Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

AMEX Westminsters Urgent Help Please - Statutory Demand


Hestia
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5204 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

  • 2 weeks later...

Just an update - got some messages from Newmans to call back on my work phone - actually exwork but they let me know about them as still friendly - a lot of no number no message calls and a few from the same town as Newmans are based according to the code so assume them too but to my knowledge no post so that means neither Newman's or RMA ever responded to CCA request so will now do the dispute letter.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just an update - got some messages from Newmans to call back on my work phone - actually exwork but they let me know about them as still friendly - a lot of no number no message calls and a few from the same town as Newmans are based according to the code so assume them too but to my knowledge no post so that means neither Newman's or RMA ever responded to CCA request so will now do the dispute letter.

 

Cool 8-) but I think you may be jumping the gun at present... its 12 WORKING days + 2 working days for postage.............. that you have to allow.

 

So I make it Tues/Weds of next week if letter sent 25/26th Nov.

 

S.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Shadow, many thanks for that - perhaps if I'd learned to count I wouldn't be in financial difficulty!

 

Actually I thought the +2 of the 12 days + 2 days calculation was because of the weekends, now I understand! tvm.

 

Will wait until Monday.

 

H

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

After all this time I finally sort of have an update - any thoughts as to what to do next?

 

The update is that yesterday I received a letter from NCO Europe (who I think own RMA who were the ones who issued the SDA.)

 

It had taken 2 weeks to get here (abroad) and said that they sent an acknowledgement to my CCA request back in November last year but a month later it was returned to them undelivered? (I don't understand that) That this letter acknowledged my subsequent breach of CCA request letter but that Amex had written to me back in December - again I have absolutely nothing.

 

They then go on to say how seriously they take their responsibilities and that they have closed my account with them:D

 

However, in the meantime I am being bombarded by phone calls by Newmans to my old workplace (they tell me that loads of messages are left for me) and I have just received a couple of letters dated toward the end of last year to my old UK address even though RMA had all my correct contact details.

 

Should I contact AMEX, Newmans, everyone?

 

At least the statutory demand seems to have fizzled out although I guess Newmans or AMex can do all that again.

 

I did read a rather sad thread by a chap who recently got whacked by AMEX for a £20k CCJ after looking good on botched records and invalid default notices so Know this is by no means over but I haven't even seen my CCA details yet.

 

Interestingly to me also, initially there was a question mark over whether my Business Gold Card would fall under the CCA scenario so I am very interested to see whether Amex's response was to say 'not relevent' or to send a copy.

 

Any thoughts appreciated.

 

Hestia10

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...