Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • The Notice to Hirer does not comply with the protection of Freedoms Act 2012 Schedule  4 . This is before I ask if Europarks have sent you a copy of the PCN they sent to Arval along with a copy of the hire agreement et. if they haven't done that either you are totally in the clear and have nothing to worry about and nothing to pay. The PCN they have sent you is supposed to be paid by you according to the Act within 21 days. The chucklebuts have stated 28 days which is the time that motorists have to pay. Such a basic and simple thing . The Act came out in 2012 and still they cannot get it right which is very good news for you. Sadly there is no point in telling them- they won't accept it because they lose their chance to make any money out of you. they are hoping that by writing to you demanding money plus sending in their  unregulated debt collectors and sixth rate solicitors that you might be so frightened as to pay them money so that you can sleep at night. Don't be surprised if some of their letters are done in coloured crayons-that's the sort of  level of people you will be dealing with. Makes great bedding for the rabbits though. Euro tend not to be that litigious but while you can safely ignore the debt collectors just keep an eye out for a possible Letter of Claim. They are pretty rare but musn't be ignored. Let us know so that you can send a suitably snotty letter to them showing that you are not afraid of them and are happy to go to Court as you like winning.  
    • They did reply to my defence stating it would fail and enclosed copies of NOA, DN Term letter and account statements. All copies of T&C's that could be reconstructions and the IP address on there resolves to the town where MBNA offices are, not my location
    • Here are 7 of our top tips to help you connect with young people who have left school or otherwise disengaged.View the full article
    • My defence was standard no paperwork:   1.The Defendant contends that the particulars of claim are generic in nature. The Defendant accordingly sets out its case below and relies on CPR r 16.5 (3) in relation to any particular allegation to which a specific response has not been made. 2. Paragraph 1 is noted. The Defendant has had a contractual relationship with MBNA Limited in the past. The Defendant does not recognise the reference number provided by the claimant within its particulars and has sought verification from the claimant who is yet to comply with requests for further information. 3. Paragraph 2 is denied. The Defendant maintains that a default notice was never received. The Claimant is put to strict proof to that a default notice was issued by MBNA Limited and received by the Defendant. 4. Paragraph 3 is denied. The Defendant is unaware of any legal assignment or Notice of Assignment allegedly served from either the Claimant or MBNA Limited. 5. On the 02/01/2023 the Defendant requested information pertaining to this claim by way of a CCA 1974 Section 78 request. The claimant is yet to respond to this request. On the 19/05/2023 a CPR 31.14 request was sent to Kearns who is yet to respond. To date, 02/06/2023, no documentation has been received. The claimant remains in default of my section 78 request. 6. It is therefore denied with regards to the Defendant owing any monies to the Claimant, the Claimant has failed to provide any evidence of proof of assignment being sent/ agreement/ balance/ breach or termination requested by CPR 31.14, therefore the Claimant is put to strict proof to: (a) show how the Defendant entered into an agreement; and (b) show and evidence the nature of breach and service of a default notice pursuant to Section 87(1) CCA1974 (c) show how the claimant has reached the amount claimed for; and (d) show how the Claimant has the legal right, either under statute or equity to issue a claim; 7. As per Civil Procedure Rule 16.5(4), it is expected that the Claimant prove the allegation that the money is owed. 8. On the alternative, as the Claimant is an assignee of a debt, it is denied that the Claimant has the right to lay a claim due to contraventions of Section 136 of the Law of Property Act and Section 82A of the consumer credit Act 1974. 9. By reasons of the facts and matters set out above, it is denied that the Claimant is entitled to the relief claimed or any relief.
    • Monika the first four pages of the Private parking section have at least 12 of our members who have also been caught out on this scam site. That's around one quarter of all our current complaints. Usually we might expect two current complaints for the same park within 4 pages.  So you are in good company and have done well in appealing to McDonalds in an effort to resolve the matter without having  paid such a bunch of rogues. Most people blindly pay up. Met . Starbucks and McDonalds  are well aware of the situation and seem unwilling to make it easier for motorists to avoid getting caught. For instance, instead of photographing you, if they were honest and wanted you  to continue using their services again, they would have said "Excuse me but if you are going to go to Mc donalds from here, it will cost you £100." But no they kett quiet and are now pursuing you for probably a lot more than £100 now. They also know thst  they cannot charge anything over the amount stated on the car park signs. Their claims for £160 or £170 are unlawful yet so many pay that to avoid going to Court. When the truth is that Met are unlikely to take them to Court since they know they will lose. The PCNs are issued on airport land which is covered by Byelaws so only the driver can be pursued, not the keeper. But they keep writing to you as they do not know who was driving unless you gave it away when you appealed. Even if they know you were driving they should still lose in Court for several reasons. The reason we ask you to fill out our questionnaire is to help you if MET do decide to take you to Court in the end. Each member who visited the park may well have different experiences while there which can help when filling out a Witness statement [we will help you with that if it comes to it.] if you have thrown away the original PCN  and other paperwork you obviously haven't got a jerbil or a guinea pig as their paper makes great litter boxes for them.🙂 You can send an SAR to them to get all the information Met have on you to date. Though if you have been to several sites already, you may have done that by now. In the meantime, you will be being bombarded by illiterate debt collectors and sixth rate solicitors all threatening you with ever increasing amounts as well as being hung drawn and quartered. Their letters can all be safely ignored. On the odd chance that you may get a Letter of Claim from them just come back to us and we will get you to send a snotty letter back to them so that they know you are not happy, don't care a fig for their threats and will see them off in Court if they finally have the guts to carry on. If you do have the original PCN could you please post it up, carefully removing your name. address and car registration number but including dates and times. If not just click on the SAR to take you to the form to send to Met.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Pumpytums goes to Northampton Help Please!


pumpytums
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3157 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Thanks Guys,

I was thinking something like this :- (from creditcardmug reply to Mr happy Thanks)

 

In the xxxxxxxx County Court

Claim number

 

Between

 

 

xxxxxxxxxxx- Claimant

 

 

and

 

 

 

 

xxxxxxxxxxxx- Defendant

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Defence

 

1. I xxxxxxxxx of xxxxxxxxxxxxx am the defendant in this action and make the following statement as my defence to the claim made by xxxxxxxxxxxx

 

2. The Defendant is embarrassed in pleading to the Particulars of Claim as it stands at present, inter alia: -

 

3. The claimants' particulars of claims disclose no legal cause of action and they are embarrassing to the defendant as the claimant's statement of case is insufficiently particularised and does not comply or even attempt to comply with CPR part 16. In this regard I wish to draw the courts attention to the following matters;

 

a) The Particulars of Claim are vague and insufficient and do not disclose an adequate statement of facts relating to or proceeding the alleged cause of action. No particulars are offered in relation to the nature of the written agreement referred to, the method the claimant calculated any outstanding sums due,or any other matters necessary to substantiate the claimant's claim.

 

b) A copy of the purported written agreement that the claimant cites in the Particulars of Claim, and which appears to form the basis upon which these proceedings have been brought, has not been served attached to the claim form.

 

c) A copy of any evidence of both the scope and nature of any default, and proof of any amount outstanding on the alleged accounts, has not been served attached to the claim form.

 

d) A copy of any termination notice, on the alleged account, has not been served attached to the claim form.

 

e) A copy of any notice of assignment, on the alleged account and proof of original service of said assignment to the defendant, has not been served attached to the claim form.

4. Consequently, I deny all allegations on the particulars of claim and put the claimant to strict proof thereof

 

5. I respectfully request the courts permission to submit an amended defence should the claimant file a fully particularised Particulars of Claim

 

Statement of Truth

 

 

I xxxxxxxxxxx, believe the above statement to be true and factual

 

 

Signed .....................

 

Date

 

 

Can this be filed on-line?

Also my defence has to be in by date of claim +5 +28 days?

I believe it will come after Christmas.

 

My CPR's are now received, If they partially respond will I have to amend my defence? or is all or nothing?

 

Once my defence is filed within the 28 days (Acknowledgement of claim ) will the claimant then have a set amount of time to change their claim?

 

Should I mention about the termination letter and letter of assignment too?

 

Thanks for all your help.

 

Pumpytums

Edited by pumpytums
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 236
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Hi P.

 

 

 

Can this be filed on-line? Pretty sure i've done one on-line

Also my defence has to be in by date of claim +5 +28 days? All as the instructions :)

I believe it will come after Christmas.

 

My CPR's are now received, If they partially respond will I have to amend my defence? or is all or nothing? See what's missing then decide

 

Once my defence is filed within the 28 days (Acknowledgement of claim ) will the claimant then have a set amount of time to change their claim? The court will write and let them know a defence has been filed. AQs will follow a few weeks later from your local court. Don't think they can just change their POCs - i'm sure someone will advise further.

 

Should I mention about the termination letter and letter of assignment too? LOS yes

 

Thanks for all your help.

 

Pumpytums

 

M

Edited by MandM
added a bit

________________________________________________________________

ALL unsolicited PMs and E-mails should be posted up - Not all on CAG are who they appear to be

 

 

My views are my own. If in doubt, seek professional advice. If I can help though, I will. CAG helped me!!

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

OK added some extra info to my embarrassed defence (in red) does that sound OK?

 

Pumpytums

 

Looks OK to me. Leave it up for further opinions,

 

Hope you're well

 

M

________________________________________________________________

ALL unsolicited PMs and E-mails should be posted up - Not all on CAG are who they appear to be

 

 

My views are my own. If in doubt, seek professional advice. If I can help though, I will. CAG helped me!!

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm fine thanks mate,

thanks for your help are you holding up ok?

 

Cheers

 

Pumpytums

 

Good thanks,

 

Just bumping ya :)

 

If anyone of our more knowledgeable chaps would be so kind as to give an opinion on the letter in post 26 above it would be much appreciated

 

M

________________________________________________________________

ALL unsolicited PMs and E-mails should be posted up - Not all on CAG are who they appear to be

 

 

My views are my own. If in doubt, seek professional advice. If I can help though, I will. CAG helped me!!

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Guys,

I was thinking something like this :- (from creditcardmug reply to Mr happy Thanks)

 

In the xxxxxxxx County Court

Claim number

 

Between

 

 

xxxxxxxxxxx- Claimant

 

 

and

 

 

 

 

xxxxxxxxxxxx- Defendant

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Defence

 

1. I xxxxxxxxx of xxxxxxxxxxxxx am the defendant in this action and make the following statement as my defence to the claim made by xxxxxxxxxxxx

 

2. The Defendant is embarrassed in pleading to the Particulars of Claim as it stands at present, inter alia: -

 

3. The claimants' particulars of claims disclose no legal cause of action and they are embarrassing to the defendant as the claimant's statement of case is insufficiently particularised and does not comply or even attempt to comply with CPR part 16. In this regard I wish to draw the courts attention to the following matters;

 

a) The Particulars of Claim are vague and insufficient and do not disclose an adequate statement of facts relating to or proceeding the alleged cause of action. No particulars are offered in relation to the nature of the written agreement referred to, the method the claimant calculated any outstanding sums due,or any other matters necessary to substantiate the claimant's claim.

 

b) A copy of the purported written agreement that the claimant cites in the Particulars of Claim, and which appears to form the basis upon which these proceedings have been brought, has not been served attached to the claim form.

 

c) A copy of any evidence of both the scope and nature of any default, and proof of any amount outstanding on the alleged accounts, has not been served attached to the claim form.

 

d) A copy of any termination notice served under section 76 and/or section 98 of the CCA, on the alleged account, has not been served attached to the claim form.

 

e) A copy of any notice of assignment compliant with the provisions of the Law of Property Act 1925, on the alleged account and proof of original service of said assignment to the defendant, has not been served attached to the claim form.

 

4. Consequently, I deny all allegations on the particulars of claim and put the claimant to strict proof thereof

 

5. I respectfully request the courts permission to submit an amended defence should the claimant file a fully particularised Particulars of Claim

 

Statement of Truth

 

 

I xxxxxxxxxxx, believe the above statement to be true and factual

 

 

Signed .....................

 

Date

 

 

Can this be filed on-line?

Also my defence has to be in by date of claim +5 +28 days?

I believe it will come after Christmas.

 

My CPR's are now received, If they partially respond will I have to amend my defence? or is all or nothing?

 

Once my defence is filed within the 28 days (Acknowledgement of claim ) will the claimant then have a set amount of time to change their claim?

 

Should I mention about the termination letter and letter of assignment too?

 

Thanks for all your help.

 

Pumpytums

 

couple of suggestions in green

Link to post
Share on other sites

Nice one Hungry,

the devil is indeed in the detail.:D

 

If an account is in dispute, and the creditor takes legal action. What happens to said legal action?

 

Pumpytums

 

I know this one, it's the only bit of the rankine judgement that's of any use to anyone really. A section 78(6) dispute does not prevent a creditor from commencing legal proceedings rankines vs HFC and others 2009.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi everyone,

quick updated so far nothing has been received, one of the dates for the CPR's was up early last week and the other is up very soon. Do I need to inform Northampton court to this effect once the time is up? If so what do I need to say?

 

I have received no acknowledgement from the claimant at all, my documents to them are confirmed received.

 

I would very much like to get this one put to bed, and eat some mince-pies in peace.:D

 

Any help is greatly appreciated as always.

 

Thanks

 

Pumpytums

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi everyone,

the time limit is up for both the CPR's nothing received (what a surprise) do I need to mention this in my embarrassed defense or leave it as it is?

 

I would like to get this submitted in the next couple of days.

 

Thanks again for everyones help.

 

Pumpytums

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi everyone,

the time limit is up for both the CPR's nothing received (what a surprise) do I need to mention this in my embarrassed defense or leave it as it is?

 

I would like to get this submitted in the next couple of days.

 

Thanks again for everyones help.

 

Pumpytums

 

I would - it starts to show a trend of their efforts to frustrate you.

 

M

________________________________________________________________

ALL unsolicited PMs and E-mails should be posted up - Not all on CAG are who they appear to be

 

 

My views are my own. If in doubt, seek professional advice. If I can help though, I will. CAG helped me!!

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok how about the following thanks M&M,

 

One question the bit thats says

 

1. I XXXXXXXXX(name) of XXXXXXX(what goes here address or town???)

 

Red text is added.

 

Thanks

 

Pumpytums

 

In the xxxxxxxx County Court

Claim number

 

Between

 

 

 

xxxxxxxxxxx- Claimant

 

 

 

and

 

 

 

 

 

xxxxxxxxxxxx- Defendant

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Defence

 

1. I xxxxxxxxx of xxxxxxxxxxxxx am the defendant in this action and make the following statement as my defence to the claim made by xxxxxxxxxxxx

 

2. The Defendant is embarrassed in pleading to the Particulars of Claim as it stands at present, inter alia: -

 

3. The claimants' particulars of claims disclose no legal cause of action and they are embarrassing to the defendant as the claimant's statement of case is insufficiently particularised and does not comply or even attempt to comply with CPR part 16. In this regard I wish to draw the courts attention to the following matters;

 

a) The Particulars of Claim are vague and insufficient and do not disclose an adequate statement of facts relating to or proceeding the alleged cause of action. No particulars are offered in relation to the nature of the written agreement referred to, the method the claimant calculated any outstanding sums due,or any other matters necessary to substantiate the claimant's claim.

 

b) A copy of the purported written agreement that the claimant cites in the Particulars of Claim, and which appears to form the basis upon which these proceedings have been brought, has not been served attached to the claim form.

 

c) A copy of any evidence of both the scope and nature of any default, and proof of any amount outstanding on the alleged accounts, has not been served attached to the claim form.

 

d) A copy of any termination notice served under section 76 and/or section 98 of the CCA, on the alleged account, has not been served attached to the claim form.

 

e) A copy of any notice of assignment compliant with the provisions of the Law of Property Act 1925, on the alleged account and proof of original service of said assignment to the defendant, has not been served attached to the claim form.

f) The defendant requested information referred in the claim under CPR 18 & CPR 31.14 from the claimant by Royal Mail Special Delivery. The request was received by the claimant on the XX December 2009, compliance with the requests has now expired. The defendant wishes to make the court aware that the claimant is trying to frustrate proceedings and denying the defendant an opportunity to file a defence and counter claim.

5. Consequently, I deny all allegations on the particulars of claim and put the claimant to strict proof thereof

 

6. I respectfully request the courts permission to submit an amended defence should the claimant file a fully particularised Particulars of Claim

 

Statement of Truth

 

 

I xxxxxxxxxxx, believe the above statement to be true and factual

 

 

Signed .....................

 

Date

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok how about the following thanks M&M,

 

One question the bit thats says

 

1. I XXXXXXXXX(name) of XXXXXXX(what goes here address or town???)yes, although of sound mind and body would give you one up on the other side!

 

Red text is added.I'll use green then

 

Thanks

 

Pumpytums

 

In the xxxxxxxx County Court

Claim number

 

Between

 

 

 

xxxxxxxxxxx- Claimant

 

 

 

and

 

 

 

 

 

xxxxxxxxxxxx- Defendant

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Defence

 

1. I xxxxxxxxx of xxxxxxxxxxxxx am the defendant in this action and make the following statement as my defence to the claim made by xxxxxxxxxxxx

 

Except where explicitly stated below the Defendant neither admits nor denies any of the assertions or claims made by the Claimant.

2. The Defendant is embarrassed in pleading to the Particulars of Claim as it stands at present, inter alia: -

 

3. The claimants' particulars of claims disclose no legal cause of action and they are embarrassing to the defendant as the claimant's statement of case is insufficiently particularised and does not comply or even attempt to comply with CPR part 16. In this regard I wish to draw the courts attention to the following matters;

 

a) The Particulars of Claim are vague and insufficient and do not disclose an adequate statement of facts relating to or proceeding the alleged cause of action. No particulars are offered in relation to the nature of the written agreement referred to, the method the claimant calculated any outstanding sums due,or any other matters necessary to substantiate the claimant's claim.

 

b) A copy of the purported written agreement that the claimant cites in the Particulars of Claim, and which appears to form the basis upon which these proceedings have been brought, has not been served attached to the claim form.

 

c) A copy of any evidence of both the scope and nature of any default, and proof of any amount outstanding on the alleged accounts, has not been served attached to the claim form.

 

d) A copy of any termination notice served under section 76 and/or section 98 of the CCA, on the alleged account, has not been served attached to the claim form.

 

e) A copy of any notice of assignment compliant with the provisions of the Law of Property Act 1925, on the alleged account and proof of original service of said assignment to the defendant, has not been served attached to the claim form.

 

f) The defendant requested information referred in the claim under CPR 18 & CPR 31.14 from the claimant by Royal Mail Special Delivery. The request was received by the claimant on the XX December 2009, compliance with the requests has now expired. The defendant wishes to make the court aware that the claimant is trying to frustrate proceedings and denying the defendant an opportunity to file a defence and counter claim.

5. Consequently, I deny all allegations on the particulars of claim and put the claimant to strict proof thereof

 

6. I respectfully request the courts permission to submit an amended defence should the claimant file a fully particularised Particulars of Claim

 

I respectfully request that the court consider striking out the claim under cpr 3.4.2(a) because it is not fully particularized nor offers any legal cause of action.

 

I respectfully request that the court consider striking out the claim under cpr 3.4.2© because, in light of the failure to respond to both cpr 31.14 & 18 requests, the Claimant is unable to substantiate their claim with documentary evidence.

 

Statement of Truth

 

 

I xxxxxxxxxxx, believe the above statement to be true and factual

 

 

Signed .....................

 

Date

 

A few suggestions

Link to post
Share on other sites

Nice on hungry, love the "of sound mind and body bit very funny".

 

I would love to know the percentage of claims that go through by default very scary I bet. I still can't believe how easy it is for them to basically print money and turn £100 into £1000.

 

Having reread the POC the bu^&ers are claiming for interest on a claim covered by the Consumer credit act 1974, I believe thats a big no. And have also added a so called charge to the claim amount again, a big no I believe.

 

So not only are they asking for the full amount they are inflating it as well. I suppose by on a default judgement though they have just made another 100% from the interest+ fee on their outlay. I suppose if all the ducks were in a row the original OC would be taking the action.

 

And to top it all the OC is playing games with my SAR info.

 

Thanks again

 

Pumpytums

Link to post
Share on other sites

Pumpytums

 

Thereis an exception to the normal rules about producing documents (as required by CPR 16 ) when the claim is started online through Northampton. Therefore the part in your defence that states "and does not comply or even attempt to comply with CPR part 16" is inaccurate and is loved by DCA solicitors to show your inexperience to the court. In doing so, the solicitors also try to divert the court's attention that they might not have all the correct paperwork.

 

I suggest you delete the phrase "attached to the claim form" from the end of paragraphs 3 (b) to (e). That way you are saying to the court in effect, 'they haven't provided any documents, even when I asked properly, so how can I defend?'.

Arrow Global/MBNA - Discontinued and paid costs

HFO/Morgan Stanley (Barclays) - Discontinued and paid costs

HSBC - Discontinued and paid costs

Nationwide - Ran for cover of stay pending OFT case 3 yrs ago

RBS/Mint - Nothing for 4 yrs after S78 request

Link to post
Share on other sites

And of course, the bit about "and does not comply or even attempt to comply with CPR part 16"

Arrow Global/MBNA - Discontinued and paid costs

HFO/Morgan Stanley (Barclays) - Discontinued and paid costs

HSBC - Discontinued and paid costs

Nationwide - Ran for cover of stay pending OFT case 3 yrs ago

RBS/Mint - Nothing for 4 yrs after S78 request

Link to post
Share on other sites

Pumpytums

 

Thereis an exception to the normal rules about producing documents (as required by CPR 16 ) when the claim is started online through Northampton. Therefore the part in your defence that states "and does not comply or even attempt to comply with CPR part 16" is inaccurate and is loved by DCA solicitors to show your inexperience to the court. In doing so, the solicitors also try to divert the court's attention that they might not have all the correct paperwork.

 

I suggest you delete the phrase "attached to the claim form" from the end of paragraphs 3 (b) to (e). That way you are saying to the court in effect, 'they haven't provided any documents, even when I asked properly, so how can I defend?'.

 

 

Good point, I suppose as I requested the information under the CPR 18 & 31.14 in the correct manner. I have now indicated that I'm still waiting for the documents they rely on and have mentioned, rather than saying well you didnt attach them when they didnt need to.

 

 

Thanks

 

Pumpytums

 

 

 

In the xxxxxxxx

County Court

Claim number

 

 

Between

 

 

 

 

xxxxxxxxxxx- Claimant

 

 

 

 

and

 

 

 

 

 

 

xxxxxxxxxxxx- Defendant

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Defence

 

1. I xxxxxxxxx of xxxxxxxxxxxxx am the defendant in this action and make the following statement as my defence to the claim made by xxxxxxxxxxxx

 

Except where explicitly stated below the Defendant neither admits nor denies any of the assertions or claims made by the Claimant.

 

2. The Defendant is embarrassed in pleading to the Particulars of Claim as it stands at present, inter alia: -

 

3. The claimants' particulars of claims disclose no legal cause of action and they are embarrassing to the defendant as the claimant's statement of case is insufficiently particularised. In this regard I wish to draw the courts attention to the following matters;

 

a) The Particulars of Claim are vague and insufficient and do not disclose an adequate statement of facts relating to or proceeding the alleged cause of action. No particulars are offered in relation to the nature of the written agreement referred to, the method the claimant calculated any outstanding sums due,or any other matters necessary to substantiate the claimant's claim.

 

b) A copy of the purported written agreement that the claimant cites in the Particulars of Claim, and which appears to form the basis upon which these proceedings have been brought.

 

c) A copy of any evidence of both the scope and nature of any default, and proof of any amount outstanding on the alleged accounts.

 

d) A copy of any termination notice served under section 76 and/or section 98 of the CCA, on the alleged account.

 

e) A copy of any notice of assignment compliant with the provisions of the Law of Property Act 1925, on the alleged account and proof of original service of said assignment to the defendant.

 

f) The defendant requested information referred in the claim under CPR 18 & CPR 31.14 from the claimant by Royal Mail Special Delivery. The request was received by the claimant on the XX December 2009, compliance with the requests has now expired. The defendant wishes to make the court aware that the claimant is trying to frustrate proceedings and denying the defendant an opportunity to file a defence and counter claim.

 

4. Consequently, I deny all allegations on the particulars of claim and put the claimant to strict proof thereof

 

5. I respectfully request the courts permission to submit an amended defence should the claimant file a fully particularised Particulars of Claim

 

I respectfully request that the court consider striking out the claim under cpr 3.4.2(a) because it is not fully particularized nor offers any legal cause of action.

 

I respectfully request that the court consider striking out the claim under cpr 3.4.2© because, in light of the failure to respond to both cpr 31.14 & 18 requests, the Claimant is unable to substantiate their claim with documentary evidence.

 

Statement of Truth

 

 

I xxxxxxxxxxx, believe the above statement to be true and factual

 

 

Signed .....................

 

Date

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just filling my online defence, daft question I know "Do I want to file a counter claim?" The account has charges and PPI but I have no idea, can I claim them back from the new owner? Can I counterclaim at a latter date or should I just tick yes?

 

 

I'm really confused can someone give me a poke please.

 

Thanks

 

Pumpytums

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi, Got your PM and I'm sorry to say I know very little about court claims so you can consider this a gentle bump :-(

  • Haha 1

If you are asked to deal with any matter via private message, PLEASE report it.

Everything I say is opinion only. If you are unsure on any comment made, you should see a qualified solicitor

Please help CAG. Order this ebook. Now available on Amazon. Please click HERE

Link to post
Share on other sites

How long have you got Pumpy? before defence needs to be in?

 

Have you started with regards to YOUR claim or will this be the first they know of it?

 

M

________________________________________________________________

ALL unsolicited PMs and E-mails should be posted up - Not all on CAG are who they appear to be

 

 

My views are my own. If in doubt, seek professional advice. If I can help though, I will. CAG helped me!!

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have about 6days I reckon. I suppose as I can submit online Christmas won't affect it courts are closed 24th to the 28th I believe.

 

I haven't looked into my claim properly yet I need to get my SAR info. The OC is being downright stubborn I wonder why??

 

The original account had PPI and has charges, I don't think I can claim these back from the new owner. The new owner has added charges, but I suppose these can simply be removed from their fairytale total.

 

 

Pumpytums

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just filling my online defence, daft question I know "Do I want to file a counter claim?" The account has charges and PPI but I have no idea, can I claim them back from the new owner? Can I counterclaim at a latter date or should I just tick yes?

 

 

I'm really confused can someone give me a poke please.

 

Thanks

 

Pumpytums

 

 

Well if you are defending in full ie deny the whole claim then the answer is no - as I belive is the case. BUT if you were only contesting charges / PPI then that would go here as a counter claim.

 

Make sense?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well if you are defending in full ie deny the whole claim then the answer is no - as I belive is the case. BUT if you were only contesting charges / PPI then that would go here as a counter claim.

 

Make sense?

 

 

Yes it does, thanks again for all your help Hungry.

 

 

Pumpytums

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...