Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Who sang 'Suspicious minds' Was it Elvis.   I was caught out and appealed firstly to CPM.  Surprise surprise, Rejected.  Then IAS surprise surprise, Dismissed.   If it is of any help.  The video posted by Squirlyline on 9th Oct 2019 shows that there are NO barriers on the entry to Trinity Park. If you Google Map the Trinity Park postcode the entry to Trinity Park clearly shows that there WERE barriers erected and that is dated Oct 2018.   If it is Private Land.  WHY were the barriers removed.   Sing up Elvis
    • Hi. I have received the SAR today. Looks like they did send a default notice, looking at it neither me or my husband remember ever seeing the letter. However, I know we cannot prove this like they can and have.... I guess there is nothing more I can do?  Thanks for all your help 
    • Dx thank you so much for all of your help this year you really are an angel you are a credit to this site and I’m sure 1000’s more would agree with me in saying that you are a perfect example of why nobody should lose hope in humanity the way society is starting to look today. I really can’t find the words to express my gratitude for your gumption. I really can’t apart from say thank you from the bottom of my heart. 
    • In terms of the result, in hindsight, I think that the manifesto possibly went too far.  I think nationalisation of utilities, railways and royal mail is a good thing due to the fact privatisation sucks money out of the system, and things end up being paid for several times over.   I'm not sure nationalisation of BT was such a good thing.  Our network is pretty rubbish and leaving infrastructure projects to private companies is incoherent and inefficient, but that might have been a step too far.   I disagree it's all Corbyn's fault because the Tory's campaigned on a very simple message - "get brexit done".  In effect, their manifesto was very basic, and labour haemorrhaged leave voting labour voters so desperately tired of the process.  There was a hell of a lot of anti Corbyn propaganda from the word go.   I said after the referendum that the Tory's would be screwed because they wouldn't be able to deliver on any of the promises made, and for a long time it looked like that would be the case.  However, I never took into consideration the effect of Boris Johnson would have because he's a very good salesman... I would bet my life on us having a deal by the end of next year, and whatever we're left with will be championed as a massive success... I'm sick of it all if I'm honest.  I've had people banging on about remainers can all shit up now, they lost etc, as if they'd won the lottery.  But when I look at it, it was all still based on nonsense and misinformation, so I think we've all lost.   We're now left with a Tory government that has a huge majority so that they can push through anything they like.  Where's the democracy there?  Leavers wanted more democracy, but Johnson having played a blinder, has secured less democracy and conviced them they're all winners.  Coupled with their promise to "renegotiate the relationship between parliament and the courts" I'm concerned all these leave voters aren't really thinking clearly.  I've also said all along that brexit was about the elite in our country having more overall control, and now they have it.  They've even convinced working class labour voters that it's in their interest.  How did this happen?
    • Hi  Received another scrawled letter this morning ,    just to to inform you that I am still waiting for further instructions from the court.    Please would you you provide me with a copy of my letter, where you have stated In your letter to me , dated 29th November 2019 ,  that my recent letter states I do not wish for you to instruct an expert or make an independent report on our behalf?    You also state that in my letter I also do not want your input in the Instructions letter to the expert.  Please forward a copy of my letter stating this to you.    Please forward where the judge states that I had to forward a written draft letter to you, with the instructions for the expert? Also where it states I needed to send you a copy for you to check to see if it’s appropriate.    Please would you send me the copy of my letter, sent to yourself, where you state , I have written all the above instructions to yourself .    Guessing she’s not kept a copy of the letters she has sent me. Oh dear!     
  • Our picks

InformedSearcher

Statute Barred and CRA Entries

style="text-align:center;"> Please note that this topic has not had any new posts for the last 3660 days.

If you are trying to post a different story then you should start your own new thread. Posting on this thread is likely to mean that you won't get the help and advice that you need.

If you are trying to post information which is relevant to the story in this thread then please flag it up to the site team and they will allow you to post.

Thank you

Recommended Posts

Hello,

 

Though it better to start my own thread as I'm sure I'm starting to tread on peoples toes!

 

Okay here's the problem. DCA's circumvent the 6 year rule by placing searches on CRA's showing the words 'outstanding debt'. There is guidance and awareness from the ICO that this should not happen. I made a complaint about dear old Mackenzie Hall and it took the ICO all of nine (!) months to finally respond - coincidentally a week after the entries vanished as they 2 years was up.

I have now come to see 'Clarity' make 3 entries, 2 of which were on the same day. They refuse to remove them and the CRA's attitude is so aloof that none of them are concerned about file entry errors.

 

Some input would be great as I could ramble on forever on this.

 

Thanks

Michael


When I was young I thought that money was the most important thing in life; now that I am old I know that it is. (Oscar Wilde)

--I like to be helpful wherever possible however I'm not qualified in this field. I do consider carefully anything important (normally from personal experience) however please understand that any actions taken are at your own risk--

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The DCA's and CRA's are in each others pockets.

 

I would write to whichever DCA's have placed entries on your file requesting that they remove them immediately.

 

Then file a separate complaint with the CRA's copying in the ICO.

 

If you are deadly serious, then you should make it clear to them that you are also going to claim for damages for each incorrect entry, currently stands at £1000 per entry, however, you should only threaten this if you are seriously going to go down this avenue.

 

Failing that all you can really do, is complain to the ICO and the CRA and use their complaints procedure to it's entirety, or until you get the desired result..;)


Who ever heard of someone getting a job at the Jobcentre? The unemployed are sent there as penance for their sins, not to help them find work!

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

This is pretty shocking IS.

 

Will try and find some information for you.

 

:)


Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

Uploading documents to CAG ** Instructions **

 

Looking for a draft letter? Use the CAG Library

Dealing with Customer Service Departments? - read the CAG Guide first

 

1: Making a PPI claim ? - Q & A's and spreadsheets for single premium policy -

HERE

2: Take back control of your finances -

Debt Diaries

3: Feel Bullied by Creditors or Debt Collectors?

Read Here

4: Staying Calm About Debt

Read Here

5: Forum rules - These have been updated -

Please Read

 

 

BCOBS

 

2: Does your Bank play fair - You can force your Bank to play Fair with you

3: Banking Conduct of Business Regulations - The Hidden Rules

4: BCOBS and Unfair Treatment - Common Examples of Banks Behaving Badly

5: Fair Treatment for Credit Card Holders and Borrowers - COBS

 

 

 

Advice & opinions given by citizenb are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

 

PLEASE DO NOT ASK ME TO GIVE ADVICE BY PM - IF YOU PROVIDE A LINK TO YOUR THREAD THEN I WILL BE HAPPY TO OFFER ADVICE THERE:D

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

BB,

Could you inform me where I can gather the information on the incorrect entry leading to a £1000 fine for the creditor?

Also I know this is a grey area but whilst an account is in dispute that does prevent them from placing adverse info on your credit file?

It is with this in mind that I want to learn the procedure

Thanks

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

Uploading documents to CAG ** Instructions **

 

Looking for a draft letter? Use the CAG Library

Dealing with Customer Service Departments? - read the CAG Guide first

 

1: Making a PPI claim ? - Q & A's and spreadsheets for single premium policy -

HERE

2: Take back control of your finances -

Debt Diaries

3: Feel Bullied by Creditors or Debt Collectors?

Read Here

4: Staying Calm About Debt

Read Here

5: Forum rules - These have been updated -

Please Read

 

 

BCOBS

 

2: Does your Bank play fair - You can force your Bank to play Fair with you

3: Banking Conduct of Business Regulations - The Hidden Rules

4: BCOBS and Unfair Treatment - Common Examples of Banks Behaving Badly

5: Fair Treatment for Credit Card Holders and Borrowers - COBS

 

 

 

Advice & opinions given by citizenb are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

 

PLEASE DO NOT ASK ME TO GIVE ADVICE BY PM - IF YOU PROVIDE A LINK TO YOUR THREAD THEN I WILL BE HAPPY TO OFFER ADVICE THERE:D

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Not sure which searches show "outstanding balance" or how that would effect your credit rating, so I'm a little confuzzed there. :confused:

 

If there's ICO advice it shoudn't happen, take them to Court and produce that advice to show the basis of the claim.

 

Why you'd wait so long for the I.C.O to even reply is beyond me - much simplier to sue them for inaccurate processing under the DPA and using the I.C.O's advice to support your claim ;)


Always happy to help where I can!

:lol:

Beware of legal advice given on a private forum - do you REALLY know who is posting? Are they REALLY accountable for their posts? What if you follow their advice and get something wrong?

It was Winston Churchill who said; "Democracy is the worst way to run a country except for all the others"

 

Advice and comments posted by car2403 are offered purely without prejudice. They reflect only my personal opinion and do not represent the opinion of this forum or it's management. You should always seek legal advice from a qualified legal advisor. As a member of the site team, I disable reputation - reputation points mean nothing, please check my posting credentials yourself and make an informed decision. You shouldn't PM me and await a reply - I may be too late with a response. No replies will be given in Private Messages - just as with getting advice from the forum, getting advice via Private Messages is dangerous. CAG is about sharing successes so others can follow your example, this is primarily why I'm here, so please don't be offended if I don't offer replies in PM that doesn't comply with this. Help CAG to help others by keeping your thread up to date.

 

 

USEFUL LINKS; New User Guide to CAG | Can't find what you're looking for? | Intro to Consumer Credit Litigation | Is My Agreement Enforceable | Default (Surleybonds) Template Letter | Defaults - background, removal methods, challenges and taking a claim to Court | Digital Signature Guide | Overdrafts and the CCA

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Car, I think what is happening is where a statute barred debt is involved.. the DCA / tracing agent is doing a search and placing the comment "outstanding debt" on the record.

 

It seems very unfair that they can get away with this.:(

 

IS, if you were to take the court route.. would you be exempt from the fees ?


Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

Uploading documents to CAG ** Instructions **

 

Looking for a draft letter? Use the CAG Library

Dealing with Customer Service Departments? - read the CAG Guide first

 

1: Making a PPI claim ? - Q & A's and spreadsheets for single premium policy -

HERE

2: Take back control of your finances -

Debt Diaries

3: Feel Bullied by Creditors or Debt Collectors?

Read Here

4: Staying Calm About Debt

Read Here

5: Forum rules - These have been updated -

Please Read

 

 

BCOBS

 

2: Does your Bank play fair - You can force your Bank to play Fair with you

3: Banking Conduct of Business Regulations - The Hidden Rules

4: BCOBS and Unfair Treatment - Common Examples of Banks Behaving Badly

5: Fair Treatment for Credit Card Holders and Borrowers - COBS

 

 

 

Advice & opinions given by citizenb are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

 

PLEASE DO NOT ASK ME TO GIVE ADVICE BY PM - IF YOU PROVIDE A LINK TO YOUR THREAD THEN I WILL BE HAPPY TO OFFER ADVICE THERE:D

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Not sure which searches show "outstanding balance" or how that would effect your credit rating, so I'm a little confuzzed there. :confused:

 

If there's ICO advice it shoudn't happen, take them to Court and produce that advice to show the basis of the claim.

 

Why you'd wait so long for the I.C.O to even reply is beyond me - much simplier to sue them for inaccurate processing under the DPA and using the I.C.O's advice to support your claim ;)

 

The listing is 'Outstanding Debt' and not 'balance'. The search is performed and any potential lender will see it's a DCA with the reason stated. I waited so long because I thought at the time it was correct. You know do everything you should that's usually suggested. My dilemma was that the ICO took so long to reply and even now the DCA's and CRA's just 'ignore you'.

What I want to do is, yes take them to court and use the DPA as the argument notwithstanding that they would know before doing the searches when the default were dated. This now wanders into the area of 'where they authorised' and that appears to be effectively a 'no'. Are lenders not supposed to advise you of debt movements from company to company?

 

Michael


When I was young I thought that money was the most important thing in life; now that I am old I know that it is. (Oscar Wilde)

--I like to be helpful wherever possible however I'm not qualified in this field. I do consider carefully anything important (normally from personal experience) however please understand that any actions taken are at your own risk--

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
BB,

Could you inform me where I can gather the information on the incorrect entry leading to a £1000 fine for the creditor?

Also I know this is a grey area but whilst an account is in dispute that does prevent them from placing adverse info on your credit file?

It is with this in mind that I want to learn the procedure

Thanks

Dont want to hijack the thread but it is very relevant to us helping everyone in the future could someone answer

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I am aware that certain searches on your CRF are only seen by 'you' and the agency who has done that search.

But it really does beg the question why the CRA's allow 'agencies' to search your CRF without your express permission.

I remember buying a TV and being 'formally' asked if it was 'OK' for them to do a credit search....no problem whatsoever, but unscrupulous leeches like these doing a search without your knowledge or consent is most definitely a matter for the ICO to answer, along with the CRA's, the more complaints, and the more people use their complaints system to it's entirety, then and only then will something be done about it..


Who ever heard of someone getting a job at the Jobcentre? The unemployed are sent there as penance for their sins, not to help them find work!

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I am aware that certain searches on your CRF are only seen by 'you' and the agency who has done that search.

But it really does beg the question why the CRA's allow 'agencies' to search your CRF without your express permission.

I remember buying a TV and being 'formally' asked if it was 'OK' for them to do a credit search....no problem whatsoever, but unscrupulous leeches like these doing a search without your knowledge or consent is most definitely a matter for the ICO to answer, along with the CRA's, the more complaints, and the more people use their complaints system to it's entirety, then and only then will something be done about it..

 

Those comments are welcome but you know, I don't think whatever happens the ICO will progress. I might have thought so months ago but heck, 8 months to reply to my compalint beggars belief!

'Outstanding Debt' searches by kickass [sic] DCA's will show up on searches by potential lenders. It does not take long to read 'between the lines' to detect 'this applicant has problems'.

I agree, if asked then there's no problem. However to wander to your file and see stuff that quite shocks you should never happen. All this 'tosh' on TV ads from CRA's amazes me to say the least. These CRA's in fact believe they are totally above any laws and are just cash cows and it saddens me to say that.

 

Michael

(who wants a Santa with 'clout' for Christmas!)


When I was young I thought that money was the most important thing in life; now that I am old I know that it is. (Oscar Wilde)

--I like to be helpful wherever possible however I'm not qualified in this field. I do consider carefully anything important (normally from personal experience) however please understand that any actions taken are at your own risk--

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
BB,

Could you inform me where I can gather the information on the incorrect entry leading to a £1000 fine for the creditor?

 

Sorry exas, I can't find the relevant info anywhere at the minute, knew I should have bookmarked it!


Who ever heard of someone getting a job at the Jobcentre? The unemployed are sent there as penance for their sins, not to help them find work!

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

IS, 8 months is an unbelievably ridiculous time frame in which to investigate your complaint, so I would be prepared to take the ICO to task over this, and use their own complaints procedure to get them to sit up and take note.

Satisfied with our service? - Information Commissioner's Office - ICO


Who ever heard of someone getting a job at the Jobcentre? The unemployed are sent there as penance for their sins, not to help them find work!

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
IS, 8 months is an unbelievably ridiculous time frame in which to investigate your complaint, so I would be prepared to take the ICO to task over this, and use their own complaints procedure to get them to sit up and take note.

Satisfied with our service? - Information Commissioner's Office - ICO

 

Thank you for that - I will certainly complain! Can I ask you though, by me complaining what will it actually achieve or gain though? Will they help me more or improve their 'service'?

Since my last posts I have now 3 entries from the DCA called 'Clarity'. These if at all, all refer to 'Statute Barred' debts but they refuse to remove them. The ICO told me that DCA's are aware of limitation but alas they are just laughing at me it would seem. This includes the (Equifax) CRA whose attitude is so alloof I hope their operators fall on spikey pointed things!

I in fact hope both the DCA and CRA involved are reading this. They are so up themselves though that I doubt they see they are doing anything both wrong and illegal! I DO intend to take both to County Court though and claim my £1k damages per entry if I ever see the data to support it.

 

Michael


When I was young I thought that money was the most important thing in life; now that I am old I know that it is. (Oscar Wilde)

--I like to be helpful wherever possible however I'm not qualified in this field. I do consider carefully anything important (normally from personal experience) however please understand that any actions taken are at your own risk--

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The service they are meant to provide is dire, which is why you must use their complaints procedure, as well as making a formal complaint to the CRA's that have allowed third parties to place defaults on your credit file without your knowledge or permission, The ICO must improve it's rotten service, they are failing to do what they are designed to do, thereby drawing wages under false pretences.

 

If you don't complain about being treated so abysmally and being laughed at then they will never improve or take their job seriously.

COMPLAIN COMPLAIN COMPLAIN!!!!!:rolleyes:

 

Here is Clarity's complaints procedure,http://www.claritycreditmanagement.co.uk/complaints.htm

 

And as they are 'supposedly' Members of the Debt buyers and sellers group (CSA) make a formal complaint to them also;http://www.csaconsumers-uk.com/page/i-have-a-complaint

Edited by Bazooka Boo

Who ever heard of someone getting a job at the Jobcentre? The unemployed are sent there as penance for their sins, not to help them find work!

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
The service they are meant to provide is dire, which is why you must use their complaints procedure, as well as making a formal complaint to the CRA's that have allowed third parties to place defaults on your credit file without your knowledge or permission, The ICO must improve it's rotten service, they are failing to do what they are designed to do, thereby drawing wages under false pretences.

 

If you don't complain about being treated so abysmally and being laughed at then they will never improve or take their job seriously.

COMPLAIN COMPLAIN COMPLAIN!!!!!:rolleyes:

 

Here is Clarity's complaints procedure,Complaints Procedure : Clarity Credit Management

 

And as they are 'supposedly' Members of the Debt buyers and sellers group (CSA) make a formal complaint to them also;I have a complaint

 

Thanks again for this further help ...

I actually thought of taking the CRA and DCA to court because that's the only real way they'll listen. Whilst I will complain to the ICO I feel that these things get treated as single instances whereas we know there are probably thousands. In other words the DCA's and CRA's simply continue in a circle.

Just some guidance on what I should be doing in court would be appreciated. I know for one that under ICO rules the entries should not have been even made never mind them not being removed. I believe that I should have been asked permission for the searches and I certainly have no idea what these statute barred debts even refer to. The fact that these people have made searches and seen my private data concerns me.

 

Michael

Edited by InformedSearcher

When I was young I thought that money was the most important thing in life; now that I am old I know that it is. (Oscar Wilde)

--I like to be helpful wherever possible however I'm not qualified in this field. I do consider carefully anything important (normally from personal experience) however please understand that any actions taken are at your own risk--

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    No registered users viewing this page.


  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...