Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • the Town and Country [advertisments ] Regulations 2007 are not easy to understand. Most Council planing officials don't so it's good that you found one who knows. Although he may not have been right if the rogues have not been "controlling" in the car park for that long. The time only starts when the ANPR signs go up, not how long the area has been used as a car park.   Sadly I have checked Highview out and they have been there since at least 2014 . I have looked at the BPA Code of Practice version 8 which covers 2023 and that states Re Consideration and Grace Periods 13.3 Where a parking location is one where a limited period of parking is permitted, or where drivers contract to park for a defined period and pay for that service in advance (Pay & Display), this would be considered as a parking event and a Grace Period of at least 10 minutes must be added to the end of a parking event before you issue a PCN. It then goes on to explain a bit more further down 13.5 You must tell us the specific consideration/grace period at a site if our compliance team or our agents ask what it is. 13.6 Neither a consideration period or a grace period are periods of free parking and there is no requirement for you to offer an additional allowance on top of a consideration or grace period. _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________So you have  now only overstayed 5 minutes maximum since BPA quote a minimum of 10 minutes. And it may be that the Riverside does have a longer period perhaps because of the size of the car park? So it becomes even more incumbent on you to remember where the extra 5 minutes could be.  Were you travelling as a family with children or a disabled person where getting them in and out of the car would take longer. Was there difficulty finding a space, or having to queue to get out of the car park . Or anything else that could account for another 5 minutes  without having to claim the difference between the ANPR times and the actual times.
    • Regarding a driver, that HAS paid for parking but input an incorrect Vehicle Registration Number.   This is an easy mistake to make, especially if a driver has access to more than one vehicle. First of all, upon receiving an NTK/PCN it is important to check that the Notice fully complies with PoFA 2012 Schedule 4 before deciding how to respond of course. The general advice is NOT to appeal to the Private Parking Company as, for example, you may identify yourself as driver and in certain circumstances that could harm your defence at a later stage. However, after following a recent thread on this subject, I have come to the conclusion that, in the case of inputting an incorrect Vehicle Registration Number, which is covered by “de minimis” it may actually HARM your defence at a later stage if you have not appealed to the PPC at the first appeal stage and explained that you DID pay for parking and CAN provide proof of parking, it was just that an incorrect VRN was input in error. Now, we all know that the BPA Code of Practice are guidelines from one bunch of charlatans for another bunch of charlatans to follow, but my thoughts are that there could be problems in court if a judge decides that a motorist has not followed these guidelines and has not made an appeal at the first appeal stage, therefore attempting to resolve the situation before it reaches court. From BPA Code of Practice: Section 17:  Keying Errors B) Major Keying Errors Examples of a major keying error could include: • Motorist entered their spouse’s car registration • Motorist entered something completely unrelated to their registration • Motorist made multiple keying errors (beyond one character being entered incorrectly) • Motorist has only entered a small part of their VRM, for example the first three digits In these instances we would expect that such errors are dealt with appropriately at the first appeal stage, especially if it can be proven that the motorist has paid for the parking event or that the motorist attempted to enter their VRM or were a legitimate user of the car park (eg a hospital patient or a patron of a restaurant). It is appreciated that in issuing a PCN in these instances, the operator will have incurred charges including but not limited to the DVLA fee and other processing costs therefore we believe that it is reasonable to seek to recover some of these costs by making a modest charge to the motorist of no more than £20 for a 14-day period from when the keying error was identified before reverting to the charge amount at the point of appeal. Now, we know that the "modest charge" is unenforceable in law, however, it would be up to the individual if they wanted to pay and make the problem go away or in fact if they wanted to contest the issue in court. If the motorist DOES appeal to the PPC explaining the error and the PPC rejects the appeal and the appeal fails, the motorist can use that in his favour at court.   Defence: "I entered the wrong VRN by mistake Judge, I explained this and I also submitted proof of payment for the relevant parking period in my appeal but the PPC wouldn't accept that"   If the motorist DOES NOT appeal to the PPC in the first instance the judge may well use that as a reason to dismiss the case in the claimant's favour because they may decide that they had the opportunity to resolve the matter at a much earlier stage in the proceedings. It is my humble opinion that a motorist, having paid and having proof of payment but entering the wrong VRN, should make an appeal at the first appeal stage in order to prevent problems at a later stage. In this instance, I think there is nothing to be gained by concealing the identity of the driver, especially if at a later stage, perhaps in court, it is said: “I (the driver) entered the wrong VRN.” Whether you agree or not, it is up to the individual to decide …. but worth thinking about. Any feedback, especially if you can prove to the contrary, gratefully received.
    • Women-only co-working spaces are part of the new hybrid working landscape, but they divide opinion.View the full article
    • The music streaming service reports record profits of over €1bn (£860m) after laying off 1500 staff.View the full article
    • deed?  you mean consent order you and her signed? concluding the case as long as you nor she break it's conditions signed upto? dx  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Help!! Brought a car yesterday and today found out clutch needs replacing!!


Foosmummy
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5233 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Can anyone tell me what my rights would be..

 

I brought a 2006 Vauxhall vectra 1.9 CDTi with 44,000 miles on clock From a garage yesterday. Anyway, while we were there, we test drove it, and all seemed ok. However, on driving it back the 80 miles or so it was rattling and stalled twice.

 

I have since been to 2 different garages, who have both said it needs a new clutch and flywheel,costing £750. I have called the garage back, who have said they will ring round some garages where they are, to have the work done, and will contribute towards the cost.

 

I feel ripped off, as I paid £1500 upfront, with £5000 taken out on fiance, and don't feel I should be paying anything. Also I don't see why I should have to drive the 80 miles again with a faulty clutch on the motorway! I have been reading the SOGA and also looking at the consumer direct website, and feel that the dealer should be paying the whole amount of repair. I was told that the car has no warranty with it, yet on their website it states and I quote "All our used cars come with our own 3 months parts and labour warranty, giving you that extra piece of mind when buying a used car from ****** Car Sales".

 

 

 

Where do I stand with my rights, as I have the car on finance. I have tried to call them, to explain what the situation is, but I am not able to speak to anyone untill Monday.

 

Many Thanks in advance. :)

Edited by Foosmummy
Extra info, and spelling mistakes
Link to post
Share on other sites

Tell the garage you want it fixed entirely at their expense or you are rejecting the car under the sale of goods act as it is not fit for the purpose purchased and will return it for a full refund. Put it in writing, send by recorded delivery after faxing it to them.

Link to post
Share on other sites

check your paper work you had as you can contact the hire purchase company as some times they will do somthing because they have the interest in the car.

they give money to the garage when you take out the finance on the car so some times they will do something if your not happy

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for the replys.

 

I have been doing some reading on SOGA and also the Consumer Direct website, I have found a little piece of info which say's

 

If you inspect the car, or someone does so for you, the dealer may not be liable for any faults which should have been uncovered by the inspection. It's a good idea to get a description of the vehicle's condition from the dealer: ask whether there is a pre-sale inspection checklist.

 

Could the dealer use this as an excuse not to repair the clutch??

 

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

I Would Do This To Get This Moving

 

Phone The Garage And Finance Co

Fax Them A Rejection Letter

Then Send A Letter To Each By Recorded Delievery

 

As Its On Finance, The Contract Will Have To Go To The Finance Company To Be Executed By The Underwriters

 

Untill Then You Have 100 % Cast Iron Rights

 

I Would Reject This Car, Get A Full Refund And Go To Another Garage

 

Its Down To Them To Collect The Car, Not You

 

Remember Also To Get Back Any Deposit

 

Ime Talking Days To Do This, Not Weeks

  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Can I do this, even though the garage has offered to contribute towards the clutch being replaced??

However I have read that if the dealer and consumer can't reach an agreement then rejection is the next step! I don't want this dragging on so will Email finance company now, and send letter to both on monday.

 

The dealer did seem genuine, I just didn't like the line "well we did £450 off the asking price, so we will contribute towards repair"!

Link to post
Share on other sites

why pay more on a car thats a lemon

 

is this the first of menny horrors

 

do you realy want to take that chance

 

go with my sugestion and things will move

 

if you want to stay , demand say 12 months waranty etc

Link to post
Share on other sites

This is all alarmist. I could burn a brand new clutrch out in 30 seconds if I try. I have also had a car with 150k on the clock and the clutch was as good as new.

 

If you are really happy with the car otherwise, get them to fix it at their expense. Otherwise reject it. The £450 off is irrelevant unless it was reduced to compensate for the dodgy clutch.

Link to post
Share on other sites

This is all alarmist. I could burn a brand new clutrch out in 30 seconds if I try. I have also had a car with 150k on the clock and the clutch was as good as new.

 

If you are really happy with the car otherwise, get them to fix it at their expense. Otherwise reject it. The £450 off is irrelevant unless it was reduced to compensate for the dodgy clutch.

From reading the OP I get the impression it is actually the flywheel that is the problem.

A friend of mine recently bought an 03 Focus. The car suffered the same problems ie. rattling an stalling. Fortunatly the car came with a 12 month AA warrenty. The flywheel is only available as a kit (hence the £750 quote). In this case AA would only pay for the flywheel, meaning my mate had to pay about £200 for the rest of the kit (AA were even able to tell him how long it woul take to fit the flywheel (4.8 hours)).

 

Anyway, in chatting with my mate he told me he heard that some Vectra's suffered from the same problem..

If the dealer's website says that all cars come with a warrenty then that is what they should supply regardless of price, unless otherwise agreed. Either way the SOGA is on your side and the dealer should repair at their own cost, replace or refund.

HALIFAX: 13/01/07 Sent S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) letter (marked as rec'd 16/01)

Paid in full in March 07

Link to post
Share on other sites

No it doesn't have a towbar. Why what does that mean??

 

It would indicate that the car has been used for towing which contributes to clutch wear.

 

In any event, the car was clearly 'not fit for the purpose' so under SOGA, you can expect the selling garage to replace the clutch and not just to 'contribute' to the cost.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Update>>>>>>

 

Garage has paid for new clutch and flywheel....Also added 12 months warranty, and we had independent inspection done and paid for on car!! :D

 

However....Today we recieved a letter from the finance company advising that as there was a number plate change to the car, could we send them a cheque for £30.00 with the correct number plate..

 

So we called DVLA, they state that the dealer have requested to have the plate (as it is personalised) removed from the car, and the number plate we have been driving around in, isn't registered to any car!!

 

Having now called the dealer it seems, they have the new tax,and MOT certificate, and the forms so we can now change the number plates back to the originals. However the dealer have stated they are not paying a penny more out for this!!

 

Today on checking the Sales invoice it does state the car reg number with in brackets not included with reg num of the car after..At the time, we didn't think anything of it, as we thought it was the original plate.

 

Did the seller need to inform us verbally, that they had requested this, as they had no intention of sending on the docs we needed for the car untill I called them yesterday.. Any help would be appreciated Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

Interesting. From what I understand the legality of a car is based on a VIN number. It might be that during the buy in sell out process the car was subject to a number plate change. Difficult one this. You own the car with the VIN number but who owns the plate. On the balance of probabilities, you don't own the plate but should not be expected to pay for the transfer. Now that's not necessariliy an issue but what will happen is that there are two cars running around with the same reg. It's a dealer mistake and it's they who should be paying for it.

 

What does the V5 you have for it say?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for the reply..

 

At the moment all we have for the car, is the green slip new keeper supplement, It doen't have any of our details, just the garage as the new owner dated 01/12/09 and stamped. The DVLA have sent the garage the new forms and log book. We brought the car on the 03/12/09.

Link to post
Share on other sites

We have still not recieved the new tax or MOT certificate, also the form to allow us to get Original plates back on!!

 

Also still waiting on the SAT-NAV CD in order for it to work, which we were told would be sent on, as previous owners wife had forgotten where she put it! I wish my husband had of took the advice to just reject this stupid car, only had it since the 3rd managed to get a weeks drive out of it, and even then it wasn't registered or insured (not intentionally).

 

Have just called consumer direct again, and this time found the lady very helpful. I have been told to write a letter to the dealer for breach of contract, as we have not yet been giving the CD in order for the SAT-NAV to work. Also she has told us to mention the 1978 satisfactory sales of goods due to there being a fault with the stereo too.

 

How long do you think would be a reasonable time to request this is resolved?

 

Thanks

Edited by Foosmummy
Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Sailor Sam,

 

Have already done that, all they say is to write to dealer. I have now contacted a solicitor, as this is taking the mick!!

 

However trying to not stress, but angry the dealers are not sending Documents we need. I think they are still mad about having to pay for the clutch!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Probably but that does not change the fact that they are responsible for ensuring the car's registration details is correct before selling it.

 

 

You would think so!! Have spoken to DVLA, what they have told us, is to send fax to their cherished transfers dept, as we were sold the car on the 3/12, and the retention was accepted on the 7/12, really the car was sold with the private plate. There is no law stopping them from retaining a plate and selling the car while process is going through.

Link to post
Share on other sites

If you look at the form for retaining/transferring a VRM (V317), it clearly advises that the donor vehicle should not be disposed of until the transfer/retention is complete.

 

I am also at a loss to understand how you have your part of the V5, etc. at the documents must be surrendered with the from.

 

I would argue that you now own the cherished VRM as that is what applied to the vehicle when you bought it (3/12) which is before the V317 was completed (7/12).

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...