Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Aktiv Kapital debenhams card


gh0108
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5257 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi

 

2 years ago my partner recieved several letters from Aktiv Kapital saying she owed them the sum of £1475.79, she telephoned them and asked what the debt was about as she didn't know anything about it. We were told it was for a Debenahms card which she has never had (her ex has)!

 

We asked them to provide proof that the debt was hers and a copy of the agreement to which they said they needed proof who she was before they could send this out! She sent a photocopy of her passport and we never heard anything else about it.

 

Today she has recieved a statment of her account from Aktiv Kapital for the last 12 months! Obviously we haven't paid anythin because we didnt know anything about it any help would be greatly appreciated. Thanks in advance.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Don't send any proof to a DCA again - if they are contacting you they are supposed to have verified your identity before contacting you.

 

How long ago was the alleged debt taken out? If over 6 years it'll be statute barred and therefore they can do nothing with it. If they have not provideded a copy of the agreement and an enforceable one at that they can do nothing with it.

 

AK are the bottom feeders - they chase uneforceable debts on a regular basis

Link to post
Share on other sites

Andie thanks for your quick response.

 

My partner has never made a payment on it because she never knew it existed till we got the Aktiv Kapital letters. They told her it was taken out in 2000!

Should i send them a letter?

Link to post
Share on other sites

These annual statements are sent out automatically for any and all debts on any dca's books now - regardless of the status of the debt. There is a legal requirement to send them hence they have incorporated the legal requirement into their ongoing phishing trips.

 

As said above, just ignore it.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Hi

 

I had posted a previous thread about my partner having various letters from AK the bold section is from the previous thread:

 

2 years ago my partner recieved several letters from Aktiv Kapital saying she owed them the sum of £1475.79, she telephoned them and asked what the debt was about as she didn't know anything about it. We were told it was for a Debenahms card which she has never had (her ex has)!

 

Over the last 2 weeks they have sent her a statement of the account and then a further letter asking for payment of the account. We sent the letter from this group saying to Aktiv Kapital to prove the debt was hers.

 

Aktiv Kapital have responded to this by sending her a copy of the agreement from 28/11/97 which is in her name and does look like her signature but she is adamant she never opened the account (thoughts are the ex did it and took another fem with him!). Obviously she cant prove she wasn't in the store on the date from 1997 will she now be liable to paying this debt?

 

Thanks in advance for any help.

Link to post
Share on other sites

When was the last payment made on the account? Was it prior to 2003?

If so, the debt could well be statue barred.

 

I think Aktiv Krapital have bought up a lot of dubious debt recently as I've had a letter asking for the £7k+ I owe Barclays Bank.

Slight problem is that whilst I was a customer for 11 years, I have not banked with them in 14 years....as the account I opened was a Supersaver account I opened when I was 7 and closed on my 18th birthday. Can't see them giving me a loan / overdraft / credit card / an other type of credit on a junior savings account under the age of 18....can you?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Lol somehow no Pete? My partner has never made any payment on this account she says she wouldn't know if payments were made by her ex. They had a joint account until 12/2001 then she has had her own account since then.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...