Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hmm yes I see your point about proof of postage but nonetheless... "A Notice to Keeper can be served by ordinary post and the Protection of Freedoms Act requires that the Notice, to be valid,  must be delivered either (Where a notice to driver (parking ticket) has been served) Not earlier than 28 days after, nor more than 56 days after, the service of that notice to driver; or (Where no notice to driver has been served (e.g ANPR is used)) Not later than 14 days after the vehicle was parked A notice sent by post is to be presumed, unless the contrary is proved, to have been delivered on the second working day after the day on which it is posted; and for this purpose “working day” means any day other than a Saturday, Sunday or a public holiday in England and Wales." My question there is really what might constitute proof? Since you say the issue of delivery is a common one I suppose that no satisfactory answer has been established or you would probably have told me.
    • I would stand your ground and go for the interest. Even if the interest is not awarded you will get the judgement and the worst that might happen is that you won't get your claim fee.  However, it is almost inevitable that you will get the interest.  It is correct that it is at the discretion of the judge but the discretion is almost always exercised in favour of the claimant in these cases.  I think you should stand your ground and don't give even the slightest penny away Another judgement against them on this issue would be very bad for them and they would be really stupid to risk it but if they did, it would cost them far more than the interest they are trying to save which they will most likely have to pay anyway
    • Yep, true to form, they are happy to just save a couple of quid... They invariably lose in court, so to them, that's a win. 😅
    • Your concern regarding the 14 days delivery is a common one. Not been on the forum that long, but I don't think the following thought has ever been challenged. My view is that they should have proof of when it was posted, not when they "issued", or printed it. Of course, they would never show any proof of postage, unless it went to court. Private parking companies are simply after money, and will just keep sending ever more threatening letters to intimidate you into paying up. It's not been mentioned yet, but DO NOT APPEAL! You could inadvertently give up useful legal protection and they will refuse any appeal, because they're just after the cash...  
    • The sign says "Parking conditions apply 24/7". Mind you, that's after a huge wall of text. The whole thing is massively confusing.  Goodness knows what you're meant to do if you spend only a fiver in Iceland or you stay a few minutes over the hour there.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
        • Like
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
        • Like
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Help and Guidance


badfugazi
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5068 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi,

 

I have an ongoing CCA with CAP1 and need someone with more know how than myself to take a look at what they have sent me. I've looked at the threads on the site but am still not sure if this is an enforceable CA or not.

 

Depending on the answer guidance with my next step would be very welcome.

Credit Agreement.pdf

Page 1.pdf

Page 2.pdf

Page 3.pdf

Link to post
Share on other sites

I am not an expert, but that's an application form...there are not terms etc, interest rate, payment dtails.

 

Thats what I was thinking but just needed someone else to take a look.

 

Any clue as to my next step?

 

 

Thanks for the reply:)

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm no expert either (;)) but I know an application form when I see it :)

 

NO APR

NO Repayment terms and

NO Credit limit nor a statement saying one will be set.

 

Total unenforceble rubbish which is C®ap one's usual emissions.

 

While you can't stop them screwing with your credit file, you have a right to stop them doing so by automated means which means their computers cant mark your file and they have to do it manually

 

Guaranteed they will sell this debt on but we can deal with that when it happens.

 

fox

If you are asked to deal with any matter via private message, PLEASE report it.

Everything I say is opinion only. If you are unsure on any comment made, you should see a qualified solicitor

Please help CAG. Order this ebook. Now available on Amazon. Please click HERE

Link to post
Share on other sites

As I said, I aint no expert but even I think that isn't a cca. Have someone knowledgeable here check it first. I think then you write to them saying you do nothing because that isn't a cca.

 

I often wonder whether it's worth doing a Data Subject Access request to the original lender and specifically asking for a copy of the original signed agreement. If they don't produce one then they mustn't have one so you could then tell them to bogg off for good.

 

If they do produce then that's a different matter.

Link to post
Share on other sites

 

I often wonder whether it's worth doing a Data Subject Access request to the original lender and specifically asking for a copy of the original signed agreement. If they don't produce one then they mustn't have one so you could then tell them to bogg off for good.

 

If they do produce then that's a different matter.

 

 

My opinion only but I think it's always good practice to send a SAR

 

In the meantime, if the account in dispute letter hasn't been sent, then now's the time.

If you are asked to deal with any matter via private message, PLEASE report it.

Everything I say is opinion only. If you are unsure on any comment made, you should see a qualified solicitor

Please help CAG. Order this ebook. Now available on Amazon. Please click HERE

Link to post
Share on other sites

My opinion only but I think it's always good practice to send a SAR

 

In the meantime, if the account in dispute letter hasn't been sent, then now's the time.

 

Thanks for the reply.

 

I did send a dispute letter when I got my first alleged copy, is it worth sending another one as they state in their letter that they will not respond.

 

Again thanks for the help.

Link to post
Share on other sites

As I said, I aint no expert but even I think that isn't a cca. Have someone knowledgeable here check it first. I think then you write to them saying you do nothing because that isn't a cca.

 

I often wonder whether it's worth doing a Data Subject Access request to the original lender and specifically asking for a copy of the original signed agreement. If they don't produce one then they mustn't have one so you could then tell them to bogg off for good.

 

If they do produce then that's a different matter.

 

That sounds like a plan to me!

 

Thanks for the help:)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes. Send it recorded delivery.

 

If they keep pressing for payment or they pass the account on, report them to trading standards.

 

the number is:

 

08454 040506

 

I would report them anyway, because what they have sent you is not what you asked for in your cca request.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes. Send it recorded delivery.

 

If they keep pressing for payment or they pass the account on, report them to trading standards.

 

the number is:

 

08454 040506

 

I would report them anyway, because what they have sent you is not what you asked for in your cca request.

 

I will try to get that sent today, if not Monday should be intresting to see what comes back.:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...

Had a letter today from f.t.c. telling me to make any payments to them direct and not to Cap1. The still want the cheque's made out to Cap1 but give me a PO box in hampsted to send them to. I have also had severel phone calls from Capquest whose company address is at the bottom of the f.t.c. letter stating that f.t.c. are a division of Capquest. Have Cap1 sold the account on? or is this still an in house matter with Cap1.

 

Hope this makes sense as I am a bit confused as to who I am now dealing with.

Link to post
Share on other sites

It sounds like ftc are collecting on behalf of Crap1 as they want the cheques made out to Crap1 so the account hasn't been sold.

 

I think a "bemused letter" is in order, letter 17 here:

 

The Consumer Forums - Debt collectors

 

This should be handled within Crap1 and not passed to any fly by night crappy debt collector.

If you are asked to deal with any matter via private message, PLEASE report it.

Everything I say is opinion only. If you are unsure on any comment made, you should see a qualified solicitor

Please help CAG. Order this ebook. Now available on Amazon. Please click HERE

Link to post
Share on other sites

It sounds like ftc are collecting on behalf of Crap1 as they want the cheques made out to Crap1 so the account hasn't been sold.

 

I think a "bemused letter" is in order, letter 17 here:

 

The Consumer Forums - Debt collectors

 

This should be handled within Crap1 and not passed to any fly by night crappy debt collector.

 

Thanks for the help, I will send it tomorrow.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Depends how you look at it.

 

If you are satisfied that the application they have sent you is the total basis on which they are hounding you then probably don't do one.

 

On the other hand, it may be worth foing a SAR to the original creditor, because then you can see all their cards should it ever have to go to court. At least for £10 you can get a total view of everything.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Badfurgazi,

silverfox is correct,you have an application form sent to you and you will recieve nothing else because they will hide behind the fact that this is all they have to send you under78 1974 and they may be correct but they wouldnt be able to enforce this in court,

Kurvaface is advising you to sar and i would also advise this,(even cap one have in there letter above) it is better to see what they have and also you can work out your charges, so money well spent.

Depends what you want out of this and how good your credit rating is at the moment,

Be prepared for sending letters to and fro and fobbing the odd dc's off (Debitas/Capquest) along the way.

Be prepared for a long battle with a bad credit rating on the account and possibly a default,

I say this not to put you off but to make you aware, out of experience,

having said that, you really are in the best place to have all this dealt with as it happens.and help is always here

 

SUBBING.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Depends how you look at it.

 

If you are satisfied that the application they have sent you is the total basis on which they are hounding you then probably don't do one.

 

On the other hand, it may be worth foing a SAR to the original creditor, because then you can see all their cards should it ever have to go to court. At least for £10 you can get a total view of everything.[/quote

 

Yes I see what you you are saying.

 

I will send on off asap.

 

Thank you for the help.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Badfurgazi,

silverfox is correct,you have an application form sent to you and you will recieve nothing else because they will hide behind the fact that this is all they have to send you under78 1974 and they may be correct but they wouldnt be able to enforce this in court,

Kurvaface is advising you to sar and i would also advise this,(even cap one have in there letter above) it is better to see what they have and also you can work out your charges, so money well spent.

Depends what you want out of this and how good your credit rating is at the moment,

Be prepared for sending letters to and fro and fobbing the odd dc's off (Debitas/Capquest) along the way.

Be prepared for a long battle with a bad credit rating on the account and possibly a default,

I say this not to put you off but to make you aware, out of experience,

having said that, you really are in the best place to have all this dealt with as it happens.and help is always here

 

SUBBING.

 

I will send on off asap and see what comes back, am I right in thinking that they have 40 days to comply?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Just as an update.

 

Sent the "Return account" to Capone letter in response to FTC and also sent no doorstep callers letter as they had said they would send someone round.

 

Got a we have put account on hold and will contact Capone.

 

SAR sent on the 16/02/10 recorded delivery.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just got a letter from Capone regarding the SAR request.

They say that as my signature on the request is not the same as the copy that they have on file they will not process my request until I send them another copy of my signature.I did change my signature as I don't trust them not to do a "photoshop job"

 

Can they do this?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Complain.

 

They cannot correspond personal details to you at your address on the one hand and on the other say they will not comply with a sar at the same address.

 

Write to them saying theat they have already ascertained who you are by corresponding with you already. Inform them that the clock is still ticking and that they have until (40 days after you sent sar) to fully comply or you will be escalating to the courts. In the mean time complain to the ICO.

 

It is possibly a myth, possibly true, that dcas have copied signatures onto blank documents in an attempt to make an enforceable agreement. Do not give it to them. You do not have to.

Edited by kurvaface
Link to post
Share on other sites

Complain.

 

They cannot correspond personal details to you at your address on the one hand and on the other say they will not comply with a sar at the same address.

 

Write to them saying theat they have already ascertained who you are by corresponding with you already. Inform them that the clock is still ticking and that they have until (40 days after you sent sar) to fully comply or you will be escalating to the courts. In the mean time complain to the ICO.

 

It is possibly a myth, possibly true, that dcas have copied signatures onto blank documents in an attempt to make an enforceable agreement. Do not give it to them. You do not have to.

 

Thought that was the case, just wanted to make sure of my facts before replying.

 

Thanks for the help.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...
Thought that was the case, just wanted to make sure of my facts before replying.

 

Thanks for the help.

 

 

Hi Again.

 

Got a reply from Capone saying that they still need a copy of my signature on a passport or driving licence. I was going to send them a copy of the application form that they sent me as my CCA. Do you think that they will accept that?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...