment by supermarket security man


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5249 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I am furious, yesterday my wife and my 14 yr old daughter went in to a local supermarket whos name begins with A and ends in A, she did her shopping and on the way out the security buzzer went off so the security man came over and was pleasant enough, couldnt find any thing so off she went again to which the buzzer sounded again, at this my wife smiled and reversed the trolley the same chap came over and my wife said looks like you got a dodgy buzzer to which the security man agreed, the security man is a supermarket employee, BUT they also contract outside security for the festive period, it was at this point a contracted security man said to my wife "it must be your knickers" my wife looked stunnedly at the contracted security man to which he then said "do you want to take them off", with that the first security man apologised and ushered my wife away from the contracted security man, my wife asked for a manager, who came over and when my wife told her what he said she promptly told him to get his coat and leave, she apologised as did the other security man, now my daughter was very upset as was my wife, she was extreemly embarrassed by this guy and i am disgusted in the way she was treated by this contracted guy, my wife then left the store to pick me up, when she told me, i was fuming and told her to go back to the supermarket so we could get the details of the contractor and the stores head office again the manager and the employed guard couldnt apologise enough, now i say this was sexual harrassment, when my wife spoke to head offece they agreed that it was sexual harrassment and the lady on the phone went to speak to some one, when she returned she asked "how much do you want" my wife was taken aback with this, my question is this, what is this worth, i am not letting the store get away with this as my family was treated appallingly.

TOTALLY debt free as of 2007, Fantastic,

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 54
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Hi,

 

By asking you 'how much do you want' is because obviously they are concerned that you may go to the media with this. They will certainly not want that to happen!

 

It seems to me that they acted swiftly by sacking the 'offender' on the spot but you are clearly not satisfied with this.

 

Therefore you should put your complaint in writing to their head office (which I think is in Leeds) indicating you may seek legal advice and ask for their comments within 14 days. Send by recorded delivery and keep a copy.

 

Your question 'what is this worth' seems a little strange to me as it suggests you are only interested in financial compensation. However, I would suggest to consult a solicitor who specializes in such matters and may be able to answer the question.

  • Haha 1

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

its sexual harrassment and its disgusting. i personally would go to the store who should have logged the incident then i'd call the police in. By asking how much you want i'd take a guess that they know that what happened could be taken further and that makes them worried.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Tell them you want enough to settle your mortgage, if they decline, go to the media.

 

Well to be frank, my opinion on this is that it is disgusting and Asda are clearly not acting in your best interests. I wouldn't personally fart around with the Police, they tend to do nothing really.

 

You have two choices, IMHO

 

Name your price,

 

or go to the media.

 

It all depends on what you want out of it, if you want compensated then take the money, but if you want justice, quickly and properly (In that the security guard will most likely lose his job and be shamed in the media,) then choose the latter.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The police might be able to charge the offending security guard under section 5 of the 1986 Public Order Act. Which is an £80 FPN, if I recall.

 

There is no offence of sexual harassment in this context, as far as I am aware of.

 

Furthermore, you have no statutory rights to compensation / any further action on behalf of the store. They appear to be doing as much as can be reasonably expected already - dismissing the guard and offering some degree of compensation.

 

What more can you expect?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Tell them you want enough to settle your mortgage, if they decline, go to the media.

 

Well to be frank, my opinion on this is that it is disgusting and Asda are clearly not acting in your best interests. I wouldn't personally fart around with the Police, they tend to do nothing really.

 

You have two choices, IMHO

 

Name your price,

 

or go to the media.

 

It all depends on what you want out of it, if you want compensated then take the money, but if you want justice, quickly and properly (In that the security guard will most likely lose his job and be shamed in the media,) then choose the latter.

 

Agreed. Completely Agreed.

 

Reason being, were they in-house security or contractors? If in-house, I'd take Asda for all they have to offer as they have a responsibility to employ people who arent pigs.

 

If contract, it's a bit trickier. If they have any sense, they'll have got wind of this and sacked the guy therefore cutting loose all obligation or liability for his actions. Again, I'd go for Asda as they shouldn't use dodgy contract firms.

 

The crux of it is - settle your mortgage and have a merry christmas.

 

Don't go to the media - I always find that tacky lol

Link to post
Share on other sites

My Real Name

 

The thing is with the Police is they are more bothered about being sat in Mercedes Sprinter vans in groups of four at the side of the road on a 30 zone instead of a 40 zone to care less about some woman with her sexual harrassment claim, they don't take these kind of crimes seriously IMO. The best thing to suggest is keep on at the company, get the idiot sacked, give him a Merry Christmas to remember. You find you waste too much time sat around giving statements with the Old Bill and little in return.

 

As i said, make sure he is sacked, maybe accept some money and have a Merry Christmas.

 

But that is just my advice, you can go to the Police if you wish to do so, but honestly, a few months inside would be a decent punishment, not £80.

Link to post
Share on other sites

my wife has been in negosiations with the supermarket in question, firstly the guard was contracted and not directly employed, the supermarket wanted to send some flowers but my missus is not a fan of flora, they offered £50 to start but my wife has agreen "verbally" to £100 store credit, tbh i dont think she would have gotten much more, but i am really annoyed abouit this, the guy is lucky i wasnt there myself.

also this is covered under sexual discrimination as my wife was discriminated against

Edited by baconbuttyman

TOTALLY debt free as of 2007, Fantastic,

Link to post
Share on other sites

Is that all that comes of this? I take it the security guard has been dismissed (To put it nicely). £50 offer? It makes me wonder what the offer would have been if your partner had been a minor. They think they can put a price on silence, it's disgusting, because that is what it is, we're a greedy nation and love to come into money, and forget everything that happened before the money was given.

 

You should have named your price when she said how much do you want...

 

£400-£500 would have been more decent to buy your silence.

Link to post
Share on other sites

They think they can put a price on silence

Where does anyone say that the supermarket's offer was conditional upon a gagging order? The OP seems to be free to continue to comment

 

It makes me wonder what the offer would have been if your partner had been a minor

Why on earth would the security guard give a crass, crude and highly inappropriate chat-up line (and that was what this was, no more) to a minor? What exactly are you accusing the OP of in respect of his choice of partner?

 

it's disgusting, because that is what it is

What an insightful analysis, but then its hardly surprising given the contradictory statements that follow;

we're a greedy nation

and

£400-£500 would have been more decent
Link to post
Share on other sites

let me clear up a few things.

my wife was with a minor, not a partner, she was with my daughter who heard every thing, the security guard in question was dismissed immidiately.

my daughter is 14, i am now in a position where i am going to tell my wife to reject the offer and let me persue it in a legal manor, it is not greedy to make people pay for their unlawful behaviour, it justice, sexual discrimination and harrassment is a crime and the offender should be held accountable for it

TOTALLY debt free as of 2007, Fantastic,

Link to post
Share on other sites

let me clear up a few things.

my wife was with a minor, not a partner, she was with my daughter who heard every thing, the security guard in question was dismissed immidiately.

my daughter is 14, i am now in a position where i am going to tell my wife to reject the offer and let me persue it in a legal manor, it is not greedy to make people pay for their unlawful behaviour, it justice, sexual discrimination and harrassment is a crime and the offender should be held accountable for it

Has he not been held accountable and paid for his behaviour by being sacked?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Has he not been held accountable and paid for his behaviour by being sacked?

 

 

The guard may have been sacked (although we don't know for certain since he is contracted to Asda, not directly employed by them) but the OP's wife gets no benefit of that action & is entitled to compensation for the actions of the guard.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The guard may have been sacked (although we don't know for certain since he is contracted to Asda, not directly employed by them)

The OP said he's been sacked

but the OP's wife gets no benefit of that action & is entitled to compensation for the actions of the guard.

She has been offered ample compensation IMO; £100 for what was no more than an ill-judged and offensive chat-up line. In any case, that is not what the OP wants. The OP wants the security guard to be held accountable for his actions and to pay for them. I believe that he (the security guard) has been held accountable and has paid with his job. I cannot see how much more can be reasonably expected

Link to post
Share on other sites

The OP said that he was sent packing from Asda but I can't see any reference to the fact that he has been sacked from his employers who are not Asda. He might be working in another store by now preparing to insult & verbally abuse other women in a town near you!

 

£100 store vouchers? Erm, that just means that the store retrieves EVERY PENNY BACK so is hardly suitable compensation IMO.

 

Women will always have a different view on comments like this when compared to a mans point of view & I commend the OP for being as disgusted with the guards actions as his wife & child were.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The OP said that he was sent packing from Asda but I can't see any reference to the fact that he has been sacked from his employers who are not Asda.

Look at post #11 where the OP says "the security guard in question was dismissed immidiately". Perhaps the OP should clarify what he meant

 

£100 store vouchers? Erm, that just means that the store retrieves EVERY PENNY BACK so is hardly suitable compensation IMO.

Why not? What relevance is it that Asda get some of it back (not all of it because they have to pay for the goods that the OP would get with the voucher)? They haven't done anything wrong as far as I can see. They recognised the problem and acted on it straight away

 

Women will always have a different view on comments like this when compared to a mans point of view & I commend the OP for being as disgusted with the guards actions as his wife & child were.

Actually the only reference to the views of the OP's wife are in post #8 where the OP says that "they offered £50 to start but my wife has agreen "verbally" to £100 store credit"

 

Far from being the man of integrity trying to defend the honour of his wife as you seem to believe, it seems to me that he's just trying to milk the situation for as much money as he can get

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have to say I think Asda have done as much as they could. I think asking for his mortgage to be paid off is ridiculous. Okay so it was disgusting and horrific and very embarrassing, but neither she nor the daughter were harmed. Rape victims dont get enough to pay off their mortgages, so I hardly think innappropriate comments would.

 

Personally, rather than financial gain, I would be questioning Asda on their recruitment process.

If you find my post helpful please click on the scales at the top. Thank you

FAQ SECTION HERE

 

Halifax Bank Claim filed and settled

Halifax Credit Card settled

Argos Store Card settled

 

CCA requests sent to

Halifax Credit Card

LLoyds TSB Credit Card

Capital One

Moorcroft (Argos)

NDR

18/06/09

Link to post
Share on other sites

I actually had similar from the same store, only it was the delivery driver who made inappropriate advances. On my request Asda made a substantial donation to a sexual violence charity and agreed to review their recruitment process (as well as the driver being dismissed).

If you find my post helpful please click on the scales at the top. Thank you

FAQ SECTION HERE

 

Halifax Bank Claim filed and settled

Halifax Credit Card settled

Argos Store Card settled

 

CCA requests sent to

Halifax Credit Card

LLoyds TSB Credit Card

Capital One

Moorcroft (Argos)

NDR

18/06/09

Link to post
Share on other sites

Okay, i have read through and it seems certain people are questioning what i was saying. I wish to cause no offence to anybody, i am merely defending and explaining my comments.

 

Natalie

Asda had clearly been offering money, i was simply making a suggestion that was so much out of normality that the OP would know not to take this forward, notice how i haven't mentioned that again in all replies i have made.

 

baconbuttyman

 

I read the Original Post thoroughly and understood that your wife was with a minor, i hope i didn't cause any harm in saying what i said, if the security guard has spoken to your wife, then i personally believe he would do the same to teenage girls, this is disgusting and i don't personally think that much justice would be done either way. I truly hope you get the response you want out of this, but to be honest, he could be working down at the next Tesco or Morrisons and repeat this kind of behaviour with another woman.

 

bedlington83

 

You seem to have questioned just about all of my statements, what i was saying in 'Price on silence' implies that 9 times out of 10 (This is an expression, not fact, but this IS the case), if somebody is offered 'Compensation' for something, they don't usually take the matter any further.

 

I don't know if you were trying to begin a slanging match in what you next quoted with regards to my 'What if his wife had been a minor?' comment. I was never implying that his wife was a minor at all, i was just stating that this could easily have been somebody else, if his wife hadn't been in that position at that time, and it'd have been a girl of 15, would he have made those same comments to that girl? Regardless of whether she was attractive or not... All i was saying was that if this incident had have been a minor, and he would have made those comments, what would Asda have been offering because that would make it oh so more serious.

 

And the typical person would keep quiet after being given some money, because in their heads, that is the end of it, they've made a gain, they will soon forget it. Money usually changes everything.

 

I think that baconbuttyman has taken a look at the advice of all people, and will have asked people elsewhere, and i know he will do what he believes to be right. Clearly he isn't going to take my advice and ask them to pay off his morgage.

 

baconbuttyman keep posting, i'd like to know what you do and what comes of this, and good luck all the way.

Link to post
Share on other sites

My Real Name

 

The thing is with the Police is they are more bothered about being sat in Mercedes Sprinter vans in groups of four at the side of the road on a 30 zone instead of a 40 zone to care less about some woman with her sexual harrassment claim, they don't take these kind of crimes seriously IMO.

Which crime is that then?

 

The best thing to suggest is keep on at the company, get the idiot sacked, give him a Merry Christmas to remember. You find you waste too much time sat around giving statements with the Old Bill and little in return.

 

As i said, make sure he is sacked, maybe accept some money and have a Merry Christmas.

 

But that is just my advice, you can go to the Police if you wish to do so, but honestly, a few months inside would be a decent punishment, not £80.

You need to complain to the MOJ, vis. sentencng guidelines, in that case.
Link to post
Share on other sites

my wife has been in negosiations with the supermarket in question, firstly the guard was contracted and not directly employed, the supermarket wanted to send some flowers but my missus is not a fan of flora, they offered £50 to start but my wife has agreen "verbally" to £100 store credit, tbh i dont think she would have gotten much more, but i am really annoyed abouit this, the guy is lucky i wasnt there myself.
This seems like a good result, and Asda have done as much as can be reasonably expected.

also this is covered under sexual discrimination as my wife was discriminated against
Covered where? I would be happy to defer to your knowledge of the law in this regard, as mine is sadly lacking.
Link to post
Share on other sites

The guard may have been sacked (although we don't know for certain since he is contracted to Asda, not directly employed by them) but the OP's wife gets no benefit of that action & is entitled to compensation for the actions of the guard.
On what basis is this entitlement based? Edited by My Real Name
spelling
Link to post
Share on other sites

it is not greedy to make people pay for their unlawful behaviour, it justice, sexual discrimination and harrassment is a crime and the offender should be held accountable for it

 

And I believe the offender did, didnt he? He lost his job. Asda isnt the offender, they acted in a reasonable manner by dismissing the employee, and AS A GOOD WILL GESTURE offered to compensate your wife.

 

They were not obliged to offer your wife anything, as soon as they knew what was occurring they acted. What more can you possibly expect from them?

If you find my post helpful please click on the scales at the top. Thank you

FAQ SECTION HERE

 

Halifax Bank Claim filed and settled

Halifax Credit Card settled

Argos Store Card settled

 

CCA requests sent to

Halifax Credit Card

LLoyds TSB Credit Card

Capital One

Moorcroft (Argos)

NDR

18/06/09

Link to post
Share on other sites

You seem to have questioned just about all of my statements

Because I find it very difficult to understand the point you're making especially as you seem to contradict yourself. For example, further along in the same sentence you go on to say "This is an expression, not fact, but this IS the case". Which is it? (It's a rhetorical question)

 

I don't know if you were trying to begin a slanging match in what you next quoted with regards to my 'What if his wife had been a minor?' comment. I was never implying that his wife was a minor at all
I'm sorry but what you actually said was "It makes me wonder what the offer would have been if your partner had been a minor". Perhaps it was an unfortunate choice of words ("partner" generally means more than "person that you were shopping with"). I'm happy to accept that you didn't mean what it appeared to mean

 

i was just stating that this could easily have been somebody else, if his wife hadn't been in that position at that time, and it'd have been a girl of 15, would he have made those same comments to that girl?
Of course not! Just because the man is socially clumsy and overtly forward in his chat-up lines doesn't make him a paedophile for God's sake. Try and keep a bit of perspective.

 

Regardless of whether she was attractive or not... All i was saying was that if this incident had have been a minor, and he would have made those comments, what would Asda have been offering because that would make it oh so more serious.

If those things had happened, then I agree it would've been more serious, but they didn't happen except in your imagination. Why should Asda offer compensation for something that never happened?

Link to post
Share on other sites

(please note - i have not named the store, all i have done is give you all a clue and then let you simply deduce which store it is)

 

its not the money thats at issue here, its the honour of my family, yes we could accept the 100 quid and then get our xmas shopping from the store, but then that would be placing a price on my wife and daughters honour, this is my belief, if the store is employ the use of security staff that are simply "bouncers" with a bouncer mentality, (i have worked as club security in the roughest club in blackpool and i know politeness is the best tool that i could use, theres a difference between a bouncer and a security guard.

the guy was dismissed and is now banned from all stores in the area belonging to that particular chain, but if the guy has been sacked from his actual employer i do not know, but the store owners have a responsability to ensure the people that are placed in the store are up to the job and the standard they require from their own employees.

i dont know what i want out of this, but its not what i want, its what makes my wife n daughter happy. maybe i want to embarrace the store like my family were embarraced and degraded.

No they wernt raped as mentioned befor (which was a stupid comment btw imho) but they were verbally abused and thats wrong

i know security staff in my area go thru police checks etc but thats only when they go for a lisence initially, when its renewed each year then there are no checks, looking at the comments the guy made, i am not making any asumptions about the guy but, how many times have you seen groups of men in vans, trucks etc leering and wolf wistling school girls, take a closer look at it and you will see its all to common, if you can honestly say you havent, then open your eyes. i am a father of two girls and a boy, i find this behaviour disgusting and reprehensable. as a human being i find it the same.

i feel my wife and child were violated by some greasy no-mark and would like 5 minutes alone with this guy.

and you think this is about money??.

the store does!! its not for me!!

Edited by baconbuttyman

TOTALLY debt free as of 2007, Fantastic,

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...