Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • What you have uploaded is a letter with daft empty threats from third-party paper tigers.  Just ignore it. What we need to see is the original invoice you received last October or November.
    • Thanks for posting the CPR contents. i do wish you hadn't blanked out the dates and times since at times they can be relevant . Can you please repost including times and dates. They say that they sent a copy of  the original  PCN that they sent to the Hirer  along with your hire agreement documents. Did you receive them and if so can you please upload the original PCN without erasing dates and times. If they did include  all the paperwork they said, then that PCN is pretty near compliant except for their error with the discount time. In the Act it isn't actually specified but to offer a discount for 14 days from the OFFENCE is a joke. the offence occurred probably a couple of months prior to you receiving your Notice to Hirer.  Also the words in parentheses n the Act have been missed off. Section 14 [5][c] (c)warn the hirer that if, after the period of 21 days beginning with the day after that on which the notice to hirer is given, the amount of unpaid parking charges referred to in the notice to keeper under paragraph 8(2)(f) or 9(2)(f) (as the case may be) has not been paid in full, the creditor will (if any applicable requirements are met) have the right to recover from the hirer so much of that amount as remains unpaid; Though it states "if any applicable ...." as opposed to "if all applicable......" in Section 8 or 9. Maybe the Site could explain what the difference between the two terms mean if there is a difference. Also on your claim form they keeper referring to you as the driver or the keeper.  You are the Hirer and only the Hirer is responsible for the charge EVEN IF THEY WEREN'T THE DRIVER. So they cannot pursue the driver and nowhere in the Hirer section of the Act is the hirer ever named as the keeper so NPC are pursuing the wrong person.  
    • This is simply a scam site.  It's been shown to be a scam in the national press and on national TV. Please fill in the the forum sticky and upload the invoice you've received. In fact what you have is an invoice, not a fine, a private company doesn't have the power to issue fines.  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Arrows/Carter CCJ - old MBNA Virgin Card


tedney

Recommended Posts

Hello

I had a CCJ against me for an unpaid credit card debt in July 2007.

An order was made by the court, and a subsequent variation order, at my request, as the plaintiff had already agreed a monthly payment arrangement prior to the original judgement being made.

I have kept to the terms of the variation order, and have never missed a payment.

I have in the last week or so been telephoned by the solicitor who acted for the claimant in 2007, who was not the original OC.

I have not spoken to them.

My concern is:

Can they apply for a further variation?

My financial circumstances have not changed since the order was made.

Any advice would be helpful.

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 54
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Thanks, probably not, but I do not really know

original debt was with Virgin/MBNA then assigned to Arrow Global, but I was not told by MBNA,

quote from Arrow letter

"MBNA Europe Bank Ltd has now assigned to Arrow Global LLC...........

...who is now the data controller...................

We have appointed Fredrickson International Limited to manage your account, and they have placed the account with their solicitors Bryan Carter & Co" All this was in one letter!

I did not know of this group when I fell behind with payments, debt includes at least £475.00 of charges.

I have not yet got my head around if I can reclaim, and original credit agreement etc.

Link to post
Share on other sites

You have a number of option. What I would do is issue a CPR request This thread will get you started:

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/legal-issues/173201-why-you-shouldnt-use.html

to find out if they have an enforceable agreement and that the DN was correct.

Your other options would be a CCA request to the DCA or a SAR to the OC.

whatever you do you have nothing to lose by getting them to prove the debt is legally enforceable - they already have the CCJ.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Did you receive the original claim form from Bryan Carter? Did he claim the full amount of the debt, or just part?

 

He also has a habit of issuing claims at the 'last known address' then mysteriously finding out where you live when default judgment is entered. More info on the original CCJ would be really useful, eg. did you defend, etc. Who knows - you may be able to get it set aside.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes original claim issued by Bryan Carter on behalf of Arrow Global was for full amount of debt, including charges and interest.

Claim originally issued via Northampton Bulk Centre.

 

I defended,

I cannot lay my hands on all documents at present,

but at the time,

CAB was helping me,

they obtained, prior to the judgement, an agreement for monthly payments, which I have, and still am keeping to.

 

I did not attend court hearing, when judgement was given was for full payment, I applied for, and got, a variation order from the court agreeing with the monthly payments.

 

The only other "funny" is that the payments were, and still are, being made to Virgin/MBNA.

I wrote to Carter requesting their bank details at the time of the variation order, but never got a reply!

 

All my correspondence was sent recorded delivery.

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sounds to me as if Bryan Carter didn't abide by this agreement, which is perhaps a reason to get the judgement set aside?

 

Have a very good look for that paperwork and if necessary go and ask CAB for a copy of their file.

RMW

"If you want my parking space, please take my disability" Common car park sign in France.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 year later...

I have a CCJ for a debt,

originally with Virgin/MBNA for a credit card.

Court proceedings were started by Arrow Global LLC, and judgment was in their name.

At time of issue, I did not know about this site and all the help available.

The judgement was for monthly sums, worked out by DMP prepared by CAB on my behalf.

I have been paying the monthly sums for some time now, years, without missing.

I have now received a "Notice of Assignment" saying that Arrow have now assigned all of its respective rights,

title and interest to Arrow Global Guernsey limited.

The letter states that current arrangements in respect of such account shall remain in place.

My questions are

1) Should I be concerned.

2) I have not questioned the amount owed, can I claim back charges?

3) Can they add interest to the judgment amount?

(The court form N35 for this states "where judgment was entered for £5000 or more (It was more!)

or is in respect of a debt which attracts contractual or statutory interest for late payment,

the claimant may be entitled to further interest"

Thanks

t

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 9 years later...

I have been paying Virgin, using references as the original card account, for many years, since 2007.

During this current coronavirus situation I am going through my monthly debt payments to try and stop paying, taking advice from elsewhere on here.

I attach a redacted copy of a document that I was sent by MBNA a few years ago, following a SAR request.

My question is, is this a CCA that can be upheld please?

They did not provide any other signed document to me,

they detailed my monthly payments, as going in, then out  as their documents "Faster Payment, thank you,"

then "Monetary Debt Adjustment" after each monthly payment.

Prevoiusly I requested a refund of £245.00 charges which they refused.

I have not received any account statements since the SAR request made in 2015.

The SAR file has an entry in 2007 "Sold to Arrow" but I have never paid Arrow, and do not receive statements from them, Virgin or MBNA.

Should I just stop paying and see what happens, is the uploaded document valid to enforce.

Thanks for reading.

t

virginapp 001.pdf

Link to post
Share on other sites

Make a specific CCA request – and do it today.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Who ever you are making paying to now....if assigned...but if the above is all they have......its illegible and void of the prescribed terms...thus unenforceable.

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • dx100uk changed the title to MBNA Virgin Credit Card

several old threads merged with this new one today

the debt is subject to a CCJ, no good sending a CCA request now.

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...