Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Thank-you dx for your feedback. That is the reason I posted my opinion, because I am trying to learn more and this is one of the ways to learn, by posting my opinions and if I am incorrect then being advised of the reasons I am incorrect. I am not sure if you have educated me on the points in my post that would be incorrect. However, you are correct on one point, I shall refrain from posting on any other thread other than my own going forward and if you think my post here is unhelpful, misleading or in any other way inappropriate, then please do feel obliged to delete it but educate me on the reason why. To help my learning process, it would be helpful to know what I got wrong other than it goes against established advice considering the outcome of a recent court case on this topic that seemed to suggest it was dismissed due to an appeal not being made at the first stage. Thank-you.   EDIT:  Just to be clear, I am not intending to go against established advice by suggesting that appeals should ALWAYS be made, just my thoughts on the particular case of paying for parking and entering an incorrect VRN. Should this ever happen to me, I will make an appeal at the first stage to avoid any problems that may occur at a later stage. Also, I continue to be grateful for any advice you give on my own particular case.  
    • you can have your humble opinion.... You are very new to all this private parking speculative invoice game you have very quickly taken it upon yourself to be all over this forum, now to the extent of moving away from your initial thread with your own issue that you knew little about handling to littering the forum and posting on numerous established and existing threads, where advice has already been given or a conclusion has already resulted, with your theories conclusions and observations which of course are very welcomed. BUT... in some instances, like this one...you dont quite match the advice that the forum and it's members have gathered over a very long consensual period given in a tried and trusted consistent mannered thoughtful approach. one could even call it forum hi-jacking and that is becoming somewhat worrying . dx
    • Yeah, sorry, that's what I meant .... I said DCBL because I was reading a few threads about them discontinuing claims and getting spanked in court! Meant  YOU  Highview !!!  🖕 The more I read this forum and the more I engage with it's incredible users, the more I learn and the more my knowledge expands. If my case gets to court, the Judge will dismiss it after I utter my first sentence, and you DCBL and Highview don't even know why .... OMG! .... So excited to get to court!
    • Yep, I read that and thought about trying to find out what the consideration and grace period is at Riverside but not sure I can. I know they say "You must tell us the specific consideration/grace period at a site if our compliance team or our agents ask what it is"  but I doubt they would disclose it to the public, maybe I should have asked in my CPR 31.14 letter? Yes, I think I can get rid of 5 minutes. I am also going to include a point about BPA CoP: 13.2 The reference to a consideration period in 13.1 shall not apply where a parking event takes place. I think that is Deception .... They giveth with one hand and taketh away with the other! One other point to note, the more I read, the more I study, the more proficient I feel I am becoming in this area. Make no mistake DBCL if you are reading this, when I win in court, if I have the grounds to make any claims against you, such as breach of GDPR, I shall be doing so.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Default & termination Notice Question


bobj70
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5281 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

A DN cannot be reissued because there is no account to issue one on - it has been terminated. The only way the account can be reopened is if you agree, which, of course, you are not going to do.

 

They cannot ask you for payments that would have arisen in the future because the account is terminated. All they can ask you for are any arrears that accrued when the account was still open.

 

It is the logical sequence of what follows on from unlawful default and termination rather than specific law.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Cheers Rob,

 

I found the dodgy DN one, but will take a look at other two.

 

That tale of yours and it's post made me tired and gave me a headache just reading let alone living it, good on you and hope it soon ends.

 

 

All the best and have a good weekend all

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Folks,

 

I have found something maybe funy with the agreement i was sent and need your views please.

 

Two more pages attached, plus ones from earlier post.

 

I was sent agreement first page (IMG) marked 1 of 4, blank key info/sig page marked 2 of 4 (IMG 1),T & C page 3 of 4, (img 1 agn soz). ALL were full size A4 non faxed.

 

No page 4 of 4 at all

 

Then Key info/sig page signed and dated (1st post img) and dealer warranty sheet (this post img)

 

BOTH these although on A4 paper are small A3 size FAXES dated 1 & 2/8/06, agreement date.

 

Although the small signed page has same ref no top right, why are they not all same size, does it mean they dont have original signature page, or am i looking for something not there ?

 

 

 

IMG.pdf

 

IMG_0001.pdf

Link to post
Share on other sites

Me Again, sorry.

 

Just looked at both sig pages, blank and signed one.

 

They both have same agrement number at base and ref number top right, so how can you have 2 signature pages for same agreement,these are 2 different pages from a document which should only have one ever.

 

i first thought they had included a blank file sig page because signed one was to small to read, but not so.

 

I think they may ONLY have a faxed signature and dealer warranty page on file, no original signed contract,and may have re done page 1 and 2 fresh for me.

 

If this is the case this is vital so your advice and help please.

 

Cheers

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry for keep posting, just got my brain working.

 

The more i think about this the more i may be right.

 

They appointed a solicitor to handle this who first wrote in July and ever since i asked them for information despite doing a CCA and DPA request back in August and telling them hubby sold car, i have had nothing. I

have been a real pest calling 2-3 times per week when deadlines were up and have had nothing but excuses and we are waiting for information from solicitors, i even joked with them it should you be chasing not us, it was only when i told them i was going direct the paperwork came from finance company a little at a time and they said they had no record of a request, despite listing my DPA/CCA chq on statement from 1/09 they sent me.

 

Not sure if they are trying to recover car, chase hubby first for money and selling car or what.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Can someone tell me what legal definition dictionary a judge or lawyer would use ?

 

I have looked up Joint and several, which i know is basically either or both or all parties are liable BUT it goes on to say "... only if their concurrent acts brought about the harm to the plaintiff." which i think may be important.

 

 

Thank You

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Folks,

 

I have found something maybe funy with the agreement i was sent and need your views please.

 

Two more pages attached, plus ones from earlier post.

 

I was sent agreement first page (IMG) marked 1 of 4, blank key info/sig page marked 2 of 4 (IMG 1),T & C page 3 of 4, (img 1 agn soz). ALL were full size A4 non faxed.

 

No page 4 of 4 at all

 

Then Key info/sig page signed and dated (1st post img) and dealer warranty sheet (this post img)

 

BOTH these although on A4 paper are small A3 size FAXES dated 1 & 2/8/06, agreement date.

 

Although the small signed page has same ref no top right, why are they not all same size, does it mean they dont have original signature page, or am i looking for something not there ?

 

 

 

[ATTACH]13747[/ATTACH]

 

[ATTACH]13748[/ATTACH]

 

 

Sorry to bother you folks but does anyone think i may be right about them not having agreement, is it worth pushing some more, or am i barking up wrong tree ?

 

Cheers

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...