Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • If the legendary dx could offer his wisdom it would be greatly appreciated 
    • Hi there Manager for our soccer sixes team moved overseas mid season and we struggled for numbers so we told the ref about 5 weeks prior to seasons end that we would see out these games then be done and he told us he’d ’pass the message on to the relevant people’. Heard nothing, then 3 days prior to the new season beginning we were given our fixture for that weekend. Told the guy over text we had pulled out and the ref should’ve passed a message on but we were told sufficient notice wasn’t given and it needed to be in writing. I argued it’s not our fault the ref didn’t do as he said but we were countered by the T&Cs.    now being chased for what was £608 kindly reduced to £476 to pay off remainder of the season. Been sent a letter in the post from their accountancy team and told needs to be paid by Friday.   seen a lot of the other threads saying we can literally just ignore everything but im concerned about debt collections and credit score being harmed. Can anyone confirm if this all works/what we should do?   thanks
    • Hi,   I have given an official police witness statement for the prosecution in an upcoming criminal court case, and I am very anxious about what might happen.  Specifically regarding being cross-examined.  My statement is very short, and only a couple of paragraphs long, regarding a conversation I had with one of the victims.  I have tried to research online about what information about me the defence barrister might be able to find and use to discredit me.  I have by no means have a shady past but, I am concerned about what private information might be brought up, and as this is a case that will be in the national press as it is in the public interest.  The two preliminary hearings were reported in the papers.   I have tried to research  online what information the opposition can seek, but it is all very complicated.  I believe that they can legally access public records, but I'm not sure what information public records hold.  Can they access my medical records, educational history, HMRC, and Department for Work and Pensions? (I am a self employed sole trader).  I was arrested once, and this was unfortunately instigated by the victim in this case, so could well be of interest to them.  It resulted in no further action, however I have only discovered this week that that, in fact, this means I have a criminal record, and will be so until I am 100 (no chance)! This has really annoyed me to say the least, especially since I asked him afterwards why he rang the police and he said 'for a laugh'.  So I have started to look into applying for it to be deleted, but again, if anyone has any advice on this I would be appreciative. At the moment, my name isn't on the confirmed list to give evidence, but the detective I have been dealing with has said it is 'likely'. The names of the victims in this case will not be allowed to be reported, are witnesses fair game for the press? I really need no know how deep they can delve in to my life so I am prepared if my character gets assassinated in front of the nation. I really wish I'd never agreed to this.   Many thanks
    • A belated thanks dx. Yes I may take your advice regarding StepChange. I am finding that I am telling them (on behalf of my Son) the true balances outstanding? They never seem to check properly in which worries me. If I was to take on myself is there another way of dealing with various debts? I have already submitted other IRL complaints on his behalf. Today I have received a further response from Quidie T/A Fernovo confirming that they will waiver all interest paid.
    • Good evening  Case hearing this Friday 26/04. looking to have all my prep/papers ready.    just checking in to get update on my last post , ( the t&c’s attached). No name or address on them as per #49   thank you UCM  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Can SLC make me Bankrupt over a pre 1998 loan


demi98765
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5250 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi,

 

I recently recieved a letter from DCA demanding payment from the student loans company for several thousand pounds, this was quickely followed by a letter from their solicitors basically saying that I have two weeks to come to an suitable arrangement with DCA, or they will proceed to court proceedings, and a further £190 will be added to my account.

 

This amount worries me, as its the same amount that a creditor is charged when making a bankruptcy petition against an individual, and I was under the impression that the SLC couldn't make you bankrupt to enforce a loan, since you can't go bankrupt to protect yourself against a student loan anymore.

 

Regarding payment history of the loan, I had two different loans from different universitys, two seperate CCA's, I deffered them both in 1999, and didn't really hear from the SLC until 2006, when I foolishly called them, and agreed to start making payments towards one of the loans, as they were harrassing my mother, which owasbvously was statute barred at the time, isn't hindsight a wonderfull thing! I last made a payment at the end of 2006 when I moved abroad.., but unfortunately I had had to return to the UK!

 

I know that one of these debts will definately be Statute Barred, but do not know which one, if its the one that DCA is trying to enforce or the other one...

 

Any help would be greatly appreciated, as the clock seems to be ticking on what seems to be creditor enforced bankruptcy...

Edited by demi98765
Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi and welcome.:)

 

First off, if you've made a payment in the last six years or acknowledged the loan then you've lost the statute barred option. Have no fear though. Have you CCA'd them or done a data subject access request? With your loan being pe-98 there is a very big chance that neither the DCA nor the SLC have a legible signed agreement. Is there a CCJ?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi and welcome.:)

 

First off, if you've made a payment in the last six years or acknowledged the loan then you've lost the statute barred option. Have no fear though. Have you CCA'd them or done a data subject access request? With your loan being pe-98 there is a very big chance that neither the DCA nor the SLC have a legible signed agreement. Is there a CCJ?

 

This is not strictly correct. Once a loan is statute barred, it cannot be unbarred. If one or both of the loans were statute barred before the OP made contact in 2006, then nothing anyone does can unbar them.

 

I think a SAR would be the best option here to get exact details of when payments were or were not paid and see if it's statute barred. Alternatively, just send the statute barred letter and let them prove it isn't.

Don't worry too much about the bankruptcy thing, it's one of capquest's favourite tricks to issue a statutory demand, however they are relatively easy to get set aside and unless you owe a very substantial amount it is rarely worth a creditor making someone bankrupt as they then have to pay the very high fees.

RMW

"If you want my parking space, please take my disability" Common car park sign in France.

Link to post
Share on other sites

This is not strictly correct. Once a loan is statute barred, it cannot be unbarred. If one or both of the loans were statute barred before the OP made contact in 2006, then nothing anyone does can unbar them.

 

 

If the loan has been deferred then that is an acknowledgement I'm afraid and the way the pre-98 loans work, they are lumped into and handled as one account. Dispute the account and do a DSAR.

Link to post
Share on other sites

No I definately have two seperate accounts for My student loans, as i attended two different courses one a BA Hons (3 loans grouped together), and one a post grad course at seperate institutions (one seperate student loan).

 

DCA are chasing me for the the first ones from my origional university. Just over £5000

 

Who do I send the SAR request to, and what template do I use? I assume the SLC, does anyone have their adress.

 

Thankfully I don't have a home phone, so no annoying phonecalls, but with two letters in quick sucession and the first threatening door stop collectors, do I need to send anything to DCA, as the date they set out for court action was fairly imminent?

 

Also worse case senario, and they didn't mention this in their letter, though the £190 court fee implied it, can they really petition me for bankruptcy, as I was under the impression that if I decided to file for bankruptcy myself, that Student loans were excempt from being added to your creditor list.

 

Surely if that is the case then bankruptcy would be pointless for them, since the debt wouldn't be written off at the end of the bankruptcy period??

Edited by demi98765
Link to post
Share on other sites

Send capquest/hl the statute barred letter, and let them jump through hoops to prove it isn't. They might issue an SD as it's relatively easy and doesn't cost them anything. As I said before, there is no way they would follow through with a bankruptcy petition, it just isn't economically viable. You would have to get the SD set aside though, just in case. If you want more reassurance have a read of some of the many threads on this subject.

 

Send the SAR to student loans. The address will be on their website. Send the letter at least recorded.

RMW

"If you want my parking space, please take my disability" Common car park sign in France.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I know, I'm a numpty, but the SAR letter says about reclaiming fees, I just want to check that the debt is definately statute barred, is still still ok to leave in?

 

Also by paying SLC the £10 for the SAR they couldn't then use that as saying that I have made a payment to them regarding my account and set the limit rolling to another 6 years could they?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Once an account is barred, it can't be unbarred, even if you make a payment in error.

 

The £10 for the DSAR is for that and that alone. It is an absolute no no for them to use it to pay into the account. You are excercising your right to obtain ther data. Perhaps make a note on the back of the check saying what it is for.

 

With regard to charges, you are entitled to ask for the information. If the account is time barred, messing with the charges at the end of the day will make no material difference to you.

 

Be sure, - do you have a period of six years where you have not paid into or acknowledged the account?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Have today recieved a default notice from SLC, dated last month for trace agent fees against my account, so they're going to play the default game with me, still waiting for my SAR from them, looks like they want to create as much rubbish on my credit file as they can, it makes me even more sure that this debt is statue barred.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I just think its outragous that they can issue me with a default for trace fees, that was issued before I even sent the sar request/ statute barred letter, ie no warning, first I know about is when the letter from the slc comes through the door today.

 

I've read other posts about the underhand tactics of the slc, think I may have to get some proffesional legal advice now!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...