Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Thanks for posting the CPR contents. i do wish you hadn't blanked out the dates and times since at times they can be relevant . Can you please repost including times and dates. They say that they sent a copy of  the original  PCN that they sent to the Hirer  along with your hire agreement documents. Did you receive them and if so can you please upload the original PCN without erasing dates and times. If they did include  all the paperwork they said, then that PCN is pretty near compliant except for their error with the discount time. In the Act it isn't actually specified but to offer a discount for 14 days from the OFFENCE is a joke. the offence occurred probably a couple of months prior to you receiving your Notice to Hirer.  Also the words in parentheses n the Act have been missed off. Section 14 [5][c] (c)warn the hirer that if, after the period of 21 days beginning with the day after that on which the notice to hirer is given, the amount of unpaid parking charges referred to in the notice to keeper under paragraph 8(2)(f) or 9(2)(f) (as the case may be) has not been paid in full, the creditor will (if any applicable requirements are met) have the right to recover from the hirer so much of that amount as remains unpaid; Though it states "if any applicable ...." as opposed to "if all applicable......" in Section 8 or 9. Maybe the Site could explain what the difference between the two terms mean if there is a difference. Also on your claim form they keeper referring to you as the driver or the keeper.  You are the Hirer and only the Hirer is responsible for the charge EVEN IF THEY WEREN'T THE DRIVER. So they cannot pursue the driver and nowhere in the Hirer section of the Act is the hirer ever named as the keeper so NPC are pursuing the wrong person.  
    • This is simply a scam site.  It's been shown to be a scam in the national press and on national TV. Please fill in the the forum sticky and upload the invoice you've received. In fact what you have is an invoice, not a fine, a private company doesn't have the power to issue fines.  
    • Moved to the Private Parking forum.
    • Good afternoon, I am writing because I am very frustrated. I received a parking fine from MET Parking Services Ltd , ( Southgate park Stansted CM24 1PY) . We stopped for a quick meal in Mcdonalds and were there fir around 30 mins. We always do this after flights and never received a parking fine before.  Reason: The vehicle left in Southgate car park without payment made for parking and the occupants southgate premises. they took some pictures of us leaving the car. i did not try and appeal it yet as I came across many forums that this is a scam and I should leave it. But I keep getting threatening letters.  Incident happened : 23/10/2023 I did contact Mcdonalds and they said this:  Joylyn (McDonald’s Customer Services) 5 Apr 2024, 12:05 BST Dear Laura, Thank you for contacting McDonald’s Customer Services. I’m sorry to hear that you have received a Parking Charge Notice following your visit to our Stansted restaurant.   We've introduced parking restrictions at some of our restaurants to make sure there are always parking spaces available for customers.   We appreciate that some visits such as birthday parties or large group visits might take longer and the parking restrictions aren't intended to stop this. If you think your stay will exceed the stated maximum parking time then please speak to a manager in advance.   Your number plate is scanned by our Automatic Number Plate Recognition (ANPR) system when you enter our car park, and then again when you leave. If you have overstayed the maximum time allowed, you will not be notified straight away- a Parking Charge Notice will be sent to you via the post.   If you feel that a Parking Charge Notice has been issued in error, please contact our approved contractors who issued the charge in order to appeal the charge. Unfortunately McDonald's are unable to revoke parking tickets- the outcome of the appeal is final and cannot be overturned by McDonald’s.   Many thanks for taking the time to contact McDonald’s Customer Services.   Can someone please help me out and suggest what I should do next?  Thank you 
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Not enough offered for car!!!!


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5255 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Dear All,

 

This is probabaly an old favourite, BUT please read.

 

The insurance company of the third party that hit my car has offered me £330 for my car which was written off as the repairs are estimated at £900. (I have TPL insurance only)

 

All I want is the correct money to buy myself a run around to replace the car that I used for the same purposes.

 

£330 will not cover it, as I cant buy a car with 6 months mot and tax for less than £450. If they offer me £330, I am £120 out of pocket as I will then have to buy a car for £450 to replace the one damaged by the TP.

 

As I am currently receiving a hired car which is being paid for by the TP's insurance at £50 a day they are not blessed with brains in trying to resolve this issue quickly. As i have had the hire car for 12 days already.

 

What rights do I have to request that I am "put back" to the same postion that I was in before the crash occured and who should I approach if the TP's insurance company is not interested in increasing the offer.

 

I just dont want to be left out of pocket through the negligence of the TP.

 

Any help would be apprecisted.

Link to post
Share on other sites

You can only claim for the value of your own car. You can argue that it is worth more than £330 if you can find similar ones advertised at a higher price and send a selection to the insurer. Try Auto-trader, eBay (Buy it now) etc. for examples. Send in the higher priced ones. You don't have to accept their first offer. Also be careful re the hire car; if the insurer thinks the hire car cost is excessive, you can possibly get left with the bill if it is one of the so-called 'credit hire' agreements. Check out other threads on here and check the small print of the hire agreement to see if it says something like '...if we cannot recover the costs from the insurer then I agree to pay.....'

  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Pud,

 

definitely find some examples for yourself and send them in- be as quick as you can to avoid being accused of delaying the claim and increasing the hire though.

 

You can claim your tax back, you need to go to your local post office for a form, cant remember the name but they will know. It doesnt matter if the vehicle has already gone to salvage- you will be able to recover it just using your vehicle details.

  • Haha 1

Insurance Guy

If I can offer any help I will....

I have experience in Fault, Non-Fault & Disputed Liability Motor Claims for vehicle damage and hire, and some experience in Personal Injury Claims

 

 

If I've helped- please click my scales :D

 

ANY ASSISTANCE IS GIVEN ENTIRELY WITHOUT PREJUDICE- YOU SHOULD SEEK INDEPENDANT LEGAL ADVICE TO CONFIRM ANY ADVICE GIVEN

FEEL FREE TO PM ME A LINK TO YOUR THREAD IF YOU WOULD LIKE ADVICE 8-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

What did you value your car at when you took out the insurance ?

Have a happy and prosperous 2013 by avoiiding Payday loans. If you are sent a private message directing you for advice or support with your issues to another website,this is your choice.Before you decide,consider the users here who have already offered help and support.

Advice offered by Martin3030 is not supported by any legal training or qualification.Members are advised to use the services of fully insured legal professionals when needed.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

For details of the refund of Tax look here;

 

How to apply for a refund of vehicle tax | NIDirect

Have a happy and prosperous 2013 by avoiiding Payday loans. If you are sent a private message directing you for advice or support with your issues to another website,this is your choice.Before you decide,consider the users here who have already offered help and support.

Advice offered by Martin3030 is not supported by any legal training or qualification.Members are advised to use the services of fully insured legal professionals when needed.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

What did you value your car at when you took out the insurance ?

 

That is totally irrelevent

 

The reason insurers ask that is NOT because they are agreeing a value, but simply because it highlights if there is anything unusual about the car. For example if the policy holder says the car is worth £30000 and it's a 3 year old ford focus then they know that something isn't right and will look deeper into it, the only other use for that question is when cars get above a specific value or if it's a classic car and the policy holder is wanted an 'agreed' value before taking the policy out.

 

So in this case it wouldn't matter if the OP had valued the car at £1000 or £100, they would still offer what GG advises the car is worth.

 

Mossy

Link to post
Share on other sites

I disagree with the last post. If you tell your insurer the car is only worth £100 then that is the most you will ever get out of them as they will have used that figure to influence the insurance quote they give you. They will argue that you told them it's worth so why are you quibbling. Never underestimate the value of your car when getting your car insured !

Link to post
Share on other sites

I disagree with the last post. If you tell your insurer the car is only worth £100 then that is the most you will ever get out of them as they will have used that figure to influence the insurance quote they give you. They will argue that you told them it's worth so why are you quibbling. Never underestimate the value of your car when getting your car insured !

 

You are absolutely and totally 100% wrong.

 

When a vehicle is declared a total loss or stolen not recovered the claims handler will get the current market value from a recognised source, usually Glass's Guide, and that what is offered to the policy holder.

 

The basic principle or insurance is to put you back in the position you were in prior to the loss/damage, so if a policyholder picked up a real bargain and managed to find a car for £2000 that had a market value of £3000, and declared its value as £2000 they would still get £3000 (or whatever GG states it is worth) , otherwise they would be penalised because the chances of them finding another such bargain are slim, likewise if they overpaid and bought a car worth £3000 but paid £4000 for it, they wouldn't get £4000 back.

 

It really is an urban myth that when you tell your insurer what your car is worth that that is the maximum you will get, or that that is the sum you are insuring it for. I do however accept that some smaller unscrupulous firms may have a clause that states that the value you put down may be the most you will get, but in the main all insurers work as I have explained.

 

Insurers DO NOT USE the figure you give them when calculating premiums, unless it is for an agreed value policy on a classic, rare or specialist vehicle.

 

If you give your insurer a value that is too high for the make and model you are insuring it will flag it up because it usually means that it is non standard or has high value extras fitted to it and that will lead to more questions about why the value is so high.

 

Mossy

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...