Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I just want to echo this.   Without wanting to sound patronising to the OP, a lot of people think that Judicial Reviews are just a case of a judge reviewing a few papers. In fact JRs are serious, complex & big-bucks litigation that a litigant in person couldn't hope to navigate and the adverse legal costs a claimant would face if they lose would start at the mid tens of thousands.
    • We believe this firm has been providing financial services or products in the UK without our authorisation. Find out why to be especially wary of dealing with this unauthorised firm and how to protect yourself from scammers. View the full article
    • We believe this firm has been providing financial services or products in the UK without our authorisation. Find out why to be especially wary of dealing with this unauthorised firm and how to protect yourself from scammers. View the full article
    • Thank you for your reply BankFodder and all advice.    Will do the SAR, as mentioned and reading customer service guide.    Thanks again.     
    • Send Firstport and SAR. Do it today. Read our customer services guide and implement the advice there in future. With any company. I expect my site team colleague @dx100uk will be along shortly to provide you with the help you need. Finally, please can you avoid posting in a solid block of text. It's very difficult to read and very unhelpful. Properly spaced and punctuated will encourage others to visit your thread and to give you the support that you need.
  • Our picks

    • Hi @BankFodder
      Sorry for only updating you now, but after your guidance with submitting the claim it was pretty straight forward and I didn't want to unnecessarily waste your time. Especially with this guide you wrote here, so many thanks for that
      So I issued the claim on day 15 and they requested more time to respond.
      They took until the last day to respond and denied the claim, unsurprisingly saying my contract was with Packlink and not with them.
       
      I opted for mediation, and it played out very similarly to other people's experiences.
       
      In the first call I outlined my case, and I referred to the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 as the reason to why I do in fact have a contract with them. 
       
      In the second call the mediator came back with an offer of the full amount of the phone and postage £146.93, but not the court costs. I said I was not willing to accept this and the mediator came across as a bit irritated that I would not accept this and said I should be flexible. I insisted that the law was on my side and I was willing to take them to court. The mediator went back to Hermes with what I said.
       
      In the third call the mediator said that they would offer the full amount. However, he said that Hermes still thought that I should have taken the case against Packlink instead, and that they would try to recover the court costs themselves from Packlink.
       
      To be fair to them, if Packlink wasn't based in Spain I would've made the claim against them instead. But since they are overseas and the law lets me take action against Hermes directly, it's the best way of trying to recover the money.
       
      So this is a great win. Thank you so much for your help and all of the resources available on this site. It has helped me so much especially as someone who does not know anything about making money claims.
       
      Many thanks, stay safe and have a good Christmas!
       
       
        • Thanks
    • Hermes and mediation hints. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/428981-hermes-and-mediation-hints/&do=findComment&comment=5080003
      • 1 reply
    • Natwest Bank Transfer Fraud Call HMRC Please help. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/428951-natwest-bank-transfer-fraud-call-hmrc-please-help/&do=findComment&comment=5079786
      • 31 replies
    • Hermes lost parcel.. Read more at https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/422615-hermes-lost-parcel/
      • 49 replies

Aktiv Kapital debenhams card


Please note that this topic has not had any new posts for the last 4074 days.

If you are trying to post a different story then you should start your own new thread. Posting on this thread is likely to mean that you won't get the help and advice that you need.

If you are trying to post information which is relevant to the story in this thread then please flag it up to the site team and they will allow you to post.

Thank you

Recommended Posts

Hi

 

2 years ago my partner recieved several letters from Aktiv Kapital saying she owed them the sum of £1475.79, she telephoned them and asked what the debt was about as she didn't know anything about it. We were told it was for a Debenahms card which she has never had (her ex has)!

 

We asked them to provide proof that the debt was hers and a copy of the agreement to which they said they needed proof who she was before they could send this out! She sent a photocopy of her passport and we never heard anything else about it.

 

Today she has recieved a statment of her account from Aktiv Kapital for the last 12 months! Obviously we haven't paid anythin because we didnt know anything about it any help would be greatly appreciated. Thanks in advance.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Don't send any proof to a DCA again - if they are contacting you they are supposed to have verified your identity before contacting you.

 

How long ago was the alleged debt taken out? If over 6 years it'll be statute barred and therefore they can do nothing with it. If they have not provideded a copy of the agreement and an enforceable one at that they can do nothing with it.

 

AK are the bottom feeders - they chase uneforceable debts on a regular basis

Link to post
Share on other sites

Andie thanks for your quick response.

 

My partner has never made a payment on it because she never knew it existed till we got the Aktiv Kapital letters. They told her it was taken out in 2000!

Should i send them a letter?

Link to post
Share on other sites

If they do hassle then send them the "prove it" letter from the template library.

 

That basically says they must prove the account to be hers. If they can't provide proof - and as its her exes I fail to see how they can - then they can go and whistle.

Link to post
Share on other sites

These annual statements are sent out automatically for any and all debts on any dca's books now - regardless of the status of the debt. There is a legal requirement to send them hence they have incorporated the legal requirement into their ongoing phishing trips.

 

As said above, just ignore it.

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 2 weeks later...

Hi

 

I had posted a previous thread about my partner having various letters from AK the bold section is from the previous thread:

 

2 years ago my partner recieved several letters from Aktiv Kapital saying she owed them the sum of £1475.79, she telephoned them and asked what the debt was about as she didn't know anything about it. We were told it was for a Debenahms card which she has never had (her ex has)!

 

Over the last 2 weeks they have sent her a statement of the account and then a further letter asking for payment of the account. We sent the letter from this group saying to Aktiv Kapital to prove the debt was hers.

 

Aktiv Kapital have responded to this by sending her a copy of the agreement from 28/11/97 which is in her name and does look like her signature but she is adamant she never opened the account (thoughts are the ex did it and took another fem with him!). Obviously she cant prove she wasn't in the store on the date from 1997 will she now be liable to paying this debt?

 

Thanks in advance for any help.

Link to post
Share on other sites

When was the last payment made on the account? Was it prior to 2003?

If so, the debt could well be statue barred.

 

I think Aktiv Krapital have bought up a lot of dubious debt recently as I've had a letter asking for the £7k+ I owe Barclays Bank.

Slight problem is that whilst I was a customer for 11 years, I have not banked with them in 14 years....as the account I opened was a Supersaver account I opened when I was 7 and closed on my 18th birthday. Can't see them giving me a loan / overdraft / credit card / an other type of credit on a junior savings account under the age of 18....can you?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Lol somehow no Pete? My partner has never made any payment on this account she says she wouldn't know if payments were made by her ex. They had a joint account until 12/2001 then she has had her own account since then.

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    No registered users viewing this page.


  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...