Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Thank-you dx for your feedback. That is the reason I posted my opinion, because I am trying to learn more and this is one of the ways to learn, by posting my opinions and if I am incorrect then being advised of the reasons I am incorrect. I am not sure if you have educated me on the points in my post that would be incorrect. However, you are correct on one point, I shall refrain from posting on any other thread other than my own going forward and if you think my post here is unhelpful, misleading or in any other way inappropriate, then please do feel obliged to delete it but educate me on the reason why. To help my learning process, it would be helpful to know what I got wrong other than it goes against established advice considering the outcome of a recent court case on this topic that seemed to suggest it was dismissed due to an appeal not being made at the first stage. Thank-you.   EDIT:  Just to be clear, I am not intending to go against established advice by suggesting that appeals should ALWAYS be made, just my thoughts on the particular case of paying for parking and entering an incorrect VRN. Should this ever happen to me, I will make an appeal at the first stage to avoid any problems that may occur at a later stage. Although, any individual in a similar position should decide for themselves what they think is an appropriate course of action. Also, I continue to be grateful for any advice you give on my own particular case.  
    • you can have your humble opinion.... You are very new to all this private parking speculative invoice game you have very quickly taken it upon yourself to be all over this forum, now to the extent of moving away from your initial thread with your own issue that you knew little about handling to littering the forum and posting on numerous established and existing threads, where advice has already been given or a conclusion has already resulted, with your theories conclusions and observations which of course are very welcomed. BUT... in some instances, like this one...you dont quite match the advice that the forum and it's members have gathered over a very long consensual period given in a tried and trusted consistent mannered thoughtful approach. one could even call it forum hi-jacking and that is becoming somewhat worrying . dx
    • Yeah, sorry, that's what I meant .... I said DCBL because I was reading a few threads about them discontinuing claims and getting spanked in court! Meant  YOU  Highview !!!  🖕 The more I read this forum and the more I engage with it's incredible users, the more I learn and the more my knowledge expands. If my case gets to court, the Judge will dismiss it after I utter my first sentence, and you DCBL and Highview don't even know why .... OMG! .... So excited to get to court!
    • Yep, I read that and thought about trying to find out what the consideration and grace period is at Riverside but not sure I can. I know they say "You must tell us the specific consideration/grace period at a site if our compliance team or our agents ask what it is"  but I doubt they would disclose it to the public, maybe I should have asked in my CPR 31.14 letter? Yes, I think I can get rid of 5 minutes. I am also going to include a point about BPA CoP: 13.2 The reference to a consideration period in 13.1 shall not apply where a parking event takes place. I think that is Deception .... They giveth with one hand and taketh away with the other! One other point to note, the more I read, the more I study, the more proficient I feel I am becoming in this area. Make no mistake DBCL if you are reading this, when I win in court, if I have the grounds to make any claims against you, such as breach of GDPR, I shall be doing so.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Self employed Carpenter ripped off...


madmax1973
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5271 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

If someone could help, we would be most grateful...

 

My Husband is owed about £4000 from a guy he has sub-contracted for. (My husband is a one man band)

 

This money has been outstanding for some months now. Unfortunatly we have no savings or any means to obtain moneys. He has now fallen out with the guy due to finally loosing it, he told him he would not work any more for him untill he has been paid. He has always been a bit of a pain for paying but this year he has got worse. (we believe his money is tied up in property that he cant sell)

 

We got married at the end of August and could not go on our honeymoon because of this. What adds insult to injury is that he and his wife have just been for a nice 10 day holiday :mad: We also have a Tax bill and a NI bill that we cannot pay untill we get this which has been outstanding for a few months now.

 

I think we can take him down the small claims route but can someone give me any advice on how, what proof we need ect.. do we need to send him a letter?

 

Kind Regards

 

Max

Link to post
Share on other sites

You will need to have some proof that the work was done and what price was agreed.

It would be a good idea to have some paper evidence that you have asked him for the money - even if he doesn't reply/

 

Write him a nice letter saying when you did the work, roughly what the work was and that the payment is now outstanding for XX months and you need it as you are in difficulty.

 

If he doesn't repond in, say, 10 days, then send him another nice letter. refer to the previous one and say that you really need to know where you stand. If he doesn't reply to that one within 7 days then send him an LBA - 7 days and then sue.

 

If you already have good verifiable evidence that he agreed to pay you for the work, that the work was done and that he hasn't paid then don't bother about all of the writing, just sned hima 7 day LBA and then sue.

 

Probably better to send him at least one preliminary letter though in order to give him an opportunity to say something - such as the quality of the work was not up to scratch etc.

 

If he says nothing then just go ahead and sue after the expiry of the LBA.

 

If in court he treis to say that the work was not good, you will be able to point out to the judge that although he had plenty of time to say that before, he has only raised this issue after the claim has been issued in order to try and avoid paying.

This point will not be lost on the judge.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi max

 

tbh in this day & age it is a bit dangerous to let money owed to you by companies build up, there are a lot of them declaring insolvency, in which case it is very difficult to get your money at all.

 

couple of questions

 

How does your husband get paid normally? ( does he invoice the guy, or does he put a time sheet in etc..)

 

Has the guy given any reason for the non payment? ( not happy with the work/ cash flow problems etc)

 

Has he made any attempt at part payment or offered anything to suggest that he does intend to pay?

 

in the meantime, what I would suggest is to get a breakdown of exactly what he owes your husband & what date the payment/s were due. put this together in a letter to the guy headed 'account overdue'. Request that he contact you to arrange payment and give him time to respond ( 7/14 days) see if that gets a response.

 

If that doesn't get a response, ( or one that you are unhappy with) then you can send him a letter before action, giving him details of the debt & a set amount of time in which to pay it, advising him that if the debt is not paid by that date, you will begin court proceedings and will be entitled to claim interest at 8% on the debt, aswell as the cost of the proceedings.

 

hth

hunni

My fight so far:

 

hunni2006 V Halifax Bank: Charges £963.11 refunded nov 2006:D

Cabot financial V hunni2006: defending court summons, ongoing... July 09 :-x:-x:-x don't even get me started about them....grrr still battling

 

hunni2006 V Capital One: SA request & CCA issued, ongoing.. July 09 OC 'checking the archives...' Sept 09, no agreement, files closed!:D

<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<< please feel free to tip my scales if I've been helpful!

:DLearning more, every day.....

 

I have No legal training, any opinions and advice posted are entirely my own opinion, and based on life experiences and knowledge gained on this great site. Ultimately, what you do is up to you.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks BF & H2006

 

Unfortunately he has worked for the builder for about 3yrs now and he normally would invoice him. This time he hasnt because he said he will pay in stage payments. my husband does have a record of what works were completed by himself but no actual dates. (Between March and September) The customer has not been happy either because the work has taking so long.(not my husbands work) The other problem is that the customer is the sister-in-law to the builder :confused: (hope this makes sense) we cant see them going against him altho they are very annoyed with him themselves. They said they have put it down to experiance and would not use him again. The customer still comes to my husband tho and gets him to work direct for them.

 

I do know that the builder has had 17k out of the job and sent 10k abroard for works to be completed on his luxury place in Dubi. (nice eh?)He has no written agreement with the guy as their was no need before..... obviously we wre wrong :sad:

Link to post
Share on other sites

You need to act fast on this!

 

Send a statement and a 7 day LBA and start court proceedings as soon as you can, this guy is obviously just stringing you along, using your money to pay more pressing debts or paying the one who shouts loudest.

 

Send LBA and stick to your guns don't allow him any wriggle room!

 

Squidward

Link to post
Share on other sites

hi max

 

personally, having had the same problem myself, the first thing I would definitely do is ask the customer for a letter of satisfaction regarding your husband's contribution to the job as a whole.

(if it gets to court, they can't change their mind & side with the brother in law)

 

Then I would create an invoice, showing the full balance payable & include the £1000 that he has already paid, and show quite clearly the balance due, include that with a letter as described above saying the account is overdue, & see if he gets in touch with some sort of offer of payment, or proposal for installments.

My fight so far:

 

hunni2006 V Halifax Bank: Charges £963.11 refunded nov 2006:D

Cabot financial V hunni2006: defending court summons, ongoing... July 09 :-x:-x:-x don't even get me started about them....grrr still battling

 

hunni2006 V Capital One: SA request & CCA issued, ongoing.. July 09 OC 'checking the archives...' Sept 09, no agreement, files closed!:D

<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<< please feel free to tip my scales if I've been helpful!

:DLearning more, every day.....

 

I have No legal training, any opinions and advice posted are entirely my own opinion, and based on life experiences and knowledge gained on this great site. Ultimately, what you do is up to you.

Link to post
Share on other sites

then follow up with the LBA & court proceedings.

 

I think it is important that you are able to show that you have done everything possible prior to court action.

My fight so far:

 

hunni2006 V Halifax Bank: Charges £963.11 refunded nov 2006:D

Cabot financial V hunni2006: defending court summons, ongoing... July 09 :-x:-x:-x don't even get me started about them....grrr still battling

 

hunni2006 V Capital One: SA request & CCA issued, ongoing.. July 09 OC 'checking the archives...' Sept 09, no agreement, files closed!:D

<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<< please feel free to tip my scales if I've been helpful!

:DLearning more, every day.....

 

I have No legal training, any opinions and advice posted are entirely my own opinion, and based on life experiences and knowledge gained on this great site. Ultimately, what you do is up to you.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Max

 

I agree with Hunni but - do not allow them to make an arrangement that is not acceptable to you, there are allot of companies who are struggling due to the banks lack of flexibility. this builder will try and turn his short term debt into long term debt to free up his cash flow and reduce his monthly commitments.

 

I would go in and get your money after all he's owed the money for some time so he has known he has the debt and has had enough time to settle it.

 

Do an up to date statement and LBA if he wonts to make an arrangement I would ask for the monies to be paid in full in the shortest time frame you can get him to commit i.e 30 days. If he wont agree start court proceedings. when he See's you mean business he will probably pay the £4000.00. At this point you have nothing to loose as there is no point in having a customer that can't pay for the work he's asked you to do.

 

You can do this and still be polite and not necessarily fall out - you might even get a bit of respect in the process.

 

Kind Regards

 

Squidward

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi everyone,

 

Many many thanks for all the good advice. I am now going to put this all in practice now..... wish me luck!

 

My husband has spoken to the customer and he is willing to sign a letter of satisfaction, so this is our first step :D and then comes the "polite" letter to the builder requesting payment..... will keep you informed when i know more !

Link to post
Share on other sites

:)Good luck.

My fight so far:

 

hunni2006 V Halifax Bank: Charges £963.11 refunded nov 2006:D

Cabot financial V hunni2006: defending court summons, ongoing... July 09 :-x:-x:-x don't even get me started about them....grrr still battling

 

hunni2006 V Capital One: SA request & CCA issued, ongoing.. July 09 OC 'checking the archives...' Sept 09, no agreement, files closed!:D

<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<< please feel free to tip my scales if I've been helpful!

:DLearning more, every day.....

 

I have No legal training, any opinions and advice posted are entirely my own opinion, and based on life experiences and knowledge gained on this great site. Ultimately, what you do is up to you.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...