Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Wayne Ting, chief executive of e-scooter firm Lime, says there's room for improvement. View the full article
    • If you are absolutely certain* that you were parked OK, write a letter of complaint to the Headteacher and copy in the Chair of the school governors.   If you or the car were identifiable in any way from the photo (eg visible registration number, driver's face etc) I would very politely write that you resent the untrue suggestion that you had parked/had stopped/were waiting in a way that contravened any traffic regulations, and that you are sure that the school will understand that you would like an apology and a correction to be printed in the next newsletter.  (You can also clearly state that you were identifiable from the photo because other parents have mentioned it to you).   See if that works.   You don't want to go to court for defamation as you'll need access to about £10k in fees before you get out of bed.  You just want an apology and a correction.  If what you've told us is accurate, I don't see any reasonable school failing to say sorry.     *My wife is a former school governor and my experience listening to her is that very very few parents actually understand the meaning of the no stopping/no waiting signs and road markings outside schools.  Don't complain unless you are sure you weren't stopped where you shouldn't have been.
    • And they haven't offered a speed awareness course either?  (Have you done one in the last three years or is this in Scotland?)   And is one of the notices for 34 in a 30?  As Man in the Middle says, that ought to be below the level at which they take action.   (And sorry - I don't want to appear preachy - but...  there don't have to be any warnings or signs or lines on the road to advise you of the presence of speed cameras.  If you get away with an exceptional hardship argument you will need to stick to speed limits in future - whether you know there are cameras there or not.  NB Don't know if this applies to you, but most 30 mph limits are restricted roads with a system of streetlighting and don't even need speed limit signs - you are assumed to know this from the Highway Code).
    • It's up to you if you want to pay £300 you don't owe plus whatever Unicorn Food Tax with no basis in law whatsoever that they will have made up in the Letter Before Claim.   We'd prefer you didn't.   But you have received a LBC so it's make your mind up time.   So please    - post up photos of the signage in the dark that you'll have taken two months ago (post 14)    - post up details of planning permission for their signs you'll have found out after you got onto the council, again two months ago (again post 14)    - also let us know if you agree with Brassnecked's excellent letter or if you'd like to tweak bits depending on what you've found out    - upload the LBC.  Some of them are appallingly drafted and invariably contain Unicorn Food Tax which is all useful extra ammo    - also, where are you living now (post 35) and are you comfortable with legal communications arriving at your parents'?   If you look in our PPC Successes thread at the top of the page, you will see 275 times these cheats have been seen off with their tails between their legs (and all had the same "well known legal companies" (ho! ho!) on hand).  In reality 275 times is a massive underestimate, in all 275 cases there was a "moment of victory" IYSWIM where the PPC were thrashed in court or discontinued a claim or were called off by a supermarket chain, etc., etc.  There will have been at least that number again where they were told to Foxtrot Oscar and then crawled back under their stone.  They are eminently beatable but logically when you're in legal dispute you have to put some graft in to beat the other party.
  • Our picks

Default & termination Notice Question


Please note that this topic has not had any new posts for the last 4039 days.

If you are trying to post a different story then you should start your own new thread. Posting on this thread is likely to mean that you won't get the help and advice that you need.

If you are trying to post information which is relevant to the story in this thread then please flag it up to the site team and they will allow you to post.

Thank you

Recommended Posts

A DN cannot be reissued because there is no account to issue one on - it has been terminated. The only way the account can be reopened is if you agree, which, of course, you are not going to do.

 

They cannot ask you for payments that would have arisen in the future because the account is terminated. All they can ask you for are any arrears that accrued when the account was still open.

 

It is the logical sequence of what follows on from unlawful default and termination rather than specific law.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Cheers Rob,

 

I found the dodgy DN one, but will take a look at other two.

 

That tale of yours and it's post made me tired and gave me a headache just reading let alone living it, good on you and hope it soon ends.

 

 

All the best and have a good weekend all

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Folks,

 

I have found something maybe funy with the agreement i was sent and need your views please.

 

Two more pages attached, plus ones from earlier post.

 

I was sent agreement first page (IMG) marked 1 of 4, blank key info/sig page marked 2 of 4 (IMG 1),T & C page 3 of 4, (img 1 agn soz). ALL were full size A4 non faxed.

 

No page 4 of 4 at all

 

Then Key info/sig page signed and dated (1st post img) and dealer warranty sheet (this post img)

 

BOTH these although on A4 paper are small A3 size FAXES dated 1 & 2/8/06, agreement date.

 

Although the small signed page has same ref no top right, why are they not all same size, does it mean they dont have original signature page, or am i looking for something not there ?

 

 

 

IMG.pdf

 

IMG_0001.pdf

Link to post
Share on other sites

Me Again, sorry.

 

Just looked at both sig pages, blank and signed one.

 

They both have same agrement number at base and ref number top right, so how can you have 2 signature pages for same agreement,these are 2 different pages from a document which should only have one ever.

 

i first thought they had included a blank file sig page because signed one was to small to read, but not so.

 

I think they may ONLY have a faxed signature and dealer warranty page on file, no original signed contract,and may have re done page 1 and 2 fresh for me.

 

If this is the case this is vital so your advice and help please.

 

Cheers

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry for keep posting, just got my brain working.

 

The more i think about this the more i may be right.

 

They appointed a solicitor to handle this who first wrote in July and ever since i asked them for information despite doing a CCA and DPA request back in August and telling them hubby sold car, i have had nothing. I

have been a real pest calling 2-3 times per week when deadlines were up and have had nothing but excuses and we are waiting for information from solicitors, i even joked with them it should you be chasing not us, it was only when i told them i was going direct the paperwork came from finance company a little at a time and they said they had no record of a request, despite listing my DPA/CCA chq on statement from 1/09 they sent me.

 

Not sure if they are trying to recover car, chase hubby first for money and selling car or what.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Can someone tell me what legal definition dictionary a judge or lawyer would use ?

 

I have looked up Joint and several, which i know is basically either or both or all parties are liable BUT it goes on to say "... only if their concurrent acts brought about the harm to the plaintiff." which i think may be important.

 

 

Thank You

Link to post
Share on other sites
Hi Folks,

 

I have found something maybe funy with the agreement i was sent and need your views please.

 

Two more pages attached, plus ones from earlier post.

 

I was sent agreement first page (IMG) marked 1 of 4, blank key info/sig page marked 2 of 4 (IMG 1),T & C page 3 of 4, (img 1 agn soz). ALL were full size A4 non faxed.

 

No page 4 of 4 at all

 

Then Key info/sig page signed and dated (1st post img) and dealer warranty sheet (this post img)

 

BOTH these although on A4 paper are small A3 size FAXES dated 1 & 2/8/06, agreement date.

 

Although the small signed page has same ref no top right, why are they not all same size, does it mean they dont have original signature page, or am i looking for something not there ?

 

 

 

[ATTACH]13747[/ATTACH]

 

[ATTACH]13748[/ATTACH]

 

 

Sorry to bother you folks but does anyone think i may be right about them not having agreement, is it worth pushing some more, or am i barking up wrong tree ?

 

Cheers

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    No registered users viewing this page.


  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...