Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I've looked through all our old NPE threads, and as far as we know they have never had the bottle to do court. There are no guarantees of course, but when it comes to put or shut up they definitely tend towards shut up. How about something like -   Dear Jonathan and Julie, Re: PCN no.XXXXX cheers for your Letter Before Claim.  I rolled around on the floor in laughter at the idea that you actually expected me to take this tripe seriously and cough up. I'll write to you not some uninterested third party, thanks all the same, because you have are the ones trying to threaten me about this non-existent "debt". Go and look up Jopson v Homeguard Services Ltd, saddos.  Oh, while you're at it, go and look up your Subject Access Request obligations - we all know how you ballsed that up way back in January to March. Dear, dear, dear - you couldn't resist adding your £70 Unicorn Food Tax, you greedy gets.  Judges don't like these made-up charges, do they? You can either drop this foolishness now or get a hell of a hammering in court.  Both are fine with me.  Summer is coming up and I would love a holiday at your expense after claiming an unreasonable costs order under CPR 27.14(2)(g). I look forward to your deafening silence.   That should show them you're not afraid of them and draw their attention to their having legal problems of their own with the SAR.  If they have any sense they'll crawl back under their stone and leave you in peace.  Over the next couple of days invest in a 2nd class stamp (all they are worth) and get a free Certificate of Posting from the post office.
    • Yes that looks fine. It is to the point. I think somewhere in the that the you might want to point out that your parcel had been delivered but clearly had been opened and resealed and the contents had been stolen
    • Hi All, I just got in from work and received a letter dated 24 April 2024. "We've sent you a Single Justice Procedure notice because you have been charged with an offence, on the Transport for London Network." "You need to tell us whether you are guilty or not guilty. This is called making your plea."
    • Okay please go through the disclosure very carefully. I suggest that you use the technique broadly in line with the advice we give on preparing your court bundle. You want to know what is there – but also very importantly you want to know what is not there. For instance, the email that they said they sent you before responding to the SAR – did you see that? Is there any trace of of the phone call that you made to the woman who didn't know anything about SAR's? On what basis was the £50 sent to you? Was it unilateral or did they offer it and you accepted it on some condition? When did they send you this £50 cheque? Have you banked it? Also, I think that we need to start understanding what you have lost here. Have you lost any money – and if so how much? Send the SAR to your bank as advised above
    • In anticipation of lodging my court claim next Weds 1 May (14 days after advising P2G that was my deadline for them to settle my claim) I have completed my first draft POC as below: Claim Claim number: xxxxx Reference: P2G MAY 2024   Claimant xxxxx   Defendant Parcel2Go 1A Parklands Lostock Bolton BL6 4SD  Particulars of Claim The defendant has failed to arrange for the safe delivery of the claimant's parcel containing a 8 secondhand golf clubs (valued at £265) that was sent to a UK address using their delivery service (P2G Reference xxxxx). The defendant contracted Evri to deliver the parcel (Evri Reference xxxxx) and refuses to reimburse the claimant on the grounds that the claimant did not purchase their secondary insurance contract. The defendant seeks to exclude their liability in breach of section 57 Consumer Rights Act. The secondary insurance contract is in breach of section 72. The claimant seeks reimbursement of £265, plus P2G fees of £9.10, plus postage costs for two first class letters to P2G of £2.70, plus court fees, plus interest. The claimant claims interest under section 69 of the County Courts Act 1984 at the rate of 8% a year from xxxxx to xxxxxx on £276.80 and also interest at the same rate up to the date of judgment or earlier payment at a daily rate of £xxxx   Details of claim Amount claimed £276.80 I look forward to your thoughts and comments guys! As ever, many thanks - G59    
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Newbie asks help again: BCW and Npower send meaningless "proof" of debt.


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5290 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi everybody, I’m posting here the latest updates about my problem with Buchanan Clark & Wells.

Couple of years ago, I stayed in a flat in London for about six months and a half, always paying all my gas bills from the beginning. Now BCW says that I have to pay £280 for unpaid gas bills, for the supply period that goes from 01/12/2006 (the day I moved in the flat) to 04/08/2009 (despite the fact that I moved out of the flat on 16/06/2007!).

So:

1) they are saying that I never paid a single gas bill (for the period of time in which I was actually there, 01/12/2006 to 16/06/2007) and

2) they want me to pay for more than 2 years that I wasn’t in the flat anymore (from 16/06/2007 to 04/08/2009).

 

(Here’s the link to my first topic, which explains the beginning of the story in more detail)

 

Anyway, the people of the forum explained to me that the best thing to do was to send a “prove it” letter, so I did, and now they sent me this document that it’s supposed to prove my debt.

 

I don’t see how this thing can prove that I was using their gas for 2 years after I moved out, or that I never paid my bills for the six months that I was actually there.

But I’m not sure of how things work, so I wanna ask the people on the forum if they think that this document they sent me is enough to prove that I owe them money.

Also, on all the documents I received from BCW and Npower, one letter of my surname is wrong, could I use this to just say that this person is not me?

Or, what happens if I just completely ignore them from now on and don’t take any action?

IMG00113.jpg

IMG00114.jpg

Edited by 86.dll
Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Huff&Puff, glad you are still following me in this.

 

What I'm thinking to do now is to send another letter with recorded delivery and let them know at this point that I left the flat more than two years ago, and that they are asking me to pay for the time in which I wasn't there.

I will also mention that sending this pseudo gas bill now doesn't mean anything, and it doesn't prove I was in the flat using their gas for the last two years.

If after this they keep sending me letters, I will ignore them I guess.. but can't they take me to court if I do like this? I'd really prefer to avoid that!

 

Also, again, can I just play on the fact that my surname is wrong on their documents? (there is only the surname, not the name, and that has one letter different from the actual one)

Link to post
Share on other sites

You won't get anywhere by arguing with them.

 

 

  • They cannot read
  • Thy ignore whatever you have to say
  • They don't care if you actually owe any debt, they just want your money

 

 

They can take you to court, but it's easy to fight them if they do. It is highly unlikely that they would though.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well I guess I will have to try and send this letter, so at least I will have done my part regardless of if they ignore it or not.

I'm desperatly trying to contact the agency that let the flat two years ago, so they can maybe write up some document that states that I left the flat in summer 2007, not two months ago. That would be a proof hard to ignore I think...

Link to post
Share on other sites

If you left the flat two years ago and they have only just now asked you for payment toward this, whether it is yours or not,then you can safely say that they will be unable to get a single penny off you. They are only allowed to get payment from you if it is within 18 months of the final bill being sent, I will try and find the relevant thread where this is stated, but it is on here somewhere.

 

Boo;)

Who ever heard of someone getting a job at the Jobcentre? The unemployed are sent there as penance for their sins, not to help them find work!

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok not exactly what I was looking for, but just as good.:D

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/utilities-gas-electricity-water/139145-thank-you.html

 

Read through the above link. But for ease here it is cut from the website;

If a gas company has failed to send out a gas bill, they aren't allowed to bill you for any amount which dates back longer than a year.

Gas supply

 

 

The Billing Code;http://www.google.info/forums/showthread.php?t=1576

 

 

Boo;)

Edited by Bazooka Boo

Who ever heard of someone getting a job at the Jobcentre? The unemployed are sent there as penance for their sins, not to help them find work!

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

This is great news Boo, I'm really glad you found this old topic for me.

 

There is only one problem now: as according to them I was still living in the place in august 2009, they won't recognise that more than one year has passed and that they have therfore lost the right to claim any money over old bills. According to their clock, it has only been two months.

Link to post
Share on other sites

That is their problem. You have set out the situation for them, if they choose not to believe you, then it's up to them to prove otherwise. Which they won't be able to do. If they continu to harass you now that you have disputed the debt you can report them to Trading Standards. That usually shut them up.

Link to post
Share on other sites

There is only one problem now: as according to them I was still living in the place in august 2009, they won't recognise that more than one year has passed and that they have therfore lost the right to claim any money over old bills. According to their clock, it has only been two months.

 

OK it still doesn't make you liable to pay for a Gas bill that isn't yours.

 

I take it that when you moved, you changed your bank details, ie. you informed them of your new address? You have other utility bills that you were liable for, showing the date from and too?

 

Again, none of that is really an issue for you, it just gives you peace of mind that you know that you have proof that you were never in that property until the date they claim.

 

As has already been said, it is up to them to prove that you do owe that money, and not for you to prove that you don't.

 

If your credit rating/score is something which matters to you then I would probably check it just to make sure they haven't added a marker on it, currently incorrect entries on peoples credit files can have damages claimed for, which stand at £1000 per incorrect entry:D

 

If nothing else, a simple short letter stating that you were not in the property from DD/MM/YYYY and that the bill has nothing to do with you, and you await their letter confirming that no further collection activity will be taken against yourself, should sufice.

 

If they write back saying you have to prove it, then again, it is for them to prove that you were living there when they say you were.

 

Ofgem

Who ever heard of someone getting a job at the Jobcentre? The unemployed are sent there as penance for their sins, not to help them find work!

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

The bill proves nothing.

 

I received seven bills in the one month all with different amounts ranginf from them owing me £500 to me owing them £1400, all based on their estimated bills - I don't think I have to tell you which way they went with the amount owing.

 

None of the usual CCA arguments apply and to be honest the 12 month rule on bills would be a very long shot as they seem very flexible with their dates

 

Make sure you keep your complaints in writing, don't even consider phoning their call centre, they will tell you it's been escalated when it hasn't promise you callbacks which don't happen and generally just try to pi$$ you off into paying them

 

I would suggest that you go through their (Npowers) complaints procedure to completion and then request NPowers final word on this matter. then go to the ombudsman, it's the one thing that seems to phase NPower, They settled on the morning the Ombudsman contacted them about my account.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Certainly as Spamheed says, you will need to use and exhaust their own internal complaints procedure before most other organisations will want to take a look.

 

Hopwfully by the time you have exhusted their own internbal complaints procedure they will come to realise, you aint budging and they are wrong!

Who ever heard of someone getting a job at the Jobcentre? The unemployed are sent there as penance for their sins, not to help them find work!

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...