Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Thanks for posting the CPR contents. i do wish you hadn't blanked out the dates and times since at times they can be relevant . Can you please repost including times and dates. They say that they sent a copy of  the original  PCN that they sent to the Hirer  along with your hire agreement documents. Did you receive them and if so can you please upload the original PCN without erasing dates and times. If they did include  all the paperwork they said, then that PCN is pretty near compliant except for their error with the discount time. In the Act it isn't actually specified but to offer a discount for 14 days from the OFFENCE is a joke. the offence occurred probably a couple of months prior to you receiving your Notice to Hirer.  Also the words in parentheses n the Act have been missed off. Section 14 [5][c] (c)warn the hirer that if, after the period of 21 days beginning with the day after that on which the notice to hirer is given, the amount of unpaid parking charges referred to in the notice to keeper under paragraph 8(2)(f) or 9(2)(f) (as the case may be) has not been paid in full, the creditor will (if any applicable requirements are met) have the right to recover from the hirer so much of that amount as remains unpaid; Though it states "if any applicable ...." as opposed to "if all applicable......" in Section 8 or 9. Maybe the Site could explain what the difference between the two terms mean if there is a difference. Also on your claim form they keeper referring to you as the driver or the keeper.  You are the Hirer and only the Hirer is responsible for the charge EVEN IF THEY WEREN'T THE DRIVER. So they cannot pursue the driver and nowhere in the Hirer section of the Act is the hirer ever named as the keeper so NPC are pursuing the wrong person.  
    • This is simply a scam site.  It's been shown to be a scam in the national press and on national TV. Please fill in the the forum sticky and upload the invoice you've received. In fact what you have is an invoice, not a fine, a private company doesn't have the power to issue fines.  
    • Moved to the Private Parking forum.
    • Good afternoon, I am writing because I am very frustrated. I received a parking fine from MET Parking Services Ltd , ( Southgate park Stansted CM24 1PY) . We stopped for a quick meal in Mcdonalds and were there fir around 30 mins. We always do this after flights and never received a parking fine before.  Reason: The vehicle left in Southgate car park without payment made for parking and the occupants southgate premises. they took some pictures of us leaving the car. i did not try and appeal it yet as I came across many forums that this is a scam and I should leave it. But I keep getting threatening letters.  Incident happened : 23/10/2023 I did contact Mcdonalds and they said this:  Joylyn (McDonald’s Customer Services) 5 Apr 2024, 12:05 BST Dear Laura, Thank you for contacting McDonald’s Customer Services. I’m sorry to hear that you have received a Parking Charge Notice following your visit to our Stansted restaurant.   We've introduced parking restrictions at some of our restaurants to make sure there are always parking spaces available for customers.   We appreciate that some visits such as birthday parties or large group visits might take longer and the parking restrictions aren't intended to stop this. If you think your stay will exceed the stated maximum parking time then please speak to a manager in advance.   Your number plate is scanned by our Automatic Number Plate Recognition (ANPR) system when you enter our car park, and then again when you leave. If you have overstayed the maximum time allowed, you will not be notified straight away- a Parking Charge Notice will be sent to you via the post.   If you feel that a Parking Charge Notice has been issued in error, please contact our approved contractors who issued the charge in order to appeal the charge. Unfortunately McDonald's are unable to revoke parking tickets- the outcome of the appeal is final and cannot be overturned by McDonald’s.   Many thanks for taking the time to contact McDonald’s Customer Services.   Can someone please help me out and suggest what I should do next?  Thank you 
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

And so the ball is rolling...Am I scared. You bet ya...


taffy_taylor
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5264 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

In June 2008 I moved permanently from the UK to Republic of Ireland.

(Bad start Huh. Whats the difference between Ireland and Iceland ---1 letter and about 3 months)

Sorry! :rolleyes:

I moved here with the family and though redundancy and retirement I had and left quite a bit of unsecured debt with loans and CC's plus some Bank OD's all with UK companies.

I contacted pay-plan and they did a wonderful job in arranging reduced payments with all the creditors. I have sent £350 a month back to my bank in the UK (NWB) at quite some cost in international transfers. I took the approach that i/we got into this mess so its our responsibility to get out of it.

The recession is very deep here and work is not that secure or frequent. As a result the UK bank have asked that i close the account and pay them the overdraft back. This has caused the payments to payplan to stop and now they (PP) are asking me to increase the monthly to make up the arrears. I need to reduce them, not increase them as things here are getting worse.

 

I contacted the UK bank and they said "as it is no longer being serviced with a salary cheque etc then the account has been moved to our "Risk management centre"and they want the whole amount repaid." I argued my case and they changed their tact and said "OK, we will consolidate the od's into 1 loan at 8% and an arrangement fee of £250 or we close them and take enforcement action." I cannot pay payplan in euro they wont take it so I cant send them money direct from here without exchange costs and sending cash through the post, which they have asked me not to do.

I may now have to take the bank loan to keep the account open in order to service the payplan account and try to catch up the arrears at a time when money is reducing.

I have few options but one is to put 2 fingers up to them all and say I tried to play ball when on my knees and you F***ed it up for me. But if they sell the debt to and Irish DCA then it could be a big problem as people go to prison over here for evading debt I am told. However with the Country on its knees would a DCA buy it?

Or I may be able to make a one off gesture payment in a final go away offer (can I do that)

I want to get rid of the debt as soon as i can and have a small lump sum that i am thinking of offering. We dont intend returning to the UK (unless absolutely necessary) for another 5 years at least.

BTW the only people who know where I now live are payplan.

 

what should I do?

 

All advice is received with gracious thanks :smile:

 

TT

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi,

 

In a word, as you now reside in Ireland the UK banks have no hold over you. You have an opportunity for a fresh start and this will be reflected in how Irish lender will respond to your requests. Irish lender do not have access to your UK credit history and therefore will not rely on it. I wish you well....

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Investigator,

i appreciate your information and advice. I had thought that, as I have been approved for a mortgage here (small one) and that passed np. The question is how do I get the debt to go away and allow me to walk down the street without constantly looking over my shoulder.

Are you saying they cant touch me here?

 

i have been told in another forum that they cant get a CCJ against me as I am no longer resident in UK (True ?) but that would need me showing my hand and revealing my new address - which they dont have unless payplan give it to them (data protection act ?)

 

Thanks for all your help

 

TT

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 months later...

My partner and I left the UK and settled in Ireland as she was made redundant and I had retired ( She is from these fair shores).

 

We had some debts and tried to sort these out before we left.

 

The bank threatened all manner of things (NWB) and we were put in a position where we accepted their solution, a loan to pay off the overdrafts.

 

The other matters (9 in total) a mix of credit cards and loans we started to pay a minimum amount.

 

The solution will/would take us 26 years to pay back.

 

I started to read the postings here and sent off cca requests to all (except the bank) to see if there were any way to turn the tide in our favour.

 

I sent the letters (with postal orders) and:-

 

2 are saying the letter wasn't signed so they don't need to comply. According to other threads I read here, signatures can be copied. Where do I stand here.

2 have sent back what apears to be legitimate agreements. I will scan them and post here for your advice.

1 sent me a copy of terms and conditions. kept the PO What next ?

1 returned the letter and postal order saying the address is different and the letter is not signed so sorry......... not complying. Help ???

1 kept postal order and said no signature so re submit. The cheek

 

 

So I need help and confidence boost to carry on. My questions are.

Do the letters need to be signed ?

Is the Terms and conditions enough ?

Can someone look at my scans (minus details I know) and advise?

 

Thanks.

Lastly and just as a side issue.

 

I had dealt with Payplan on this they are the only people with my Irish address.

 

I have been advised that Payplan have informed all the creditors of my new address.

 

Can they do that?

 

They didnt ask me if they could.

I was told

 

"Good morning, I can see that you updated us with your Irish address in September 2008

unfortunately I cannot see anywhere where you advised us not to pass this address onto your creditors.

 

As I previously advised to complete security checks with your creditors for data protection we must hold the same address as your creditors,

 

kind regards XXXXXX"

 

 

Many many thanks for any advice and help

 

Regards

 

Taffy

Link to post
Share on other sites

You do not need signatures so no matter what they say you have made your legal request and it stands. You can sit back and await their non compliance.

 

Terms and conditions on there own mean squat. You can sit back and await their non compliance.

 

You have proof they recieved these requests with recorded sips ? Them cashing the PO is also proof enougth

 

So far so good, you have the winning hand thus far.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for your response it confirms all that I have read here. One of the resposes says that the data they hold (address) is different to the one on the CCA request and therefore they require a signature. I figured this was a reasonable request until I remembered that they have all been given my new address by payplan (in Breach of DPA if you ask me). Should I sign a new request or just wait. as far as record of service is concerned. Those that have refused pending a signature have sent my letter back with their received date stamp on it :-)

 

So to sign or not to sign that is the question (?)

 

Thanks again

 

TT

:?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...