Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Good Evening, I've got a fairly simple question but I'll provide some context incase needed. I've pursued a company that has operations in england despite them having no official office anywhere. I've managed to find a site they operate from and the papers there have been defended so I know they operate there. They've filed a defence which is honestly the worst defence ever, and despite being required to provide their witness evidence, they have not and have completely ignored the courts and my request for copies of it. I'm therefore considering applying to strike out their defence on the grounds the defence was rubbish and that they haven't provided any evidence for the trial. However, it has a trial date set for end of june, and a civil application wouldn't get heard until a week before then, so hardly worth it. However, my local court is very good at dealing with paper applications (i.e ones that don't need hearings, and frankly I think they are literally like 1-2 days from when you submit it to when a Judge sees it. I'm wondering if I can apply to strikeout a defence without a hearing OR whether a hearing is required for a strikeout application.   Thanks
    • I have just opened another bank acc with lloyds (i have a few already) After doing some research they may have some relation to tsb or be apart of the same group will this cause me issue if my salary is paid into my lloyds account? Also, if the debts do go into default and nothing is paid then after 6 years it all goes away? As the DCAs cannot do anything? I do want to start paying in like 3/4 months or do you advise I leave it if it goes into default? again sorry for all the questions, i am just processing everything
    • one reply only  follow post 2 of letter of claim <<clickme link. dx
    • Sorry, I got confused  Yes, it states all three   Thanks, 
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

£620 for digital Ariel + installation


hallowitch
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5205 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

my sister-in law paid £620 for a digital Ariel plus installation she is getting the same firm to my aunts I'm not happy with my aunt paying this much

 

I am going to phone the digital switch over help line tomorrow as she may be entitled to help as she is 86 however she is quite well of and if this is means tested she wont get help

 

so i am looking for options have check her post code and she is in the winterhill area

 

her telly is about 12 years old and i wondered if she could get freesat + dish would this work on a telly that old

Link to post
Share on other sites

and also availablefor peeps in in digital switchover areas -

 

can get sky equipment free and jusy pay a min package for 12 months and then have freesat after the 12 months - alot cheaper than the above price

 

 

but deffinatley worth following bigdaddy's advice and there are many people that qualify for the helpline offers

 

 

Ida x

Please contact a member of the site team if you are offered help off the forum for a a paid or no win no fee service.

 

Please consider making a small donation to help keep this site running

Click here to donate through PayPal (opens in a new window)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Before paying out check that she actually needs a new aerial as most don't actually need changing.

 

More Information provided on the following link.

 

 

 

Here

 

 

enamae

Please note: I have no qualifications in this area and any advice offered is given in good faith.

 

 

http://www.financial-ombudsman.org.uk/publications/Ombudsman-news/40/40_setoff.htm

Link to post
Share on other sites

my sister-in law paid £620 for a digital Ariel plus installation she is getting the same firm to my aunts I'm not happy with my aunt paying this much

 

I am going to phone the digital switch over help line tomorrow as she may be entitled to help as she is 86 however she is quite well of and if this is means tested she wont get help

 

so i am looking for options have check her post code and she is in the winterhill area

 

her telly is about 12 years old and i wondered if she could get freesat + dish would this work on a telly that old

 

that is outrageous!!

 

see the watchdog site.

 

most people dont even need an aerial upgrade its all a big [problem].

 

stick a freeview box on the aerial feed she has first and test it!

 

a 'digital' aerial is typically

 

RIP OFF!!

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

No such thing as a digital aerial

 

Most aerials require no more than realigning with the transmitter as a lot of installers don't check and just point it in the same general direction as other aerials are facing.

One other common problem is oxidation of the cable connection at the aerial, all it requires it cleaning and reconnection.

Edited by Conniff
Correct typo - oops
Link to post
Share on other sites

No such thing as a digital aerial

 

Most aerials require no more than realigning with the transmitter as a lot of installers don't check and just point it in the same general direction as other aerials are facing.

One other common problem is oxidation of the cable connection at the aerial, all it requires it cleanting and reconnection.

 

well my avatar gives a clue.......

 

typically freeview is sometimes outside the bandwidth of many old aerials, they are not wideband, thats what causes the issue.

but no there is no such thing as a digital aerial.

 

but sadly corrosion and the non use of rubberweld tape leads to many issues that can very easily be fixed.

 

they are all rip off merchants.....

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

for 37yrs yep

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

wilco

 

gotta do a pmr tower at 2pm so i'll resp later

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

The aerial on my house dates from the 1980's and picks up freeview just fine. Its old, tatty looking and rusty but the picture is perfect.

 

Also £620 ?? I bet whom ever fitted that was laughing all the way to the bank.

Link to post
Share on other sites

the confusion with Aerials

 

in simple terms

 

area's around the country are in groups ,

 

eg, London group a , because it uses channels 21 - 35

 

other parts of the UK will have other groups

 

it is also done so that the transmitter do not interfere with ajacent ones

 

and freeview uses a group "W" ( wideband ) WHICH COVERS ALL CHANNELS ( often called a DIGITAL AERIAL )

 

if you have a single group aerial you may miss some of the channels

 

however if you are close to the local transmitter you may well receive everything

 

true cost for a group W is about £20 - £80 Depending on the elements , more elements more gain ( further you are from the mast the higher the gain needed )

 

installation is on top

 

if your aerial is 20 years or more it is ideal to replace everything inc cable,

 

and unless you have an unusal install problem its going to be under £100 ( install is normally about £35 - £50 on top of the cost of the aerial )

..

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

£620 is a ridiulous amount to pay for an aerial install, but I have heard of higher charges.

 

An aerial can cost the installer anywhere from £5-£80 depending on what type they use.

 

We charge £115 for an aerial install, which includes an aerial, bracket and pole (upto a certain size) and caling to one point in the house. If an amp is required then this is extra, price dependant upon what amp you have, but we will not try and sell the most expensive unless it si genuinely needed.

 

A lot of old aerials will work perfectly fine with freeview and dont need upgrading.

 

With regards to freesat working on an old TV, so long as it has a scart socket then yes it will. freesat box's so not have a RF out on them, so have to be connected via scart or HDMI if you get the HD version.

 

We dont typically do residential installs and concentrate mainly on commercial work, so I am unsure of the free aerials/box's for people over a certain age, but I would imagine the scheme was set up for older people so that when their area switchs over they are able to continue recieving viewing, even they are unable to afford to pay for an aerial/box. As you have mentioned she is quite well off, then I dont think this is in the spirit of claiming for a free on really.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...