Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I'm not sure we were on standard tariffs - I've uploaded as many proofs as I can for the ombudsman - ovo called last night uping the compensation to 100 from 50 pounds for the slip in customer service however they won't acknowledge the the problem them not acknowledging a fault has caused nor are they willing to remedy anything as they won't accept the meter or formula was wrong.   I'd appreciate more details on the economy 7 approach and I'll update the ombudsman with any information you can share. 
    • To re-iterate and highlight my urgent question on this one: The N24 from the court did not include any instructions to submit paperwork 28 days before the date, unlike the N157 received for other smaller claims. Do I have to submit a WS for this court date? Link has!...
    • No, reading the guidance online it says to wait for a letter from the court. Should I wait or submit the directions? BTW, I assume that the directions are a longer version of the particular of claim accompanied by evidence, correct?
    • Thanks for opening, it's been another rough year for my family and I've procastinated a little.. Due to the age of my defaults on this and other accounts (circa 2021), I really need to avoid a CCJ as that will be another 6 years of credit issues. Mediation failed as I played the 'not enough info to make a decision' however during the call for some reason they did offer settlement at 80%, I refused. this has been allocated to small claims track, court date is June 3 and I've received their WS. I'm starting on my WS. They do appear to have provided everything required of them (even if docs could be reconstructions). Not really sure what my argument is anymore but I do want to attend court and see this through. Should a judgement be made against me then I will clear the balance within 30 days and have the CCJ removed - this is still possible isn't it? I'm going to be reading up today and tomorrow and hope you can provide me some guidance in the meantime. Wonder what your advice would be given the documents they have provided? I am now in a position to clear the debt either by lump sum or a few large installments - Is this something i should look into at this late stage? Thanks as always in advance
    • I have now received my SAR. It includes a great deal of information! Is there a time limit on how long account information is kept and/or can be provided to debtors? I have received many account statements which were not previously sent to me. I remember that the creditor should provide explanations of any acronyms and abbreviations that maybe used in the documents. Is this still the case? Also what, if any, are the regulations in regard to adding fees to a debt? Can fees be added to a debt after the court has approved a charge on a property. Perhaps due to the numerous owners of the debt, many payments I made were not properly recorded on the account, some were entered over a year after the payment was made! Following the Legal Charge, I paid every month until my payments were refused. I am trying to compute the over payments, but the addition of fees etc. is confusing me. Any comments and/or help would be appreciated.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Egg - CAbot - Not properly executed agreement


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5257 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hello all

 

i have had this going on for quite some time now, it has been moved to PPI but i also think it should be in this section as i am being hounded by a DCA for a contract that i don't think is executed properly.

 

THe link for more info is here:

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/payment-protection-insurance-ppi/224542-egg-cabot-cca-docs.html

 

I just last week received a letter from cabot saying that although i think that they still have every right to hound for the debt as they are very much the owners of it now and that even if i think the contract isn't properly executed all this means is that it is unenforceable through courts but that that would be for a judge to decide. I am however still liable for the debt and they are still obligated to chase me for it.

 

I will load up the full letter tomorrow once i get to a scanner.

 

Now i really do need help on this as so far i have have no advice and no one has looked over the contract to tell me whether it is infact unenforceable.

 

Please please please can someone advise me on this? What should i do next

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes they are right, if they think you owe them money they can ask for it, they can also stand on one leg holding a unicorn and whistle dixie if they like. If there is no enforceable contract then there is no enforceable debt no buts, no grey areas. Send them a cca request then when they dont comply with it (probably because the unicorn ate the agreement) you can write and place the matter in 78(6) dispute - which means they cannot even ask for payment until they catch the unicorn and get the agreement off him!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Your post really need make me smile Hungrybear! Alas i have already requested the CCA and despite it take several months it did arrive. What i am now disputing is that it isn't properly executed, however i only guessed at this based on another CAG members post - no one has yet looked over it though to confirm either way or advise me so i have kind of been winging it! That is why i really do need help now. If you clink on the link in this post it will take you through to my original post which shows you the doc they sent through.

 

Still patiently waiting for some helpful cag member to tell me if i am right in suspectingit is unenforceable and also what i need to do now.

 

Unicorn.....very funny though

 

xx

Link to post
Share on other sites

Your post really need make me smile Hungrybear! Alas i have already requested the CCA and despite it take several months it did arrive. What i am now disputing is that it isn't properly executed, however i only guessed at this based on another CAG members post - no one has yet looked over it though to confirm either way or advise me so i have kind of been winging it! That is why i really do need help now. If you clink on the link in this post it will take you through to my original post which shows you the doc they sent through.

 

Still patiently waiting for some helpful cag member to tell me if i am right in suspectingit is unenforceable and also what i need to do now.

 

Unicorn.....very funny though

 

xx

 

 

I'll have a look. Why dont you think its enforceable?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Gosh there are a number of reasons, i need to find the CAG user who had a CCA returned to her that was almost identical to mine - once i track that down i will provide a link. Militant consumer also has a thread going on the same thing also querying the same thing. Am just comparing them and putting two and two together hopefully i will have got four and not 6 if you see what i mean. One of the things though is not all the prescribed terms and also no cooling off period mentioned, there are lots of other things too but i can't remember them off the top of my head.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Right no cooling off period does not make it unenforceable

 

OK Here's my thinking, it appears to be section 18 multiple agreement in that it is for a loan and PPI and should have separate Terms and Signatures for the Main Loan and PPI. And there is no option to choose the PPI or not

 

There are no terms within 'the four corners on the agreement' even though they are refered to which would make it unenforceable under 127(3).

 

Thats my thoughts - BUT I'M NOT A JUDGE

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for looking at it hungrybear! Yes i know that this is all subject to a court ruling from other threads i had read so it could in that respect still be enforceable, however its good to know i hadn't got the wrong end of the stick and misunderstood. I know the cooling off period isnt a deal breaker but that was just one of things that my pea sized brain could remember from the other bits i had read! (sad i know).

 

I guess then that my next step would be to SAR egg??? I scanned the letter in that cabot sent today but haven't managed to upload it yet so will do so asap!

 

Thanks again hungry bear for looking

Link to post
Share on other sites

I guess i just want to try and pull out everything that have and dont have on me. If this does go to court i don't want anything i don't know about being produced.

 

I guess i just dont feel its really an open and shut case.....

 

Do you think i should just sit tight and see what they do then? (do't worry i won't hold you to it!)

 

I will post up the letter they sent tomorrow which should give you more of an insight to their angle, basically they are saying they complied with the CCA request which i guess to a point they have?

Link to post
Share on other sites

I guess i just want to try and pull out everything that have and dont have on me. If this does go to court i don't want anything i don't know about being produced.

 

 

They wouldnt, you would come on here and we would give you the CPR letters to get all the info off them

 

My View? Their move next

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...