Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • In order for us to help you we require the following information:- [if there are more than one defendant listed - tell us] 1 defendant   Which Court have you received the claim from ? County Court Business Centre, Northampton   Name of the Claimant ? LC Asset 2 S.A R.L   Date of issue – . 28/04/23   Particulars of Claim   What is the claim for –    (1) The Claimant ('C') claims the whole of the outstanding balance due and payable under an agreement referenced xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx and opened effective from xx/xx/2017. The agreement is regulated by the Consumer Credit Act 1974 ('CCA'), was signed by the Defendant ('D') and from which credit was extended to D.   (2) D failed to comply with a Default Notice served pursuant to s87 (1) CCA and by xx/xx/2022 a default was recorded.   (3) As at xx/xx/2022 the Defendant owed MBNA LTD the sum of 12,xxx.xx. By an agreement in writing the benefit of the debt has been legally assigned to C effective xx/xx/2022 and made regular upon C serving a Notice of Assignment upon D shortly thereafter.   (4) And C claims- 1. 12,xxx.xx 2. Interest pursuant to Section 69 County Courts Act 1984 at a rate of 8% per annum from xx/01/2023 to xx/04/2023 of 2xx.xx and thereafter at a daily rate of 2.52 to date of judgement or sooner payment. Date xx/xx/2023   What is the total value of the claim? 12k   Have you received prior notice of a claim being issued pursuant to paragraph 3 of the PAPDC (Pre Action Protocol) ? Yes   Have you changed your address since the time at which the debt referred to in the claim was allegedly incurred? No   Did you inform the claimant of your change of address? N/A Is the claim for - a Bank Account (Overdraft) or credit card or loan or catalogue or mobile phone account? Credit Card   When did you enter into the original agreement before or after April 2007 ? After   Do you recall how you entered into the agreement...On line /In branch/By post ? Online   Is the debt showing on your credit reference files (Experian/Equifax /Etc...) ? Yes, but amount differs slightly   Has the claim been issued by the original creditor or was the account assigned and it is the Debt purchaser who has issued the claim. DP issued claim   Were you aware the account had been assigned – did you receive a Notice of Assignment? Not that I recall...   Did you receive a Default Notice from the original creditor? Not that I recall...   Have you been receiving statutory notices headed “Notice of Sums in Arrears”  or " Notice of Arrears "– at least once a year ? Yes   Why did you cease payments? Loss of employment main cause   What was the date of your last payment? Early 2021   Was there a dispute with the original creditor that remains unresolved? No   Did you communicate any financial problems to the original creditor and make any attempt to enter into a debt management plan? No   -----------------------------------
    • Hello CAG Team, I'm adding the contents of the claim to this thread, but wanted to open the thread with an urgent question: Do I have to supply a WS for a claim with a court date that states " at the hearing the court will consider allocation and, time permitting, give an early neutral evaluation of the case" ? letter is an N24 General Form of Judgement or Order, if so, then I've messed up again. Court date 25 May 2024 The letter from court does not state (like the other claims I have) that I must provide WS within 28 days.. BUT I have recently received a WS from Link for it! making me think I do need to!??
    • Massive issues from Scottish Power I wonder if someone could advise next steps. Tennant moved out I changed the electric into my name I was out the country at the time so I hadn't been to the flat. During sign up process they tried to hijack my gas supply as well which I made it clear I didn't want duel fuel from them but they still went ahead with it. Phoned them up again. a few days later telling them to make sure they stopped it but they said too late ? had to get my current supplier to cancel it. Paid £50 online to ensure there was money covering standing charges etc eventually got to the flat no power. Phoned Scottish Power 40 minutes to get through they state I have a pay as you go meter and that they had set me up on a credit account so they need to send an engineer out which they will pass my details onto. Phone called from engineer asking questions , found out the float is vacant so not an emergency so I have to speak to Scottish Power again. Spoke with the original person from Scottish Power who admitted a mistake (I had told her it was vacant) and now states that it will take 4 weeks to get an appointment but if I want to raise a complaint they will contact me in 48 hours and it will be looked at quicker. Raised a complaint , complaints emailed me within 24 hours to say it will take 7 days till he speaks with me. All I want is power in the property would I be better switching over to EON who supply the gas surely they could sort it out quicker? One thing is for sure I will never bother with Scottish Power ever again.    
    • Hi. Please don't follow McD's advice to contact Met to appeal. They won't listen and you could end up giving them helpful information. HB
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

what should I do now - if anything


flooz
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4854 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Sorry Flooz, highjacking again.

 

Good luck with ICO, it seems they take a while.

 

Incidently I sent them a signature for mine with a little added extra and they sent it without any further delay, things missing which I wrote back for has been ignored and I am presently trying for PPI and charges reclaim.

 

Just off to get a bottle!!!!!;)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 560
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

:Dhonestly, what are you lot like ;-) the mere mention of alcohol.......

 

I shall be putting together my case to the ICO tomorrow - it'll keep me busy for a while.

 

Hehe, me thinks we'd be your bestest customers. None of ya cuddling the half a shandy for an hour in this house :lol:

 

Good luck with the ICO, have to be honest they've been very helpful to me in the past and will act where they deem necessary.

 

If they do need to 'chat' to Crap1 there is of course a fee for them (Crap1) to pay :grin:

 

Gez

Link to post
Share on other sites

Oh, it's my lucky day.... Letter received today from Frederickson's, as follows:

 

Dear ....

 

Your Capital One Bank (Europe) plc account, which is seriously overdue, has been referred to us for debt collection.

 

You must contact us on receipt of this letter on 08458396093 to make a payment to bring your account up to date. If we do not hear from you action to enforce the debt may be taken against you without further notice.

 

Please do not ignore this letter - the debt will not go away.

 

Yours sincerely ......

 

So, I was right - it is FPC, and I guess they're right I shouldn't ignore their letter, so I shall look through the posts and library to find a suitable response.

Link to post
Share on other sites

lol........... shame on you for forgetting the important things in life - says he, cuddling a bottle of finest Morissons ZA merlot :lol:

 

 

 

The merlot is £2.99 at Aldi saw it today concerning the ICO will you get a reply? they around 8 months behind with their cases, they have acknowledged all of my complaints but said they way behind and don`t know when they will get to deal with them

Edited by Laura Cooke
Link to post
Share on other sites

Letter done ready to be posted tomorrow (Fredrickson's letter that is).

 

Now, another thought has come into my head..... If Cap1 were so unsure of my identity, how come they thought it was perfectly ok to divulge sensitive information to a third party?

 

Do you think this warrants yet another letter to them regarding this? Or should I just let it lie?

 

I'm also assuming that the alleged debt is still with Cap1, just FPC acting on their behalf. Yet again, without a proper CCA how can anyone justify the collections procedure?

 

With regards to the ICO, I'm just trying to decide whether to file the complaint on-line, or through the post - I don't suppose it matters. I believe it will be correct to JUST send the letters directly pertaining to the Data request?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Now, another thought has come into my head..... If Cap1 were so unsure of my identity, how come they thought it was perfectly ok to divulge sensitive information to a third party?

 

Do you think this warrants yet another letter to them regarding this? Or should I just let it lie?

 

Very good point Flooz, if you have the time and inclination I would be sending another complaint to them.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Letter done ready to be posted tomorrow (Fredrickson's letter that is).

 

Now, another thought has come into my head..... If Cap1 were so unsure of my identity, how come they thought it was perfectly ok to divulge sensitive information to a third party?

 

Do you think this warrants yet another letter to them regarding this? Or should I just let it lie?

 

I'm also assuming that the alleged debt is still with Cap1, just FPC acting on their behalf. Yet again, without a proper CCA how can anyone justify the collections procedure?

 

With regards to the ICO, I'm just trying to decide whether to file the complaint on-line, or through the post - I don't suppose it matters. I believe it will be correct to JUST send the letters directly pertaining to the Data request?

 

the more letters and complaints you write to them now- the more they will know that they are getting at you

 

my advice, unless they raise a point which is new- is to simply file unanswered

 

or, if you WANT to play games- just write "one liners"

 

dear sirs

 

I have received your letter of XXXXXXXXX and note the contents

 

Y F

Edited by diddydicky
Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks DD.

 

They are getting to me, but I'm very stubborn too.

 

I was just thinking along the lines of pointing out as often as possible that they are procrastinating :rolleyes: and I'm the injured party ;-).

 

You're probably right, I'll concentrate on the complaint to ICO. Do I send a copy to Cap1?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks DD.

 

They are getting to me, but I'm very stubborn too.

 

I was just thinking along the lines of pointing out as often as possible that they are procrastinating :rolleyes: and I'm the injured party ;-).

 

You're probably right, I'll concentrate on the complaint to ICO. Do I send a copy to Cap1?

 

i wouldn-t - but i think the ICO will expect you to have exhausted the OC;s complaints proceedure before they will deal with it

Link to post
Share on other sites

Oh, I hadn't given any thought to Cap1's official complaints procedure, I shall look through the pile of documents/letters/leaflets I've got from them to ensure I do everything correctly.

 

It seems a bit like employment tribunals, having to following your employers complaints procedure before going to tribunal. Still I guess that separates the wheat from the chaff :|

Link to post
Share on other sites

Oh, I hadn't given any thought to Cap1's official complaints procedure, I shall look through the pile of documents/letters/leaflets I've got from them to ensure I do everything correctly.

 

It seems a bit like employment tribunals, having to following your employers complaints procedure before going to tribunal. Still I guess that separates the wheat from the chaff :|

 

Hi flooz.

When I get letters from new DCA's I remind them that as they have taken over the responsibilities of collecting the debt they have also taken on the responsibilities of providing requested information:- so please provide.

1. CCA.

2. Default notice.

3. Termination notice

4. Notice of transfer (can't remember the proper name for that one).

 

Keeps them busy for a while..

John

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks everyone. Having read through the ICO complaint procedure, I found that I HAD to exhaust Cap1's internal complaint procedure first (as DD also pointed out), so today a letter of complaint has been sent along with a final request for the information within 7 days.

 

I still don't expect to receive anything though. :-(

 

I also sent a letter to Fredrickson's informing them that the account was in dispute with Cap1 (from what I've read on here, it does seem that Fredrickson's take notice of situations like this). Maybe Fredrickson's don't agree with Cap1 not conforming with legislation, or maybe they're just simply too busy to bother with accounts when no CCA has been provided.

 

We'll see.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sigh.....

 

Further letter received from Fredricksons today, as follows:

 

..... quote

 

We wrote to you recently about this account which is in arrears but have failed to receive an adequate response.

 

You must clear the arrears on your account immediately. If enforcement action is taken against you this will affect your credit file and may have an impact on your ability to obtain credit in the future.

 

You need to contact us now on 08458396094 to resolve this matter and we urge you to do so without delay.

 

...... end quote

 

I plan to response with the following, and would appreciate opinions.

 

Quote.....

 

I refer to your letter of 6th April 2010 and respectfully request you refer to my response dated 1st April which was in response to your initial letter.

 

As previously advised, this account is in dispute. For the avoidance of doubt, I have no recollection of signing an agreement with Capital One, and they in turn have failed to provide me with a copy of such.

 

Without any copy of such agreement being provided to me, any attempted enforcement action taken against me, will be strenuously defended. Likewise, without an agreement, Capital One do not have my permission to disclose any information to third parties, such as yourselves.

 

Your timely response and acknowledgement of my letters would be appreciated.

 

..... end quote

 

:?:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Flooz,

 

It took me a couple of letters to Freds before they backed off, there is a letter on my thread, its on post 134, with a bit of a tweak, courtesy of CitizenB on 135.

 

Put a similar comment on another C1 thread today so Freds have done a batch post I guess.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Flooz

 

Honestly not sure its worth the effort or postage cost, personally I wouldnt bother sending anything else.

 

Crap1 are aware its in dispute - whether they like it or not its for a court to decide if the dispute is valid (not them)

 

You have previously made the DCA aware of dispute.

 

Theres nothing else worth saying to them at the mo, they admit to being a 3rd party intervener only - no assignment - so they'll need to pass it back to Crap1 if they want to enforce which in turn brings you back to the dispute.

 

Don't get hung up on the idiots threats by playing their game of ping pong mail.

 

If you feel the need to send anything, send crap1 a sh**ty letter confirming your position.

 

As always make sure its rec del and you keep copies of everything, if this ever ends up in court you need to show how amicable you have been in attempting to resolve matters :rolleyes:

 

Gez

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Gez, i'll send this one, purely because I didn't send the last one recorded, so to give them the benefit of the doubt, there's always a possibility it wasn't received (especially given the state of the mail system).

 

I wrote a complaint last week to the executive office at Carp1, purely to exhaust their complaints procedure before making my complain to the ICO. I gave them a further 7 days...... that expires on Monday.

 

I know it's not going to just go away once a complaint is made. I'm not sure whether it's worth my going for 'disclosure' or not, just in case they suddenly manage to find the CCA.

 

At the moment, my stance will be that I didn't agree to the charges etc, and the majority of the balance is made up of those. If they are prepared to negotiate (I doubt it) I'm happy to repay any monies borrowed that may (probably not) be outstanding, but not charges and interest.

 

Not sure if that's a sensible thing or not.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Flooz

 

Sorry, seem to look in on so many threads I do tend to lose track of where everyone is and their last position on any matter.

 

Assuming I havent missed anything on yours........

 

In your case (due to no record of postal service), then certainly send the DCA a final foxtrot oscar.

 

Crap1 would be foolish to sell this on whilst in dispute so keep all future correspondence aimed at them only.

 

If you have charges to recover then go to the ICO as soon as the complaints procedure is exhausted to effect gain of the data requested under SAR compliance.

 

Once you have the data, and you will receive all records whether this year or next, start calculating all charges + CI + simple interest at 8%. The longer they leave this the more it will cost them in the long term.

 

Out of interest (and once again, apologies if posted previously) do you have an estimate of charges etc v balance they are claiming?

 

Gez

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Gez - nice to see you. :-)

 

Haven't a clue how much of the balance is made up of charges, I can only calculate this once they have provided the information requested in my SAR (which is looking unlikely at the moment). All I know is the credit card has been in existence for about 6 years, at times has had some highish balances on (£4,000 or so) but has been paid off in full several times. Haven't been able to pay it off in it's entirety for about 3 years or so, and of course, they're currently adding penalties to the balance too.

 

Once I get the information (if I get it) I'll have more idea.

Link to post
Share on other sites

How do you show the courts how amicable you have been when they do not have a enforceable CCA or DN? I don`t acknowledge letters from DC so looks as if I`m not being amicable but a third party with no assignment as no rights to discuss your account?:confused:

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...