Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • The move marks the first time the country's central bank has raised interest rates for 17 years.View the full article
    • The move marks the first time the country's central bank has raised interest rates for 17 years.View the full article
    • The firm has benefited from the AI boom, making it the third-most valuable company in the US.View the full article
    • Former billionaire Hui Ka Yan has been fined and banned from the financial market for life.View the full article
    • In terms of "why didn't I make a claim" - well, that has to be understood in the context of the long-standing legal battle and all its permuations with the shark. In essence there was a repo and probable fire sale of the leasehold property - which would have led to me initiating the complaint/ claim v SPF in summer 19. But there was no quick sale. And battle commenced and it ain't done yet 5y later. A potential sale morphed into trying to do a debt deal and then into a full blown battle heading to trial - based on the shark deliberately racking up costs just so the ceo can keep the property for himself.  Along the way they have launched claims in 4 different counties -v- me - trying to get a backdoor B. (Haven't yet succeeded) Simultaneously I got dragged into a contentious forfeiture claim and then into a lease extension debacle - both of which lasted 3y. (I have an association with the freeholders and handled all that legal stuff too) I had some (friend paid for) legal support to begin with.  But mostly I have handled every thing alone.  The sheer weight of all the different cases has been pretty overwhelming. And tedious.  I'm battling an aggressive financial shark that has investors giving them 00s of millions. They've employed teams of expensive lawyers and barristers. And also got juniors doing the boring menial tasks. And, of course, in text book style they've delayed issues on purpose and then sent 000's of docs to read at the 11th hour. Which I not only boringly did read,  but also simultaneously filed for ease of reference later - which has come in very handy in speeding up collating legal bundles and being able to find evidence quickly.  It's also how I found out the damning stuff I could use -v- them.  Bottom line - I haven't really had a moment to breath for 5y. I've had to write a statement recently. And asked a clinic for advice. One of the volunteers asked how I got into this situation.  Which prompted me to say it all started when I got bad advice from a broker. Which kick-started me in to thinking I really should look into making some kind of formal complaint -v- the broker.  Which is where I am now.  Extenuating circumstances as to why I'm complaining so late.  But hopefully still in time ??  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
        • Thanks
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 160 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Default Notice 7 days or 14 days


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5023 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi,

 

This is my first time posting. i received a DN from Nationwide. Is it 7 days notice or 14 days notice that the DN should give? The loan was taken out in December 2006 if that makes any difference.

 

Any information would be appreciated.

 

Thanks

socleirigh

Regards

socleirigh

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello and Welcome, socleirigh.

 

Section 87(1) of the 1974 Act allows the creditor to send you a default notice giving you fourteen days from the date you receive it to pay the arrears.

 

I'll move this thread to the appropriate Forum.

 

Regards.

 

Scott.

Any advice I give is honest and in good faith.:)

If in doubt, you should seek the opinion of a Qualified Professional.

If you can, please donate to this site.

Help keep it up and active, helping people like you.

If you no longer require help, please do what you can to help others

RIP: Rooster-UK - MARTIN3030 - cerberusalert

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for such a quick reply maroondevo52.

 

I had thought that the 1974 Act was seven days, but the 2006 Act gives 14 days.

 

If it is the case that they must give 14 days, then I think they may have made a mistake as they have given 14 days from the date then sent it. They didn't allow time for postage.

 

It was sent on Friday 13th November 09, with asking for the full balance to be paid by Friday 27th November.

 

I received it on 14th November 09, which only gave me 13 clear days to remedy the alleged default.

 

Also the fact that they have asked for the full balance and not the arrears, does this mean they have actually terminated the agreement illegally?

 

Kind Regards

socleirigh

Regards

socleirigh

Link to post
Share on other sites

 

Also the fact that they have asked for the full balance and not the arrears, does this mean they have actually terminated the agreement illegally?

 

Kind Regards

socleirigh

 

 

In a word, yes!

 

The design of the DN is to give you an opportunity to put things right prior to further action

 

To do this, it must accurately state the amount required to clear the arrears and this amount ONLY

 

ont have access to all my files at the mo, but there is a COA case that proved this and this would be binding on a lower court

 

(anyone remember the name of case off the top of their heads?)

  • Haha 1

omnia praesumuntur legitime facta donec probetur in contrarium

 

 

Please note: I am not a member of the legal profession, all advice given is purely my opinion, if in doubt consult a professional

Link to post
Share on other sites

Further, have they terimated the agreement via a seperate letter, or does it state on the DN similar to "if you fail to rememdy this by the date shown we will terimnate the agreement" (or similar)

 

?

omnia praesumuntur legitime facta donec probetur in contrarium

 

 

Please note: I am not a member of the legal profession, all advice given is purely my opinion, if in doubt consult a professional

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry ncf355 for only getting back to you now. I can only use the internet a few minutes each day in work, and don't have access at home.

 

They haven't yet sent a separate letter terminating the agreement, and I'm not sure what the text in the DN says. I'll have a look at home tonight and post comment tomorrow.

 

Thanks for your help so far.

 

Kind Regards

socleirigh

Regards

socleirigh

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

 

No they haven't sent a letter terminating the agreement, and the only thing the DN says is that if I don't remedy the alleged breach, then they may commence legal proceedings to recover the full balance.

 

Kind Regards

socleirigh

Regards

socleirigh

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...

Hi,

 

I've had a few letters since my last post.

 

The first was one saying that the loan was being moved from Nationwide Trust to Nationwide Building Society Ltd. (No mention of assignment)

 

I'm not sure if this is connected to the second letter I received, which is from KPR Debt Collection requesting the full balance within seven days. I have learned from other threads that KPR are actually part of Nationwide.

 

Is it just a coincidence that these two letters arrived roughly a week apart, or did the first one have something to do with the second?

 

Regards

socleirigh

Regards

socleirigh

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

 

Wouldnt bother too much about the standard letters they send you.

 

I would concentrate on writing a letter to Nationwide informing them as they have illegally terminated your account by not giving you the required 14 days and asking you for the balance instead of the arrears you will be taking legal action against them.

IVA Entry Removed

Nationwide Default Removed

Nationwide Joint Account Default Removed

Natwest Default Removed

Blackhorse Car Finance Court Claim - Won

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

 

I have seen on other threads that some people have not waited for a termination letter and have gone ahead and sent a letter accepting the unlawful rescission of contract as termination.

 

Does this work, or should I hold out for a termination letter?

 

Kind regards

socleirigh

Regards

socleirigh

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi diddydicky

 

Yes, the D.N. asks for the whole outstanding balance of more than £16k to be paid in full.

 

I also received a letter at the weekend from K.P.R. offering me to settle the loan at a discounted amount. It says to phone them within seven days to agree figure, after which time this offer will be withdrawn. It also says that if I agree to this they will mark the account as partially satisfied with the CRAs. Does this mean that they could sell any remaining balance to a DCA?

 

Regards

socleirigh

Regards

socleirigh

Link to post
Share on other sites

yes

don't do it

 

int, if they are offering a discount that means something is wrong,

i smell a rat!

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi dx100uk

 

I won't phone them, and hopefully they will pass the account onto solicitors, and thus formally terminate the agreement, allowing me to accept their unlawful rescission of contract.

 

Thanks

socleirigh

Regards

socleirigh

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello greendollar!

 

Would someone confirm that the 14 days are 'working days' mon - fri ?

 

Sadly, no. The 14 days are 14 clear days, i.e. whole or calendar days.

 

The Working Day issue is mainly in relation to the time scale for getting the Default Notice to you.

 

In that case, Working Days are very important, and you need to establish Date of Posting, Type of Post used (1st Class, 2nd Class, or worse which would be classed as 2nd Class) from which the Legal Date of Service can be established...which is not the same as the actual day the Notice happened to arrive.

 

Thus, always keep the Envelopes within which any bank letter is sent, and especially in relation to s87(1) Default Notices.

 

Examine the Envelope for Franking Marks and Dates, and any Barcodes that might one day be de-coded to establish key dates that can aid the clarification of the Date of Posting or at least confirm when the Envelope was still in transit so not Served at that time. IOW, other evidence to show that you had not actually been Served with the damned thing at that time!

 

Cheers,

BRW

Link to post
Share on other sites

you dont need to smell the rat- it is right there in front of your eyes!!

 

the demand to pay the full outstanding balance of the account is an unlawful repudiation by the creditor of his obligations- he has made it clear that he will not permit you to continue to pay sums not yet due on a monthly basis

 

the wording of the DN defeats the intent and purpose of the DN and it is impossible for your comply with it ANd obtain the benefits of its intent and purpose

 

 

|I would wait a couple of weeks for a termination letter or another demand for payment in full and if none recevied then write and regard the DN as an unlawful rescission

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...

just a quick update - received my third default notice from Nationwide this week. They have fixed one of the problems in that they ask for the arrears this time, not the whole balance.

 

But, yet again they have not allowed sufficient time to remedy the default. The default was issued 19th May, and asked for the arrears to be paid by November 2009!!! As this date is before the default was issued, they are obviously not allowing fourteen days to pay the arrears!!

Regards

socleirigh

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

Had to laugh at their total bloomin' ineptitude!

 

Any update on unlawful rescission yet, socleirigh?

< < < < If I can help I will and if I have helped please tip my scales. :|

Please keep this site alive by downloading the great new CAG toolbar - keeps all your subscribed threads in one easy to use place. http://consumeractiongroup.co.uk/cag_plugin.php Use the search facility regularly and CAG generates much needed money!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...