Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • No I'm not. Even if I was then comments on this forum wouldn't constitute legal advice in the formal sense. Now you've engaged a lawyer directly can I just make couple of final suggestions? Firstly make sure he is fully aware of the facts. And don't mix and match by taking his advice on one aspect while ploughing your own furrow on others.  Let us know how you get on now you have a solicitor acting for you.
    • Oil and gold prices have jumped, while shares have fallen.View the full article
    • Thank you for your reply, DX! I was not under the impression that paying it off would remove it from my file. My file is already trashed so it would make very little difference to any credit score. I am not certain if I can claim compensation for a damaged credit score though. Or for them reporting incorrect information for over 10 years? The original debt has been reported since 2013 as an EE debt even though they had sold it in 2014. It appears to be a breach of the Data Protection Act 1998 Section 13 and this all should have come to a head when I paid the £69 in September 2022, or so I thought. The £69 was in addition to the original outstanding balance and not sent to a DCA. Even if I had paid the full balance demanded by the DCA back in 2014 then the £69 would still have been outstanding with EE. If it turns out I have no claim then so be it. Sometimes there's not always a claim if there's blame. The CRA's will not give any reason for not removing it. They simply say it is not their information and refer me to EE. More to the point EE had my updated details since 2022 yet failed to contact me. I have been present on the electoral roll since 2012 so was traceable and I think EE have been negligent in reporting an account as in payment arrangement when in fact it had been sold to a DCA. In my mind what should have happened was the account should have been defaulted before it was closed and sold to the DCA who would then have made a new entry on my credit file with the correct details. However, a further £69 of charges were applied AFTER it was sent to the DCA and it was left open on EE systems. The account was then being reported twice. Once with EE as open with a payment arrangement for the £69 balance which has continued since 2013 and once with the DCA who reported it as defaulted in 2014 and it subsequently dropped off and was written off by the DCA, LOWELL in 2021. I am quite happy for EE to place a closed account on my credit file, marked as satisfied. However, it is clear to me that them reporting an open account with payment arrangement when the balance is £0 and the original debt has been written off is incorrect? Am I wrong?
    • OMG! I Know! .... someone here with a chance to sue Highview for breach of GDPR with a very good chance of winning, I was excited reading it especially after all the work put in by site members and thinking he could hammer them for £££'s and then, the OP disappeared half way through. Although you never know the reason so all I can say is I hope the OP is alive and well regardless. I'd relish the chance to do them for that if they breached my GDPR.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

CCJ Issued - Now what?


sunshine70
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5273 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi all,

 

I've read round and round now in circles on CAG but still not sure what to do.

 

Confession first: About 15-18 years ago my early jobs included working for a number of bailiff companies (in the office). Yes I was hard on people, it was difficult work collecting Community Charge then Council Tax and Parking Fines. But I'm over it now, I got out of the business because I didn't like the way I felt when I got home at then end of the day.

 

Now I respectfully ask for some help on a current problem. In January 2009 Cabot managed to get a CCJ against me for £4500 issued on a Barclaycard debt from 2003. This was after they had to drop another for MBNA from a few years earlier. This is the last debt accrued whilst married, my wife managed to get 2 secured loans by forging my signature, no idea where the money went, ex is a compulsive liar.

 

In the summer of 2008 I managed to get the original CCJ for £11k (MBNA and Barclaycard combined) set aside. They claimed to have sent the summons etc to my previous address in 2007, however by then the flat I had lived in had been demolished and was just a pile of rubble. After much toing and froing from Hodsons on behalf of Cabot a CCJ was granted even though they never managed to produce a CCA.

 

I have ignored Cabot since the CCJ, however now Fire acting on their behalf have been calling me at work (mostly silent calls), 27 calls in the last 20 days, although I have not actually spoken to anyone during any calls.

 

So what to do next?

 

I have logged a complaint about the calls with Ofcom.

 

I have been living in a rented 1 bed flat for the last 3 years and am just scraping by after I pay rent, bills and maintenance to my ex-wife. (Just had her and my son and stepson staying with me because she did not pay the rent on her place.)

 

Should I try to again get the CCJ set aside? Offer a full and final settlement? (I could borrow some money from family to make a settlement.)

 

Any help or suggestions would be much appreciated.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Welcome to Cag...

 

You're not very clear....

 

How did you get two Original Creditors as in BarclayCard and Mbna in the same judgement/court action?

 

You then say it was set aside but then Cabot got the CCJ?

 

Having the same judgement set aside twice? That would take some doing and the grounds for doing so would need to be pretty tight.

 

Also, if you're in a one bed rented flat with large outgoings / maintenance etc and have no realisable assets that Cabot could try and grab then what would you achieve by having it set aside and offer them an FFS for a debt that you say they were unable to produce an enforceable CCA or even an CCA for that matter. STOP right there, it is not something that you want to be doing if they can't prove the debt.

 

As stated up a little, you're a little unclear, perhaps you could clarify a little?

I reside in Dawlish Warren but am not a rabbit.

Link to post
Share on other sites

:confused: As Deb says, little more info. please sunshine.

 

BTW, the F&F is out of the window if you have a CCJ on these debts. The court order for payment to the claimant MUST be followed so unless you apply to the court for a variation, an F&F wouldn't stand anyway.

Any knowledge I possess or advice I proffer is based solely on my experiences in the University of Life. Please make your own assessment of legality, risks & costs before taking any action.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Deb for the quick reply.

 

So to clarify both debts (Barclaycard and MBNA) were assigned to/bought by Cabot at some stage. When they managed to get the CCJ issued, without my knowledge they had lumped them together. I'm guessing that there was a lack of evidence at the time but as I never saw anything I have no idea.

 

The MBNA debt is now gone, statute-barred and will hopefully never see the light of day again.

 

My reasoning for wanting get this cleared is because I think I would like to move soon so that my son can live with me. (In case the ex-wife does not pay her rent again.) Would like to finally clear up my credit file as I am now keeping it tidy just don't want this blot on the landscape.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I am still confused sunshine. If the MBNA & the BC were lumped together as you say, on one POC, they were presumably the subject of one judgment so how can the MBNA one now be statute barred? They must both come under the CCJ.

 

BTW a CCJ will stay on your credit file for 6 years.

Any knowledge I possess or advice I proffer is based solely on my experiences in the University of Life. Please make your own assessment of legality, risks & costs before taking any action.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

even with a ccj there is nothing stopping you negotiating a F & F with the plaintiff so long as he agrees to the court being advised that the CCj has been settled.

 

if you have nowt- then you are a "woman of straw" and in a very good position to negotiate

 

you are in an even better position to tell the plaintiff to go take a hike!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...