Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • you are in the info gather phase  get it.   it could be fraud or ID theft id you've moved since that EE was taken out.   the other accounts could well be statute barred if you've made no payments in 6yrs prior to their claimforrn. and if they were that would be extremely important to any defence as SB defence would blow those accounts out the water.   dx    
    • I'm trying to understand your story and I gather that the court papers were sent to the wrong address and the claim is in respect of an alleged parking matter but at incorrect address. This correct? please respond and then monitor this thread for a full response tomorrow  
    • I paid £500 for 6 months towards the arrears.  After 6 months I wanted them to capitalize arrears.   I was also slightly struggling to pay 500 every month. I understand I should not have stopped but I made mistake.   Shall I pay £1000 tomorrow?
    • DEAR ALL I have read all of the NEWBIES sections on Car Parking Management and default judgment ( https://forums.moneysavingexpert.com/showthread.php?t=5585047) but I have no direct idea how to proceed this. This is important for me to resolve as I have a pending house purchase mortgage lender refused because of the CCJ and if I don't set it aside soon, Vendors will sell to someone else!!! PLEASE HELP ME. I have paid a CCJ but in the same time I have sent a cover email to both Newlyn and Gladstones that my payment is not made because of acceptance of any aspect of the judgment. A little different to the above mentioned post, I actually got a notice from CPM and Gladstones and Debt Collection which I responded to refusing the claim, as a registered keeper, denying the incident and liability. They kept on sending me correspondence with wrong street address. I have provided them an updated address but they didn't send it there (I have to put Subject Access Request first to access all data, working on it) and my landlord sent all back with Return to Sender sticker. - I moved 6 months later (march 2019) to a new address and got a final notice from newlyn debt collection which under the influence of my panicked parents I have paid them with the above mentioned cover email (the enquiries lady at northamptonshire business centre assured me I can still submit N244 if I pay, didn't take her name, stupid me I know) - BUT requesting the Particulars of Claim from Northamptonshire Business Centre, I can see that the whole Claim as well as all of the relevant correspondence sent up to date (Gladstones, Debt Collection Plus) referred to a Claim for a WRONG STREET. They claim it was parked on parallel street, whereas the photographic evidence is for a different street. There was also no sign on that side of the pavement. BIG QUESTION IS Do you think I can set a CCJ aside on the basis of this event never happening and subsequent procedural errors? (sorry, I don't speak legal terms and English is not my first language) Please if you can help me, my whole family is panicked and angry at me about this and Vendors are on standby unless I am convinced I can win this. I wrote to the Business Park management to tell them about this to just confirm the photos are not from that road but I dont think they will get involved unless I write to the local MP.
    • Thank you, do you mean to ask for the dates of when I last paid them for the contracts that I may have had with them?   Is this essential for the Defence letter?   Though I am 99.9% sure I have never had a contract with EE, surely the Claimant's whole case would be dropped if I prove this to be the case?    Thanks!
  • Our picks

Alphageek

The other test case

style="text-align:center;"> Please note that this topic has not had any new posts for the last 3585 days.

If you are trying to post a different story then you should start your own new thread. Posting on this thread is likely to mean that you won't get the help and advice that you need.

If you are trying to post information which is relevant to the story in this thread then please flag it up to the site team and they will allow you to post.

Thank you

Recommended Posts

Does anyone know anything about the test cases for credit cards that I think were due to start today?

 

There was a thread that got a little heated and so was closed to new posts.


The REAL Axis of evil: Banks, Credit Card Companies & Credit Reference Agencies.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It started at 10 sharp. Will be on all week

  • Haha 1

You may receive different advice to your query as people have different experiences and opinions. Please use your own judgement in deciding whose advice to take.

 

If in doubt seek advice from a qualified insured professional. Any advice I have offered you is done so on an informal basis, without prejudice or liability.

 

If you think I have been helpful PLEASE click the scales

 

court bundles for dummies

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Is this the Manchester one ?


If I have been of help to you please feel free to click my scales to the left Thanks.:)

I have no legal training and the advice I offer is what I have learnt here and offered as a matter of support. Before you commit to any Legal action you are advised to contact a qualified legal practitioner.

 

Finally if you succeed with your claim please consider a donation to consumer action group as those donations keep this site alive.

 

CARTER V Co-Op

BANK CHARGES

REFUNDED £3567

 

POMPEYFAITH V Co-Op PPI

OFFER MADE BUT REFUSED

ONGOING AND STILL ONGOING

NOW WITH THE OMBUDSMAN

 

R.I.P BOB aka ROOSTER-UK you have always been a Gent on these boards and you will be remembered for that.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes. Section 78 and prescribed terms


You may receive different advice to your query as people have different experiences and opinions. Please use your own judgement in deciding whose advice to take.

 

If in doubt seek advice from a qualified insured professional. Any advice I have offered you is done so on an informal basis, without prejudice or liability.

 

If you think I have been helpful PLEASE click the scales

 

court bundles for dummies

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
It started at 10 sharp. Will be on all week

 

Thanks Josie.


The REAL Axis of evil: Banks, Credit Card Companies & Credit Reference Agencies.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

are they just hearing it this week or will there be a ruling at the end of the week?

 

PF


If I have been of help to you please feel free to click my scales to the left Thanks.:)

I have no legal training and the advice I offer is what I have learnt here and offered as a matter of support. Before you commit to any Legal action you are advised to contact a qualified legal practitioner.

 

Finally if you succeed with your claim please consider a donation to consumer action group as those donations keep this site alive.

 

CARTER V Co-Op

BANK CHARGES

REFUNDED £3567

 

POMPEYFAITH V Co-Op PPI

OFFER MADE BUT REFUSED

ONGOING AND STILL ONGOING

NOW WITH THE OMBUDSMAN

 

R.I.P BOB aka ROOSTER-UK you have always been a Gent on these boards and you will be remembered for that.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
are they just hearing it this week or will there be a ruling at the end of the week?

 

PF

 

I heard that MBNA threw in the towel this morning for 2 cases on the court room steps will try to get more info

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I heard that MBNA threw in the towel this morning for 2 cases on the court room steps will try to get more info

 

Sounds juicy!

 

;-)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Axiom, thanks 4 that fantastic mbna too yes please if u could find out any more that would be great as i have a vested interest in mbna


If I have been of help to you please feel free to click my scales to the left Thanks.:)

I have no legal training and the advice I offer is what I have learnt here and offered as a matter of support. Before you commit to any Legal action you are advised to contact a qualified legal practitioner.

 

Finally if you succeed with your claim please consider a donation to consumer action group as those donations keep this site alive.

 

CARTER V Co-Op

BANK CHARGES

REFUNDED £3567

 

POMPEYFAITH V Co-Op PPI

OFFER MADE BUT REFUSED

ONGOING AND STILL ONGOING

NOW WITH THE OMBUDSMAN

 

R.I.P BOB aka ROOSTER-UK you have always been a Gent on these boards and you will be remembered for that.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Wasn't it MBNA who had the penchant for microfiching then destroying all the original documents as a matter of course?

 

No wonder then that they settled and don't want anything like that going to court.

 

If so that doesn't mean you get off lightly as they will probably play the numbers game - that only 1% will get them to the court steps.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Subbing


Beck

"There are two ways to conquer and enslave a nation. one is by the Sword. The other is by Debt."

 

Barclaycard PPI Refund £4300:whoo:

Barclaycard = Mexican Stand Off

 

TSB = Mexican Stand Off

 

Santander = :mad2: MungyPup is coming to get yahh :mad2:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Sub..


Live Life-Debt Free

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Also possible to click the blue "Thread Tools" button at the top to subscribe.


 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

From the website of a CMC.

 

xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx had brought legal proceedings against major credit card lender MBNA for what they believed to be significant failings in their obligations under the Consumer Credit Act.

 

However just hours before the trial was due to commence at the Manchester Mercantile Court, xxxxxxxxxxxxxx's nominated solicitors for the case, BPS, were contacted by a representative from MBNA asking what it would take for these cases to ‘go away’.

 

The answer was simple, ‘what is right for the client’ and in this instance that resulted in a full write off of the outstanding balances, a total of £17,256.

‘Today’s result is a signification move towards forcing lenders to accept responsibility for what we believe to be serious failings. In this instance it was clear that the lender, MBNA, had failed to comply with the regulations and has resulted in the clients having a substantial sum written off. We would have liked to have met them in court today however the right outcome for our clients has been achieved and we are celebrating.’

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Got a link for that?


Live Life-Debt Free

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

....................................

Edited by gyos

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Dec

01Success over MBNA

Written by Andrew | Filed under In the News | No Comments

 

MBNA capitulates just hours before the trial begins!

 

Two clients, two credit cards with balances totalling £17,256 and one claims management company determined to champion for the consumer.

 

Credit Issues had brought legal proceedings against major credit card lender MBNA for what they believed to be significant failings in their obligations under the Consumer Credit Act. However just hours before the trial was due to commence at the Manchester Mercantile Court Credit Issues’ nominated solicitors for the case, BPS, were contacted by a representative from MBNA asking what it would take for these cases to ‘go away’.

 

The answer was simple, ‘what is right for the client’ and in this instance that resulted in a full write off of the outstanding balances, a total of £17,256.

 

Credit Issues are at the leading edge of the claims management industry with what is believed to be the most advanced legal argument of any CMC. Legal Services Director, Lee Lipson, comments ‘Today’s result is a signification move towards forcing lenders to accept responsibility for what we believe to be serious failings. In this instance it was clear that the lender, MBNA, had failed to comply with the regulations and has resulted in the clients having a substantial sum written off. We would have liked to have met them in court today however the right outcome for our clients has been achieved and we are celebrating.’

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

OK...saw it...shame it didn't go to court as this would have done us all a big favour


Live Life-Debt Free

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

B3RTY,

 

Indeed but what do you expect from MBNA all mouth and nothing to back it up.

 

Do not worry though fellas I have a court hearing on the 14th Jan 10 and it will be a very juicy event.

 

After I have finished with them I have no doubts the judge will order it to the high court.

 

PF


If I have been of help to you please feel free to click my scales to the left Thanks.:)

I have no legal training and the advice I offer is what I have learnt here and offered as a matter of support. Before you commit to any Legal action you are advised to contact a qualified legal practitioner.

 

Finally if you succeed with your claim please consider a donation to consumer action group as those donations keep this site alive.

 

CARTER V Co-Op

BANK CHARGES

REFUNDED £3567

 

POMPEYFAITH V Co-Op PPI

OFFER MADE BUT REFUSED

ONGOING AND STILL ONGOING

NOW WITH THE OMBUDSMAN

 

R.I.P BOB aka ROOSTER-UK you have always been a Gent on these boards and you will be remembered for that.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    No registered users viewing this page.


  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...