Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Thank-you dx for your feedback. That is the reason I posted my opinion, because I am trying to learn more and this is one of the ways to learn, by posting my opinions and if I am incorrect then being advised of the reasons I am incorrect. I am not sure if you have educated me on the points in my post that would be incorrect. However, you are correct on one point, I shall refrain from posting on any other thread other than my own going forward and if you think my post here is unhelpful, misleading or in any other way inappropriate, then please do feel obliged to delete it but educate me on the reason why. To help my learning process, it would be helpful to know what I got wrong other than it goes against established advice considering the outcome of a recent court case that seemed to suggest it was dismissed due to an appeal not being made at the first stage. Thank-you.  
    • you can have your humble opinion.... You are very new to all this private parking speculative invoice game you have very quickly taken it upon yourself to be all over this forum, now to the extent of moving away from your initial thread with your own issue that you knew little about handling to littering the forum and posting on numerous established and existing threads, where advice has already been given or a conclusion has already resulted, with your theories conclusions and observations which of course are very welcomed. BUT... in some instances, like this one...you dont quite match the advice that the forum and it's members have gathered over a very long consensual period given in a tried and trusted consistent mannered thoughtful approach. one could even call it forum hi-jacking and that is becoming somewhat worrying . dx
    • Yeah, sorry, that's what I meant .... I said DCBL because I was reading a few threads about them discontinuing claims and getting spanked in court! Meant  YOU  Highview !!!  🖕 The more I read this forum and the more I engage with it's incredible users, the more I learn and the more my knowledge expands. If my case gets to court, the Judge will dismiss it after I utter my first sentence, and you DCBL and Highview don't even know why .... OMG! .... So excited to get to court!
    • Though it would be Highview you would  pursue. DCBL are nonentities-on their best day,
    • Yep, I read that and thought about trying to find out what the consideration and grace period is at Riverside but not sure I can. I know they say "You must tell us the specific consideration/grace period at a site if our compliance team or our agents ask what it is"  but I doubt they would disclose it to the public, maybe I should have asked in my CPR 31.14 letter? Yes, I think I can get rid of 5 minutes. I am also going to include a point about BPA CoP: 13.2 The reference to a consideration period in 13.1 shall not apply where a parking event takes place. I think that is Deception .... They giveth with one hand and taketh away with the other! One other point to note, the more I read, the more I study, the more proficient I feel I am becoming in this area. Make no mistake DBCL if you are reading this, when I win in court, if I have the grounds to make any claims against you, such as breach of GDPR, I shall be doing so.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Outstanding Gas Bill not Paid by ex flatmate


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5250 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi,

 

I moved out of my rented property in August 2009 and due to a mistake by Southern electric my flatmate and I had been under paying for gas and had a bill of £418 at our final reading.

 

After checking this was correct we agreed with Southern electric to pay £105 a month for 4 months.

As we were moving out it was also agreed that I would transfer half the £105 to my flatmates acount each month and she woud pay the full amount.

I have references to this agreement on email between myself and my flatmate however it is in a conversational format over the 4 month period (Me: i have transfered your half of the outstanding gas bill Her: great how many more months are left to pay etc...).

I also have bank statements showing the amounts transfered by me into her account matching those mentioned on the emails.

 

I recieved a call from Southern electric today to inform me the bill was still outstanding and had no payments had been made since July 2009.

My flatmate was responsible for the utilities however as I had to speak to them on occasion and apparently my name was added to the account as a bill payer.

They have now threatened legal action/debt recovery and as my name is on the account this will apply to me aswell.

Can anyone tell me where I stand with this and what courses of action are open to me???

 

Many thank in advance, DB

Link to post
Share on other sites

If you were both named on the account then you are jointly and severally liable for the bills. That means they can chase either or both of you for the money, and you could end up with a judgement against you for the whole lot.

If your flatmate won't pay up, the only option you would have is to take legal action against her to recover half, so keep all those emails somewhere really safe.

Have you asked her what's happened? However unlikely, it's possible that it's some sort of mistake that can be easily resolved.

RMW

"If you want my parking space, please take my disability" Common car park sign in France.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I spoke with her today and apparently her cards was recently cloned and her bank accounts wiped out however this does not explain why she was not making the monthly repayments.

She was struggling to pay her portion of rent and bills when we lived together and now she is renting on her own i suspect she is struggling even more and has spent the money for this bill on living costs.

I have asked to to speak with them to make some kind of payment arrangement as, as far as i am concerned, i have paid her the full amount I owe for this bill and also to have them remove my name from the account as, as she has clearly spent the money i gave her for my share of the bill, it is down to her to sort this out.

I do not know if they will be able to do this and appreciate they will not differentiate between u in terms of seeking payment however does anyone know if I fight it on the basis of being able to prove i made payments to her in good faith in order to pay off this bill?

I did consider legal action against her however knowing the state of her finances i doubt it would be a viable option.

 

DB

Link to post
Share on other sites

I would certainly argue this point with the energy company, but with the awareness that any arrangement between the account holders is not really their concern. Incidentally, since this is potentially going to 'go legal', don't speak to them on the phone any more - put everything in writing (and send recorded so you have proof of delivery) and if they phone you, refuse to discuss it and insist that they write.

 

If they do issue proceedings, you can put in a defence on the basis that you've paid your share to the flatmate but it may not help and could possibly make things worse. If it becomes obvious that the energy company are going to pursue you, it would be far better to come to some arrangement rather than have the almost inevitable CCJ on your credit file.

You would always have the option to pursue the flatmate if her circumstances ever improved, but there's never any point throwing good money after bad.

 

My usual disclaimer applies. I don't have any legal qualifications and any advice is 'to the best of my knowledge'. There are bound to be threads with similar circumstances on here - I know I've seen some - and it would be wise to check out the advice given on those. Try the tenants forum if you can't find anything in this one.

RMW

"If you want my parking space, please take my disability" Common car park sign in France.

Link to post
Share on other sites

From the companies point of view this is a third party dispute. Personally I'd explore a little more how you came to be added to the account because it would've been possilbe to put a note on the account giving you permission to discuss it without adding the name on.

 

If this was done over the phone chances are they won't have the call recording so then I don't see how they can prove you are liable. If you were on a tenancy agreement though you are pretty much stuck with it IMO.

The views I express here are mere speculation based on my experience. I am not qualified nor insured to give legal advice and any action you take will be at your own risk.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi indebtstudent,

 

Basically I was on the tenancy agreement however when we moved in it was agreed I would deal with the rent and landlord and my flatmate would deal with the utilities.

We had a few problems with the gas due to an estimated bill that was extremely high but my flatmate was not good at talking to people over the phone and tended to get fobbed off quite easily.

I tried calling southern electric about this problem and was told thy would only talk to the account holder so my flatmate called up and asked them to add my name as a person authorised to discuss the account.

This was done and I thought that was an end of it until a couple of weeks ago whe they called me about the outstnading bill.

I dont know if they are pulling a fast one and simply contacting me as they have my details on file, any idea what they must provide in order to prove I am liable?

 

Cheers, DB

Link to post
Share on other sites

"any idea what they must provide in order to prove I am liable?"

 

This is a very good question to which I sadly don't know the answer. Anybody else have any idea?

 

It seems to me asking for someone to be authorized to discuss the account (for example for a friend or perhaps an elderly relative) is entirely different from somebody being added onto the account because that implies they are happy to be liable.

 

In order to add your name on they should have checked this was ok with you as well as your friend.

 

However if you are on the tenancy agreement then I think this leaves you in a difficult spot unless the agreement you alluded to is in there.

 

It sounds to me like they either mis-understood or genuily believed your name needed to be added, but like I say they should have checked this with you. Otherwise I could add anyone I didn't like onto the bill.

The views I express here are mere speculation based on my experience. I am not qualified nor insured to give legal advice and any action you take will be at your own risk.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...