Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I would guess so dx which is why I've asked the OP to upload the original invoice.
    • ps i doubt the PCN says macdonalds?? MET dont operate a reverse trespass car park for mc'd's parkers going to starbucks...(occupants left vehicle claim) they only do that for the starbucks part  i bet you parked in the starbuck side and walked to MCd's? dx    
    • it is NOT A FINE.....this is an extremely important point to understand no-one bar a magistrate in a magistrates criminal court can ever fine anyone for anything. Private Parking Tickets (speculative invoices) are NOT a criminal matter, merely a speculative contractual Civil matter hence they can only try a speculative monetary claim via the civil county court system (which is no more a legal powers matter than what any member of Joe Public can do). Until/unless they do raise a county court claim a CCJ and win, there are not ANY enforcement powers they can undertake other than using a DCA, whom are legally powerless and are not BAILIFFS. Penalty Charge Notices issued by local authorities etc were decriminalised years ago - meaning they no longer can progress a claim to the magistrates court to enforce, but go directly to legal enforcement via a real BAILIFF themselves. 10'000 of people waste £m's paying private parking companies because they think they are FINES...and the media do not help either. the more people read the above the less income this shark industry get. where your post said fine it now says charge .............. please fill out the Q&A ASAP. dx  
    • Well done on reading the other threads. If ECP haven't got the guts to do court then there is no reason to pay them. From other threads there is a 35-minute free stay after which you need to pay, with the signs hidden where no-one will read them.  Which probably explains why ECP threaten this & threaten that, but in the end daren't do court. As for your employer - well you can out yourself as the driver to ECP so the hamster bedding will arrive at yours.  Get your employer to do that using the e-mail address under Appeals and Transfer Of Liability.  
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Another Swift Agreement to See


zincoxide
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5148 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Alright, I wrote to swift and got a copy of the payments made to my account and their charges. I complained and guess what - got nothing.

 

[EDIT]

 

Swift Agreement Front picture by zincoxide1979 - Photobucket

 

Swift Agreement Back picture by zincoxide1979 - Photobucket

 

I've read somewhere about asking for an underwriting sheet etc.

 

It's important to note that this agreement was made in Scotland.

 

So far, they've paid back £28,000 of the £55k and have just been quoted a redemption figure of £62k!!!!!

Edited by alanfromderby
Link to post
Share on other sites

Alright, I wrote to swift and got a copy of the payments made to my account and their charges. I complained and guess what - got nothing.

 

Now I'm intent in getting as much out of these crooks as possible, can someone with the knowledge please look at the copies of the agreement (links below) and let me know where I should start?

 

Swift Agreement Front picture by zincoxide1979 - Photobucket

 

Swift Agreement Back picture by zincoxide1979 - Photobucket

 

I've read somewhere about asking for an underwriting sheet etc.

 

It's important to note that this agreement was made in Scotland

 

 

So far, they've paid back £28,000 of the £55k and have just been quoted a redemption figure of £62k!!!!!

 

 

First zincoxide welcome to the Swift Fighters forum

A couple of Questions.

 

How did you mangae to get this loan .....I see you paid no Brokers fees and no legal charges ........Swift or more to the point Mr Mark White again who stated quite clearly that Swift only lend via brokers they do not lend Direct to the Public ...I am intrigued as to what your answers will be and note this was when they were at Purbreck House...but it is still a Swift Advances Plc loan

 

sparkie

Edited by Sparkie1723
Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi just saw your agreement did you know you had a capital Agreement

I know for a fact that they themselves CHANGE interest only loans to Capital ones so check it out and everyone else do the same:cool:

pick up a penquin two systems for the price of one:?:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sparkie

 

It's not my loan - I've been asked to look into it by good friends as I've already got them a fortune back on bank, credit card and other loan charges.

 

They got this loan by calling ocean finance who arranged for a guy to go see them at their address and sign up for the loan.

 

They put a charging order on the house that I'm currently trying to get a copy from the land registry but other than that, I'm not entirely sure where to go with this one as they've already rejected my application for the return of outlandish fees. I do have a copy of what has been paid.

 

They have steadily increased the interest rate despite rates going down and I remember seeing on here that they apparently lend (libor) at a fix rate?!

 

So I need some really good help to get to these guys somehow.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi zincoxide,

 

First thing "subbing" means that the person is supporting you and will post if & when they have something cnstructive to say.

 

Before anyone can help it is essential that we have as much information about the issues that you can provide ...of course deleting personalinfo from any documents posted....I already have soe strong views but need more info .....The first thing you must do is send Ocean Finace & Swift and Subject Data Access Request ......I can supply you with a comprehensive template of one of those if you wish to use it, once you have that we will know a lot more.

 

One thing I have already gleened from this agreement is that [EDIT]....for reason there are no brokers fees charged on this agreement and I also notice that their are no legal and Administration charges.

This means that Ocean Finace were/are a direct agent of Swift on a full commission basis..........a further question for everyone to ask ..if Swift can have agreements like this one without the need to charge legal fees WHY MAKE OTHERS PAY THEM ?? That is an unfair act in treating one customer differently than another ( no offence or insinuation meant to your friends )

Send off your SAR's as soon as possible

 

sparkie

Edited by alanfromderby
Link to post
Share on other sites

I have done the SAR to swift and I'll scan the reponse in when I get a working scanner this week.

 

I'll also send a SAR to Ocean Finance.

 

What are you aiming to do to Swift - for me, I'd like to see this loan written off and all payments made to it returned to my friends cause they have been treated like dogs.

 

Then if I need to lobby every politician, financial regulation group, fraud squads etc - get these idiots closed down for destroying lives.

Link to post
Share on other sites

This is all the paperwork I have so far - should I be chasing them for anything else?

 

I believe the loan was in essence mis-sold as the salesman said he was from Ocean Finance and it was sold under those pretense, but I am looking for any whatsoever to get this loan written off or get back a great deal of charges & interest that have been applied.

 

You'll probably need to zoom out of the pdf files and they are all watermarked as I only found an old scanner that doesn't work on Windows 7 - so had to use a trial programme.

Rate Increase 17July2008.pdf

Rate Increase 21May07.pdf

Rate Increase 23Nov06.pdf

Rate Increase 30Nov07.pdf

DPA SAR.pdf

Edited by zincoxide
Forgot to add info
Link to post
Share on other sites

I love the way they say 'increase in the Bank Base Rate' !!! then last year and this year they have been telling me on the phone (for at least 12 months) that they base their rates on LIBOR....NOW it is the cost of funds....if ever their was an unfair relationship it was this !!! Yet they say their staff stating the interest is based on LIBOR is a 'training issue'....I'd say this is pretty close to the GMAC case....!!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

I love the way they say 'increase in the Bank Base Rate' !!! then last year and this year they have been telling me on the phone (for at least 12 months) that they base their rates on LIBOR....NOW it is the cost of funds....if ever their was an unfair relationship it was this !!! Yet they say their staff stating the interest is based on LIBOR is a 'training issue'....I'd say this is pretty close to the GMAC case....!!!

 

 

But I have [EDIT] nailed into admitting that it WAS and IS GOVERNED by the LIBOR Rate........nothing else.in any event their funding was obtained at a FIXED CAPPED rate to provide a hedge against interest rate rises which is stated in their annual accounts which under company law the same as a statemnt of truth.

 

sparkie

Edited by alanfromderby
Link to post
Share on other sites

I will send every last bit of paperwork to the FSA - but is there any way of getting a quicker resolution.

 

DO we think this debt is unenforceable so just stop paying?

 

Should I ask for a copy of the underwriting sheet?

 

Shall I point out every error they have made in a complaint to them and then anyone else that will listen.

 

My friends are being nailed by this company with repayments of over £800 a month which they simply cannot afford, I need to help them,

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sparkie - is there a way you could email me the proof you have that Mr White said the rate is governed by Libor?

 

 

NO problem send me your e-mail address by PM and I'll send you the two pages of my court judgement summary where that is confirmed by the Judge ( Recorder)

 

With regrds to your sar info write back to mr Strickley and ask him these questions

1...Why has no Account history been supplied as part of your SAR

 

2...Will he supply the account records of your account that is being processed by Kestrel No 1 Loans Ltd.

 

3...Will he supply a copy of the Title Indemnity insurance document refrred to and contained in and on the Loan agreement. to which you are legally entitled to.. Unless Swift want to continue to flout section 3 of the New Fraud Act 2006, by concealing a document you are legally entitled to see for reason you have paid for it.

 

 

sparkie

 

sparkie

Edited by Sparkie1723
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...
NO problem send me your e-mail address by PM and I'll send you the two pages of my court judgement summary where that is confirmed by the Judge ( Recorder)

 

With regrds to your sar info write back to mr Strickley and ask him these questions

1...Why has no Account history been supplied as part of your SAR

 

2...Will he supply the account records of your account that is being processed by Kestrel No 1 Loans Ltd.

 

3...Will he supply a copy of the Title Indemnity insurance document refrred to and contained in and on the Loan agreement. to which you are legally entitled to.. Unless Swift want to continue to flout section 3 of the New Fraud Act 2006, by concealing a document you are legally entitled to see for reason you have paid for it.

 

 

sparkie

 

sparkie

Hi Sparkie

I am new to your forum and only wish I had looked at these sights before I had let Swift take me to court and get a suspendid possession order on my property.I am trying to keep to the court order- but finding it hard. have written to Swift to ask for a refund on charges though they accept they could have been more helpfull they are only willing to pay back £490 or more which is small fry compared to the charges on my account. I would realy appreciate your help in any way. I am scared in one way if I push them to much will they take my house? or should I apply to the court to ask if I can have the case overturned?Have only got a copy of the agreement that they submitted to the court.there is no APR showing under each instalement.plus I was led to believe it would run alongside my mortgage, which isn't the case as it's for 300 payments, credit amount £31,000.00 monthly amount £302.71 which has risen, interest 9.84%pa variable.the loan was taken out in feb 2007

Please help

p.s.Sorry if I have contacted you in the correct way

Tophat

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

 

I am new to this and have just posted a message for SPARKIE and any one else who can help.as I don't think I posted it in the corect way as I can see it looks like it is in reply to another post , So please read past the first bit of other message.

 

Tophat

Link to post
Share on other sites

HI Tophat,

Can you tell me what your fees and charges are ..ie Broker fee......Admin fee ........and Title Indemnity fee is please............or better still can you post up the 1st page of your agreement ....remove your personal information first of course.

There are legal arguments being formulated that could break a vast majority of Swifts agreements....yours may be one of them.

 

 

sparkie

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Sparkie for such a prompt reply, unable to scan you a copy but it reads as follows credit £31,000.00 monthly payment £302.71 Though the amonut has gone up number of repayments is 300.Broker fee of £2,000.00 ,loan admin fee £595 title Indeminity fee £135 rate of interest 9.84% p.a variable.there is no apr showing on the agreement. the agreement is the same as SNBailey on one of the forums.I have been intouch with Swift

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Sparkie for such a prompt reply, unable to scan you a copy but it reads as follows credit £31,000.00 monthly payment £302.71 Though the amonut has gone up number of repayments is 300.Broker fee of £2,000.00 ,loan admin fee £595 title Indeminity fee £135 rate of interest 9.84% p.a variable.there is no apr showing on the agreement. the agreement is the same as SNBailey on one of the forums.I have been intouch with Swift to try and claim back charges that appear on my account.they have are a lot :

Returned payment charge 11 x £33

Arrears Letter charge 19 x £23 and 2 x £12

Monthly arrears charge 21 x £70

Default charge £250

INFORMATION TO AND FROM PRIOR ORTGAGEES 5 X £23 AND 1 X £12

Letter before Action charge £75

Letter Issuing PROCEEDINGS charge 2 x £100

Court fees £150

H M Land Registry Office copies charge £35

Solicitors charge to attend hearing 2 x £65

Issuing a warrant for possession £100

Eviction cancellation £100

Cancelled Eviction - Estate Agents fee £29.38

Solicitors fees - no detail, but on my printed list of transactions I have acharge of £1,298.40 21st sept 2008 plus a further one of £364.26 sept 26th and another for £365 march 2009 which they forgot to disclose in the letter.

What is the best thing for me to do? should I try and see if I can get it back to court or should I send the deyails I have to FLA?

 

Thanks for all your help

 

Tophat

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...

HI Sparkie

 

I have had a look at your interest rate although you are being charged on a compound basis they have supplied a simple annual interest rate. I make it

 

Monthly 1.17

Annual Simple14.04

Annual Compound

14.9796547

 

The fact that the agreement is variable the fact that there appears multiple breaches and incidence of sharp practice I think you would have a good chance to challenge your agreement. xxxx has a Solicitor who is very experienced in this area I think they charge £99.00 for a formal review of your agreement well worth a punt

Edited by cerberusalert
commercial name removed
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...